Challenges in multi-centric generalization: phase and step recognition in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

PURPOSE: Most studies on surgical activity recognition utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have focused mainly on recognizing one type of activity from small and mono-centric surgical video datasets. It remains speculative whether those models would generalize to other centers. METHODS: In this work, we introduce a large multi-centric multi-activity dataset consisting of 140 surgical videos (MultiBypass140) of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgeries performed at two medical centers, i.e., the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France (StrasBypass70) and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland (BernBypass70). The dataset has been fully annotated with phases and steps by two board-certified surgeons. Furthermore, we assess the generalizability and benchmark different deep learning models for the task of phase and step recognition in 7 experimental studies: (1) Training and evaluation on BernBypass70; (2) Training and evaluation on StrasBypass70; (3) Training and evaluation on the joint MultiBypass140 dataset; (4) Training on BernBypass70, evaluation on StrasBypass70; (5) Training on StrasBypass70, evaluation on BernBypass70; Training on MultiBypass140, (6) evaluation on BernBypass70 and (7) evaluation on StrasBypass70. RESULTS: The model's performance is markedly influenced by the training data. The worst results were obtained in experiments (4) and (5) confirming the limited generalization capabilities of models trained on mono-centric data. The use of multi-centric training data, experiments (6) and (7), improves the generalization capabilities of the models, bringing them beyond the level of independent mono-centric training and validation (experiments (1) and (2)). CONCLUSION: MultiBypass140 shows considerable variation in surgical technique and workflow of LRYGB procedures between centers. Therefore, generalization experiments demonstrate a remarkable difference in model performance. These results highlight the importance of multi-centric datasets for AI model generalization to account for variance in surgical technique and workflows. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/CAMMA-public/MultiBypass140.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban for Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis in Patients After Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Clinical end point studies on thromboprophylaxis with direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing bariatric surgery are lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of a prophylactic dose of 10 mg/d of rivaroxaban for both 7 and 28 days after bariatric surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This assessor-blinded, phase 2, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021, with participants from 3 academic and nonacademic hospitals in Switzerland. Intervention: Patients were randomized 1 day after bariatric surgery to 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban for either 7 days (short prophylaxis) or 28 days (long prophylaxis). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic) and pulmonary embolism within 28 days after bariatric surgery. Main safety outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and mortality. Results: Of 300 patients, 272 (mean [SD] age, 40.0 [12.1] years; 216 women [80.3%]; mean body mass index, 42.2) were randomized; 134 received a 7-day and 135 a 28-day VTE prophylaxis course with rivaroxaban. Only 1 thromboembolic event (0.4%) occurred (asymptomatic thrombosis in a patient undergoing sleeve gastrectomy with extended prophylaxis). Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were observed in 5 patients (1.9%): 2 in the short prophylaxis group and 3 in the long prophylaxis group. Clinically nonsignificant bleeding events were observed in 10 patients (3.7%): 3 in the short prophylaxis arm and 7 in the long prophylaxis arm. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, once-daily VTE prophylaxis with 10 mg of rivaroxaban was effective and safe in the early postoperative phase after bariatric surgery in both the short and long prophylaxis groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03522259.

Gastroesophageal Junction and Pylorus Distensibility Before and After Sleeve Gastrectomy-pilot Study with EndoFlipTM.

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric surgical intervention worldwide. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequently observed after SG and is a relevant clinical problem. This prospective study investigated the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and pyloric sphincter by impedance planimetry (EndoFlipTM) and their association with GERD at a tertiary university hospital center. Between January and December 2018, patients undergoing routine laparoscopic SG had pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments of the GEJ and pyloric sphincter by EndoFlipTM. The distensibility index (DI) was measured at different volumes and correlated with GERD (in accordance with the Lyon consensus guidelines). Nine patients were included (median age 48 years, preoperative BMI 45.1 kg/m2, 55.6% female). GERD (de novo or stable) was observed in 44.4% of patients one year postoperatively. At a 40-ml filling volume, DI increased significantly pre- vs. post-SG of the GEJ (1.4 mm2/mmHg [IQR 1.1-2.6] vs. 2.9 mm2/mmHg [2.6-5.3], p VALUE=0.046) and of the pylorus (6.0 mm2/mmHg [4.1-10.7] vs. 13.1 mm2/mmHg [7.6-19.2], p VALUE=0.046). Patients with postoperative de novo or stable GERD had a significantly increased preoperative DI at 40 ml of the GEJ (2.6 mm2/mmHg [1.9-3.5] vs. 0.5 mm2/mmHg [0.5-1.1], p VALUE=0.031). There was no significant difference in DI at 40 mL filling in the preoperative pylorus and postoperative GEJ or pylorus. In this prospective study, the DI of the GEJ and the pylorus significantly increased after SG. Postoperative GERD was associated with a significantly higher preoperative DI of the GEJ but not of the pylorus.

Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology.

BACKGROUND: Phase and step annotation in surgical videos is a prerequisite for surgical scene understanding and for downstream tasks like intraoperative feedback or assistance. However, most ontologies are applied on small monocentric datasets and lack external validation. To overcome these limitations an ontology for phases and steps of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is proposed and validated on a multicentric dataset in terms of inter- and intra-rater reliability (inter-/intra-RR). METHODS: The proposed LRYGB ontology consists of 12 phase and 46 step definitions that are hierarchically structured. Two board certified surgeons (raters) with > 10 years of clinical experience applied the proposed ontology on two datasets: (1) StraBypass40 consists of 40 LRYGB videos from Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France and (2) BernBypass70 consists of 70 LRYGB videos from Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. To assess inter-RR the two raters' annotations of ten randomly chosen videos from StraBypass40 and BernBypass70 each, were compared. To assess intra-RR ten randomly chosen videos were annotated twice by the same rater and annotations were compared. Inter-RR was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Additionally, for inter- and intra-RR accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and application dependent metrics were applied. RESULTS: The mean ± SD video duration was 108 ± 33 min and 75 ± 21 min in StraBypass40 and BernBypass70, respectively. The proposed ontology shows an inter-RR of 96.8 ± 2.7% for phases and 85.4 ± 6.0% for steps on StraBypass40 and 94.9 ± 5.8% for phases and 76.1 ± 13.9% for steps on BernBypass70. The overall Cohen's kappa of inter-RR was 95.9 ± 4.3% for phases and 80.8 ± 10.0% for steps. Intra-RR showed an accuracy of 98.4 ± 1.1% for phases and 88.1 ± 8.1% for steps. CONCLUSION: The proposed ontology shows an excellent inter- and intra-RR and should therefore be implemented routinely in phase and step annotation of LRYGB.

The impact of bariatric and metabolic surgery on cancer development.

Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) with related comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, sleep apnea syndrome, and fatty liver disease is one of the most common preventable risk factors for cancer development worldwide. They are responsible for at least 40% of all newly diagnosed cancers, including colon, ovarian, uterine, breast, pancreatic, and esophageal cancer. Although various efforts are being made to reduce the incidence of obesity, its prevalence continues to spread in the Western world. Weight loss therapies such as lifestyle change, diets, drug therapies (GLP-1-receptor agonists) as well as bariatric and metabolic surgery are associated with an overall risk reduction of cancer. Therefore, these strategies should always be essential in therapeutical concepts in obese patients. This review discusses pre- and post-interventional aspects of bariatric and metabolic surgery and its potential benefit on cancer development in obese patients.

Vasoconstrictor nasal spray causing life-threatening complications after bariatric surgery: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Bariatric surgery is an evolving surgical field with increasing cases per year, as obesity is prevalent, especially in developed countries. Complication diagnosis and management can be challenging. Marginal ulcers and anastomosis perforation are rare, but their incidence is likely underestimated. CASE PRESENTATION: To the best of our knowledge, we present the first case with a two and a half years history of recurrent ischemia, marginal ulcers, and recurrent perforation after laparoscopic omega loop gastric bypass, most likely due to an abuse of an over-the-counter (OTC) sympathomimetic nasal spray. The complications (Clavien-Dindo classification IIIb) caused the necessity of recurrent hospitalizations and diagnostic interventions and an open conversion into Roux-Y gastric bypass in a damage control manner. CLINICAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Conclusively, we advocate evaluating drug abuse, including OTC medications that patients might not report on a daily-based medical history, as an etiology for marginal ulcers and anastomosis perforation, especially in late and recurrent cases.

Ulcer Disease in the Excluded Segments after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Current Review of the Literature.

Ulcer disease in excluded segments after Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is rare but can evolve into a life-threatening situation. The excluded segments exhibit a different behavior from that of non-altered anatomy; perforated ulcers do not result in pneumoperitoneum or free fluid, and therefore must be met with a low threshold for surgical exploration. The anatomical changes after RYGB impede routine access to the remnant stomach and duodenum. There are various options to address bleeding or perforated ulcers. While oversewing and drainage preserves the anatomy and forgoes resection, remnant gastrectomy offers a definitive solution. The importance of traditional risk factors such as smoking or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is unclear. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and secondary prophylaxis with proton-pump inhibitors is advisable, albeit in double-dose.

Tailored access to the hepatobiliary system in post-bariatric patients: a tertiary care bariatric center experience.

BACKGROUND: In bariatric surgery patients, pancreaticobiliary access via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging and the optimal approach for the evaluation and treatment of biliary tree-related pathologies has been debated. Besides laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) as standard of care, EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) and hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) with placement of a fully covered metal stent have emerged as novel techniques. The objective of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of three different endoscopic approaches (LA-ERCP, EDGE, and HGS) in bariatric patients. METHODS: In this retrospective review, consecutive patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) who underwent from 2013 to 2019 a LA-ERCP, an EDGE, or a HGS at a tertiary care reference center for bariatric surgery were analyzed. Patient demographics, type of procedure and indication, data regarding cannulation and therapeutic intervention of the common bile duct (procedure success), and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included. Indications for LA-ERCP, EDGE, or HGS were mostly choledocholithiasis (78.9%) and in a few cases papillitis stenosans. Eight patients (57.1%) with LA-ERCP underwent concomitant cholecystectomy. Procedure success was achieved in 100%. Adverse events (AEs) were identified in 15.7% of patients (all ERCP related). All AEs were rated as moderate and there were no serious AEs. CONCLUSION: This case series indicates that ERCP via a transgastric approach (LA-ERCP, EDGE, or HGS) is a minimally invasive, effective, and feasible method to access the biliary tree in bariatric patients. These techniques offer an appealing alternative treatment option compared to percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage- or deep enteroscopy-assisted ERCP. In bariatric patients who earlier had a cholecystectomy, EUS-guided techniques were the preferred treatment options for biliary pathologies.

[Internal hernias after bariatric and metabolic surgery]. / Innere Hernien nach bariatrischer und metabolischer Chirurgie.

Internal hernias after bariatric and metabolic surgery Abstract. Internal hernias are among the most common long-term complications of morbid obesity following gastric bypass procedures. The diagnosis of an internal hernia after a gastric bypass is often uncertain due to unspecific clinical symptoms and is difficult despite various diagnostic procedures. This fact requires special attention in the postbariatric follow-up after gastric bypass surgery and the knowledge of the possibility of the development of internal hernias. In addition, the recurrence rate after surgical treatment is not insignificant.

Mental Illness Has a Negative Impact on Weight Loss in Bariatric Patients: a 4-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Mental health disorders are highly prevalent among bariatric surgery patients. Bariatric surgery induces weight loss with continuous health improvements. However, long-term follow-up data on weight loss and quality of life data of patients who have a mental illness after bariatric surgery are scarce, and it is not clear whether mental illness is associated with more pronounced weight regain. The aim was to investigate the impact of preoperative mental illness on the course of long-term weight changes after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Patients with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) between 2005 and 2013 with a follow-up of at least 3 years were included. The study population was divided into two groups: patients with mental illness (MI) and patients without (No-MI). Weight loss outcomes over time were compared using mixed models up to 4 years after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 254 patients (RYGB 61.0%, SG 39%) were included. The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar between the MI (n = 108) and No-MI groups (n = 146). The most prevalent mental illness was depressive disorder (63.9%). In the MI group, the percent of total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly smaller over the study period. After 36 months, the predicted mean group-difference of %TWL was 4.6% (95% CI 1.9, 7.2; p = 0.001), and the predicted odds ratio for weight regain was 4.9 (95% CI 1.6, 15.1) for patients in the MI group. CONCLUSION: Preoperative mental illness leads to lower long-term weight loss and an increased risk of weight regain after bariatric surgery.

The effect of bariatric surgery on the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban: the extension study.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic disease is a potentially serious complication in bariatric surgery patients. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been investigated in orthopedic surgery patients. DOAC data after bariatric surgery are still limited to the early postsurgical period. Whether postsurgical midterm adaptations due to anatomic and physiologic alterations influence drug pharmacology is currently not known. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of weight loss and type of bariatric surgery on midterm postsurgical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of rivaroxaban. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: In this monocentric study, bariatric patients received a single oral dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg) 6 to 8 months after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were assessed and compared with prebariatric surgery results. RESULTS: We included 6 RYGB and 6 SG patients. Percent excess weight loss was 71.4% (interquartile range 56.4, 87.9) in the SG group and 76.6% (64.5, 85.7) in the RYGB group. Rivaroxaban mean areas under the curve 6 to 8 months after the bariatric procedure (922.4 µg × h/L, coefficient of variation 43.2) were comparable to those measured preoperatively (952.6 µg × h/L, 16.8). There was no relevant difference between the 2 surgical procedure groups. Rivaroxaban led to a decrease of prothrombin fragments F1+2 over 12 hours after oral intake confirming in vivo efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Significant weight loss and altered anatomy after RYGB and SG procedures do not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prophylactic rivaroxaban. A single dose of Rivaroxaban was well tolerated and considered safe in this trial.

Prevalence and Prediction of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Prior to Bariatric Surgery-Gender-Specific Performance of Four Sleep Questionnaires.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery (BS) is a treatment option for morbid obesity leading to substantial and sustained weight loss in adults. As obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in obese subjects and may increase the perioperative risk, screening for OSA is recommended prior to BS. In clinical routine, BS is performed more frequently in women. Therefore, we sought to assess the gender-specific performance of four sleep questionnaires (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), STOPBang, and NoSAS) to predict moderate to severe OSA in the morbidly obese population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We applied all four questionnaires to patients scheduled for BS with polygraphic OSA screening at our institution between 2012 and 2015 and performed gender-specific sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We included 251 bariatric patients (76% female, median age 39 years, median BMI 42.0 kg/m2). OSA (AHI > 5/h; AHI > 15/h) was present in 43% (females 35%, males 68%; p < 0.001) and 21% (females 13%, males 45%; p < 0.001). STOPBang and NoSAS performed markedly better than ESS and FSS. With the exception of the ESS, all sleep questionnaires allowed better OSA prediction in women than in men. CONCLUSION: In obese patients scheduled for BS, a gender-specific difference was observed in the performance of the evaluated OSA screening questionnaires. This needs to be considered when these questionnaires are used. Our results underline the need for better gender-specific OSA screening algorithms in morbidly obese patients.

Radiologic, endoscopic, and functional patterns in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard in treatment of morbid obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Resolution of GERD symptoms is reported to be approximately 85% to 90%. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients with persistent GERD symptoms after RYGB and to identify contributing factors. SETTING: University hospital, cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data of patients evaluated for persistent GERD with a history of RYGB between January 2012 and December 2015 were reviewed. GERD was assessed with questionnaires, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-impendance manometry, and barium swallow. RESULTS: Of 47 patients, 44 (93.6%) presented with typical GERD, 18 (38.3%) with obstruction, 8 (17%) with pulmonary symptoms, and 21 (44.7%) with pain. The interval between RYGB and evaluation was a median of 3.8 years (range .8-12.6); median patient age was 36.5 years (19.1-67.2). Median body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2 (20.3-47.2). Pouch gastric fistulas were seen in 2 (5.1%), enlarged pouches in 5 (10.6%), and hiatal hernias in 25 patients (53.2%). Twelve (23.4%) had esophagitis>Los Angeles (LA) grade B. Manometry was performed in 45 (95.7%) and off-proton pump inhibitor 24-hour pH-impedance-metry in 44 patients (94.6%). Seventeen patients (37.8%) had esophageal hypomotility or aperistalsis; hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter was seen in 26 patients (57.8%). Increased esophageal acid exposure (>4% pH<4) was found in 27 (61.4%), an increased number of reflux episodes (>53) in 30 patients (68.2%). Symptoms were deemed as functional in 6 (12.8%). CONCLUSION: The evaluation for persistent GERD after RYGB revealed a high percentage of hiatal hernias, hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter, and severe esophageal motility disorders. These findings might have an influence on hiatal hernia closure concomitant with RYGB and the role of pH manometry in the preoperative bariatric assessment.

Diarrhea after bariatric procedures: Diagnosis and therapy.

Diarrhea after bariatric procedures, mainly those with malabsorptive elements including Roux-Y Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion, is common and an essential determinant of quality of life and micro- and macronutrient deficiencies. Bariatric surgery is the only sustainably successful method to address morbid obesity and its comorbidities, particularly gaining more and more importance in the specific treatment of diabetic patients. Approximately half a million procedures are annually performed around the world, with numbers expected to rise drastically in the near future. A multitude of factors exert their influence on bowel habits; preoperative comorbidities and procedure-related aspects are intertwined with postoperative nutritional habits. Diagnosis may be challenging owing to the characteristics of post-bariatric surgery anatomy with hindered accessibility of excluded segments of the small bowel and restriction at the gastric level. Conventional testing measures, if available, generally yield low accuracy and are usually not validated in this specific population. Limited trials of empiric treatment are a practical alternative and oftentimes an indispensable part of the diagnostic process. This review provides an overview of causes for chronic post-bariatric surgery diarrhea and details the particularities of its diagnosis and treatment in this specific patient population. Topics of current interest such as the impact of gut microbiota and the influence of bile acids on morbid obesity and especially their role in diarrhea are highlighted in order to provide a better understanding of the specific problems and chances of future treatment in post-bariatric surgery patients.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of rivaroxaban in obese patients prior to and after bariatric surgery.

AIMS: Venous thromboembolism is an important cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in bariatric surgery. Studies of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not available in this surgical field. The objective of this phase 1 clinical trial was to investigate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters of rivaroxaban in bariatric patients. METHODS: In this single-centre study, obese patients received single oral doses of rivaroxaban (10 mg) 1 day prior to and 3 days after bariatric surgery. PK and PD parameters were assessed at baseline and during 24 h after drug ingestion. RESULTS: Six Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients and six sleeve gastrectomy patients completed the study. Mean rivaroxaban area under plasma concentration-time curve, peak plasma concentration, time to peak plasma concentration and terminal half-life were 971.9 µg·h l-1 (coefficient of variation: 10.6), 135.3 µg l-1 (26.7), 1.5 h and 13.1 h (34.1) prior to and 1165.8 (21.9), 170.0 (15.9), 1.5 and 8.9 (44.6) postsurgery for SG patients and 933.7 µg·h l-1 (22.3), 136.5 µg l-1 (10.7), 1.5 h und 13.8 h (46.6) prior to and 1029.4 (7.4), 110.8 (31.8), 2.5 and 15 (60.0) postsurgery for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients, respectively. Prothrombin fragments (F1 + 2) decreased during the first 12 hours and increased thereafter in the pre- and the postbariatric setting. Thrombin-antithrombin complexes dropped within 1-3 h in the prebariatric setting and remained low after surgery until they increased at 24 h postdose. Rivaroxaban was well tolerated and no relevant safety issues were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery does not appear to alter PK of rivaroxaban in a clinically relevant way. Effective prophylactic postbariatric anticoagulation is supported by changes in PD.

Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients with excessive concomitant disease carry a significantly increased perioperative risk. Although they may benefit most from a bariatric intervention, they are often denied surgery. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), as it is less complication-prone than other bariatric procedures, suits the needs of those patients. OBJECTIVE: To review the short-term outcome of LSG for high-risk patients SETTING: University hospital, Switzerland. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with high perioperative risk undergoing LSG between January 2008 and December 2014 were prospectively recorded. Patients were defined as "high-risk" if they met 2 of the following criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score (ASA)>III, Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS)≥4, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) class IV, Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Severity Index (OSA-SI)≥5, renal insufficiency chronic kidney disease ≥3, liver cirrhosis, or history of life-threatening perioperative events. RESULTS: Of the patients, 59 (54%) were male. Median age was 49 years (range: 18-69), and median BMI was 51.7 kg/m2 (38.7-89.2). Median operating time was 65 minutes (27-260). Eighty-six patients (78%) were classified as ASA IV, 65 (59%) as RCRI class IV, 51 (46%) as OS-MRS≥4 and 63 (57%) as OSA-SI≥5. Eighty-nine (81%) had type 2 diabetes, 70 (64%) were under antiplatelet and or anticoagulant therapy. Four patients (4%) were converted to open. Length of stay was 5 days (1-70). Major complications occurred in 12 patients (11%), including 1 mortality (1%). CONCLUSION: "High-risk"-patients identified using a combination of established obesity- and co-morbidity-related risk scores profit from LSG as part of a uniform treatment pathway. Given the severity of co-morbidities, LSG can be performed safely. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;X:XXX-XXX.) © 2016 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Gastric resection, short bowel syndrome, and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for development of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Reasons are multifactorial and not completely elucidated. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of EPI after distal (dRYGB) and proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (pRYGB) and to assess the influence of respective limb lengths. SETTING: University hospital, Switzerland. METHODS: The study comprised 188 consecutive patients who underwent primary dRYGB (common channel<120 cm, biliopancreatic limb 80-100 cm) or pRYGB (alimentary limb = 155 cm, biliopancreatic limb 40-75 cm) and who were followed-up for at least 2 years. Patients with a history of gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary resection (except for cholecystectomy), postoperative pregnancy, and any revision of RYGB (gastric pouch, limb lengths) were excluded. EPI was defined by clinical symptoms in combination with fecal pancreatic elastase-1<200 µg/g stool or fecal pancreatic elastase-1>200 and<500 µg/g stool and positive dechallenge-rechallenge test with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 52.2 months (range 24-120). Seventy-nine patients (42%) underwent dRYGB, and 109 (58%) underwent pRYGB. Of those, 59 (31%) patients were diagnosed with EPI after a mean 12.5±16.3 months. There was a significant difference between dRYGB and pRYGB groups in initial body mass index (dRYGB 47.1±8.1 kg/m(2) versus pRYGB 42.7±6.1 kg/m(2); P<.01), patients in Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score group C (13% versus 3%; P = .02), and prevalence of EPI (48% versus 19%; P<.01). Neither overall small bowel length nor absolute or relative limb lengths were influencing factors on EPI after dRYGB. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of EPI after dRYGB (48%) and pRYGB (19%) is of clinical importance. There was no significant difference in absolute or relative limb lengths between EPI and non-EPI groups after dRYGB.

Re-sleeve gastrectomy as revisional bariatric procedure after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.

BACKGROUND: Re-sleeve gastrectomy (re-SG) is a possible option to increase weight loss after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). We report the feasibility, efficacy and safety of re-SG in patients presenting with long-term weight regain after BPD-DS. METHODS: From October 2010 to December 2013, a total of 17 patients (12 female, 5 male) with a mean age of 42.1 ± 19.4 years underwent re-SG, mainly because of weight regain after BPD-DS. Re-SG was performed laparoscopically over a 32 French stomach tube. RESULTS: At the time of BPD-DS, the mean weight and BMI of all patients were 130.1 ± 17.9 kg and 46.1 ± 6.5 kg/m(2), respectively. The mean time interval between BPD-DS and re-SG was 63.1 ± 20.3 months. At the time of re-SG, the mean weight and BMI were 115.4 ± 14.2 kg and 39.8 ± 5.3 kg/m(2), and the %EWL after BPD-DS was 22.9 ± 17.4 %. Three conversions (17.6 %) to open surgery were required. No mortality occurred. One patient (5.9 %) developed a leak within the first week after re-SG that was treated conservatively with an endoluminal stent. The mean follow-up was 37.2 ± 7.1 months after re-SG. One- and three-year follow-up showed a mean weight, BMI, and cumulative %EWL of 96.0 ± 17.1 kg, 33.8 ± 7.3 kg/m(2), and 53.1 ± 18.3 % (17/17 patients; 100 %), and 100.3 ± 21.1 kg, 35.1 ± 8.3 kg/m(2), and 47.2 ± 19.7 % (13/17 patients; 76 %) after re-SG, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that re-SG in patients with weight regain after BPD-DS is a feasible, effective and safe option as a revisional bariatric procedure. However, patients have to be carefully considered for revisional surgery since re-SG is associated with the potential risk of surgical complications.