RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Patient education by nurses is a cornerstone of any heart failure (HF) program, but the models are widely heterogeneous and few specific instruments exist. Our objective is to evaluate our own questionnaire and its utility as a guide for educational intervention. METHODS: This work is a prospective cohort study of patients followed-up on in a specialized unit after diagnosis of HF. The intervention group received educational sessions guided according to their knowledge using the questionnaire and was compared to a group which received standard education. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated. The utility of the educational model was determined by the primary composite endpoint of death and/or hospital admission or emergency care for HF. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included, 88 which received guided education and 64 which received standard education, with a mean follow-up time of 16±4 months. In the guided education group, the evaluation questionnaire score (qs) rose from 59% to 78.5% (p=0.018), which was associated with greater self-care (28.5-0.6*qs, p=0.04), a tendency toward better quality of life (51.1-1.1*qs, p=0.09), and adherence (5.02+0.04*qs, p=0.06), with acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.75). The primary composite endpoint was met in 12 patients (13.6%) in the intervention group compared to 19 (29.7%) in the control group (hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.88; p=0.019). Only educational level, age, NT-proBNP, and atrial fibrillation were predictors in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The HF knowledge questionnaire proposed is a valid, reliable tool and allows for quantifying learning. Its utility in guiding education requires a certain degree of skill from the patient that determines a group with better prognosis.