RESUMO
The primary goal of the clinical evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding is to establish a specific diagnosis in the most efficient and least invasive manner possible. Hysteroscopy (HS) allows physicians to obtain directed biopsy in addition to direct visualization of the uterine cavity and lesions, but often requires ambulatory surgery centers and some anesthesia, or can potentially result in significant patient discomfort. Sonohysterography (SHG) is less invasive than HS but does not allow a histologic sample. A new technique, called the Nicoletti-Gorlero (NiGo) device, was developed and evaluated to obtain histologic results during SHG. This study is a prospective, observational evaluation between the NiGo device technique and standard HS to obtain endometrial samples. The NiGo device was used to obtain an endometrial sample during SHG in 18 women. In a subsequent session, HS was performed to verify the results. From January 2005 through November 2005 both procedures (SHG + biopsy and HS) were performed on 18 patients. The SHG procedures using the NiGo forcep were performed successfully on 15 out of 18 women, and the endometrial sample was obtained in 14 out of 15 patients. In one patient, the endometrial biopsy obtained provided too little tissue to accomplish histologic evaluation. All 13 pathologic results obtained with the NiGo device were identical with those subsequently obtained with HS. The office-based HS procedure was not successful in two women; in these women, an HS procedure performed in the operating room was necessary. The NiGo device technique allows the physician to obtain sonographic-guided biopsies of the entire endometrium during SHG. The technique is less invasive compared with HS. In our small series, there were no complications during the procedure.
Assuntos
Biópsia/instrumentação , Endométrio/patologia , Histeroscopia , Hemorragia Uterina/etiologia , Idoso , Endométrio/diagnóstico por imagem , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Uterina/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To maintain a high standard of patient care, it is essential to provide adequate pain management in patients who undergo laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: We randomly enrolled 74 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for gynecological benign diseases. Patients in the levobupivacaine group (n=37) were injected with 7 ml of 5 mg/ml levobupivacaine at all incisional areas patients in the control group (n=37) were injected with an equal volume of physiologic saline solution. In the postoperative period the following variables were assessed for each group: decline of hemoglobin concentration, consumption of analgesics, time of ambulation, length of postoperative ileus, length of postoperative hospital stay, and VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: Mean pain intensity at 6 and 12 h after surgery was significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group than in the control group (p<0.01). Analgesic requirement was significantly lower (p<0.01) in the levobupivacaine group (0.3 phial+/-0.2) than in the control group (2.1 phial+/-1.0). The mean time of ambulation was significantly lower (p<0.05) in the levobupivacaine group (16+/-4) than in the control group (22+/-6). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in mean pain intensity 24 h after surgery, decline of hemoglobin concentration, length of postoperative ileus, or length of postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that presurgical infiltration of levobupivacaine in addition to general anesthesia and standard analgesic therapy significantly decreases the intensity of postsurgical pain, especially for the first 12 h after surgery, and reduces analgesic consumption after surgery.
Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Laparoscopia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/análogos & derivados , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Levobupivacaína , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare pain management of standard analgesic and standard analgesic plus diclofenac transdermal patch in patients who undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: Randomized prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients requiring laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic benign diseases. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into two groups, one medicated with a diclofenac patch (diclofenac group) and the other medicated with standard skin medication (placebo; control group) at all incisional areas at the end of the operation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The principal measures of outcome were pain intensity at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery and consumption of analgesics. The two treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographic and intraoperative characteristics. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in mean pain intensity at 6 hours after surgery. Mean pain intensity at 12 and 24 hours, respectively, after surgery was significantly lower in the diclofenac group (3.7 +/- 1.3 and 2.0 +/- 0.6) than that observed in the control group (5.7 +/- 1.9 and 4.6 +/- 0.5) (p value, respectively, .002 and <.001). Twenty-one patients (35.0%) in the diclofenac group required analgesics in the first 36 hours after the operation versus 43 patients (71.7%) in the control group (p <.001). Hospital discharge was significantly more rapid in the diclofenac group (28 +/- 5 hours vs 39 +/- 3 hours; p = .031). CONCLUSION: Diclofenac transdermal administration seems a valid help to standard analgesic treatment in postoperative pain control and could also help reduce the period of hospitalization of patients who undergo laparoscopic benign gynecologic surgery.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Diclofenaco/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Myasthenia gravis (MG) often affects women in the second and third decades of life, overlapping with the childbearing years. The course of the disease is unpredictable during pregnancy; however, worsening of symptoms occurs more likely during the first trimester and postpartum. MG can be well managed during pregnancy with relatively safe and effective therapies. Anticholinesterase drugs are the mainstay of treatment, when MG symptoms are not satisfactorily controlled, corticosteroids, azathioprine and in some cases cyclosporin A can be used. Until information is available regarding safety, mycophenolate mofetil should be discontinued before pregnancy. Pregnancy should be avoided in women treated with methotrexate because of the risk of causing typical malformations. Plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins have been successfully used in the treatment of MG crisis during pregnancy. Caesarean section is recommended only for obstetric reasons; forceps delivery and vacuum extraction are sometimes required. Epidural anesthesia is advised to reduce physical and emotional stress. MG during pregnancy can lead to serious life-threatening conditions, including respiratory insufficiency; therefore, intensive checkups by a gynaecologist and a neurologist are necessary. Women with myasthenia gravis should not be discouraged from conceiving; however, they should discuss their plan for pregnancy with their neurologist and their gynaecologist.