Two-Year Analysis of a New Oral Testosterone Undecanoate (TU) Formulation in Hypogonadal Men: Efficacy, Impact on Psychosexual Function, and Safety.

BACKGROUND: Long-term data evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral testosterone undecanoate (oral TU; JATENZO) in adult hypogonadal men provides important information for healthcare professionals who prescribe testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of long-term oral TU therapy, including its impact on total testosterone (T) levels and psychosexual functioning. METHODS: Hypogonadal men, between 18 and 75 years old, (mean age 56.2; 87.2% white) who completed a 12-month, open-label, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial were given the opportunity to enroll in a 12-month extension study. Among the 129 eligible TU-treated subjects, 86 chose this option, and 69 completed 24 months of uninterrupted oral TU therapy. OUTCOMES: The efficacy of oral TU was documented by measuring total serum T concentrations; sexual function was measured using the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire (PDQ). For safety, liver function tests, cardiovascular endpoints, and prostate health were measured. RESULTS: Over 2 years, total serum T concentrations for patients treated with oral TU were in the eugonadal range (300-1,000 ng/dL [10-35 nmol/L]; mean ± SD: 617 ± 427 ng/dL [21 ± 15 nmol/L]) and increased significantly from baseline (P < .0001). For sexual function, mean score changes versus baseline for all PDQ domains at all time points were significantly improved (P < .0011 for all). For the sexual activity and sexual desire components, patient scores were consistently greater than validated thresholds for clinically meaningful change. Typical T-induced safety changes were observed, including a 3-6 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure (P < .05); a slight increase in hematocrit (P < .0001) that stayed <48% throughout the study; no clinically significant changes in prostate-specific antigen levels; and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.8 ± 0.9 mg/dL from baseline; P < .0001). There were no clinically significant changes from baseline in liver function tests. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Over 2 years of treatment, this novel oral TU formulation maintained total T concentrations in mideugonadal ranges, with improvements in sexual function and no clinically significant changes in liver function or other safety concerns previously associated with oral TRT. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: These are the first long-term data to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel formulation of oral TU; the comparative long-term safety of oral TU would be strengthened by confirmatory studies versus other TRT formulations. CONCLUSION: Oral TU offers a safe and effective long-term treatment option for men with hypogonadism. Honig S, Gittelman M, Kaminetsky J, et al. Two-Year Analysis of a New Oral Testosterone Undecanoate (TU) Formulation in Hypogonadal Men: Efficacy, Impact on Psychosexual Function, and Safety. J Sex Med 2022;19:1750-1758.

A 17-gene Panel for Prediction of Adverse Prostate Cancer Pathologic Features: Prospective Clinical Validation and Utility.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the 17-gene Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) biopsy-based gene expression assay as a predictor of adverse pathology (AP, Gleason score [pGS] ≥4+3and/or ≥pT3) in a prospectively enrolled cohort. METHODS: Between July 2014 and September 2015, 1200 men with very low-, low-, and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer enrolled in a multi-institutional prospective study of the GPS assay (NCT03502213). The subset who proceeded to immediate radical prostatectomy (RP) after GPS testing was included in a prespecified subanalysis of GPS on biopsy and its association with surgical AP on RP using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. The effect of GPS testing on physicians' and patients' attitudes about decision making was assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patients (treated by 59 physicians from 19 sites) elected RP and 40 (35%) had AP. GPS result was a significant predictor of AP (odds ratio per 20 GPS units [OR/20 units]: 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-4.1; P = .008) in univariable analysis and remained significant after adjustment for biopsy Gleason score, clinical T-stage, and logPSA (OR/20 units: 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.8; P = .04), or NCCN risk group (OR/20 units: 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.7; P = .02). Mean pre-GPS Decisional Conflict Scale score was 27 (95% CI 24-31), which improved significantly after GPS testing to 14 (95% CI 11-17) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this real-world multi-institutional study, the GPS assay was prospectively confirmed as an independent predictor of AP at surgery. GPS testing was associated with reduced patient decisional conflict.

The effect of digital rectal exam on the 4Kscore for aggressive prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The 4Kscore is a new commercially available blood-based diagnostic test which predicts risk for aggressive, clinically significant prostate cancer on prostate biopsy. The 4Kscore is currently restricted to patients who have not had a digital rectal exam (DRE) in the previous 96 h, owing to prior mixed data suggesting that prostate specific antigen (PSA) isoforms may increase by a statistically significant-if not necessarily clinically significant-amount shortly after DRE. Our primary objective was to determine if 4Kscore test results are affected by a preceding DRE. METHODS: Participants at a Prostate Cancer Awareness Week screening event sponsored by the Prostate Conditions Education Council filled out clinical history questionnaires and had blood samples for 4Kscore testing drawn prior to DRE, then 15-45 min following DRE. Patients with prior cancer diagnosis, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor medication use, or lower urinary tract procedures in the prior 6 months were excluded, resulting in a population of 162 participants for analysis. Values were then compared to determine if there was a significant difference in 4Kscore following DRE. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase was seen in levels of 3 kallikreins measured (total PSA, free PSA, and intact PSA; median <0.03 ng/mL for all). This resulted in a small but statistically significant decrease in post-DRE 4Kscore (median absolute score decrease 0.43%). Using a 4Kscore cutoff of 7.5% resulted in reclassification of 10 patients (6.2%), nine of whom were "downgraded" from above the cutoff to below. CONCLUSIONS: If the blood draw for the 4 K score is performed after a screening DRE, there is a statistically significant difference in the 4 K score results, but in the vast majority of cases it would not affect clinical decision making.

The 4Kscore blood test accurately identifies men with aggressive prostate cancer prior to prostate biopsy with or without DRE information.

INTRODUCTION: The 4Kscore Test is a prebiopsy blood test that incorporates four prostate protein biomarkers along with patient clinical information to determine a man's risk for high-grade, aggressive (Gleason ≥7) prostate cancer. However, some men likely to benefit from the test may be seen in primary care settings where the digital rectal examination (DRE) information is not always obtained. In this study, we assessed the clinical validity of the 4Kscore Test when the DRE information was not included in the algorithm. METHODS: The Prospective 4Kscore Validation Study enrolled 1012 men scheduled for prostate biopsy across 26 urology practices in the United States. The 4Kscore was calculated for each patient with and without DRE information. The primary outcome was Gleason ≥7 prostate cancer on prostate biopsy. The contribution of DRE to the predictive accuracy of the test was evaluated by area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC), risk calibration and clinical consequences. RESULTS: High-grade, aggressive prostate cancer was found in 231 (23%) of the 1012 patients. Both versions of the 4Kscore Test, with and without DRE, showed excellent discrimination (AUC=0.821 with DRE and AUC=0.818 without DRE input) and excellent calibration. No clinically significant difference was found between the two versions of the 4Kscore. CONCLUSIONS: The 4Kscore Test algorithm, whether DRE findings are available or not, performs well in predicting a man's risk of high-grade, aggressive prostate cancer. Patients who are suspected of having aggressive prostate cancer can safely have their risk better defined by 4Kscore even if a DRE has not been performed recently.