Nurse Faculty Job Satisfaction: A Concept Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study provides an analysis of the concept of nurse faculty job satisfaction. METHOD: Walker and Avant's (2019) eight-step method guided this analysis. Searches of the CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases were performed with the following terms: faculty, nursing, nurs* faculty, nurs* educator, job satisfaction, work satisfaction, and employee satisfaction. Thirty-seven articles published between 2010 and 2022 in the field of nursing were included. RESULTS: Three defining attributes of nurse faculty job satisfaction were identified: psychological empowerment, self-efficacy, and motivational factors (achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement, work, and growth). Antecedents included mentoring, effective leadership, structural support, and work culture and relationships. The consequences of nurse faculty job satisfaction were commitment (professional and organizational) and work efficiency, which included productivity, creativity, and innovation. CONCLUSION: This concept analysis showed the attributes of nurse faculty job satisfaction are intrinsic and the antecedents are extrinsic. An operational definition was proposed, and a conceptual model was created. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 202x;5x(x):xx-xx.].

Role of Stigma for Health Care Professionals With Nonmedical Substance Use.

BACKGROUND: Stigma toward those with non-medical substance use may present as anticipated, perceived, enacted, or internalized stigma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to describe the role of stigma on health care professionals with non-medical substance use, from the perspective of treatment providers. Soliciting information about stigma from treatment providers is a unique perspective lacking in current literature. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was used with semi-structured interviews of treatment providers (N = 16) in Colorado. Inductive content analysis was used to identify concepts and themes across interviews. RESULTS: Findings showed that stigma is a major concern and a barrier for health care professionals seeking substance use treatment. Nurses and physicians demonstrate shame and guilt (internalized stigma) around their substance use. These professionals also experience fear around their reputation (perceived stigma) and challenges around re-entry to the workforce after treatment (anticipated stigma). CONCLUSIONS: The awareness of existing stigma as well as internalized stigma impacts how health care professionals approach treatment, recovery, and returning to work.

Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers.

BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act Interoperability and Information Blocking Rule was created to increase patient access to health information. This federally mandated policy has been met with praise and concern. However, little is known about patient and clinician opinions of this policy within cancer care. METHODS: We conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods study to understand patient and clinician reactions to the Information Blocking Rule in cancer care and what they would like policy makers to consider. Twenty-nine patients and 29 clinicians completed interviews and surveys. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Interview and survey data were analyzed separately, then linked to generate a full interpretation of the results. RESULTS: Overall, patients felt more positive about the policy than clinicians. Patients wanted policy makers to understand that patients are unique, and they want to individualize their preferences for receiving health information with their clinicians. Clinicians highlighted the uniqueness of cancer care, due to the highly sensitive information that is shared. Both patients and clinicians were concerned about the impact on clinician workload and stress. Both expressed an urgent need for tailoring implementation of the policy to avoid unintended harm and distress for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide suggestions for optimizing the implementation of this policy in cancer care. Dissemination strategies to better inform the public about the policy and improve clinician understanding and support are recommended. Patients who have serious illness or diagnoses such as cancer and their clinicians should be included when developing and enacting policies that could have a significant impact on their well-being. Patients with cancer and their cancer care teams want the ability to tailor information release based on individual preferences and goals. Understanding how to tailor implementation of the Information Blocking Rule is essential for retaining its benefits and minimizing unintended harm for patients with cancer.

Implementation Science for the Practice-Oriented Nurse Leader.

Senior nurse leaders are accountable for improving patient outcomes efficiently and cost-effectively. Nurse leaders often find heterogeneous patient outcomes across comparable nursing units in the same enterprise, presenting a challenge for nurse leaders tasked with making system-wide quality improvements. Implementation science (IS) offers a promising new approach to guide nurse leaders in understanding why certain implementation efforts meet with success or failure and the barriers faced in making practice changes. Knowledge of IS builds upon evidenced-based practice and quality improvement knowledge, adding to the armamentarium of tools at nurse leaders' disposal for improving nursing and patient outcomes. In this article, we demystify IS, differentiate it from evidence-based practice and quality improvement, describe IS concepts every nurse leader should be familiar with, and outline nurse leaders' role in building IS in their organizations.

Managing safety in perioperative settings: Strategies of meso-level nurse leaders.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative nursing units are described as one of the most challenging practice environments, characterized by a distinct hierarchal culture and rapid pace. These dynamics create challenges for creating a culture of safety, where meso-level nurse leaders (MLNLs) must operate in the space between the micro level of direct patient care and the macro-level administrative priorities. PURPOSE: Guided by complexity leadership theory, we sought to understand the strategies MLNLs used to facilitate a culture of safety in perioperative settings. METHODOLOGY: A qualitative descriptive study with semistructured interviews was conducted. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze content from the interviews, and several techniques (audit trail, reflexivity, peer debriefing) were used to ensure rigor. RESULTS: Seventeen MLNLs completed an interview, and analysis identified four strategies that MLNLs reported to foster safety as meso-leaders in perioperative environments: (a) recognizing the unique perioperative management environment, (b) learning not to take interactions personally, (c) developing "super meso-level nurse leader" skills, and (d) appealing to policies and patient safety. CONCLUSION: Perioperative environments require MLNLs to use multifaceted strategies to keep the peace among many stakeholders and foster patient safety. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our study shows how clear organizational policies and procedures can serve as a vital tool-moving attention away from a feeling of individual "policing" and toward joint discussion about shared patient safety goals-and ultimately support MLNLs in challenging perioperative work environments. Perioperative environments create unique challenges, and organizations should consider perioperative-specific leadership training to prepare MLNLs for these roles.

Leadership Science in Nursing: Creating New Solutions for New Challenges.

The Association for Leadership Science in Nursing (ALSN) November 2022 International Conference was held at the Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing at Case Western University. ALSN is dedicated to uniting academic and practice leaders to shape leadership science, education in nursing, and the practice of nursing leadership. One hundred fifty-one nurse leaders from the United States, Canada, and Oman gathered to discuss leadership as highlighted in this column.

Advancing Nursing Leadership Science Through an Innovative Research-Practice Partnership.

ABSTRACT: The Association for Leadership Science in Nursing and American Organization for Nursing Leadership Foundation have formed a new research-practice collaborative. The collaborative allows for a synergistic approach to the advancement of leadership science. This article discusses the impetus for the collaborative, its structure, and how its synergy of research and practice expertise provides immense opportunity for robust, practice-relevant research.

Rural engagement in primary care for optimizing weight reduction (REPOWER): A mixed methods study of patient perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: To report on patients' satisfaction and experience of care across three different modes of weight loss counseling. METHODS: 1407 patients with obesity in the rural Midwest were enrolled to a 2-year weight management trial through their primary care practice and assigned to one of three treatment conditions: in-clinic individual, in-clinic group, phone group counseling. Patients completed surveys assessing seven domains of satisfaction and experience of care at 6 and 24-months. Post-treatment interviews were conducted to add context to survey responses. RESULTS: 1295 (92.0%) and 1230 (87.4%) completed surveys at 6 and 24-months, respectively. Patients in phone group counseling reported lower satisfaction than patients who received in-clinic group or in-clinic individual counseling across all domains at 6-months and five out of seven domains at 24-months. Interviews revealed that patients were more satisfied when they received face-to-face counseling and had meaningful interactions with their primary care provider (PCP) about their weight. CONCLUSION: Rural patients with obesity have higher satisfaction and experience of care when weight loss counseling is delivered in a face-to-face environment and when their PCP is involved with their treatment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Primary care practices looking to offer weight loss treatment should consider incorporating some level of face-to-face treatment plans that involves meaningful interaction with the PCP.

Building the Science to Guide Nursing Administration and Leadership Decision Making.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the challenges, barriers, and solutions for conducting nursing administration and leadership science (NALS) research. BACKGROUND: Evidence from leadership science should be at the forefront of nurse leaders' decision making. Yet, challenges remain in building the evidence and moving it into nursing administration and leadership practice. METHODS: This study used a Delphi technique with open-ended questions and direct content analysis to evaluate survey responses of members of the Association for Leadership Science in Nursing and American Organization for Nursing Leadership. RESULTS: Open-ended responses were coded to yield super categories and supportive codes for areas with limited evidence to guide leadership practice and the challenges for conducting NALS research. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide future directions for continuously driving NALS research and for building and leveraging leadership science to support nursing administration decision making.

Implementation of cancer screening in rural primary care practices after joining an accountable care organisation: a multiple case study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe common strategies and practice-specific barriers, adaptations and determinants of cancer screening implementation in eight rural primary care practices in the Midwestern United States after joining an accountable care organisation (ACO). DESIGN: This study used a multiple case study design. Purposive sampling was used to identify a diverse group of practices within the ACO. Data were collected from focus group interviews and workflow mapping. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were cross-analysed by clinic and CFIR domains to identify common themes and practice-specific determinants of cancer screening implementation. SETTING: The study included eight rural primary care practices, defined as Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 5-9, in one ACO in the Midwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Providers, staff and administrators who worked in the primary care practices participated in focus groups. 28 individuals participated including 10 physicians; one doctor of osteopathic medicine; three advanced practice registered nurses; eight registered nurses, quality assurance and licensed practical nurses; one medical assistant; one care coordination manager; and four administrators. RESULTS: With integration into the ACO, practices adopted four new strategies to support cancer screening: care gap lists, huddle sheets, screening via annual wellness visits and information spread. Cross-case analysis revealed that all practices used both visit-based and population-based cancer screening strategies, although workflows varied widely across practices. Each of the four strategies was adapted for fit to the local context of the practice. Participants shared that joining the ACO provided a strong external incentive for increasing cancer screening rates. Two predominant determinants of cancer screening success at the clinic level were use of the electronic health record (EHR) and fully engaging nurses in the screening process. CONCLUSIONS: Joining an ACO can be a positive driver for increasing cancer screening practices in rural primary care practices. Characteristics of the practice can impact the success of ACO-related cancer screening efforts; engaging nurses to the fullest extent of their education and training and integrating cancer screening into the EHR can optimise the cancer screening workflow.

Nutrition Literacy Tailored Interventions May Improve Diet Behaviors in Outpatient Nutrition Clinics.

OBJECTIVES: Nutrition literacy examines the intersection of nutrition knowledge and skills; however, no evidence shows interventions tailored to nutrition literacy deficits affect diet behaviors. This study examined the effects of nutrition interventions tailored to individual nutrition literacy deficits on improving diet-related behaviors. METHODS: Five outpatient clinics were randomized to 2 arms. The nutrition literacy and diet behaviors of patients were assessed before intervention with a dietitian and again 1 month later. Intervention-arm dietitians received patient nutrition literacy levels and tailored interventions toward nutrition literacy weaknesses. Differences in diet behaviors between arms were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-tests and within-arms using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: Intervention-arm patients improved 10 of 25 measured diet behaviors; control-arm patients improved 6 behaviors. Similarly, intervention-arm patients reported increased green vegetable consumption from baseline to follow-up (z = 2.00; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Nutrition interventions tailored toward nutrition literacy deficits may play an important role in improving patient diet behaviors.

Setting the Research Agenda for Nursing Administration and Leadership Science: A Delphi Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize research topics for nursing administration and leadership science. BACKGROUND: Nursing administration and leadership research priorities should provide a framework for building the science needed to inform practice. METHODS: The Association for Leadership Science in Nursing (ALSN) and American Organization for Nursing Leadership (AONL) Foundation (AONL-F) for Nursing Leadership and Education collaborated on a Delphi study. Initial input on research priority items were received from ALSN and AONL members. National experts participated in a 3-round Delphi study. RESULTS: Top-ranked priorities included: 1) nurses' health, well-being, resiliency, and safety in the workplace; 2) developing and managing a nursing workforce to meet current and future healthcare needs; 3) healthy work/practice environments for direct care nurses; 4) healthy work/ practice environments for nurse leaders; 5) quantification of nursing's value across the healthcare delivery system; and 6) nurse leader development and essential competencies. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers and funders should use these priorities to guide future studies.

Implementation Science and Nursing Leadership: Improving the Adoption and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice.

Increasingly, nurse executives are embracing evidence-based practice (EBP). Yet, it takes 17 years to move only 14% of research evidence into practice. Implementation science (IS) aims to reduce this gap through the study of factors that influence dissemination, adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. Nurse leaders aiming for EBP must be well equipped to support IS. This article introduces IS, leadership competencies essential for supporting implementation research and practice, and preparing an IS-ready workforce.

Nurses Taking the Lead: A Look Back to Move Forward.

In recognition of the Year of the Nurse and Midwife, the 2020 annual conference of the Association for Leadership Science in Nursing (ALSN) celebrated A Look Back to Move Forward in recognition of the 50th anniversary of ALSN. The ALSN began as the Council of Graduate Education for Administrative Nursing (CGEAN) in 1970. Today, ALSN maintains the goals of shaping graduate education and research to inform nursing leadership practice.

Affiliate Faculty in Nursing Clinical Education: Student and Faculty Perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Academic-practice relationships can be integral in advancing high-quality education for prelicensure nursing students. In a midwestern city, the academic health center and school of nursing developed the affiliate faculty model, a viable and sustainable model for clinical education. PURPOSE: This study explores the efficacy of the affiliate faculty model as reported by prelicensure nursing students and affiliate faculty over a 7-year period. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional, descriptive survey design. An electronic survey using a mixed-methods approach was administered to nursing students and affiliate faculty. RESULTS: Seventy-two students and 25 affiliate faculty participated, agreeing that affiliate faculty prepared students to provide safe care and connect classroom to clinical. Themes included knowledge of the health system, support at the bedside, enjoyment of teaching, and creating "light bulb moments." CONCLUSIONS: The affiliate faculty model strengthens academic-practice partnerships while addressing the nursing faculty shortage.

Magnet® and Pathway to Excellence®: Focusing on Research and Evidence-Based Practice.

Healthcare organizations seeking to achieve or maintain Magnet or Pathway to Excellence designation are increasingly challenged to demonstrate how nurses are leading or are engaged in research and evidence-based practice. This article describes common barriers to and effective strategies for developing a culture of research and evidence-based practice, with recommendations for Magnet- and Pathway-seeking organizations.

The Effect of an Evidence-Based Practice Education and Mentoring Program on Increasing Knowledge, Practice, and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice in a Rural Critical Access Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of an evidence-based practice (EBP) education and mentoring program on the knowledge, practice, and attitudes toward EBP among staff nurses and clinicians in a rural critical access hospital. BACKGROUND: While rural nurses value EBP, they often have more limited resources to engage in EBP activities compared with urban-based nurses. METHODS: Direct care nurses and clinicians participated in a 5-month EBP education and mentoring program following the Iowa Model Revised: Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Excellence in Health Care. The Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire was used to assess pretest-posttest knowledge, practice, and attitudes toward EBP. RESULTS: Knowledge and practice of EBP increased significantly (P = .008 and P = .015, respectively) after the EBP education and mentoring intervention. Attitudes toward EBP also increased, although the increase was not statistically significant (P = .106). CONCLUSIONS: Education and mentoring of healthcare clinicians in rural settings are crucial to the translation of evidence-based research into practice to improve patient outcomes.

Exploring nurses' perceptions of nurse managers' communicative relationships that encourage nurses' decisions to buy-in to initiatives that enhance patients' experiences with care.

AIM: To explore nurses' perceptions of nurse managers' (NMs') communicative relationships that encourage nurses' decisions to buy-in to organisational initiatives to enhance patients' experiences with care (PEC). BACKGROUND: The role of the nurse to patient experience is well established, yet little is known about how the communicative relationship between manager and nurse relates to nurse buy-in to PEC initiatives. METHOD: An exploratory qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 15 nurses from two inpatient medical-surgical units in a large acute care hospital using semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Three themes were identified. The communicative relationship was developed and strengthened through the manager's: (a) multimodal approach to communicating and influencing, (b) engaging and supporting staff and (c) promoting staff-led decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses in our study who reported having a strong communicative relationship with their NM perceived that this relationship encouraged their buy-in and engagement in PEC initiatives. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: An assessment of the communication between the frontline NM and his or her team is important for understanding why initiatives to support PEC are or are not yielding desired results.

Disruptive Innovation: Impact for Practice, Policy, and Academia.

The 2019 Association for Leadership Science in Nursing International Conference, Disruptive Innovation, was held in Los Angeles, California, with attendees from 30 US states, Canada, Brazil, and China. Presenters discussed the need for nurse leaders to advocate for health equity, lead evidence-based innovation, how robots and other technology are generating disruptive innovations in healthcare, and building strong academic-practice partnerships to address nursing workforce challenges. This article will report on these important insights.

The Role of a Symptom Assessment Tool in Shaping Patient-Physician Communication in Palliative Care.

CONTEXT: Patients with cancer experience many symptoms that disrupt quality of life, and symptom communication and management can be challenging. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was developed to standardize assessment and documentation of symptoms, yet research is needed to understand patients' and caregivers' experiences using the tool and its ability to impact patient-provider aligned care. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to understand how the ESAS shapes communication between patients and providers by exploring patients' and caregivers' experiences using the ESAS and assessing the level of agreement in symptom assessment between patients and palliative care physicians. METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods design. Thirty-one semistructured interviews were conducted and audio-recorded with patients (n = 18) and caregivers (n = 13). Data were analyzed following a social constructionist grounded theory approach. Patient and provider ESAS scores were obtained by medical chart review. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the level of agreement between patient-completed ESAS scores and provider-completed ESAS scores. RESULTS: Participants reported that the ESAS was a beneficial tool in establishing priorities for symptom control and guiding the appointment with the palliative care physician, despite challenges in completing the ESAS. Filling out the ESAS can also help patients more clearly identify their priorities before meeting with their physician. There was a good to excellent level of agreement between patients and physicians in all symptoms analyzed. CONCLUSION: The ESAS is beneficial in enhancing symptom communication when used as a guide to identify and understand patients' main concerns.