RESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine whether the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) score independently contributes to the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) score and quantified its relative contribution to SIS scores in chronic stroke survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study in a university-based rehabilitation centre with people with chronic stroke (N = 95) aged ≥ 50 years. The outcome measures included paretic hand grip strength, Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), UEFI, and SIS. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed that paretic hand grip strength, FMA-UE, UEFI, and WMFT scores exhibited a significant moderate positive correlation with SIS scores (r = 0.544-0.687, p < 0.001). The results of a regression model indicated that after adjustment for demographic factors and stroke-related impairments, the UEFI scores remained independently associated with SIS scores, accounting for 18.8% of the variance. The entire model explained 60.3% of the variance in SIS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Self-perceived UE motor function is a crucial component to be included in rehabilitation programmes aimed at enhancing quality of life and participation among chronic stroke survivors.
Observation-based outcome measures, e.g., FuglMeyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) could not predict the health-related quality of life (Stroke Impact scale (SIS)) in chronic stroke survivors in our study, which was contradictory with current studies.A self-perceived outcome measure to evaluate upper extremity function (Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI)) could independently predict the health-related quality of life (SIS), accounting for 18.8% of the variance.Our study demonstrated that self-perceived UE motor function would be an important component to optimize the rehabilitation programmes aimed at enhancing quality of life and social participation among chronic stroke survivors.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To provide updated evidence about the effects of MT with ES for recovering upper extremities motor function in people with stroke. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis were completed. Methodological quality was assessed using the version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 16 trials with 773 participants were included in this review. The results demonstrated that MT with ES was more effective than sham (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.89 [1.52-2.26]) and ES alone (SMD, 0.42 [0.11-0.73]) with low quality of evidence, or MT alone (SMD, 0.47[0.04-0.89]) with low quality of evidence for improving upper extremity motor control assessed using Fugl-Meyer Assessment. MT with ES had significant improvement of (MD, 6.47 [1.92-11.01]) the upper extremity gross gripping function assessed using the Action Research Arm Test compared with MT alone with low quality of evidence. MT combined with ES was more effective than sham group (SMD, 1.17 [0.42-1.93) for improving the ability to perform activities of daily living with low quality of evidence assessed using Motor Activity Log. CONCLUSION: MT with ES may be effective in improving upper limb motor recovery in people with stroke.
Combining Mirror Therapy (MT) and Electrical Stimulation (ES) modality could improve upper limb motor control, gross gripping function, and performance in ADLs based on ICF for people with stroke.Those individuals with subacute stroke are recommended as the optimal target group for the combined MT and ES.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to promote quality end-of-life (EOL) care for nursing home residents, through the establishment of advance care plan (ACP) and introduction of a new care pathway. This pathway bypassed the emergency room (ER) and acute medical wards by facilitating direct clinical admission to an extended-care facility. DESIGN: An audit on a new clinical initiative that entailed the Community Geriatrics Outreach Service, ER, acute medical wards, and an extended-care facility during winter months in Hong Kong. METHODS: The participants were older nursing home residents enrolled in an EOL program. We monitored the ratio of clinical to emergency admissions, ACP compliance rate, average length of stay (ALOS) in both acute hospital and an extended-care facility, and mortality rates. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were hospitalized from January to March 2013. Of them, 30 (39%) were directly admitted to the extended-care facility, either through the liaison of Community Geriatrics Outreach Service (group A, 19/76, 25%) or transferred from the ER (group B, 11/76, 14%). The remaining 46 patients (group C, 61%) were admitted via the ER to acute medical wards following the usual pathway, followed by transfer to an extended-care facility if indicated. The ACP compliance rate was nearly 100%. In the extended-care unit, groups A and C had similar ALOS of 11.8 and 11.1 days, respectively, whereas group B had a shorter stay of 7.6 days. The ALOS of group C in acute medical wards was 3.5 days. The in-hospital mortality rates were comparable in groups A and C of 26% and 28%, respectively, whereas group B had a lower mortality rate of 18%. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 40% of EOL patients could be managed entirely in an extended-care setting without compromising the quality of care and survival. A greater number of patients may benefit from the EOL program by improving the collaboration between community outreach services and ER; and extending hours for direct clinical admission to an extended-care facility.