Long-term outcomes after COVID-19 infection in transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes after COVID-19 infection unique to solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are not published. We describe outcomes including readmission, allograft rejection, allograft dysfunction, allograft failure, and death. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mostly unvaccinated SOTR with COVID-19 from March 2020 to November 2021. Disease severity was assigned by NIH criteria. Data included demographics, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes and are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (range). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight SOTR were diagnosed with COVID-19 at a median of 5 (IQR 3-8) years post-transplant with a mean age of 57 ± 12 years at diagnosis. Forty-one recovered at home; 97 were admitted. 12/32 (37.5%) SOTR with critical disease expired during initial admission. Among those who recovered, 48/126 (38.0%) had asymptomatic or mild infection, 31/126 (24.6%) had moderate, 27/126 (21.4%) severe, and 20/126 (15.9%) critical infection. 38/85 (44.7%) of SOTR who survived initial admission had 74 readmissions within 180 days (Figure 1). The 6-month mortality rate among those who survived infection was 4/126 (3.2%). The mean time from initial infection to death was 32 ± 66 days in inpatient deaths and 95 ± 39 days in those who were discharged or never admitted. Six-month graft dysfunction occurred in 18/125 (14.4%) and graft failure in 9/126 (7.2%); five failures were deaths with function. CONCLUSION: Readmissions after COVID-19 infection were frequent after the index admission. Rejection was relatively infrequent; graft dysfunction at 6 months post-infection was more common than rejection. Six-month mortality following COVID-19 recovery in SOTR was significant; close follow-up of patients is warranted.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for the treatment of a kidney transplant patient with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication following kidney transplantation, and there is a critical and unmet need for PTLD treatments associated with more pronounced and durable responses. To date, reports on the use of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T (CAR-T) cells in patients after solid organ transplant (SOT) have been anecdotal, clinical presentations and outcomes have been heterogenous, and a longitudinal analysis of CAR-T cell expansion and persistence in PTLD patients has not been reported. Our report describes a patient with a history of renal transplant who received CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy for the treatment of refractory PTLD, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-type. We show that even with the background of prolonged immunosuppression for SOT, it is possible to generate autologous CAR-T products capable of expansion and persistence in vivo, without evidence of excess T-cell exhaustion. Our data indicate that CAR-T cells generated from a SOT recipient with PTLD can yield deep remissions without increased toxicity or renal allograft dysfunction. Future clinical studies should build on these findings to investigate CAR-T therapy, including longitudinal monitoring of CAR-T phenotype and function, for PTLD in SOT recipients.

Humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants including omicron in solid organ transplant recipients after three doses of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.

Objectives: Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) receiving post-transplant immunosuppression show increased COVID-19-related mortality. It is unclear whether an additional dose of COVID-19 vaccines can overcome the reduced immune responsiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants. Methods: We analysed humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants in 53 SOTR receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Results: Following the initial vaccination series, 60.3% of SOTR showed no measurable neutralisation and only 18.9% demonstrated neutralising activity of > 90%. More intensive immunosuppression, antimetabolites in particular, negatively impacted antiviral immunity. While absolute IgG levels were lower in SOTR than controls, antibody titres against microbial recall antigens were higher. By contrast, SOTR showed reduced vaccine-induced IgG/IgA antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 and its delta variants and fewer linear B-cell epitopes, indicating reduced B-cell diversity. Importantly, a third vaccine dose led to an increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres and neutralising activity across alpha, beta and delta variants and to the induction of anti-SARS-CoV-2 CD4+ T cells in a subgroup of patients analysed. By contrast, we observed significantly lower antibody titres after the third dose with the omicron variant compared to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and the improvement in neutralising activity was much less pronounced than for all the other variants. Conclusion: Only a small subgroup of solid organ transplant recipients is able to generate functional antibodies after an initial vaccine series; however, an additional vaccine dose resulted in dramatically improved antibody responses against all SARS-CoV-2 variants except omicron where antibody responses and neutralising activity remained suboptimal.

Post-Abdominal Transplant Hernia: Can We Predict Size and Onset?

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal organ transplant is a life-saving treatment. However, the resultant weakening of abdominal muscles leaves patients susceptible to incisional hernia. Obesity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus are common risk factors for post-transplant hernia. However, the literature is void on the impact these risk factors have on timing and size of hernia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all post-abdominal transplant patients who underwent hernia repair in 2010-2017 at a single institution. Primary outcomes were hernia size and time from transplant to hernia repair. RESULTS: We identified 31 patients. The majority of patients were female (15 male, 16 female), and the average patient was 56 ± 8.7 years old and obese (body mass index 30.6). Smoking (26.7%, n = 8) and diabetes mellitus (51.6%, n = 16) were prevalent. Transplant types represented were renal (n = 24), simultaneous pancreas-kidney (n = 5), liver (n = 1), and liver with subsequent kidney (n = 1). The median size of hernia was 100.0 cm2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 78.5-234.0), and median time to hernia repair was 53.0 months (IQR: 12.5-110.0). Risk factors (obesity, smoking, and diabetes) did not influence hernia size, nor alter time to hernia repair. CONCLUSION: Obesity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus are not prognostic of size or onset of post-transplant incisional hernia. Large cohort studies are needed to determine predictive factors of size and onset of hernia.

The demise of islet allotransplantation in the United States: A call for an urgent regulatory update.

Islet allotransplantation in the United States (US) is facing an imminent demise. Despite nearly three decades of progress in the field, an archaic regulatory framework has stymied US clinical practice. Current regulations do not reflect the state-of-the-art in clinical or technical practices. In the US, islets are considered biologic drugs and "more than minimally manipulated" human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps). In contrast, across the world, human islets are appropriately defined as "minimally manipulated tissue" and not regulated as a drug, which has led to islet allotransplantation (allo-ITx) becoming a standard-of-care procedure for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This regulatory distinction impedes patient access to islets for transplantation in the US. As a result only 11 patients underwent allo-ITx in the US between 2016 and 2019, and all as investigational procedures in the settings of a clinical trials. Herein, we describe the current regulations pertaining to islet transplantation in the United States. We explore the progress which has been made in the field and demonstrate why the regulatory framework must be updated to both better reflect our current clinical practice and to deal with upcoming challenges. We propose specific updates to current regulations which are required for the renaissance of ethical, safe, effective, and affordable allo-ITx in the United States.

A Multidisciplinary Technique for Concurrent Panniculectomy-Living Donor Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been shown that panniculectomy concurrent to living donor renal transplantation is a safe option for management of renal transplant recipients with a large focal pannus. This combined management requires precise coordination of teams. We describe the technique, timing, and sequence for combined renal transplantation and panniculectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent simultaneous living donor renal transplantation-panniculectomy from 2015 to 2019. A multi-team approach that included urology, transplant, and plastic surgery was used to perform the combined operations. Typically, the plastic surgery team initiates the operation by performing the panniculectomy. This is followed by kidney transplantation and graft anastomosis. The plastic surgery team then completes the operation with closure of the wound. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified. Most were male (12:8) with a mean age of 55 years and an average body mass index of 35 kg/m. The mean total operative duration was 394 minutes. On average, 17% of operating time was devoted to panniculectomy. At 90 days follow-up, there was 100% graft survival and all patients had primary graft function. There was a 25% wound complications rate and a 15% reoperation rate. CONCLUSION: By performing panniculectomy first in the sequence, concurrent panniculectomy provides wide exposure and a large operative field for transplantation. Wound closure by plastic surgeons may mitigate the high complication rate commonly seen in obese patients with end-stage renal disease. Future studies are needed to evaluate the cost-benefit of the combined living donor renal transplantation-panniculectomy.

Panniculectomy at the time of living donor renal transplantation: An 8-year experience.

Panniculectomy can be performed as a prophylactic procedure preceding transplantation to enable obese patients to meet criteria for renal transplantation. No literature exists on combined renal transplant and panniculectomy surgery (LRT-PAN). We describe our 8-year experience performing LRT-PAN. A retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone LRT-PAN from 2010 to 2018 was conducted. Data were collected on patient demographics, allograft survival and function, and postoperative course. Fifty-eight patients underwent LRT-PAN. All grafts survived, with acceptable function at 1 year. Median length of stay was 4 days with a mean operative duration of 363 minutes. The wound complication rate was 24%. Ninety-day readmission rate was 52%, with medical causes as the most common reason for readmission (45%), followed by wound (32%) and graft-related complications (23%). Body mass index, diabetes status, and previous immunosuppression did not influence wound complication rate or readmission (P = .7720, P = .0818, and P = .4830, respectively). Combining living donor renal transplant and panniculectomy using a multidisciplinary team may improve access to transplantation, particularly for the obese and postobese population. This combined approach yielded shorter-than-expected hospital stays and similar wound complication rates, and thus should be considered for patients in whom transplantation might otherwise be withheld on the basis of obesity.

C-peptide levels do not correlate with pancreas allograft failure: Multicenter retrospective analysis and discussion of the new OPT definition of pancreas allograft failure.

The OPTN Pancreas Transplantation Committee performed a multicenter retrospective study to determine if undetectable serum C-peptide levels correspond to center-reported pancreas graft failures. C-peptide data from seven participating centers (n = 415 graft failures for transplants performed from 2002 to 2012) were analyzed pretransplant, at graft failure, and at return to insulin. One hundred forty-nine C-peptide values were submitted at pretransplant, 94 at return to insulin, and 233 at graft failure. There were 77 transplants with two available values (at pretransplant and at graft failure). For recipients in the study with pretransplant C-peptide <0.75 ng/mL who had a posttransplant C-peptide value available (n = 61), graft failure was declared at varying levels of C-peptide. High C-peptide values at graft failure were not explained by nonfasting testing or by individual center bias. Transplant centers declare pancreas graft failure at varying levels of C-peptide and do not consistently report C-peptide data. Until February 28, 2018, OPTN did not require reporting of posttransplant C-peptide levels and it appears that C-peptide levels are not consistently used for evaluating graft function. C-peptide levels should not be used as the sole criterion for the definition of pancreas graft failure.

Decreasing dialysis catheter rates by creating a multidisciplinary dialysis access program.

INTRODUCTION:: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have determined that chronic dialysis units should have <12% of their patients utilizing central venous catheters for hemodialysis treatments. On the Eastern Shore of Maryland, the central venous catheter rates in the dialysis units averaged >45%. A multidisciplinary program was established with goals of decreasing catheter rates in order to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infections, decrease mortality associated with central line-associated bloodstream infection, decrease hospital days, and provide savings to the healthcare system. METHODS:: We collected the catheter rates within three dialysis centers served over a 5-year period. Using published data surrounding the incidence and related costs of central line-associated bloodstream infection and mortality per catheter day, the number of central line-associated bloodstream infection events, the costs, and the related mortality could be determined prior to and after the initiation of the dialysis access program. RESULTS:: An organized dialysis access program resulted in a 82% decrease in the number of central venous catheter days which lead to a concurrent reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infection and deaths. As a result of creating an access program, central venous catheter rates decreased from an average rate of 45% to 8%. The cost savings related to the program was calculated to be over US$5 million. The decrease in the number of mortalities is estimated to be between 13 and 27 patients. CONCLUSION:: We conclude that a formalized access program decreases catheter rates, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and the resultant hospitalizations, mortality, and costs. Areas with high hemodialysis catheter rates should develop access programs to better serve their patient population.

Surgical complications of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a retrospective study.

The single-port approach has been associated with an unacceptably high rate of umbilical port hernias in large series of patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy and colectomy and with additional surgical risks thought secondary to technical and ergonomic limitations. A retrospective review of 378 consecutive laparoendoscopic single-site(LESS) donor nephrectomies performed between 04/15/2009 and 04/09/2014 was conducted. Twelve patients (3%) developed an umbilical hernia. Eleven (92%) were female and eight (73%) of these patients had a prior pregnancy. Hernias were reported 13.5 ± 6.9 months after donation, and the mean size was 5.1 ± 3.7 cm. Seven additional cases (1.9%) required a return to the operating room for internal hernia (2), evisceration (1), bleeding (1), enterotomy (1), and wound infection (2). The original incision was utilized for reexploration. One patient required emergent conversion to an open procedure for bleeding during the initial donation. There were no mortalities. Recipient patient and graft survival were 99% and 99% at 1 year, respectively. Although reports associated with earlier experiences with single-site procedures suggested an unacceptably high rate of hernias at the surgical site, this does not seem to be the case at our center. This technique is a reliable surgical technique for left donor nephrectomy at this institution.

Recreational marijuana use is not associated with worse outcomes after renal transplantation.

As marijuana (MJ) legalization is increasing, kidney transplant programs must develop listing criteria for marijuana users. However, no data exist on the effect of MJ on kidney allograft outcomes, and there is no consensus on whether MJ use should be a contraindication to transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed 1225 kidney recipients from 2008 to 2013. Marijuana use was defined by positive urine toxicology screen and/or self-reported recent use. The primary outcome was death at 1 year or graft failure (defined as GFR<20 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). The secondary outcome was graft function at 1 year. Using logistic regression analyses, we compared these outcomes between MJ users and non-users. Marijuana use was not associated with worse primary outcomes by unadjusted (odds ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.45-2.57, P=.87) or adjusted (odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.28-2.28, P=.67) analysis. Ninety-two percent of grafts functioned at 1 year. Among these, the mean creatinine (1.52, 95% CI 1.39-1.69 vs 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.49; P=.38) and MDRD GFR (50.7, 95% CI 45.6-56.5 vs 49.5, 95% CI 48.3-50.7; P=.65) were similar between groups. Isolated recreational MJ use is not associated with poorer patient or kidney allograft outcomes at 1 year. Therefore, recreational MJ use should not necessarily be considered a contraindication to kidney transplantation.

Live Donor Renal Transplant With Simultaneous Bilateral Nephrectomy for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Is Feasible and Satisfactory at Long-term Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Timing of bilateral nephrectomy (BN) is controversial in patients with refractory symptoms of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (APKD) in need of a renal transplant. METHODS: Adults who underwent live donor renal transplant (LRT) + simultaneous BN (SBN) from August 2003 to 2013 at a single transplant center (n = 66) were retrospectively compared to a matched group of APKD patients who underwent LRT alone (n = 52). All patients received general health and polycystic kidney symptom surveys. RESULTS: Simultaneous BN increased operative duration, estimated blood loss, transfusions, intravenous fluid, and hospital length of stay. Most common indications for BN were pain, loss of abdominal domain, and early satiety. There were more intraoperative complications for LRT + SBN (6 vs 0, P = 0.03; 2 vascular, 2 splenic, and 1 liver injury; 1 reexploration to adjust graft positioning). There were no differences in Clavien-Dindo grade I or II (39% vs 25%, P = 0.12) or grade III or IV (7.5% vs 5.7%, P = 1.0) complications during the hospital course. There were no surgery-related mortalities. There were no differences in readmission rates (68% vs 48%, P = 0.19) or readmissions requiring procedures (25% vs. 20%, P = 0.51) over 12 months. One hundred percent of LRT + SBN allografts functioned at longer than 1 year for those available for follow-up. Survey response rate was 40% for LRT-alone and 56% for LRT + SBN. One hundred percent of LRT + SBN survey responders were satisfied with their choice of having BN done simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcomes for graft survival, satisfaction, and morbidity suggest that the combined operative approach be preferred for patients with symptomatic APKD to avoid multiple procedures, dialysis, and costs of staged operations.

Pancreas transplant alone.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present article aims to review the current state of diabetes, including its treatment options, and highlight current issues in pancreas transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Compared with other areas of transplantation, pancreas transplant/transplantation alone in the absence of kidney disease remains a relatively small field. As a consequence, reported new research articles are few in number, and often data regarding pancreas transplant/transplantation alone are mixed in with simultaneous kidney-pancreas and pancreas after kidney transplantation, which are covered separately. The prevalence of diabetes is reaching epidemic levels and continues to increase. New developments in diabetes care include the bionic pancreas and immunotherapy. Persistent efforts at gene and stem cell therapies are ongoing. Pancreas transplantation outcomes are improving, yet numbers are declining, even though pancreas transplantation still offers the most optimal glycemic control. SUMMARY: Pancreas transplantation has improving outcomes but stands in competition with other diabetes management options.

Induction therapy in pancreas transplantation.

Induction therapy, the initial high-dose bolus of immunosuppression given perioperatively to transplant patients, is almost ubiquitous in pancreas transplantation. Despite the frequent use, scientific data on the risks and benefits of induction therapy are scarce, especially as it concerns use specifically for pancreas transplantation. Indeed, none of the currently used induction agents are approved as induction therapy for pancreas transplantation, yet potential benefit is largely extrapolated from trials in kidney transplant recipients. This review summarizes which induction therapy agents are available both now and historically, their mechanisms of action, and provides an overview of the published literature describing the use of these agents in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant and solitary pancreas transplant recipients. In summary, there are two multicenter randomized trials, several single-center randomized trials, and many other single-center descriptive reports. Overall, the main benefit of induction therapy is the ability to wean steroids earlier, and the main downside is a higher risk of opportunistic infections. Despite a lack of solid evidence, over 90% of pancreas transplants performed annually in the United States receive some type of induction immunosuppression.

Luminex-based desensitization protocols: the University of Wisconsin initial experience.

BACKGROUND: We have demonstrated that immunodominant donor-specific antibody (DSA) more than 100 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) at the time of transplant is associated with a significantly higher risk of rejection. We now present short-term outcomes of DSA-based desensitization (DSZ) strategies in patients with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch. METHODS: Between January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010, live-donor kidney transplant recipients were divided into three protocols based on their immunodominant DSA MFI pretransplant (D1: 100-500, D2: 501-1000, and D3: 1001-3000). Deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were stratified into two protocols (D4: 501-1000 and D5: 1001-3000). The intensity of the conditioning treatment increased with DSA levels and included thymoglobulin induction, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin in the highest risk groups. We compared outcomes between desensitized patients (DSZ) and those undergoing no DSZ (or D0) during the same interval. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 249 (23%) kidney transplants underwent DSZ (n=20, 4, 3, 4, and 17 in D1-D5 protocols, respectively). There was more retransplantation (50% vs. 18%, P<0.001) and live donor transplantation (56% vs. 30%, P<0.001) in the DSZ group. In this group, mean peak panel reactive antibody and MFI at transplant were 51% ± 7% and 960 ± 136, respectively. The incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (25% vs. 12.5%, P=0.008) and acute cellular rejection (23% vs. 14%, P=0.02) was greater in the DSZ group. However, mixed rejection (8%), graft loss (0 vs. 6), patient death (0 vs. 3), cytomegalovirus infection (15% vs. 12%), and 1-year serum creatinine (1.4 ± 0.5 and 1.4 ± 0.4 mg/dL) were similar between DSZ and no-DSZ groups. CONCLUSION.: Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the role of Luminex-based strategies in current preconditioning regimens.