Myopia progression following 0.01% atropine cessation in Australian children: Findings from the Western Australia - Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia (WA-ATOM) study.

BACKGROUND: A rebound in myopia progression following cessation of atropine eyedrops has been reported, yet there is limited data on the effects of stopping 0.01% atropine compared to placebo control. This study tested the hypothesis that there is minimal rebound myopia progression after cessation of 0.01% atropine eyedrops, compared to a placebo. METHODS: Children with myopia (n = 153) were randomised to receive 0.01% atropine eyedrops or a placebo (2:1 ratio) daily at bedtime during the 2-year treatment phase of the study. In the third year (wash-out phase), all participants ceased eyedrop instillation. Participants underwent an eye examination every 6 months, including measurements of spherical equivalent (SphE) after cycloplegia and axial length (AL). Changes in the SphE and AL during the wash-out phase and throughout the 3 years of the study (treatment + wash-out phase) were compared between the treatment and control groups. RESULTS: During the 1-year wash-out phase, SphE and AL progressed by -0.41D (95% CI = -0.33 to -0.22) and +0.20 mm (95% CI = -0.46 to -0.36) in the treatment group compared to -0.28D (95% CI = 0.11 to 0.16) and +0.13 mm (95% CI = 0.18 to 0.21) in the control group. Progression in the treatment group was significantly faster than in the control group (p = 0.016 for SphE and <0.001 for AL). Over the 3-year study period, the cumulative myopia progression was similar between the atropine and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed evidence of rapid myopia progression following cessation of 0.01% atropine. Further investigations are warranted to ascertain the long-term effects of atropine eyedrops.

Distribution of Axial Length in Australians of Different Age Groups, Ethnicities, and Refractive Errors.

Purpose: Treatments are available to slow myopic axial elongation. Understanding normal axial length (AL) distributions will assist clinicians in choosing appropriate treatment for myopia. We report the distribution of AL in Australians of different age groups and refractive errors. Methods: Retrospectively collected spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and AL data of 5938 individuals aged 5 to 89 years from 8 Australian studies were included. Based on the SER, participants were classified as emmetropes, myopes, and hyperopes. Two regression model parameterizations (piece-wise and restricted cubic splines [RCS]) were applied to the cross-sectional data to analyze the association between age and AL. These results were compared with longitudinal data from the Raine Study where the AL was measured at age 20 (baseline) and 28 years. Results: A piece-wise regression model (with 1 knot) showed that myopes had a greater increase in AL before 18 years by 0.119 mm/year (P < 0.001) and after 18 years by 0.011 mm/year (P < 0.001) compared to emmetropes and hyperopes, with the RCS model (with 3 knots) showing similar results. The longitudinal data from the Raine Study revealed that, when compared to emmetropes, only myopes showed a significant change in the AL in young adulthood (by 0.016 mm/year, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The AL of myopic eyes increases more rapidly in childhood and slightly in early adulthood. Further studies of longitudinal changes in AL, particularly in childhood, are required to guide myopia interventions. Translational Relevance: The axial length of myopic eyes increases rapidly in childhood, and there is a minimal increase in the axial length in non-myopic eyes after 18 years of age.

Agreement between 2 SS-OCT biometry devices.

PURPOSE: To assess the agreement between 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry devices, Anterion and IOLMaster 700. SETTING: Tertiary referral center, Brisbane, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective comparative study. METHODS: Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between devices for flat (K1), steep (K2), and mean (Km) keratometry for anterior, posterior, and total cornea, lens thickness (LT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), white to white (WTW), and axial length (AL). Generalized estimating equations were used to control for within-patient between-eye correlations. Interdevice differences were considered clinically significant if they were likely to alter the spherical refractive outcome by 0.25 diopter (D) or more. RESULTS: 159 eyes of 91 patients (41 male, 50 female) were included. Statistically significant differences were found for K1, K2, and Km for anterior, posterior, and total cornea. When the Anterion was compared with the IOLMaster 700, the mean differences were as follows: anterior K1: -0.17 D, anterior K2: -0.18 D, anterior Km: -0.17 D, posterior K1: -0.38 D, posterior K2: -0.36 D, posterior Km: -0.37 D, total K1: -0.65 D, total K2: -0.82 D, and total Km: -0.74 D. The difference in posterior and total K metrics was clinically significant. Statistically significant differences were noted for LT: 0.159 mm, CCT: -0.004 mm, ACD: 0.054 mm, and WTW: -0.152 mm, although these were not found to be clinically significant. There was no significant difference between devices for AL. CONCLUSIONS: This study found statistically and clinically significant differences for both posterior and total keratometry between the Anterion and the IOLMaster 700. Posterior and total corneal parameters cannot be considered interchangeable between devices.

Subjective measurement of the Stiles-Crawford effect with different field sizes.

The Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind (SCE) is the phenomenon in which light entering the eye near the center of the pupil appears brighter than light entering near the edge. Previous investigations have found an increase in the directionality (steepness) of the effect as the testing location moves from the center of the visual field to parafoveal positions, but the effect of central field size has not been considered. The influence of field size on the SCE was investigated using a uniaxial Maxwellian system in which stimulus presentation was controlled by an active-matrix liquid crystal display. SCE directionality increased as field size increased from 0.5° to 4.7° diameter, although this was noted in four mild myopes and not in two emmetropes. The change with field size was supported by a geometric optics absorption model.

Subjective measurement of the Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind with variation in accommodation.

PURPOSE: To measure the Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind (SCE-I), corresponding to central vision, with innovative technology to evaluate changes in the directionality and photoreceptor alignment with accommodation. METHODS: A uniaxial Maxwellian system (spot size in pupil 0.5 mm diameter) was employed, incorporating a spatial light modulator to flicker at 2 Hz between two 2.3° fields corresponding to test (peripheral pupil) and reference (pupil centre) positions. Participants determined thresholds at 13 positions along the horizontal pupil meridian by indicating if the test field was brighter or dimmer than the reference field. Thresholds were determined by a staircase procedure after four reversals at each pupil location. After pupil dilation, seven emmetropes were tested at 0 D to 6 D accommodation stimulus levels in 2 D intervals. Data were fit by the Gaussian function, both when the fits were unforced or forced to pass through the sensitivity expected for the reference point. Directionality (ρ) and peak location values (xmax) were determined for unforced and forced fits. RESULTS: Regression slopes for ρ as a function of accommodation stimulus were not significant. There was a tendency for xmax to shift temporally with increasing accommodation across the 6 D stimulus range. This was not significant for regression fitting (-0.059 mm/D, R2  = 0.06, p = 0.20), but a paired t-test for 0 and 6 D stimuli showed a weakly significant change of 0.62 mm (p = 0.05). The differences between the two fitting approaches were small and non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Directionality did not change with accommodation, but the pupil peak location showed a significant temporal shift of approximately 0.62 mm with 6 D accommodation stimulus. It is possible that substantial changes in the directionality and a shift in the direction of peak location might occur at very high levels of accommodation.

A computational analysis of retinal image quality in eyes with keratoconus.

Higher-order aberrations (HOA's) are exaggerated in eyes with keratoconus but little is known about their impact on the retinal image quality (IQ) of these eyes. This computational study determined changes in IQ [peak IQ, best focus and depth of focus (DOF)] of 12 subjects with manifest keratoconus in both eyes (KCE cohort), 9 subjects with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE cohort) with and without their Rigid Gas Permeable contact lenses (RGP CL's) and 20 age-matched controls, using a HOA-based through-focus analysis performed on the logNS IQ metric over 5 mm pupil diameter following cycloplegia. All IQ parameters were significantly worse in the KCE cohort with their native HOA's, relative to controls and in the ectatic eye of the VAE cohort, relative to the fellow non-ectatic eye (p ≤ 0.008 for all). Reduction in HOA's of these eyes with RGP CL's resulted in a significant improvement in all IQ parameters but they all remained significantly poorer than controls (p ≤ 0.02 for all). The inter-subject variability of best focus and the DOF range were inversely related to peak IQ in these eyes (r = 0.85; p < 0.001). These results provide the optical basis for two clinical observations on keratoconus: (1) optical performance of keratoconic eyes are significantly better with RGP CL's than with spectacles or unaided conditions and (2) the endpoint of subjective refraction is elusive in keratoconic eyes, relative to healthy controls or to the non-ectatic eye in bilaterally asymmetric ectasia.

Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Stereoacuity losses are induced by increased magnitudes and interocular differences in high-order aberrations (HOAs). This study used keratoconus as a model to investigate the impact of HOAs on disparity processing and stereoacuity. HOAs and stereoacuity were quantified in subjects with keratoconus (n = 21) with HOAs uncorrected (wearing spectacles) or minimized (wearing rigid gas-permeable contact lenses) and in control subjects without keratoconus (n = 5) for 6-mm pupil diameters. Disparity signal quality was estimated using metrics derived from binocular cross-correlation functions of stereo pairs convolved with point-spread functions from these HOAs. Metrics computed for all subjects were compared with stereoacuities. The effects of contrast losses and phase shifts on disparity signal quality were studied independently by manipulating the amplitude and phase components of optical transfer functions. The magnitudes, orientations, interocular relationships in magnitude, and shape of the point-spread function affected the cross-correlation metrics that determine disparity signal quality. Stereoacuity covaries strongly with cross-correlation metrics and moderately with image-quality metrics. Both phase distortions and contrast losses due to HOAs significantly influence computations of binocular disparity. HOA-induced stereoacuity reductions are attributable to disparity blur and noise from image properties that reduce the height and kurtosis of the peak stimulus disparity match of the cross-correlation. Phase distortions and contrast losses due to HOAs are both partly responsible for the greater stereoacuity losses seen with spectacles compared to rigid gas-permeable contact lenses in keratoconus.

Lens magnification affects the estimates of refractive error obtained using eccentric infrared photorefraction.

Positive- and negative-powered ophthalmic lenses are used in eccentric infrared photorefraction to calibrate the device, correct the subject's baseline refractive error before an experimental manipulation, or stimulate blur-driven accommodation. Through theoretical modeling of luminance gradients formed across the pupil and empirical measurements of the eye's refractive error using a commercial photorefractor, this study shows that image magnification by positive lenses and image minification by negative lenses under- and overestimates the refractive error, respectively, all independent of image defocus. The impact of image magnification/minification therefore appears non-trivial in experimental paradigms involving ophthalmic lenses to manipulate the eye's optics during photorefraction.

LogMAR and Stereoacuity in Keratoconus Corrected with Spectacles and Rigid Gas-permeable Contact Lenses.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed an improvement in three-dimensional depth perception of subjects with bilateral and unilateral keratoconus with rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lens wear, relative to spectacles. This novel information will aid clinicians to consider RGP contact lenses as a management modality in keratoconic patients complaining of depth-related difficulties with their spectacles. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically compare changes in logMAR acuity and stereoacuity from best-corrected spherocylindrical spectacles to RGP contact lenses in bilateral and unilateral keratoconus vis-à-vis age-matched control subjects. METHODS: Monocular and binocular logMAR acuity and random-dot stereoacuity were determined in subjects with bilateral (n = 30; 18 to 24 years) and unilateral (n = 10; 18 to 24 years) keratoconus and 20 control subjects using standard psychophysical protocols. RESULTS: Median (25th to 75th interquartile range) monocular (right eye) and binocular logMAR acuity and stereoacuity improved significantly from spectacles to RGP contact lenses in the bilateral keratoconus cohort (P < .001). Only monocular logMAR acuity of affected eye and stereoacuity improved from spectacles to RGP contact lenses in the unilateral keratoconus cohort (P < .001). There was no significant change in the binocular logMAR acuity from spectacles to RGP contact lenses in the unilateral keratoconus cohort. The magnitude of improvement in binocular logMAR acuity and stereoacuity was also greater for the bilateral compared with the unilateral keratoconus cohort. All outcome measures of cases with RGP contact lenses remained poorer than control subjects (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Binocular resolution and stereoacuity improve from spectacles to RGP contact lenses in bilateral keratoconus, whereas only stereoacuity improves from spectacles to RGP contact lenses in unilateral keratoconus. The magnitude of improvement in visual performance is greater for the binocular compared with the unilateral keratoconus cohort.

Photorefraction estimates of refractive power varies with the ethnic origin of human eyes.

Eccentric infrared photorefraction is an attractive tool for measuring refractive errors of young children and uncooperative subjects, for it allows quick and non-invasive acquisition of data from both eyes simultaneously over a reasonably large dioptric range. Accuracy of refraction in this technique depends on calibration of luminance slope formed across the pupil into diopters (defocus calibration factor). Commercial photorefractors, like the PowerRef 3™ used in this study, employ an universal defocus calibration factor from one population (Caucasian) to convert raw data of all populations. This study reports significantly larger defocus calibration factors of PowerRef 3™ in 132 East Asian, African and Indian eyes, relative to the machine's default calibration (p < 0.001). The calibration slope of 50 Indian eyes was over-estimated by 64 ± 11% (mean ± 95%CI), vis-à-vis, retinoscopy (p < 0.001). The error reduced to ~6-7% upon rescaling the data using a calibration factor specific for Indian eyes or to that individual (p > 0.9, relative to no over-estimation). Our results therefore strongly suggest the use of an ethnicity- or individual-specific defocus calibration factor for accurate estimation of refraction using photorefraction. Inaccurate refraction estimates due to calibration errors will otherwise severely undermine the advantages of this technique.