Effectiveness of mono antiplatelet therapy vs dual antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack-Special subgroup consideration for the African-American Population.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of mono antiplatelet therapy vs dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing recurrent stroke and mortality in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare outcomes in African-American patients compared with non-African-American patients. METHODS: This is a single-centre, retrospective, chart review, cohort study conducted at the University Medical Center New Orleans (UMCNO), New Orleans, Louisiana. This study includes all patients who are admitted to UMCNO with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or TIA. The subjects were divided into two groups, patients who received mono antiplatelet therapy and patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy. RESULTS: A total of 762 stroke patients were included in the study. Of these, 499 (65.5%) received mono antiplatelet therapy and 263 (34.5%) patients received dual antiplatelet therapy. There was no statistical significant difference in the incidence of mortality and recurrent stroke in the mono antiplatelet therapy group compared with the dual antiplatelet therapy group. When comparing primary outcomes between African Americans and non-African Americans, there was no statistical significant difference in mortality rate and recurrent stroke rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study found no statistical significant difference in the incidence of recurrent stroke and mortality between mono antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy among patients who had ischemic stroke or TIA; with similar findings in a subgroup analysis comparing outcomes in African-American patients compared with non-African-American patients.

Concordance of Vancomycin Population-Predicted Pharmacokinetics with Patient-Specific Pharmacokinetics in Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin empiric therapy is commonly dosed using clinical algorithms adapted from population-predicted pharmacokinetic parameters. However, precise dosing of vancomycin can be designed using patient-specific pharmacokinetic calculations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the correlational fit between vancomycin population-predicted and patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters [elimination rate constant (Ke) and half-life (t1/2)] in a case series of adult hospitalized patients. METHODS: This is a single-center case series of hospitalized adult patients who received vancomycin, had creatinine clearance calculation for derivation of population-predicted pharmacokinetic parameters, and had two vancomycin concentrations for calculation of patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters. The primary objective of this case series is to evaluate the correlation between population-predicted and patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate the mean bias and precision between the population-predicted and patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters and to assess the correlation between population-predicted and patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters in special population subgroups (obese patients with body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 and patients with renal dysfunction). All correlation analyses were performed on the population-predicted pharmacokinetics using diverse methods of estimating renal function (Salazar-Corcoran and Cockcroft-Gault methods using either ideal, actual, or adjusted body weights). All significance testing was set at an α of < 0.05. IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 and SAS version 9.4 were used to conduct all statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in the study; 33.3% (10/30) of the patients were obese and 56.7% (17/30) had renal dysfunction. In all patients in the study, the calculated population-predicted Ke and t1/2 using all four creatinine clearance estimation methods were each significantly correlated with patient-specific Ke and t1/2 (all Pearson correlation coefficients [r]: > + 0.7, p < 0.001). The population-predicted Ke and t1/2 calculated using Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance using adjusted body weight showed the strongest association with patient-specific Ke and t1/2. In the subgroup analyses, all the population-predicted Ke and t1/2 using four creatinine clearance estimation methods were each significantly correlated with patient-specific Ke and t1/2. The exception was the population-predicted t1/2 derived from Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance using actual body weight that did not show a significant correlation with patient-specific t1/2 in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, population-predicted pharmacokinetic parameters were strongly correlated with patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters. The vancomycin population-predicted pharmacokinetic formula can be used safely to predict a patient's vancomycin pharmacokinetic disposition and can be maintained as an empiric dosing strategy in various hospitalized adult patients.