In vitro comparison of the novel, dual-acting FIIa/FXa-inhibitor EP217609C101, unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux in preventing cardiac catheter thrombosis.

Efficient and safe anticoagulation is crucial in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or extracorporeal circulation during cardiac surgery. Although new anticoagulant strategies have emerged for PCI as alternatives to the established treatment with heparins, the development of new anticoagulants with an improved efficacy/safety ratio is still necessary. Our study compared the efficacy of the novel, dual-acting, neutralizable FIIa/FXa-inhibitor EP217609C101 (EP) at 2, 1.2, 0.9, and 0.6 µg/ml to unfractionated heparin (UFH), enoxaparin, and fondaparinux in preventing cardiac catheter thrombosis under in vitro conditions. Blood drawn by venepunction from healthy male volunteers (n = 10) pretreated with 500 mg aspirin orally was treated with the anticoagulant to test and continuously circulated through a cardiac catheter for 60 min or until the catheter became blocked by thrombotic debris. Anticoagulant efficacy was assessed by thrombus weight, electron microscopic features of the developing thrombi, and laboratory parameters. Whereas UFH, enoxaparin, EP 2, and EP 1.2 µg/ml secured maximum circulation times, statistically significant premature catheter occlusions were observed for EP 0.9, EP 0.6 µg/ml, and fondaparinux. The UFH group and both high-dose concentrations of EP showed significantly lower thrombus weights than the low-dose concentrations of EP and fondaparinux, (p ≤ 0.05). On electron microscopic analysis of the thrombotic debris no differences were observed in erythrocyte deposition between UFH, enoxaparin, and all EP concentrations tested. A significant reduction in fibrin deposition was achieved by UFH and EP 2 µg/ml but no significant differences in platelet deposition were found, except for a significant reduction for EP 0.6 µg/ml. Our in vitro study showed that EP217609C101 is a promising new drug that is dose-dependently superior to classical (UFH, enoxaparin) and newer (fondaparinux) drugs in preventing heart catheter thrombosis.

Effect of the urotensin receptor antagonist palosuran in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy.

The urotensin system has been hypothesized to play an important role in the pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study, the effects of the urotensin receptor antagonist palosuran on urinary albumin excretion and blood pressure in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy treated with a single blocker of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system were assessed. Patients with 24-hour albuminuria >0.5 and <3.0 g, systolic blood pressure >135 and <170 mm Hg, and/or diastolic blood pressure >85 and <110 mm Hg received both palosuran 125 mg BID and placebo for 4 weeks each. Fifty-four patients (20% women; mean age: 61.6 years, blood pressure: 155/84 mm Hg, and albuminuria: 1016 mg per 24 hours) were included in the per-protocol analysis. Palosuran did not affect albuminuria, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, or renal plasma flow significantly. These results question whether urotensin receptor antagonism represents a new treatment strategy in this high-risk patient population.

The hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of low doses of tezosentan (an endothelin A/B receptor antagonist) in patients with acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: In previous studies (the RITZ project), tezosentan, an intravenous (i.v.)-balanced dual endothelin (ET-A/B) antagonist, in doses of 50 and 100 mg/h, improved the hemodynamics but not the clinical outcome of patients with acute heart failure (AHF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of lower doses of tezosentan in patients with AHF. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Included were 130 patients hospitalized due to AHF with dyspnea at rest, despite initial treatment, and were in need of hemodynamic monitoring with cardiac index (CI)<2.5 l/min/m(2) and wedge pressure > or = 20 mm Hg. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive placebo or tezosentan: 0.2, 1, 5, or 25 mg/h for 24 h. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the study, CI increase at 6 h of treatment, was significant in the 5 and 25 mg/h groups. Tezosentan induced a dose-dependent increase in CI and a decrease in wedge pressure, peaking after 3 h in the 5 and 25 mg/h groups. In the 1 mg/h group, this effect was smaller during the first 6 h and increased gradually, becoming significant at 24 h and beyond treatment discontinuation. There was no hemodynamic effect in the 0.2 mg/h arm. Type-B natriuretic peptide (BNP) decreased in the 1, 5, and 25 mg/h groups but not on placebo. Endothelin levels were significantly increased by the 5 and 25 mg/h groups but not in the lower (< or = 1 mg/h) tezosentan doses. Urine output decreased on the 25 mg/h dose. There was a trend towards improvement in patients' subjective dyspnea score and worsening heart failure events, mainly in the 1 mg/h group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted with AHF, tezosentan doses of 1-25 mg/h are efficacious in improving the hemodynamics and reducing BNP. Tezosentan doses beyond 1 mg/h increased plasma endothelin levels and reduced urine output, probably limiting their clinical efficacy, as compared to tezosentan 1 mg/h.