Exploring the chemical subspace of RPLC: A data driven approach.

BACKGROUND: The chemical space is comprised of a vast number of possible structures, of which an unknown portion comprises the human and environmental exposome. Such samples are frequently analyzed using non-targeted analysis via liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry often employing a reversed phase (RP) column. However, prior to analysis, the contents of these samples are unknown and could be comprised of thousands of known and unknown chemical constituents. Moreover, it is unknown which part of the chemical space is sufficiently retained and eluted using RPLC. RESULTS: We present a generic framework that uses a data driven approach to predict whether molecules fall 'inside', 'maybe' inside, or 'outside' of the RPLC subspace. Firstly, three retention index random forest (RF) regression models were constructed that showed that molecular fingerprints are able to predict RPLC retention behavior. Secondly, these models were used to set up the dataset for building an RPLC RF classification model. The RPLC classification model was able to correctly predict whether a chemical belonged to the RPLC subspace with an accuracy of 92% for the testing set. Finally, applying this model to the 91 737 small molecules (i.e., ≤1 000 Da) in NORMAN SusDat showed that 19.1% fall 'outside' of the RPLC subspace. SIGNIFICANCE AND NOVELTY: The RPLC chemical space model provides a major step towards mapping the chemical space and is able to assess whether chemicals can potentially be measured with an RPLC method (i.e., not every RPLC method) or if a different selectivity should be considered. Moreover, knowing which chemicals are outside of the RPLC subspace can assist in reducing potential candidates for library searching and avoid screening for chemicals that will not be present in RPLC data.

Swimming coaches' professional development and training practices: an international survey.

This study investigated swim coaches' perceptions of professional development issues and current training practices according to their coaching experience, education level, and gender. An online survey (January-April 2022) was completed by 123 swim coaches (96 male/27 female) of competitive swimmers based in 41 countries. The survey consisted of 36 questions divided into six sections: (1) background information, (2) developing swim coaching through learning, (3) self-evaluation, (4) interpersonal-intrapersonal interactions, (5) life skills, and (6) analyzing swimming performance. Pearson chi-square assessed the relationship between the frequency of responses and professional background and gender. The survey results indicated that swim coaches' educational level is potentially one of the most influential parameters affecting the coaches' perceptions about their own professional development. The data presented may be used for the future design of coach education programmes as they advance current knowledge on understanding psycho-social issues related to professional development and training perceptions involved in the competitive swimming environment.

Evaluation of the Perceptions, Attitudes and Practices among Greek Non-Professional Athletes Visiting a Public Hospital during March 2022, towards COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Consequences on Sports Training and Sports Activity.

Sports have been majorly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. After the lockdown period, vaccination and protocols were implemented to return to normality. We aimed to assess the attitudes and practices related to COVID-19 vaccination among athletes, and to record adverse effects of vaccination, if any. A questionnaire was distributed to 1012 male and female athletes, 15+ years old, within the region of Athens. Vaccination coverage with at least one dose was 93.5%, whereas 53.9% were fully vaccinated. More than half of the participants were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at the time of the study. More than 90% of the participants, considered the vaccines as safe, effective and important for public health. Concern about potential side-effects was raised especially by women athletes (59.1% of women compared to 42.2% of men, p < 0.001). The main reasons for avoiding vaccination were fear of vaccine safety, concern about the short time period for vaccine development and testing and doubt of risk of being exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The main reported side-effects were pain at the injection site, fatigue, fever and headache. Approximately two thirds of the participants reported that vaccination did not affect their training, and none reported missing participation in scheduled athletic events. Participants reported high compliance to preventive measures by themselves and fellow athletes, but low satisfaction regarding the implementation of public protocols and the flow of information provided by the authorities. Athletes of older age and those less concerned about potential side-effects were more likely to get fully vaccinated. Nevertheless, the vast majority of the athletes in our study were vaccinated for COVID-19 despite any hesitation regarding effectiveness, safety, or potential side-effects from the vaccines.