Maori and Pacific families' experiences and perspectives of cardiovascular care; A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the reasons behind evidence-practice gaps and inequities in cardiovascular care for Maori and Pacific people, as evidenced by the experiences and perspectives of patients and their families. METHODS: The research was guided by Maori and Pacific worldviews, incorporating Kaupapa Maori Theory and Pacific conceptual frameworks and research methodologies. Template analysis was used to analyse interview data from 61 Maori and Pacific people who had experienced a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment, acute coronary syndrome, and/or heart failure. RESULTS: The range of experiences relating to participants' heart health journeys are presented in five main themes: Context, Mana (maintaining control and dignity), Condition, People and Journey. CONCLUSIONS: Maori and Pacific people want to take charge of their heart health but face challenges. Participants described important obligations to family, community and tikanga (the culturally correct way of doing things). Participants described times when health care undermined existing responsibilities, their dignity and/or their mana, and they felt excluded from treatment as a result. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Good reciprocal communication, stemming from a high-quality relationship is essential for successful outcomes. A workforce that is representative of the population it serves and is culturally safe lays the foundation for excellence in care.

Ethnic differences of the care pathway following an out-of-hospital cardiac event: A systematic review.

AIM: This systematic review aimed to determine to what extent and why the care pathways for acute cardiac events in the community might differ for minoritised ethnic populations compared to non-minoritised populations. It also sought to identify the barriers and enablers that could influence variations in access to care for minoritised populations. METHODS: A multi-database search was conducted for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2023. A combination of MeSH terms and keywords was used. Inclusion criteria for papers were published in English, adult population, the primary health condition was an acute cardiac event, and the primary outcomes were disaggregated by ethnicity or race. A narrative review of extracted data was performed, and findings were reported according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 3552 articles identified using the search strategy, 40 were deemed eligible for the review. Studies identified a range of variables in the care pathway that differed by ethnicity or race. These could be grouped as time to care, transportation, event related-variables, EMS interactions and symptoms. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity across the studies. CONCLUSION: The extent and reasons for differences in cardiac care pathways are considerable. There are several remediable barriers and enablers that require attention to achieve equitable access to care for minoritised populations.

Reasons for Ethnic Disparities in the Prehospital Care Pathway Following an Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Event: Protocol of a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Substantial inequities in cardiovascular disease occur between and within countries, driving much of the current burden of global health inequities. Despite well-established treatment protocols and clinical interventions, the extent to which the prehospital care pathway for people who have experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac event (OHCE) varies by ethnicity and race is inconsistently documented. Timely access to care in this context is important for good outcomes. Therefore, identifying any barriers and enablers that influence timely prehospital care can inform equity-focused interventions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to answer the question: Among adults who experience an OHCE, to what extent and why might the care pathways in the community and outcomes differ for minoritized ethnic populations compared to nonminoritized populations? In addition, we will investigate the barriers and enablers that could influence variations in the access to care for minoritized ethnic populations. METHODS: This review will use Kaupapa Maori theory to underpin the process and analysis, thus prioritizing Indigenous knowledge and experiences. A comprehensive search of the CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE (OVID), PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases will be done using Medical Subject Headings terms themed to the 3 domains of context, health condition, and setting. All identified articles will be managed using an Endnote library. To be included in the research, papers must be published in English; have adult study populations; have an acute, nontraumatic cardiac condition as the primary health condition of interest; and be in the prehospital setting. Studies must also include comparisons by ethnicity or race to be eligible. Those studies considered suitable for inclusion will be critically appraised by multiple authors using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and CONSIDER (Consolidated Criteria for Strengthening the Reporting of Health Research Involving Indigenous Peoples) framework. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology. Disagreements on inclusion or exclusion will be settled by a discussion with all reviewers. Data extraction will be done independently by 2 authors and collated in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The outcomes of interest will include (1) symptom recognition, (2) patient decision-making, (3) health care professional decision-making, (4) the provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (5) access to automated external defibrillator, and (6) witnessed status. Data will be extracted and categorized under key domains. A narrative review of these domains will be conducted using Indigenous data sovereignty approaches as a guide. Findings will be reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. RESULTS: Our research is in progress. We anticipate the systematic review will be completed and submitted for publication in October 2023. CONCLUSIONS: The review findings will inform researchers and health care professionals on the experience of minoritized populations when accessing the OHCE care pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022279082; https://tinyurl.com/bdf6s4h2. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/40557.

Upholding te mana o te wa: Maori patients and their families' experiences of accessing care following an out-of-hospital cardiac event.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of Maori patients and their families accessing care for an acute out-of-hospital cardiac event and to identify any barriers or enablers of timely access to care. Design: Eleven interviews with patients and their families were conducted either face-to-face or using online conferencing. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis using Kaupapa Maori methodology. Results: Data analysis identified three themes: (1) me and the event, (2) the people (3) upholding te mana o te wa or self-determined heart wellbeing. Knowledge of symptoms and a desire to maintain personal dignity at the time of the event affected emergency medical service initiation. Participants described relationships with health professionals, the importance of good quality information, having family support, and drawing on cultural practices as vital for their health care journey. Conclusion: Systemic barriers including racism, discrimination, and inadequate resourcing exist for Maori journeying to and through care following an out of hospital cardiac event. Improving the cultural safety of health professionals, better access to community defibrillation, and improving understanding of the life-long impacts a cardiac event has on patients and whanau is recommended.