Vascular Access Team Central Line Dressing Changes to Reduce Infection Risk: A Focused Two-Person Approach in High-Risk Patients.

Due to low compliance by bedside nursing with a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention bundle and increased CLABSI rates, a mandatory re-education initiative at a 1200-bed university-affiliated hospital was undertaken. Despite this, 2 units, housing high-risk immunocompromised patients, continued to experience increased CLABSI rates. A quality improvement before-after project design in these units replaced bedside nursing staff with 2 nurses from the vascular access team (VAT) to perform central vascular access device (CVAD) dressing changes routinely every 7 days or earlier if needed. The VAT consistently followed the bundled components, including use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated dressings on all patients unless an allergy was identified. In this case, a non-CHG transparent semipermeable membrane dressing was used. There were 884 patients with 14 211 CVAD days in the preimplementation period and 1136 patients with 14 225 CVAD days during the postimplementation period. The VAT saw 602 (53.0%) of the 1136 patients, performing at least 1 dressing change in 98% of the patients (n = 589). The combined CLABSI rate for the 2 units decreased from 2.53 per 1000 CVAD days preintervention to 1.62 per 1000 CVAD days postintervention. The estimated incidence rate ratio (IRR) for the intervention was 0.639, a 36.1% reduction in monthly CLABSI rates during the postimplementation period.

Opioid Analgesia Compared with Non-Opioid Analgesia After Operative Treatment for Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: Minimal pain and opioid use after operative treatment for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures have been previously described; however, opioid-prescribing practices in the United States remain variable. We hypothesized that children without an opioid prescription would report similar postoperative pain compared with children prescribed opioids following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of supracondylar humeral fractures. METHODS: Children who were 3 to 12 years of age and were undergoing CRPP for a closed supracondylar humeral fracture were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, comparative study. Following a standardized dosing protocol, oxycodone, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen were prescribed at 2 hospitals (opioid cohort), and 2 other hospitals prescribed ibuprofen and acetaminophen alone (non-opioid cohort). The children's medication use and the daily pain that they experienced (scored on the Wong-Baker FACES Scale) were recorded at postoperative days 1 to 7, 10, 14, and 21, using validated text-message protocols. Based on an a priori power analysis, at least 64 evaluable subjects were recruited per cohort. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were evaluated (81 [52%] in the opioid cohort and 76 [48%] in the non-opioid cohort). The median age at the time of the surgical procedure was 6.2 years, and 50% of the subjects were male. The mean postoperative pain scores were low overall (<4 of 10), and there were no significant differences in pain ratings between cohorts at any time point. No patient demographic or injury characteristics were correlated with increased pain or medication use. Notably, of the 81 patients in the opioid cohort, 28 (35%) took no oxycodone and 40 (49%) took 1 to 3 total doses across the postoperative period. Patients rarely took opioids after postoperative day 2. A single patient in the non-opioid cohort (1 [1%] of 76) received a rescue prescription of opioids after presenting to the emergency department with postoperative cast discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Non-opioid analgesia following CRPP for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures was equally effective as opioid analgesia. When oxycodone was prescribed, 84% of children took 0 to 3 total doses, and opioid use fell precipitously after postoperative day 2. To improve opioid stewardship, providers and institutions can consider discontinuing the routine prescription of opioids following this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Influence of age and vaccination interval on canine parvovirus, distemper virus, and adenovirus serum antibody titers.

Canine core vaccine titer screenings are becoming increasingly popular in veterinary practice as a tool to guide vaccination decisions, despite a lack of supportive, peer-reviewed evidence-based literature. Additionally, it has been suggested that the canine core vaccine duration of host protective immunity can persist past the currently recommended vaccination interval. Thus, this study evaluated serum antibody titers against three core antigens in dogs with known vaccination histories and lifestyles, analyzing the effect of life stage, exposure risk, and time since last vaccination (TSLV). Clinically healthy dogs (n = 188) presenting to the primary care services of three colleges of veterinary medicine were selected to represent a variety of ages, breeds, and vaccination history. Serum antibody titers for canine parvovirus (CPV), canine distemper virus (CDV), and canine adenovirus-2 (CAV2) were measured via virus neutralization and hemagglutination inhibition. CAV2 and CPV titers decreased, while CDV titers had a decreasing trend with increasing time since last vaccination or vaccination interval. When assessing circulating antibody levels historially associated with protective immunity across various vaccination intervals, 62% (95%CI 36-82%; 8/13) of dogs had positive titers for CDV 5 years post last vaccination, while 92% (95%CI 67-99%; 12/13) of dogs were positive for CAV2 and CPV. Both advanced age and life stage were associated with lower titers and thus, identify a canine population cohort likely at higher disease risk. The results of this study revealed that patient duration of core vaccine-mediated immunity changes with a number of variables, with animal aging and time since vaccination influencing host humoral immunity. This provides further support for the performance of canine core antibody titers to assess whether a vaccine booster and/or specific type of booster is warranted.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement are Unsatisfactory When Determining Abstract Study Design and Level of Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Understanding differences between types of study design (SD) and level of evidence (LOE) are important when selecting research for presentation or publication and determining its potential clinical impact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver reliability when assigning LOE and SD as well as quantify the impact of a commonly used reference aid on these assessments. METHODS: Thirty-six accepted abstracts from the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) 2021 annual meeting were selected for this study. Thirteen reviewers from the POSNA Evidence-Based Practice Committee were asked to determine LOE and SD for each abstract, first without any assistance or resources. Four weeks later, abstracts were reviewed again with the guidance of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) LOE chart, which is adapted from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were calculated using Fleiss' kappa statistic (k). χ2 analysis was used to compare the rate of SD-LOE mismatch between the first and second round of reviews. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for LOE improved slightly from fair (k=0.28) to moderate (k=0.43) with use of the JBJS chart. There was better agreement with increasing LOE, with the most frequent disagreement between levels 3 and 4. Interobserver reliability for SD was fair for both rounds 1 (k=0.29) and 2 (k=0.37). Similar to LOE, there was better agreement with stronger SD. Intraobserver reliability was widely variable for both LOE and SD (k=0.10 to 0.92 for both). When matching a selected SD to its associated LOE, the overall rate of correct concordance was 82% in round 1 and 92% in round 2 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Interobserver reliability for LOE and SD was fair to moderate at best, even among experienced reviewers. Use of the JBJS/Oxford chart mildly improved agreement on LOE and resulted in less SD-LOE mismatch, but did not affect agreement on SD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio: An Objective Measure to Guide against Overcorrection of a Main Thoracic Curve in the Setting of a Structural Proximal Thoracic Curve.

Purpose: The correction of double thoracic (Lenke 2) curves has been associated with higher rates of postoperative shoulder imbalance that may compromise long-term outcomes following spinal deformity correction. A number of methods have been proposed to mitigate this risk, though no accepted standard measurement exists. The purpose of this study is to validate a novel quantitative method of determining the relative curve correction magnitude in double thoracic curves. Methods: Retrospective data from a multi-center database of patients undergoing surgical correction of left-proximal thoracic, right-main thoracic Lenke 2 curves were analyzed. A novel measurement tool, the Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio (TCCR), was applied for the purposes of validation against historical data. Results: A total of 305 patients with complete two-year follow-up data were included. The TCCR, or the ratio of postoperative percent correction of the thoracic curves divided by the ratio of the preoperative curve magnitudes, displayed a significant negative correlation (Pearson R = −0.66; p < 0.001) with T1 tilt at two years postoperatively. Conclusions: The TCCR could be added as an important factor in the preoperative planning process and intraoperative assessment in order to reduce postoperative T1 tilt. While T1 tilt remains an imperfect surrogate measure for clinical shoulder balance, it serves as one of many potential measures that the surgeon may evaluate quantitatively and radiographically.

Klippel-Feil Syndrome: Clinical Presentation and Management.

¼: Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is a rare multisystem constellation of findings with congenital cervical fusion as the hallmark. The etiology is not fully understood. ¼: Recent studies have indicated that KFS is more prevalent than previously described. ¼: Hypermobility in the nonfused segments may lead to adjacent segment disease and potential disc herniation and myelopathy after minor trauma. ¼: Most patients with KFS are asymptomatic and can be managed nonoperatively. Surgical treatment is reserved for patients presenting with pain refractory to medical management, instability, myelopathy or radiculopathy, or severe adjacent segment disease. ¼: Patients with craniocervical abnormalities and upper cervical instability should avoid contact sports as they are at increased risk for spinal cord injury after minor trauma.

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Serology Testing in a 3-Month-Old Organ Donor: A Case Report and Review of Available Literature.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a highly prevalent infectious disease. Currently, organs are not being transplanted from donors who are SARS-CoV-2 positive. It remains unclear as to how to differentiate active from recovered patients. We report our recent experience of a 3-month-old deceased organ donor who died as the result of an anoxic brain injury after a cardiopulmonary arrest (presumed sudden infant death syndrome). The child was born to a mother presumed to have coronavirus disease 2019. The donor tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and positive for SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin A antibodies. We suspect this is the first known report of its kind and noteworthy for the organ donation and transplantation community.

Significant Variation in Blood Transfusion Practice Persists Following Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case control study. OBJECTIVE: To review current transfusion practise following Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) surgery and assess risks of complication from transfusion in this cohort. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No study to date has investigated variation in blood transfusion practices across surgeons and hospitals following AIS surgery. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) all patients with (ICD-9) code for AIS (737.30) ("idiopathic scoliosis") and underwent spinal fusion between 2000 and 2015 were included. Bivariate and mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were performed to assess patient, surgeon, and hospital factors associated with perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Additional multivariable analyses examined the association between transfusion and infectious complications. RESULTS: Of the 7689 patients who underwent AIS surgery, 21.1% received a perioperative blood transfusion. After controlling for patient factors, wide variation in risk-adjusted transfusion rates was present with a 10-fold difference in transfusion rates observed across surgeons (4.4%-46.1%) and hospitals (5.1%-50%). Patient factors did not explain any of the surgeon or hospital variation. Use of autologous blood transfusion, higher surgeon procedure volume, and greater surgeon years in practice were independently associated with lower odds of allogeneic blood transfusion (P < 0.001), and surgeon and hospital characteristics explained 45% of surgeon variation but only 2.4% of hospital variation. Allogeneic blood transfusion was independently associated with postoperative wound infection (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.20-2.93), pneumonia (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.26-2.44), and sepsis (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.11-5.83). CONCLUSION: Significant variation exists across both surgeons and hospitals in perioperative blood transfusion utilization following AIS surgery. Use of autologous blood transfusion and implementing institutional transfusion protocols may reduce unwarranted variation and potentially decrease infectious complication rates.Level of Evidence: 3.

What patient factors and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains are associated with worse pain coping in pediatric orthopaedic patients in the United States?

We sought to better understand the relationship between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mobility, pain interference (PI) and depressive symptoms scores, as well as determine what patient factors and PROMIS domains were associated with worse pain coping (PROMIS PI), in a pediatric orthopaedic population. Between 27 August 2015 and 30 April 2019, new pediatric orthopaedic patients 18 years or younger (or their guardians as a proxy) were asked to complete PROMIS mobility, PI and depressive symptoms domains at an academic medical center pediatric orthopaedic clinic. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated between each PROMIS domain. Linear multivariate regression analysis was used to determine patient characteristics and PROMIS domains associated with presenting PROMIS PI scores. There was a strong-moderate correlation between PROMIS mobility and PI (r = -0.66, P < 0.001), while the correlation between PROMIS mobility and depressive symptoms was moderate-poor (r = -0.38, P < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between PROMIS depressive symptoms and PI (r = 0.54, P < 0.001). In multivariate linear regression analysis, female gender (ß = 0.82, P < 0.001), self-reported black race (ß = 0.94, P < 0.001), Medicaid insurance (ß = 0.82, P < 0.001) and worsening depressive symptoms (ß = 0.33, P < 0.001) were associated with worse pain coping mechanisms, while increasing mobility (ß = -0.47, P < 0.001) was associated with better pain coping mechanisms. Poor mobility and worse depressive symptoms are associated with worse pain coping mechanisms. Additionally, Medicaid insurance status, black race and female gender are also associated with worse physical limitations secondary to pain.

Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use in Children with Supracondylar Humeral Fractures: Balancing Analgesia and Opioid Stewardship.

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia remains a priority in orthopaedic surgery, but concerns with regard to opioid diversion and misuse have brought overdue attention to improving opioid stewardship. Normative data for postoperative pain and opioid use are needed to guide and balance these dual priorities. We aimed to characterize postoperative pain and opioid use for an archetypal pediatric orthopaedic procedure: closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a supracondylar humeral fracture. METHODS: Children at a single pediatric trauma center who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a supracondylar humeral fracture were enrolled and were prospectively followed. Validated pain scores (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale) and opioid utilization data were collected using an automated text message-based protocol on postoperative days 1 to 7, 10, 14, and 21. Data were analyzed with descriptive and univariate statistics. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 6.1 ± 2.1 years (62% of whom were male) were enrolled, including 53.1% who had Type-II fractures and 46.9% who had Type-III fractures. The mean pain ratings were highest on arrival to the emergency department (3.5 ± 3.5 points) and the morning of postoperative day 1 (3.5 ± 2.4 points). By postoperative day 3, the mean pain rating decreased to <2 (1.8 ± 1.8 points) and the mean opioid doses decreased to <1 dose (0.8 ± 1.2 doses). Postoperative opioid use decreased in parallel to reported pain (r = 0.972; p < 0.001). The interquartile range of opioid use was 1 to 7 doses, and patients used only 24.1% of the prescribed opioids (mean, 4.8 ± 5.6 doses used and 19.8 ± 7.1 doses prescribed). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in pain ratings or opioid use by fracture classification, age, or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for supracondylar humeral fracture, pain levels and opioid usage decrease to a clinically unimportant level by postoperative day 3. Patients who report pain scores of ≥6 points following discharge are outliers and should be screened for compartment syndrome or ischemia. Patients used <25% of prescribed opioid medication, suggesting the potential for overprescription and opioid diversion. A prescription for 7 opioid doses after discharge should allow adequate postoperative analgesia in the majority of patients while improving narcotic stewardship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Widespread Lichtheimia Infection in a Patient with Extensive Burns: Opportunities for Novel Antifungal Agents.

The Mucorales fungi-formerly classified as the zygomycetes-are environmentally ubiquitous fungi, but generally rare causes of clinical infections. In the immunocompromised host, however, they can cause invasive, rapidly spreading infections that confer a high risk of morbidity and mortality, often despite surgical and antifungal therapy. Patients with extensive burn injuries are particularly susceptible to skin and soft-tissue infections with these organisms. Here, we present a case of Lichtheimia infection in a patient with extensive full-thickness burns that required significant and repeated surgical debridement successfully treated with isavuconazole and adjunctive topical amphotericin B washes. We also review the available literature on contemporary antifungal treatment for Lichtheimia species and related Mucorales fungi.

Operative Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Epidemiology Over 16 Years.

BACKGROUND: The burden of surgical treatment for infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is unknown. We aimed to investigate the epidemiology of operative DDH reductions in the United States and identify potential at-risk populations. METHODS: The Healthcare Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database (1997 to 2012) were analyzed. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) codes identified inpatient hospitalizations for DDH reductions excluding neuromuscular cases. Hospital variables and patient demographics were captured. Weighted population-level counts were calculated to allow for national estimates. RESULTS: An estimated 5525 (95% confidence interval, 4907.8-6142.2) operative reductions were performed. In total, 73.3% were open with a mean age at the reduction of 2.3 years (95% confidence interval, 2.1-2.5). In total, 70.0% were female and 42.3% were white. Regional distribution varied: 36.4% of reductions occurred in the West, 22.8% in the South, 21.9% in the Midwest, and 18.9% in the Northeast. Operative reductions decreased over time; open reductions decreased by 5.6% and closed by 53.4%. Mean age at treatment increased from 1.6 to 3.7 years (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, age (P<0.001) and geographic location (P<0.05) were associated with open reduction. Patients in the West had increased odds of being Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander [odds ratio (OR), 4.9, P<0.001 and OR, 2.8; P=0.008]. In the South and Midwest, the highest income quartile was protective (OR, 0.4; P=0.001 and OR, 0.5; P=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of closed reductions decreased more over time compared with open reductions. However, the mean age of children undergoing reductions increased suggesting a possible delay in diagnosis. The data suggests that there is room for improvement in screening. Targeted research in identified populations may reduce the burden of surgical disease in infantile DDH. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Two for One: A Change in Hand Positioning During Low-Dose Spinal Stereoradiography Allows for Concurrent, Reliable Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of low-dose stereoradiography compared to standard hand bone age films for assessing Sanders skeletal maturity stage in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Sanders skeletal maturity staging system is a valuable tool in the care of juvenile and adolescent spine scoliosis, but obtaining dedicated hand films adds additional time, radiation, and expense to the clinic visit. A change in patient hand positioning for routine full-length PA spine low-dose stereoradiography may offer a viable alternative. METHODS: A survey consisting of 30 standard bone age hand films and 26 posteroanterior spine low-dose stereoradiography images (magnified view of hands only) was created in REDCap and distributed to two pediatric spine surgeons and two fellows. The graders were asked to classify the images according to the Sanders skeletal maturity classifications. Images were graded in two trials conducted one week apart. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was assessed using the mean linearly weighted kappa to provide an overall index of agreement. RESULTS: In Trial 1, the interobserver reliability was similar for both the standard bone age films (κ = 0.82) and for the low-dose stereoradiography films (κ = 0.79) (p = .501). In Trial 2, reliability was similar between imagine modalities and slightly improved for both standard bone age films (κ = 0.85) and low-dose stereoradiography films (κ = 0.82) (p = .192). Intraobserver reliability was strong for both standard films (κ=0.89) and low-dose stereoradiography films (κ = 0.86) (p = .446). CONCLUSION: A simple change in patient hand positioning for low-dose stereoradiography allows clinicians to simultaneously assess a patient's spinal deformity and skeletal maturity with excellent reliability. Given the frequency of scoliosis surveillance visits, this simple change could lead to significant savings of time, money, and radiation exposure for the growing child. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

What's New in Pediatric Hip?

BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), which encompasses a wide spectrum of disease from mild dysplasia to frank dislocation, is one of the most common developmental deformities of the lower extremities and one of the leading causes of future osteoarthritis and hip arthroplasty. Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) results from a vascular insult to the growing femoral epiphysis, which in turn can create permanent morphologic changes to the hip joint. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) occurs when the proximal femoral physis fails allowing the epiphysis to displace in relation to the metaphysis. Infections about the hip also create significant morbidity in the pediatric hip. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for all studies related to DDH, LCPD, SCFE, and pediatric hip infections that were published between July 1, 2014 and August 31, 2017. The search was limited to English articles and yielded 839 papers. This project was initiated by the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Publications Committee and was reviewed and approved by the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Presidential Line. RESULTS: A total of 40 papers were selected for review based upon new and significant findings. Select historical manuscripts are also included to provide sufficient background information. CONCLUSIONS: DDH, LCPD, SCFE, and infections about the hip continue to be important topics in pediatric orthopaedics and areas of vital research. This manuscript reviews the most important recent literature on the diagnosis and treatment of these pediatric hip conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Anaphylaxis to Surgiflo During Posterior Spinal Fusion in an Adolescent Status Post Truncus Arteriosus Repair: A Case Report.

Anaphylactic reaction to gelatin-containing hemostatic agents has been reported in the orthopedic literature, most commonly during scoliosis repair in adolescents. However, the risk, differential diagnosis, and management of anaphylaxis in patients with complex congenital heart disease undergoing noncardiac procedures have not been previously reported. We describe the case of an adolescent with a history of repaired truncus arteriosus undergoing posterior spinal fusion who developed sudden and profound hypotension that was ultimately confirmed to be an anaphylactic reaction to Surgiflo. Echocardiography was used to aid in diagnosis and management of the cardiovascular effects of anaphylaxis in this patient with residual cardiac pathophysiology.

Outpatient Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery.

Outpatient surgery refers to a surgical procedure that is performed without an overnight stay in a hospital. Outpatient surgery is associated with decreased individual and societal costs while achieving equivalent health outcomes and excellent patient satisfaction. Successful outpatient pediatric surgery is predicated on appropriate patient selection, adequate pain control, thorough preoperative education, and close clinical follow-up. Continuous research in quality, value, and patient safety are needed to ensure that this practice continues in as safe and efficient a manner as possible.

The Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: Normative Data.

BACKGROUND: Children are participating in sports at an increasingly younger age, which has contributed to an increased incidence of knee injuries among this population. Because of increased interest in the application of patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedic surgery to evaluate treatment results, numerous knee outcome scores, including the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Form (IKDC), have been used to evaluate the knee. Although the IKDC has been validated only in adults, it is also being used for children because of a lack of appropriate outcome scores in the pediatric population. To address this concern, a pediatric version of the IKDC (Pedi-IKDC) was developed and evaluated for reliability, validity, and responsiveness. However, normative data for the Pedi-IKDC have not been established. PURPOSE: We aimed to aid the interpretation of Pedi-IKDC scores by characterizing normative data in children and adolescents and to validate the Pedi-IKDC by examining differences in scores among children who had a history of knee surgery or limited activity compared with those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2000 children and adolescents aged 10 to 18 years living in the United States, who were recruited by ORC International to obtain equal numbers of participants by sex and by integer age group. Participants were asked to complete the Pedi-IKDC for 1 study-designated "index" knee (right or left) and to provide demographic data and information on their knee surgery history and recent (4-week) activity limitations. Raw Pedi-IKDC total scores were rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale. We used nonparametric Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare subgroup scores, and we used the van Elteren test to adjust for age. Unadjusted and adjusted P values were similar, and only unadjusted values are reported. RESULTS: The number of respondents (N = 2000) was uniform with respect to age and sex, with 11% in each age represented (10-18 years). Fifty percent of respondents were female. Forty-nine states plus Washington, DC, were represented. In addition, 68% and 86% of respondents identified themselves as white and non-Hispanic, respectively. Seven percent of respondents (n = 136) respondents reported having prior surgery in 1 or both knees; 4% of these surgeries (n = 79) were in the index knee. The Pedi-IKDC score distribution was skewed left (mean ± SD score, 86.7 ± 16.8; median, 94.6) and 34% of scores reached the ceiling value of 100. Participants who reported prior surgery or limited activity in the index knee had median Pedi-IKDC scores that were approximately 25 points lower than participants without these histories ( P < .0001 for both comparisons). In contrast, although it was statistically significant, the variation by age ( P = .02), race ( P = .02), ethnicity ( P = .01), and level of sports/exercise participation ( P = .04) was much smaller (all ranges of median scores <4.5). There were no significant differences in scores in terms of respondent sex or geographic region. CONCLUSION: Normative Pedi-IKDC scores were determined in this study. The strong association between Pedi-IKDC scores and prior knee surgery as well as recent activity limitations in the index knee can be used to evaluate clinical outcomes and supports the construct validity of the Pedi-IKDC. There was a large ceiling effect, with 34% of scores at the maximum value of 100. The lack of a sex-based effect and the minor variation with age both simplify the interpretation and use of the Pedi-IKDC. Therefore, Pedi-IKDC score distributions can provide assumptions for use in sample size or power calculations for research.