Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg ; 259(3): 502-7, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23579581

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS) aims to maximize afferent or efferent stimulation from the sacral plexus. BACKGROUND: We hypothesized this may be a promising new treatment for patients with bowel dysfunction in complete cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: Thirteen patients with complete CES [8 constipation predominant (group 1) and 5 incontinence predominant (group 2)] had a 3-week trial of PNS. Patients who showed a 50% or more improvement in symptoms during the trial phase proceeded to permanent neurostimulator implantation. RESULTS: Five (63%) of the 8 patients in group 1 showed a 50% or more improvement in bowel symptoms during the trial phase and were permanently implanted. The mean Cleveland Clinic constipation score, sense of incomplete evacuation (%), and straining during defecation (%) improved from 17 ± 3.2 to 10 ± 4.5, 94 ± 18% to 30 ± 35%, and 81 ± 23% to 44 ± 38%, respectively. All 5 patients in group 2 showed a 50% or more reduction in incontinent episodes during the trial phase. The mean St Mark's score, ability to defer defecation, and the number of incontinent episodes per week improved from 18 ± 1.0 to 3.8 ± 2.5, 2.2 ± 1.8 to 11 ± 5.5 minutes, and 9.4 ± 10.7 to 0.4 ± 0.5 episodes, respectively, per week. During a median follow-up of 12 (10-22) months of permanent implantation, one patient lost efficacy at 6 months due to lead migration and another required removal and reimplantation of the neurostimulator due to wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: PNS is an effective treatment in the short term for bowel dysfunction in some patients with complete CES.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/inervação , Constipação Intestinal/terapia , Defecação/fisiologia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Incontinência Fecal/terapia , Polirradiculopatia/terapia , Canal Anal/fisiopatologia , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Constipação Intestinal/fisiopatologia , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Incontinência Fecal/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polirradiculopatia/complicações , Polirradiculopatia/fisiopatologia , Nervo Pudendo , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 55(3): 302-6, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22469797

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In patients with fecal incontinence who do not benefit from medical or behavioral treatments sacral nerve stimulation is now considered a first-line procedure. Although the efficacy of treatment appears to be sustained in the short and medium term, the long-term results of therapy are relatively unknown. OBJECTIVE: We report the results of chronic sacral nerve stimulation in patients who have had more than 8 years of therapy. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: All patients who underwent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence from 1996 to 2002 were followed up prospectively. Data were collected prospectively by the use of bowel habit diaries and St Mark's continence scores. Treatment success was defined as >50% reduction in episodes of fecal incontinence with sacral nerve stimulation in comparison with baseline symptoms. RESULTS: Between January 1996 and December 2002, 25 patients (male/female 2:23; median age, 54 years (range, 35-68 years) underwent temporary sacral nerve stimulation. Twenty-three (92%) patients had a greater than 50% improvement in their ability to defer defecation during the trial phase and were considered suitable for chronic stimulation. Over a median follow-up of 114 months (range, 96-164 months), full continence was maintained in 12 (48%) of the 23 patients who received a neurostimulator implant. Two patients lost efficacy at 48 and 60 months after permanent implant for unknown reasons and had the device removed. Three patients died at 3, 8, and 9 years after permanent implant because of unrelated comorbidities. Nine patients required a change of battery at a mean (SD) of 87 (13.5) months. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral nerve stimulation can maintain a persistent clinical benefit in the long term for the majority of patients. Some patients will experience deterioration in their symptoms over time, for reasons yet unknown.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Incontinência Fecal/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Adulto , Idoso , Defecação , Incontinência Fecal/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Plexo Lombossacral , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA