Impact of antimetabolite discontinuation following cytomegalovirus or BK polyoma virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyoma virus (BKV) infection following kidney transplantation have been associated with allograft dysfunction and allograft loss. Reduction in immunosuppression is a mainstay of management yet has been associated with increased risk of rejection. According to international consensus guidelines, one approach to management of these viral infections is to discontinue the antimetabolite. Little is known surrounding long-term outcomes in these patients, and it remains unclear if consideration should be given to resuming the antimetabolite as variable re-escalation strategies have been reported. The objective was to describe episodes of rejection and identify risk factors for rejection following antimetabolite withdrawal after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review evaluated adult kidney transplant recipients with a serum CMV or BKV DNA PCR ≥500 copies/ml who underwent antimetabolite discontinuation. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were included. Overall, 14 patients (8.8%) experienced BPAR at a median of 1.6 years after antimetabolite discontinuation. Compared to CMV, discontinuation after BKV DNAemia was associated with a higher incidence of BPAR. Characteristics observed more frequently in patients with BPAR included younger age, female sex, higher initial viral load, and development of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that antimetabolite discontinuation after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients is a reasonable and safe approach. Further prospective studies investigating optimal immunosuppression management following CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.

Clinical Experience with Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) prescribing information states that there is insufficient data in older adult patients from which to make recommendations on use in this population. This study sought to provide information on de novo use of LCP-Tac in the older adult kidney transplant population. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study had two distinct objectives; to determine if weight-based doses of LCP-Tac differ based on recipient age and to compare safety and efficacy between LCP-Tac and immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in older adult transplant recipients. Data was obtained through electronic chart review up to 2 years after transplant with censoring for graft loss and death. RESULTS: Weight-based doses were compared between patients aged ≥ 65 years (n = 84), 36-64 years (n = 64), and ≤35 years (n = 44). LCP-Tac weight-based doses were lower at all time points in patients ≥ 65 years of age. Both age and race significantly impacted required dose on linear regression. The doses required to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus troughs were significantly lower in all age groups compared with the current FDA de novo dosing recommendation. In the older adult population, graft outcomes and infectious and metabolic complications were compared between recipients of LCP-Tac (n = 84) and IR-Tac (n = 42). Within this cohort, there were no differences between LCP-Tac and IR-Tac on graft function, rejection, graft loss, death, cytomegalovirus viremia, BK viremia, hypertension, diabetes, alopecia, or tremor up to 2 years after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Older adult recipients required significantly lower LCP-Tac doses compared with younger recipients and with the FDA-labeled starting dose. There were no differences in graft outcomes or adverse effects in older adult patients who received LCP-Tac versus IR-Tac.

Choice of Acid Suppressant Therapy and Long-Term Graft Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the long-term adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) compared with histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort compared 582 patients treated with PPI with 705 patients treated with H2RA and evaluated adverse effects throughout their course of acid suppressant therapy to a maximum of nine years posttransplant. The primary outcome of interest was renal function at 1 year posttransplant; secondary outcomes included renal function at 30 days, 3, 5, and 9 years posttransplant as well as rejection, electrolyte and laboratory abnormalities, osteoporosis, pneumonia, and Clostridium difficile infections. RESULTS: Renal function did not significantly differ at any timepoint posttransplant. Rejection rates and Clostridium difficile infections were similar between groups; osteoporosis and pneumonia rates were numerically higher in the PPI treated arm but did not reach statistical significance. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treated patients were more likely to experience hypomagnesemia requiring supplementation. High dose PPI treated patients had significantly higher rates of pneumonia and osteoporosis compared with H2RA treated patients. Patients were maintained on PPI therapy for an average of 5 years and H2RA therapy for 3 years posttransplant, the majority without a clear indication for therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in renal function, rejection, or graft loss between PPI and H2RA treated patients. The majority of patients were maintained on PPI therapy for several years posttransplant without a clear indication; critical evaluation of ongoing need for acid suppressant therapy in the posttransplant course should be an area of future focus.