Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(15): e146, 2024 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651226

RESUMO

In the 2023-2024 season, the influenza epidemic in South Korea peaked earlier than in recent years. In this study, we aimed to estimate the interim vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the influenza vaccination to prevent influenza during the early season. From November 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023, we enrolled 2,632 subjects with influenza-like illness from eight hospitals participating in hospital-based influenza morbidity and mortality surveillance. A retrospective test-negative case-control study was conducted to estimate the VE. The results showed an adjusted VE of 22.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6 to 35.8) for the total population. The adjusted VE was 22.3% (95% CI, 6.1 to 35.7) for influenza A and 9.4% (95% CI, -51.3 to 45.7) for influenza A/H1N1. Full results of the analysis will be reported.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Estações do Ano , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinação
2.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(5): e45, 2024 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317446

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Korea, there are no surveillance programs for vaccines that are not included in the national immunization program (NIP), and vaccine safety monitoring in the adult population is inadequate. This study aimed to establish a safety monitoring system for non-NIP vaccines in adults. METHODS: Frequently administered non-NIP vaccines were selected. Individuals were included if they received at least one of the selected vaccines at a participating institution and provided informed consent. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were monitored using questionnaires sent through text messages on days 1, 3, 7, 28, and 90 post-vaccination. Selected adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were monitored monthly by retrospective review of electronic medical records. Causality was assessed according to the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency guidelines. RESULTS: Four vaccines (tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis [Tdap], pneumococcal conjugate 13-valent [PCV13], live zoster vaccine [ZVL], and recombinant zoster vaccine [RZV]) were selected, and their safety profiles were monitored at four tertiary hospitals and 10 primary care clinics. The response rates of the questionnaires on post-vaccination days 1, 7, 28, and 90 were 99.2%, 93.6%, 81.0%, and 48.7%, respectively. Of 555 AESI identified over 10 months, 10 cases received one of the selected non-NIP vaccines within 90 days of the event. CONCLUSION: We are establishing the first safety monitoring system for selected non-NIP vaccines in Korea since September 2022 and report its progress as of July 2023. However, continuous government support is essential for its maintenance and improvement.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Tétano , Adulto , Humanos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas , Programas de Imunização , República da Coreia
3.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(3): e15, 2024 Jan 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bivalent booster mRNA vaccines containing the omicron-variant strains have been introduced worldwide in the autumn of 2022. Nevertheless, the omicron subvariants evoked another large coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wave in late 2022 and early 2023. METHODS: A retrospective, test-negative, case-control study was conducted to estimate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of bivalent COVID-19 vaccines in 8 university hospitals between January and February 2023. The case and control groups were divided based on nasopharyngeal COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction results and matched based on age, sex, hospital, and date (week) of the test performed. The VE of the BA.1- or BA.4/BA.5-based mRNA vaccines were estimated. VE was calculated using the 1-adjusted odds ratio from multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 949 patients and 947 controls were enrolled in this study. VE for the BA.4/BA.5-based bivalent mRNA vaccine was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17, 61%). In subgroup analysis based on age and underlying medical conditions, BA.4/BA.5-based bivalent mRNA vaccine was effective against old adults aged ≥ 65-years (VE, 55%; 95% CI, 23, 73%) and individuals with comorbidities (VE, 54%; 95% CI, 23, 73%). In comparison, the BA.1-based bivalent mRNA vaccine did not demonstrate statistically significant effectiveness (VE, 25%; 95% CI, -8, 49%). CONCLUSION: The BA.4/BA.5-based bivalent mRNA booster vaccine provided significant protection against COVID-19 in the Korean adults, especially in the older adults aged ≥ 65 years and in individuals with underlying medical conditions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinas de mRNA , Hospitais Universitários , RNA Mensageiro/genética , República da Coreia/epidemiologia
4.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(5): 646-652, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101473

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This nationwide cohort study compared the incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) between adenoviral vector-based (ChAdOx1) and mRNA-based (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. METHODS: A targeted trial emulation study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service database. Vaccinees aged 18-85 years who had received at least one dose of ChAdOx1 or an mRNA-based vaccine were identified. The 42-day risks of AESIs were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1 767 539 ChAdOx1 vaccinees were matched exactly with mRNA vaccinees according to their risk factors. The 42-day risks of adverse events were low (∼0 to 176 events per 100 000 persons in both vaccine groups), and the incidence rates of AESIs were comparable between the two platforms, except for a higher occurrence of acute cardiac injury (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.35), myocarditis or pericarditis (IRR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.14-4.04), and arrhythmia (IRR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24-1.71) in mRNA vaccinees. The incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (IRR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69), vasovagal syncope (IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), radiculopathy (IRR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), and aseptic arthritis (IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93) was significantly lower in mRNA-based vaccinees compared with ChAdOx1 vaccinees. DISCUSSION: A remarkable platform-dependent difference was observed in the safety profiles of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for myocarditis or pericarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. However, the overall risk of AESIs was low for both vaccine platforms.


Assuntos
Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Estudos de Coortes , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinas de mRNA , Incidência , Adenoviridae/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia
5.
J Clin Med ; 12(23)2023 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38068427

RESUMO

Antiviral treatment reduces the severity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, its effectiveness against long COVID-19 is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral drugs in preventing long COVID and related hospitalizations/deaths. Scientific and medical databases were searched from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2023. We included observational cohort studies comparing individuals receiving early antiviral therapy for COVID-19 and those receiving supportive treatment. A fixed-effects model was used to merge the effects reported in two or more studies. The risk of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) was combined as an odds ratio (OR). Six studies were selected, including a total of 3,352,235 participants. The occurrence of PASC was 27.5% lower in patients who received antiviral drugs during the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 0.725; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.409-0.747) than in the supportive treatment group. Moreover, the risk of PASC-associated hospitalization and mortality was 29.7% lower in patients receiving early antiviral therapy than in the supportive treatment group (OR = 0.721; 95% CI = 0.697-0.794). Early antiviral therapy was associated with a reduced risk of PASC and related hospitalization or death. Thus, early antiviral therapy is recommended for at-risk individuals.

6.
J Hosp Infect ; 2023 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial for the prevention of nosocomial tuberculosis (TB) transmission. We aimed to determine the effect of an LTBI programme for HCWs in a tertiary care hospital in a country with an intermediate TB burden. METHODS: In 2013, baseline LTBI screening was implemented for newly hired doctors and nurses, along with annual screening of HCWs in high-risk departments. HCWs with LTBI were also provided with treatment. Since 2017, all HCWs without an LTBI test result have been tested for LTBI. We assessed the annual incidence of active TB among HCWs between 2013 and 2020. Additionally, we evaluated the incidence of active TB among HCWs employed at the hospital in 2020, with a specific focus on those who had undergone LTBI tests between 2013 and 2018, considering their LTBI test results and treatment status. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of active TB among HCWs significantly decreased between 2013 and 2020. The average risk reduction for pulmonary TB was 10.2% per year (95% CI, 1.0-19.0; p = 0.034). Among HCWs employed at the hospital in 2020, 4,354 individuals underwent LTBI tests between 2013 and 2018. Out of them, 927 (21.3%) tested positive. Nine (1.5%) out of 588 without LTBI treatment developed active TB. Among the 1,285 HCWs who underwent follow-up testing, 62 (4.8%) converted, and one (4.3%) out of the 23 without treatment developed active TB. None of those who received treatment were diagnosed with active TB. CONCLUSION: The LTBI programme significantly reduced the incidence of active TB in HCWs. LTBI screening and treatment should be implemented, particularly in countries with a high or intermediate TB burden.

7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(3): 2266233, 2023 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37964587

RESUMO

The highdose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVHD) has shown improved protection against influenza and its complications in older adults. We aimed to evaluate the costeffectiveness of QIVHD compared with QIVSD among Korean adults aged ≥ 65 years in reducing influenzarelated disease burden. We evaluated the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons and their average values using a static decision tree model. The difference in efficacy between standard-dose (SD) and high-dose (HD) was calculated based on the results of a clinical trial comparing Fluzone® High-Dose Vaccine and Fluzone® Vaccine in older adults. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were assessed from the healthcare system perspective. A discount rate of 4.5% was applied to life-year-gained (LYG) values and utilities. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to account for both epidemiological and economic sources of uncertainty. In the analysis of the 2017/2018 season, the QIV-HD strategy generated an excess of 0.00182 life-years (Lys)/person and 0.003953 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)/person compared with QIV-SD. The ICER was 6,467.56 United States Dollars (USD)/QALY. In the analysis from the 2016/2017 season, QIV-HD caused a surplus of 0.00117 Lys/person and 0.003272 QALYs/person compared with QIV-SD. ICER was 7,902.46 USD /QALY. From the average data of the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons, an excess of 0.00147 Lys/person and 0.003561 QALYs/person were generated using QIV-HD compared with QIV-SD, while the ICER was 7,190.44 USD /QALY. From the healthcare system perspective, QIV-HD was a more cost-effective vaccination option in reducing influenza-related disease burden and healthcare costs in Koreans aged ≥ 65 years compared with QIV-SD.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Humanos , Idoso , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Vacinação/métodos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Vacinas Combinadas
8.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(8)2023 Aug 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37631890

RESUMO

Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines that contain BA.1 or BA.4/BA.5 have been introduced worldwide in response to pandemic waves of Omicron subvariants. This prospective cohort study was aimed to compare neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) against Omicron subvariants (BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, BN.1, and XBB.1) before and 3-4 weeks after bivalent booster by the types of SARS-CoV-2 variants in prior infections and bivalent vaccine formulations. A total of 21 participants were included. Prior BA.1/BA.2-infected, and BA.5-infected participants showed significantly higher geometric mean titers of Nab compared to SARS-CoV-2-non-infected participants after bivalent booster (BA.1, 8156 vs. 4861 vs. 1636; BA.5, 6515 vs. 4861 vs. 915; BQ.1.1, 697 vs. 628 vs. 115; BN.1, 1402 vs. 1289 vs. 490; XBB.1, 434 vs. 355 vs. 144). When compared by bivalent vaccine formulations, Nab titers against studied subvariants after bivalent booster did not differ between BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 bivalent vaccine (BA.1, 4886 vs. 5285; BA.5, 3320 vs. 4118; BQ.1.1, 311 vs. 572; BN.1, 1028 vs. 1095; XBB.1, 262 vs. 362). Both BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 bivalent vaccines are immunogenic and provide enhanced neutralizing activities against Omicron subvariants. However, even after the bivalent booster, neutralizing activities against the later Omicron strains (BQ.1.1, BN.1, and XBB.1) would be insufficient to provide protection.

9.
J Infect Dis ; 228(10): 1326-1335, 2023 11 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to determine the risk of herpes zoster reactivation and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination (mRNA vaccine [BNT162b2] and adenovirus-vectored vaccine [ChAdOx1 nCoV-19]). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed herpes zoster cases diagnosed between 26 February 2021 and 30 June 2021 and registered in the National Health Insurance Service database. A matched case-control study with a 1:3 matching ratio and a propensity score matching (PSM) study with a 1:1 ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals were performed. RESULTS: In the matched case control analysis, BNT162b2 was associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster reactivation (first dose adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.15; second dose aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12-1.23). PSM analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in risk within 18 days following any vaccination (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16). BNT162b2 was associated with an increased risk at 18 days postvaccination (aHR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.35-2.02) and second dose (aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19). However, the risk did not increase in both analyses of ChAdOx1 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: mRNA COVID-19 vaccination possibly increases the risk of herpes zoster reactivation, and thus close follow-up for herpes zoster reactivation is required.


Assuntos
Infecções por Adenoviridae , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Herpes Zoster , Humanos , Adenoviridae/genética , Vacina BNT162 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/efeitos adversos , Herpesvirus Humano 3/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos
10.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(18): e134, 2023 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37158771

RESUMO

There are many reports of subacute thyroiditis (SAT) that occurred after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but no such case has been reported in Korea. Moreover, the simultaneous occurrence of SAT and Graves' disease (GD) is rare. Here, we describe a patient who developed SAT and GD after the second episode of COVID-19. A 27-year-old woman with no known history of thyroid disease presented with fever, upper respiratory tract symptoms, and painful neck swelling. Thyroid function tests revealed thyrotoxicosis, and thyroid ultrasound showed heterogeneous echogenicity of enlarged thyroid glands. Her initial clinical presentation was consistent with SAT after viral infection, with typical neck tenderness and spontaneous improvement of thyrotoxicosis without antithyroid drug use. However, this case had some atypical features, such as an elevated thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin level, relapse of thyrotoxicosis in short-term follow-up, and increased Tc-99m pertechnetate uptake, suggesting the coexistence of GD. About two months after methimazole (15 mg/day) was prescribed, she was lost to follow up again. We report the first case of unusual co-occurrence of SAT and GD following COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doença de Graves , Tireoidite Subaguda , Tireotoxicose , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Tireoidite Subaguda/complicações , Tireoidite Subaguda/diagnóstico , Tireoidite Subaguda/tratamento farmacológico , COVID-19/complicações , Doença de Graves/complicações , Doença de Graves/diagnóstico , Doença de Graves/tratamento farmacológico , Tireotoxicose/complicações , Tireotoxicose/diagnóstico , Tireotoxicose/tratamento farmacológico , Febre , Dor
11.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1079277, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37051240

RESUMO

Objectives: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infects gut luminal cells through the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor and disrupts the gut microbiome. We investigated whether the gut microbiome in the early stage of SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with the prognosis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: Thirty COVID-19 patients and 16 healthy controls were prospectively enrolled. Blood and stool samples and clinical details were collected on days 0 (enrollment), 7, 14, and 28. Participants were categorized into four groups by their clinical course. Results: Gut microbiota composition varied during the clinical course of COVID-19 and was closely associated with cytokine levels (p=0.003). A high abundance of the genus Dialister (linear discriminant analysis [LDA] effect size: 3.97856, p=0.004), species Peptoniphilus lacrimalis (LDA effect size: 4.00551, p=0.020), and Anaerococcus prevotii (LDA effect size: 4.00885, p=0.007) was associated with a good prognosis. Starch, sucrose, and galactose metabolism was highly activated in the gut microbiota of the poor prognosis group. Glucose-lowering diets, including whole grains, were positively correlated with a good prognosis. Conclusion: Gut microbiota may mediate the prognosis of COVID-19 by regulating cytokine responses and controlling glucose metabolism, which is implicated in the host immune response to SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Citocinas , Prognóstico , Progressão da Doença
12.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1131229, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36960070

RESUMO

Background: Whether or not a single-dose Ad26.COV2.S prime and boost vaccination induces sufficient immunity is unclear. Concerns about the increased risk of breakthrough infections in the Ad26.COV2.S-primed population have also been raised. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Participants included healthy adults who were Ad26.COV2.S primed and scheduled to receive a booster vaccination with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or Ad26.COV2.S. The IgG anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody titers, neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers (against wild type [WT] and Omicron [BA.1 and BA.5]), and Spike-specific interferon-γ responses of the participants were estimated at baseline, 3-4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after booster vaccination. Results: A total of 89 participants were recruited (26 boosted with BNT162b2, 57 with mRNA-1273, and 7 with Ad26.COV2.S). The IgG anti-RBD antibody titers of all participants were significantly higher at 6 months post-vaccination than at baseline. The NAb titers against WT at 3 months post-vaccination were 359, 258, and 166 in the participants from the BNT162b2-, mRNA-1273-, and Ad26.COV2.S-boosted groups, respectively. Compared with those against WT, the NAb titers against BA.1/BA.5 were lower by 23.9/10.9-, 16.6/7.4-, and 13.8/7.2-fold in the participants from the BNT162b2-, mRNA-1273-, and Ad26.COV2.S-boosted groups, respectively, at 3 months post-vaccination. Notably, the NAb titers against BA.1 were not boosted after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. Breakthrough infections occurred in 53.8%, 62.5%, and 42.9% of the participants from the BNT162b2-, mRNA-1273-, and Ad26.COV2.S-boosted groups, respectively. No significant difference in humoral and cellular immunity was found between individuals with and without SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. Conclusion: Booster vaccination elicited acceptable humoral and cellular immune responses in Ad26.COV2.S-primed individuals. However, the neutralizing activities against Omicron subvariants were negligible, and breakthrough infection rates were remarkably high at 3 months post-booster vaccination, irrespective of the vaccine type. A booster dose of a vaccine containing the Omicron variant antigen would be required.


Assuntos
Ad26COVS1 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Vacina BNT162 , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Infecções Irruptivas , Estudos Prospectivos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Imunoglobulina G
13.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 56(1): 64-74, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995667

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Poor liquefaction of pyogenic liver abscesses, which makes drainage impossible at the time of diagnosis, is not infrequent. The impact of poor liquefaction and subsequent drainage failure on clinical outcomes is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with all patients diagnosed with liver abscesses from July 2017 through June 2020. Late drainage (LD) was defined as drainage performed ≥48 h after diagnosis due to poor liquefaction. Logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with late or non-drainage (LD/ND). The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the variables related to abscess recurrence by 90 days after diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included. Thirty (19.6%) patients underwent LD and 54 (35.3%) did not undergo drainage. Other than non-cystic appearance, LD/ND was associated with smaller size (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.98, p = 0.031) and culture-negativity (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.14-6.67, p = 0.027). Current hepatopancreaticobiliary malignancy was the only significant predictor of 90-day recurrence. Neither LD/ND (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.13-2.41; p = 0.426) nor LD (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.23-5.55; p = 0.719) was associated with recurrence by 90 days. The incidence of late complications was reduced by drainage, without a reduction in the duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Several clinical features were associated with undrainable liver abscesses. Neither LD/ND nor ND had an adverse impact on clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Abscesso Hepático Piogênico , Humanos , Abscesso Hepático Piogênico/diagnóstico , Abscesso Hepático Piogênico/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prognóstico , Drenagem , Hospitalização
15.
Immune Netw ; 23(6): e43, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38188597

RESUMO

The continuous emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants has provided insights for updating current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. We examined the neutralizing activity of Abs induced by a BA.4/5-containing bivalent mRNA vaccine against Omicron subvariants BN.1 and XBB.1.5. We recruited 40 individuals who had received a monovalent COVID-19 booster dose after a primary series of COVID-19 vaccinations and will be vaccinated with a BA.4/5-containing bivalent vaccine. Sera were collected before vaccination, one month after, and three months after a bivalent booster. Neutralizing Ab (nAb) titers were measured against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants BA.5, BN.1, and XBB.1.5. BA.4/5-containing bivalent vaccination significantly boosted nAb levels against both ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants. Participants with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection had higher nAb titers against all examined strains than the infection-naïve group. NAb titers against BN.1 and XBB.1.5 were lower than those against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and BA.5 strains. These results suggest that COVID-19 vaccinations specifically targeting emerging Omicron subvariants, such as XBB.1.5, may be required to ensure better protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in high-risk groups.

16.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(47): e351, 2022 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36472087

RESUMO

Since its first emergence in late 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 has claimed more than 6.5 million lives worldwide and continues to infect hundreds of thousands of people daily. To combat this once-in-a-century disaster, several vaccines have been developed at unprecedented speeds. Novel vaccine platforms (messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines and adenoviral vector vaccines) have played a major role in the current pandemic. In Korea, six vaccines, including a domestically developed recombinant vaccine, have been approved. As in other countries, vaccines have been proven to be safe and highly effective in Korea. However, rare serious adverse events and breakthrough infections have undermined public trust in the vaccines, even while the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. The rise of the omicron variant and the subsequent increase in excess mortality demonstrated that while vaccines are a key component of the pandemic response, it alone can fail without non-pharmaceutical interventions like masking and social distancing. The pandemic of coronavirus disease has revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of our healthcare system and pandemic preparedness. When the next pandemic arrives, improved risk communication and vaccine development should be prioritized. To enable timely vaccine development, it is essential to make strategic and sufficient investments in vaccine research and development.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , República da Coreia/epidemiologia
17.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(45): e325, 2022 Nov 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36413798

RESUMO

As most individuals acquire immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, South Korea declared a return to normalcy a few months ago. However, epidemic waves continue because of endlessly emerging variants and waning immunity. Health authorities are focusing on those at high risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 to minimize damage to public health and the economy. In this regard, we investigated the vaccination rates in patients with various chronic medical conditions by examining the national health insurance claims data and the national immunization registry. We found that patients with chronic medical conditions, especially those of higher severity, such as malignancy, had vaccination rates approximately 10-20% lower than those of the general population. Public health authorities and healthcare providers should try to vaccinate these patients to avoid preventable morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Imunização , Doença Crônica
18.
Front Immunol ; 13: 968105, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36211416

RESUMO

Introduction: Despite vaccine development, the COVID-19 pandemic is ongoing due to immunity-escaping variants of concern (VOCs). Estimations of vaccine-induced protective immunity against VOCs are essential for setting proper COVID-19 vaccination policy. Methods: We performed plaque-reduction neutralizing tests (PRNTs) using sera from healthcare workers (HCWs) collected from baseline to six months after COVID-19 vaccination and from convalescent COVID-19 patients. The 20.2% of the mean PRNT titer of convalescent sera was used as 50% protective value, and the percentage of HCWs with protective immunity for each week (percent-week) was compared among vaccination groups. A correlation equation was deduced between a PRNT 50% neutralizing dose (ND50) against wild type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 and that of the Delta variant. Results: We conducted PRNTs on 1,287 serum samples from 297 HCWs (99 HCWs who received homologous ChAdOx1 vaccination (ChAd), 99 from HCWs who received homologous BNT162b2 (BNT), and 99 from HCWs who received heterologous ChAd followed by BNT (ChAd-BNT)). Using 365 serum samples from 116 convalescent COVID-19 patients, PRNT ND50 of 118.25 was derived as 50% protective value. The 6-month cumulative percentage of HCWs with protective immunity against WT SARS-CoV-2 was highest in the BNT group (2297.0 percent-week), followed by the ChAd-BNT (1576.8) and ChAd (1403.0) groups. In the inter-group comparison, protective percentage of the BNT group (median 96.0%, IQR 91.2-99.2%) was comparable to the ChAd-BNT group (median 85.4%, IQR 15.7-100%; P =0.117) and significantly higher than the ChAd group (median 60.1%, IQR 20.0-87.1%; P <0.001). When Delta PRNT was estimated using the correlation equation, protective immunity at the 6-month waning point was markedly decreased (28.3% for ChAd group, 52.5% for BNT, and 66.7% for ChAd-BNT). Conclusion: Decreased vaccine-induced protective immunity at the 6-month waning point and lesser response against the Delta variant may explain the Delta-dominated outbreak of late 2021. Follow-up studies for newly-emerging VOCs would also be needed.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Imunização Passiva , Cinética , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Soroterapia para COVID-19
19.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(38): e30474, 2022 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36197235

RESUMO

Although some studies have reported prognostic factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), they were conducted before standard treatment with remdesivir and dexamethasone was implemented. This retrospective, observational study was conducted to evaluate various prognostic factors in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving standard treatment with remdesivir and dexamethasone. Of 99 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, 68 (68.7%) died within 30 days of hospitalization. The mean age was 71.3 years. Remdesivir and dexamethasone were administered to 80 (80.8%) and 84 (84.8%) patients, respectively. Early antibiotic treatment was administered to 70 patients (70.7%) within 5 days of hospitalization. Dexamethasone (79.4% vs 96.8%, P = .033) was more frequently administered in the survived group, whereas early antibiotics (60.3% vs 93.5%, P = .001) were less frequently administered. In the multivariate analysis, a high National Early Warning Score (NEWS; odds ratio [OR] 1.272), high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; OR 1.441), and dyspnea (OR 4.033) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. There was no significant difference in age, sex, and vaccination doses between the survived and fatal groups. Lymphopenia, monocytopenia and high levels of C-reactive protein (CRP)/lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) reflected poor prognosis. NEWS, CCI, and dyspnea were predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Early antibiotic use did not lower the 30-day mortality risk.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Dispneia , Humanos , Lactato Desidrogenases , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
20.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 686, 2022 Aug 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35948963

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To find pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of vancomycin associated with the optimal outcome of severe infection due to Enterococcus species. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed enterococcal bacteremia cases treated with vancomycin from January 2015 to December 2020. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We calculated cutoff values of the ratio of vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h to the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC24/MIC) and trough concentration (Ctrough) during the initial 72 h of treatment. The optimal cutoff value was determined using the Youden index. Binary variables created based on these cutoffs were further assessed using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included. The majority (87.7%) had solid or hematologic malignancies. Thirty-day mortality and nephrotoxicity occurred in nine (13.4%) and 14 (21.5%) patients, respectively. Both vancomycin AUC24/MIC and Ctrough showed fair performance in predicting 30-day mortality (AUC of receiver-operator curve for AUC24/MIC, 0.712; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.539-0.886; AUC for Ctrough, 0.760; 95% CI 0.627-0.892; pairwise AUC comparison: p = 0.570). Ctrough ≥ 13.94 µg/mL, but not AUC24/MIC ≥ 504, had a significant association with 30-day mortality after adjusting for confounders (odds ratio, 8.40; 95% CI 1.60-86.62; p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Mean Ctrough ≥ 13.94 µg/mL during the initial 72 h was associated with higher 30-day mortality in enterococcal bacteremia. Further studies are warranted to elucidate optimal pharmacokinetic targets for enterococcal bacteremia.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Área Sob a Curva , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Vancomicina/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA