Current Expectations and Opinions on Single-port Robotic Surgery: A Survey Among European Experts by the SPARC Collaborative Group.

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a relatively new technology that is expected to become available on the European market within a year. We investigated the current expectations of robotic surgery experts and opinion leaders practicing in Europe. A 17-item online questionnaire was sent to 120 participants identified as "experts" on the basis of their general contributions to the field of robotic surgery. Overall, 90 responses were registered, with a response rate of 75%. Italy (30%), France (15%), and the UK (12%) provided the most participants, who worked mainly in academic-either public (60%) or private (20%)-hospitals. Most respondents (79%) had no previous experience with "single site" surgery, and attendance at scientific meetings (79%) and perusal of the literature (65%) were the sources of SP knowledge most frequently reported. The perceived advantages of SP robotic surgery included lower invasiveness (61%), easier access to the retroperitoneal or extraperitoneal space (53%), better cosmetic results (44%), and lower postoperative pain (44%). The most "appealing" SP procedures were retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy via an anterior approach (43%) and transvesical simple prostatectomy (43%). Within the limitations of this type of analysis, our findings suggest high interest and a positive attitude towards SP technology overall. Patient summary: Technology for single-port (SP) robotic surgery, in which just one skin incision is made in the abdomen to perform the operation, will soon be available in Europe. We conducted a survey on SP surgery among European experts in urological robotic surgery. The results show that there is high interest in and a positive attitude to SP surgery. The SP approach could result in better cosmetic results and lower postoperative pain for patients.

Single-Port Robotic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is an essential component in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of penile cancer. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery may play an important role in decreasing the adverse effects and complications of lymph node dissections. We present our technique utilizing a single-port (SP) robot assisted laparoscopic bilateral ILND in a patient with pT3N2Mx penile cancer s/p partial penectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. METHODS: We present a case of a 64-year-old man who underwent a radical penectomy for previously diagnosed penile cancer. Pathology report showed invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. In accordance with NCCN guidelines, we performed a bilateral inguinal and pelvic lymph node dissection using robotic assisted SP laparoscopy with the DaVinci Single-Site platform. Our methods are detailed in this technical report. RESULTS: Total operative time was 3 hours and 38 minutes in duration with minimal blood loss (<20 mL). A 3 cm inguinal lymph node was excised and positive for malignancy without involvement of other nodes. The patient was discharged 90 minutes after recovery in PACU without narcotics and returned to normal bowel function within 6 hours. CONCLUSION: We present a successful surgical outcome of a SP robotic ILND in treating a patient with T3N2M0 penile cancer. At the time of publication, the patient is cancer-free with no palpable lymphadenopathy on exam. Utilization of the SP DaVinci system may soon become the standard of care in select cases as it is currently the least invasive approach and is associated with lower morbidity and mortality.

Predictors of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: A large single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative factors that predict positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using our institutional partial nephrectomy database, we investigated the patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for malignant tumors between January 2011 and December 2015. Patient, tumor, surgeon characteristics were compared by surgical margin status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of positive surgical margins. RESULTS: A total of 1025 cases were available for analysis, of which 65 and 960 had positive and negative surgical margins, respectively. On univariate analysis, positive margins were associated with older age (64.3 vs. 59.6, p<0.01), history of prior ipsilateral kidney surgery (13.8% vs. 5.6%, p<0.01), lower preoperative eGFR (74.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 81.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, p=0.01), high tumor complexity (31.8% vs. 19.0%, p=0.03), hilar tumor location (23.1% vs. 12.5%, p=0.01), and lower surgeon volume (p<0.01). Robotic versus open approach was not associated with the risk of positive margins (p=0.79). On multivariable analysis, lower preoperative eGFR, p=0.01), hilar tumor location (p=0.01), and lower surgeon volume (p<0.01) were found to be independent predictors of positive margins. CONCLUSION: In our large institutional series of partial nephrectomy cases, patient, tumor, and surgeon factors influence the risk of positive margins. Of these, surgeon volume is the single most important predictor of surgical margin status, indicating that optimal oncological outcomes are best achieved by high-volume surgeons.

Renal Arterial Pseudoaneurysm After Partial Nephrectomy: Literature Review and Single-Center Analysis of Predictive Factors and Renal Functional Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Partial nephrectomy (PN) represents the current surgical standard for T1 tumors. Renal arterial pseudoaneurysm is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication reported after PN. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with the occurrence of pseudoaneurysm after PN, specifically focusing on those requiring management with selective embolization. A literature review of the topic was performed. METHODS: A retrospective review of the institutional PN database was performed from January 2011 to December 2016. Patients who underwent embolization for pseudoaneurysm represented a separated cohort to be compared with other patients (controls). Patients' and tumors' characteristics were considered. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to test their eventual association with the occurrence of pseudoaneurysm. RESULTS: A total of 1417 cases were evaluated. At a median of 21 days (interquartile range = 10-34), 20 patients (1.4%) developed postoperative pseudoaneurysm. The majority of patients (70%) presented with gross hematuria. The clinical suspicion was confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan with angiography. Selective embolization was performed using endovascular coils. Technical success and clinical success rates were 100% and 95%, respectively. No difference was found in percentage estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preserved between patients who underwent embolization versus controls (median 82.6% versus 86.3%, P = .35). No differences in age, baseline renal function (as assessed by glomerular filtration rate [GFR]), tumor size, and R.E.N.A.L. were found between patients who reported and did not report pseudoaneurysm. In patients who developed pseudoaneurysm, longer operative time (225.6 minutes versus 193 minutes, P = .04), and cold ischemia time (48 minutes versus 29 minutes, P = .03) were reported. CONCLUSION: In our series, the occurrence of pseudoaneurysm was associated with longer operative and cold ischemia times. In patients who underwent selective embolization, renal function remained comparable with that of controls.

Robotic cold ischemia achieves comparable functional outcomes to open cold ischemia during partial nephrectomy for complex kidney tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes after open and robotic partial nephrectomy performed with cold ischemia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed of consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy with renal hypothermia between January 2011 and September 2016. The study cohort included both open (Open Cold Ischemia, OCI; n=170) and robotic (Robotic Cold Ischemia, RCI; n=31) patients with complex renal masses (R.E.N.A.L. score >7) who did not meet exclusion criteria. A modified intracorporeal technique 1 was utilized for the introduction of ice slush at the time of hilar clamping in the RCI group. Statistical testing was performed to compare key perioperative and functional outcomes after ensuring equilibration of both groups by clinicodemographic criteria. RESULTS: Both groups were statistically equivalent with respect to baseline characteristics. Median GFR preservation postoperatively was 86.7% for the open group and 86.6% in the robotic group (p=0.49). Cold ischemia time (CIT) in the open group was 35 minutes compared to 28 minutes (p = 0.03) in the robotic group. LOS was significantly shorter by 2 days (p < 0.01) in the robotic group. Positive margins was noted to be 17 (10%) in the open group and 2 (6.5%) patients in the robotic group (p=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate an effective and simplified method of intracorporeal ice cooling during robotic partial nephrectomy. Our data suggests that results with this approach compare favorably to open cold ischemia technique. Intracorporeal ice cooling can be considered when performing complex partial nephrectomies with ischemia times expected to exceed 25 minutes.

Perinephric and Sinus Fat Invasion in Stage pT3a Tumors Managed by Partial Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the influence of perinephric fat invasion (PFI) compared with sinus fat invasion (SFI) on disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after partial nephrectomy (PN) for stage pT3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were recorded from the consecutive records of patients who had undergone underwent PN for cT1-T2 RCC from 2007 to 2016. Of these patients, 143 had stage pT3a with SFI or PFI found on final pathologic examination. The demographic, perioperative, and pathologic variables were reviewed. DFS and CSS analyses were performed. The factors predicting disease progression in this population were assessed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 28 months (range 15-41 months), 19 patients (13.3%) had developed recurrence, including 5 local and 14 distant metastases, with 11 cancer-specific deaths (7.7%). No differences were found in DFS (5 years, 60.9% vs. 55.3%; log-rank P = .7) or CSS (5 years, 81% vs. 74.2%; log-rank P = .8) between the SFI and PFI groups. For the pT3a fat invasion population, the 2- and 5-year DFS and CSS rates were 83.6% and 58.6% and 93.6% and 78%, respectively. SFI (P = .5) and positive surgical margins (P = .1) did not predict for progression. On multivariate Cox regression, increased tumor size (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.9; P < .01) and higher tumor grade (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.6; P = .04) were independent predictors of disease progression in the pT3a fat invasion population. CONCLUSION: In our series of patients with pT3a RCC after PN, SFI compared with PFI was not associated with an increased risk of progression or cancer-specific death.

Robotic Radical Left Nephrectomy With Inferior Vena Cava Level III Thrombectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We present our robotic approach and technique to manage a large left renal tumor with inferior vena cava (IVC) Level III thrombus. The superior mesenteric artery crossing the left renal vein requires robotic docking from the left, for dissection of the left kidney followed by repositioning and re-docking the robot from the right side for dissection of the right renal vein, distal and proximal IVC, and the remaining left renal vein insertion into the IVC. METHODS: We present a 53-year-old man with a 10.9-cm left renal mass with IVC level III tumor thrombus. A robotic left radical nephrectomy with lymph node dissection was completed using 4 ports in a midline configuration. The dissection of the left renal vein was taken medially until the superior mesenteric artery. The patient was then repositioned in the right side flank position and the robot was re-docked using the previously placed midline ports. The right renal vein, distal and proximal IVC were then controlled using modified Rummel tourniquets. RESULTS: Operative time was 530 minutes which included patient positioning, robot re-docking. The patient did not require a blood transfusion. Hospital stay was 4 days. Final pathology showed pT3bNoM1 renal cell carcinoma, clear cell type grade 4 with necrosis, and focal rhabdoid features measuring 11 cm. The tumor invaded the renal sinus and the renal vein and was metastatic to the ipsilateral adrenal gland. Margins were negative. CONCLUSION: Herein we present a successful outcome of a left-sided robotic radical nephrectomy with IVC level III tumor thrombectomy.

Robotic Retrocaval Metastasectomy After an Ipsilateral Radical Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Robotic management of a retrocaval metastasis can be challenging because of prior surgery leading to scarring and obscure surgical planes around vital structures. We present our robotic approach and technique to manage a large retrocaval, biopsy-proven, metastatic mass after previous laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy with concomitant adrenalectomy 10 years ago. METHODS: We present a 62-year-old man who previously underwent a laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy for pT1bNxMx chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2007. Surveillance imaging in November 2016 indicated a 5-cm retrocaval mass, and biopsy confirmed the metastasis. The patient was positioned in standard robotic positioning for right renal surgery. Meticulous dissection was required to free the duodenum and inferior vena cava from the mass, enabling the mass to be lifted anteriorly. Posteriorly, a labyrinth of vessels required hem-o-lok clips before excision, which allowed complete extraction of the mass. RESULTS: Operative time was 234 minutes and estimated blood loss was 40 cc. Final pathology revealed a right 5 cm × 3.1 cm metastatic RCC, chromophobe-type, lymph node. The surgical margins were negative for tumor. CONCLUSION: We present a successful surgical outcome of a robotic retrocaval metastasectomy for recurrent RCC, chromophobe type. At the time of publication, the patient continues to remain cancer free. Incorporating the da Vinci robotic platform allows for excellent visualization and access to difficult surgical locations while providing patients with the least invasive approach. A high degree of robotic experience is necessary before attempting this procedure, given the adherence of the mass to the inferior vena cava and duodenum.

Imaging strategy and outcome following partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of surveillance after partial nephrectomy (PN) in a single institution and the relevance of imaging studies in detecting recurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 830 patients who underwent PN for localized renal cell carcinoma between 2007 and 2015 at a single institution. We studied the characteristics of recurrence according to pathological and clinical features and elaborated risk groups. The type and the total number of imaging studies performed during surveillance or until recurrence were evaluated. Outcomes of surveillance were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 48 patients (5.8%) diagnosed with recurrence during median 36 [21-52] months follow-up, including local recurrence in 18 patients (37.5%) and metastasis in 30 patients (62.5%). Totally, 17/18 patients (94.4%) with local recurrence and 26/30 patients (86.6%) with metastasis were diagnosed within the first 36 months after PN. When studying the recurrence rate, and time-to-recurrence, 2 risk groups emerged. Patients with pathological characteristics (tumors with pT1b or higher or high-grade tumor or positive surgical margin status) or patients with anatomical characteristics (high or moderate R.E.N.A.L. score) or both had high recurrence rate. Chest x-ray and abdominal ultrasound detected 7.7% and 3.4% of all recurrences, respectively, whereas computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging scan detected the rest. Of the 48 patients diagnosed with recurrence, 44 (91.6%) were suitable for secondary active treatment (systemic, surgery, and radiotherapy) including 26 (54.2%) suitable for metastasectomy. The rate of relapse after secondary treatment was 43.5% (16.6% for the local recurrence group and 60.7% for metastasis group). CONCLUSION: Local recurrence emerges earlier than distant metastasis. Patients with any adverse pathological or anatomical features should be considered as high-risk group and followed closely in the first 36 months after PN with cross-sectional studies. Secondary active treatment is suitable for most patients, while surgical treatment fits fewer patients. Local recurrence is associated with increased rates of metastatic progression.

Current status of robotic single-port surgery.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology is an ever progressing field, and boundaries are constantly broken with the aid of new technology. Advancements in instrumentation have given birth to the era of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site technique (R-LESS). R-LESS however, has not gained widespread acceptance due to technical hurdles such as adequate triangulation, robotic arm clashing, decreased access for the bedside assistant, lack of wrist articulation, continued need for an axillary/accessory port, lack of robust retraction, and ergonomic discomfort. Many innovations have been explored to counter such limitations. We aim to give a brief overview of a history and development of R-LESS urologic surgery and outline the latest advancements in the realm of urologic R-LESS. By searching PubMed selectively for relevant articles, we concluded a literature review. We searched using the keywords: robotic laparoscopic single incision, robotic laparoendoscopic single-site, single incision robotic surgery, and R-LESS. We selected all relevant articles in that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology. We selected all relevant articles that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology in a table encompassed within this article. The development of the R-LESS procedures, instrumentations, and platforms has been an evolution in progress. Our results showed the history and evolution toward a purpose-built single-port robotic platform that addresses previous limitations to R-LESS. Even though previous studies have shown feasibility with R-LESS, the future of R-LESS depends on the availability of purpose-built robotic platforms. The larger concern is the demonstration of the definitive advantage of single-site over the conventional multiport surgery.

Optimum outcome achievement in partial nephrectomy for T1 renal masses: a contemporary analysis of open and robot-assisted cases.

OBJECTIVES: To compare optimum outcome achievement in open partial nephrectomy (OPN) with that in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using our institutional partial nephrectomy (PN) database, we reviewed 605 cases performed for unifocal clinical T1 renal masses in non-solitary kidneys between 2011 and 2015. Tetrafecta, which was defined as negative surgical margins, freedom from peri-operative complications, ≥80% renal function preservation, and no chronic kidney disease upstaging, was chosen as the composite optimum outcome. Factors associated with tetrafecta achievement were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, with adjustment for age, gender, race, Charlson comorbidity score, body mass index, chronic kidney disease, tumour size, tumour complexity and approach. RESULTS: The overall tetrafecta achievement rate was 38%. Negative margins, freedom from complications, and optimum functional preservation were achieved in 97.1%, 73.6% and 54.2% of cases, respectively. For T1a masses, the tetrafecta achievement rate was similar between approaches (P = 0.97), but for T1b masses, the robot-assisted approach achieved significantly higher tetrafecta rates (43.0% vs 21.3%; P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, the robot-assisted approach had 2.6-fold higher odds of tetrafecta achievement than the open approach, primarily because of lower peri-operative morbidity, specifically related to wound complications. Positive surgical margin rates and renal function preservation were similar in the two approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Optimum outcomes are readily achieved regardless of PN approach. The robot-assisted approach may facilitate optimum outcome achievement for 4-7-cm masses by minimizing wound complications.

The Synergistic Influence of Ischemic Time and Surgical Precision on Acute Kidney Injury After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the dynamic and potentially synergistic influence of warm ischemia time (WIT) and excisional volume loss (EVL) on predicted rates of postpartial acute kidney injury (AKI) across a range of tumor complexities, and to investigate whether these modifiable variables sensitize the kidney to each other's damaging influence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1245 patients between 2006 and 2016 with bilateral kidneys and enhancing renal masses in our single-institution robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) database. EVL was calculated as the difference between specimen and tumor volume based on pathologic measurements. Multivariate logistic regressions, followed by marginal effects, were run to examine the interaction of ischemia type, EVL, and radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of deepest tumor portion to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior and location relative to polar line score on rates of AKI. RESULTS: We found a significant interaction effect of WIT and log EVL on predicted AKI (P < .001). Each doubling of EVL caused a 4.03% and 8.46% increased probability of AKI for WIT of <25 and >25 minutes, respectively. At an EVL of >5.5 cm3, prolonged WIT had statistically greater odds of causing AKI. These predicted effects on AKI were amplified for increasing radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of deepest tumor portion to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior and location relative to polar line scores (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although the adverse functional effects of WIT and parenchymal volume loss during PN have previously been described in isolation, our findings suggest that their influence on AKI is synergistic, especially in complex tumors. As such, additional attention should be given to limiting warm ischemia and maximizing surgical precision to avoid a "double hit" on postoperative renal function.

When Partial Nephrectomy is Unsuccessful: Understanding the Reasons for Conversion from Robotic Partial to Radical Nephrectomy at a Tertiary Referral Center.

PURPOSE: We sought to identify the preoperative factors associated with conversion from robotic partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy. We report the incidence of this event. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using our institutional review board approved database, we abstracted data on 1,023 robotic partial nephrectomies performed at our center between 2010 and 2015. Standard and converted cases were compared in terms of patients and tumor characteristics, and perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was done to identify predictors of radical conversion. RESULTS: The overall conversion rate was 3.1% (32 of 1,023 cases). The most common reasons for conversion were tumor involvement of hilar structures (8 cases or 25%), failure to achieve negative margins on frozen section (7 or 21.8%), suspicion of advanced disease (5 or 15.6%) and failure to progress (5 or 15.6%). Patients requiring conversion were older and had a higher Charlson score (both p <0.01), including an increased prevalence of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.02). Increasing tumor size (5 vs 3.1 cm, p <0.01) and R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar lines and hilar location) score (9 vs 8, p <0.01) were also associated with an increased risk of conversion. Worse baseline renal function (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p = 0.04), large tumor size (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.7, p <0.01) and increasing R.E.N.A.L. score (p = 0.02) were independent predictors of conversion. Compared to converted cases, at latest followup standard robotic partial nephrectomy cases had similar short-term oncologic outcomes but better renal functional preservation (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: At a high volume center the rate of robotic partial nephrectomy conversion to radical nephrectomy was 3.1%, including 2.2% of preoperatively anticipated nephrectomy cases. Increasing tumor size and complexity, and poor preoperative renal function are the main predictors of conversion.

Robot-assisted approach improves surgical outcomes in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of approach on surgical outcomes in otherwise healthy obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using our institutional partial nephrectomy database, we abstracted data on otherwise healthy (Charlson comorbidity score ≤1 and bilateral kidneys), obese patients (body mass index >30 kg/m2 ) with small renal masses (<4 cm) treated between 2011 and 2015. The primary outcomes were intra-operative transfusion, operating time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. The association between approach, open (OPN) vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and outcomes was assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Covariates included age, gender, obesity severity, tumour size and tumour complexity. RESULTS: Of 237 obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, 25% underwent OPN and 75% underwent RAPN. Apart from larger tumour size in the OPN group (2.8 vs 2.5 cm; P = 0.02), there was no significant difference between groups. The rate of intra-operative blood transfusion (1.1 vs 10%; P = 0.01), the median operating time (180 vs 207 min; P < 0.01) and the median ischaemia time (19.5 vs 27 min; P < 0.01) were all greater for OPN. The LOS was significantly shorter for RAPN (3 vs 4 days; P < 0.01). While the overall complication rate was higher for OPN (15.8 vs 31.7%; P < 0.01), major complications were not significantly different (5.6 vs 1.7%; P = 0.20). On multivariable analyses, OPN independently predicted longer operating time, longer length of stay, and more overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: At a high-volume centre, the robot-assisted approach offers less blood transfusion, shorter operating time, faster recovery, and fewer peri-operative complications compared with the open approach in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. In this setting, RAPN may be a preferable treatment option.

Patterns and Predictors of Recurrence after Partial Nephrectomy for Kidney Tumors.

PURPOSE: We sought to identify patterns and predictors of recurrence in patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma managed by partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 830 consecutive cases of partial nephrectomy done between 2007 and 2015 for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma at a single institution. Patient demographics and pathological characteristics were correlated with recurrence patterns (overall, local and distant) and overall survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Differences in the recurrence patterns were evaluated. RESULTS: Median patient age was 61 years and median tumor size was 3.1 cm. Overall, 11.6% of tumors were stage pT3, 39.3% were high grade, 2.9% had lymphovascular invasion and 7.1% had positive margins. Higher grade, higher stage, positive surgical margins and increased R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of deepest tumor portion to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior and location relative to polar line) score were associated with shorter disease-free survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis. On multivariable regression pT (p <0.01), grade (p <0.01) and R.E.N.A.L. score (p = 0.03) remained independent predictors of disease-free survival. Predictors of metastasis were pT stage (HR 4.5) and grade (HR 3.9, both p <0.01), while R.E.N.A.L. score (HR 3.2, p = 0.03) was the single predictor of local recurrence. Five-year disease-free and overall survival probabilities were 91% and 94%, respectively. Local recurrence manifested and developed earlier than metastasis (median 13 vs 22 months, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: High pT stage, high grade and high R.E.N.A.L. score increase the risk of disease recurrence after partial nephrectomy. The pT stage and grade are predictors of metastasis, while R.E.N.A.L. score predicts local recurrence. Because relapse features and risk factors differ between the 2 recurrence patterns, they should be studied separately in the future.

Non-modifiable factors predict discharge quality after robotic partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of poor discharge quality after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) at a large academic center. METHODS: We queried our institutional RPN database for consecutive patients treated between 2011 and 2015. The primary outcome was poor discharge quality, defined as length of stay >3 days and/or unplanned readmission. The association between patient, disease, and provider factors and overall discharge quality was assessed using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 791 cases, 219 (27.7 %) had poor discharge quality. On univariate analysis, factors associated with poor discharge quality were older age (p < .01), black race (p = .01), social insurance (p < .01), higher ASA score (p < .01), chronic kidney disease (p < .01), increased tumor size (p < .01), and higher tumor complexity (p = .01). Surgeon case volume did not predict discharge quality (p = .63). After adjustment for covariates on multivariable analysis, race (p = .01), ASA (p = .02), CKD (p < .01), tumor size (p = .02), and tumor complexity (p = .03) still predicted poor discharge quality. In particular, the odds of poor discharge quality were highest in the setting of CKD (OR 2.62, 95 % CI 1.72-4.01), black race (OR 2.17, 95 % CI 1.32-3.57), and higher ASA (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.07-2.08). CONCLUSIONS: Non-modifiable patient and disease factors predict poor discharge quality after RPN. Risk adjustment for these factors will be important for determining future reimbursement for RPN providers.

Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors larger than 7 cm: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative outcomes between robotic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy for localized >7 cm tumors. METHODS: We identified patients in our institutional review boards approved database who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy for treatment of renal tumors >7 cm in size between January 2009 and August 2015. The operative-postoperative outcomes and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: The number of patients with >7 cm renal tumors treated at our center with robotic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy were 54 and 56, respectively. Patients' demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Likewise, there were no significant difference between the groups in duration of operation, positive surgical margin rates and incidence of malignant disease rates. Median ischemia time was lower in robotic partial nephrectomy group (31.5 vs. 35 min., p = 0.02). Patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy had significantly lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (9.4 vs. 30.4 %, p = 0.008) and shorter length of hospital stay (3.5 vs. 5.3 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of overall complications (robotic arm, 18.5 % vs. open arm, 28.6 %, p = 0.26) and major complications (robotic arm, 3.7 % vs. open arm, 12.5 %, p = 0.16) was comparable between the two groups. The readmission rate within 30-days after discharge was higher in open partial nephrectomy group (p = 0.03). There was no difference in the median percentage estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation and chronic kidney disease upstaging between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Localized renal tumors >7 cm and amenable to partial nephrectomy can be considered suitable for robotic approach.

Multiple Tumor Excisions in Ipsilateral Kidney Increase Complications After Partial Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical morbidity of ipsilateral synchronous multifocality (ISM) is poorly characterized. We assessed the impact of ISM on complications after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We abstracted data on RPN cases performed between 2006 and 2015 at our institution. Multifocal disease was characterized by >1 renal mass on preoperative imaging or >1 mass excision during RPN. The primary outcome was the rate of overall postoperative complications. The association between multifocality and complications was evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 1121 cases, 59 (5.3%) had >1 ipsilateral renal mass and 50 (4.5%) required >1 excision. The overall complication rate was 20.3% (230/1121). The radiographic number of ipsilateral renal masses was not significantly associated with complications (20.2% for 1 mass vs. 25.4% for >1 mass, p = 0.338). However, the actual number of ipsilateral mass excisions performed during RPN was significantly associated with complications (20.2% for ≤2 excisions vs. 42.9% for >2 excisions, p = 0.037). Major complications were higher (14.3% vs. 5.3%) for >2 versus ≤2 excision(s), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.174). The most common complications associated with multiple excisions were transfusion, urine leak, arrhythmia, venous thromboembolism, and ileus. On multivariable analysis, number of excisions independently predicted complications (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.03-9.33, p = 0.041). Other independent predictors of complications included age, race, Charlson score, body mass index, RENAL score, and surgeon experience. CONCLUSIONS: ISM requiring ≥2 excisions is associated with increased morbidity after RPN. Pending external validation, this information may facilitate clinical decision-making and preoperative patient counseling.

Comparison of robot-assisted and open partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumours: a single centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open PN (OPN) for completely endophytic renal tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1 230 consecutive cases, consisting of 823 RAPNs and 407 OPNs, performed for renal mass at a single academic tertiary centre between 2011 and 2016. Of these, data on 87 RAPN and 56 OPN cases for completely endophytic renal tumours were analysed. Patient and tumour characteristics, operative, postoperative, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Apart from a higher prevalence of solitary kidney among OPN cases (RAPN, 5.7% vs OPN, 21.4%; P = 0.005), demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in tumour size (P = 0.07), tumour stage (P = 0.3), margin status (P = 0.48), malignant tumour subtypes (P = 0.51), and grades (P = 0.61) between the groups. Also, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups for warm ischaemia time (P = 0.15), cold ischaemia time (P = 0.28), and intraoperative (P = 0.75) or postoperative (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-V, P = 0.08; Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V, P = 0.85) complication rates. The patients in the RAPN group had a shorter length of stay (P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), and lower intraoperative transfusion rates (0% vs 7.1%, P = 0.02). No local recurrences occurred during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 15.2 (7-27.2) and 18.1 (8.2-30.9) months in the RAPN and OPN groups, respectively. There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation rates between groups for the early (P = 0.26) and latest (P = 0.22) functional follow-up. CONCLUSION: For completely endophytic renal tumours, both OPN and RAPN have excellent outcomes when performed by experienced surgeons at a high-volume centre. For skilled robotic surgeons, RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to OPN with the advantages of shorter length of stay and less blood loss.

Predicting complications in partial nephrectomy for T1a tumours: does approach matter?

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in complications after robot-assisted (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) among experienced surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients in our institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained database who underwent OPN or RAPN for management of unifocal, T1a renal tumours at our institution between January 2011 and August 2015. The primary outcome measure was the rate of 30-day overall postoperative complications. Baseline patient factors, tumour characteristics and peri-operative factors, including approach, were evaluated to assess the risk of complications. RESULTS: Patients who underwent OPN were found to have a higher rate of overall complications (30.3% vs 18.2%; P = 0.038), with wound complications accounting for the majority of these events (11.8% vs 1.8%; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the open approach to be an independent predictor of overall complications (odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.43; P = 0.035). Major limitations of the study include its retrospective design and potential lack of generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The open surgical approach predicts a higher rate of overall complications after partial nephrectomy for unifocal, T1a renal tumours. For experienced surgeons, the morbidity associated with nephron-sparing surgery may be incrementally improved using the robot-assisted approach.