Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment strategies and complications in older adults with colorectal cancer considering surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in customizing care for elderly cancer patients, specifically focusing on colorectal cancer. The research compared treatment strategies and outcomes in older adults considered for surgery before and after the initiation of a Geriatric Oncology Service (GOS). METHODS: Conducting a comparative study, two cohorts of consecutive colorectal cancer patients aged 75 or older were examined: the control group (n = 156) and the GOS group (n = 158). Upon the treating surgeon's GOS consultation request, a geriatrician and an oncologist performed CGA, guiding treatment decisions and perioperative interventions. Postoperative complications were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In the GOS group, 91% (n = 116) underwent CGA consultations, influencing decisions to forego surgery in 12 patients. After PSM for surgical cases (controls n = 146, GOS n = 146), each group comprised 128 patients. Perioperative physical therapy and pharmacist referrals were more frequent in the GOS group. The GOS group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications (22%) compared to the control group (33%) (p = 0.0496). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing colorectal surgery post-GOS implementation experienced a notable reduction in postoperative complications, highlighting the positive impact of personalized geriatric assessment on surgical outcomes in the elderly.

Survival in Older Japanese Adults With Advanced Cancer Before and After Implementation of a Geriatric Oncology Service.

PURPOSE: Research studies have demonstrated that comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) improves outcomes in older adults with cancer treated with chemotherapy. We compared survival outcomes on older adults with advanced cancer before and after the initiation of a geriatric oncology service (GOS) in a single Japanese cancer center. METHODS: This was a comparative study of two groups of consecutive patients 70 years and older with advanced cancer who were referred to medical oncology for first-line chemotherapy before (controls; n = 151, September 2015-August 2018) and after (GOS; n = 191, September 2018-March 2021) implementation of the GOS. When the treating physician requested a consultation from the GOS, a geriatrician and an oncologist performed CGA and provided recommendations for cancer treatment and geriatric interventions. Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The median age for all patients was 75 (range, 70-95) years, and 85% had GI cancers. In the GOS group, 82 patients received the CGA before a treatment decision and oncologic treatment plans were changed in 49 patients (60%). The overall implementation rate of the CGA-based geriatric interventions was 45%. Two hundred and eighty-two patients received chemotherapy (controls; n = 128 and GOS; n = 154), and 60 patients were treated with best supportive care only (controls; n = 23 and GOS; n = 37). Among patients receiving chemotherapy, TTF event rates for the GOS group compared with the control group were 5.7% versus 14% at 30 days (P = .02) and 13% versus 29% at 60 days (P = .001). The GOS group had longer OS than the control group with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.93; P = .02). CONCLUSION: In this study, older adults with advanced cancer managed after the implementation of a GOS had improved survival outcomes compared with a historical control of patients.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment: Valuation and patient preferences in older Japanese adults with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for the management of older adults with cancer. We evaluated the effect of CGA conducted by a geriatric oncology service (GOS) on the management of older adults with cancer. We also queried patients about their perceptions of the value of this process. METHODS: This was a prospective quality assessment study of 498 consecutive older adults with cancer who were referred to the GOS from May 2020 through December 2021. Treating physicians requested a consultation and the GOS conducted a CGA and assessed patient preferences. The GOS provided recommendations on cancer treatment and geriatric interventions. Patient perspectives on the consultation were evaluated using collaboRATE and modified Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC) subscales. RESULTS: A 10-item frailty index based on a CGA (FI-CGA-10) [Oncologist, 26, e1751 (2021)] in the 498 patients showed that 19% of patients were fit, 40% pre-frail, and 41% frail. Prior to CGA the intent of the proposed cancer treatment was curative in 56% (n = 280), life-extending in 40% (n = 201), and palliative in 3.4% (n = 17). After a CGA consultation, a cancer treatment decision was changed in 45% of patients. The intent of treatment after the CGA consultation was curative in 45%, life-extending in 34%, and palliative in 21%. At least one referral to relevant disciplines was recommended for 88% of patients and was implemented in 43%. As part of the GOS consultation educational support was provided to 97% of patients. Based on the collaboRATE and PACIC tools, patients perceived the GOS consultation positively and helpful for facilitating shared decision-making and patient-centered care. CONCLUSION: Our institutional experience demonstrated the valuable effect of the CGA consultation on oncologic decision-making and geriatric interventions in a patient-centered manner.

Impact of the Cancer and Aging Research Group score and treatment intensity on survival and toxicity outcomes in older adults with advanced noncolorectal gastrointestinal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the predictive value of the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score, a validated chemotherapy toxicity prediction tool for older adults with cancer, for survival outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients ≥65 years old receiving first-line chemotherapy for advanced noncolorectal gastrointestinal cancer for which combination chemotherapy is the standard of care. Overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), which was defined as the time from the start of first-line chemotherapy to the discontinuation of first-line chemotherapy for any reason, and toxicity were compared in 4 groups of patients: 1) non-high-risk (nHR) CARG score (<10) and standard-intensity therapy (ST), 2) nHR score and reduced-intensity therapy (RT), 3) high-risk (HR) CARG score (≥10) and ST, and 4) HR score and RT. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age, 71 years) were enrolled. The median OS in months was 19.7 in nHR/ST (n = 19) group, 12.7 in nHR/RT (n = 9) group, 4.5 in HR/ST (n = 12) group, and 3.9 in HR/RT (n = 10) group (log-rank test, P = .005). The median TTF in months was 9.1 in nHR/ST group, 2.5 in nHR/RT group, 2.3 in HR/ST group, and 3.0 in HR/RT group (log-rank test, P = .04). The CARG-score category was prognostic of OS (HR, 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-5.83, P = .001) and TTF (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.31-5.20, P = .007). The incidence of grade 3-5 toxicity was 68% in nHR/ST group, 33% in nHR/RT group, 92% in HR/ST group, and 70% in HR/RT group (Fisher exact test, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adapted chemotherapy based on the CARG-score may improve treatment outcomes.

A 10-Item Frailty Index Based on a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (FI-CGA-10) in Older Adults with Cancer: Development and Construct Validation.

BACKGROUND: A frailty index (FI) based on domain-level deficits identified through a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been previously developed and validated in general geriatric patients. Our objectives were to construct an FI-CGA and to assess its construct validity in the geriatric oncology setting. METHODS: Five hundred forty consecutive Japanese patients with cancer who underwent a CGA on a geriatric oncology service were included (median age 80 years, range 66-96 years). We developed a 10-item frailty index based on deficits in 10 domains (FI-CGA-10): cognition, mood, communication, mobility, balance, nutrition, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, social support, and comorbidity. Deficits in each domain were scored as 0 (no problem), 0.5 (minor problem), and 1.0 (major problem). Scores were calculated by dividing the sum of the scores for each domain by 10 and then categorized as fit (<0.2), pre-frail (0.2-0.35), and frail (>0.35). Construct validity was tested by correlating the FI-CGA-10 with other established frailty measures. RESULTS: FI-CGA-10 was well approximated by the gamma distribution. Overall, 20% of patients were fit, 41% were pre-frail, and 39% were frail. FI-CGA-10 was correlated with Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) Clinical Frailty Scale (r = 0.83), CSHA rules-based frailty definition (r = 0.67), and CSHA Function Score (r = 0.77). Increasing levels of frailty were significantly associated with functional and cognitive impairments, high comorbidity burden, poor self-rated health, and low estimated survival probabilities. CONCLUSION: The FI-CGA-10 is a user-friendly and construct-validated measure for quantifying frailty from a CGA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article describes the construction of a user-friendly 10-item frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA-10) for older adults with cancer: cognition, mood, communication, mobility, balance, nutrition, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, social support, and comorbidity. The FI-CGA-10 simplifies the original FI-CGA used in the general geriatric setting while maintaining its content validity. The index's construct validity was demonstrated in a cohort of older adults with various cancer types. The advantage of the FI-CGA-10 is that a frailty score can be calculated more readily and interpreted in a more clinically sensible manner than the original FI-CGA.

Geriatric Screening for Hospitalized Older Adults with Cancer: A Survey of the Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers.

Objective Geriatric screening followed by a more detailed assessment and intervention is recommended for older adults with cancer. However, little is known regarding how the geriatric screening covered by Japanese health insurance is used for hospitalized older cancer patients. We surveyed all hospitals in Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers (JACCC) to explore the current use of this approach. Methods The JACCC member hospitals specialize in cancer care from prevention, through diagnosis and treatment, to palliative care. We mailed paper questionnaires to the presidents of the hospitals in December 2019 and collected them by February 2020. The survey requested general hospital information and asked whether (and how) such geriatric screening for hospitalized older adults with cancer was conducted. Results Twenty-six of 32 hospitals completed the survey (81%). Fourteen hospitals are cancer centers, while the remaining 12 hospitals are general hospitals which care of both cancer and non-cancer patients. Eleven hospitals (42%) performed geriatric screening and the most common use of the results was for "early discharge planning" and for "applying for long-term care insurance." Most clinicians rated the screening "somewhat" or "a little" helpful and found it most helpful for "meeting patient-post discharge needs". The most frequently reported barrier to implementation was a "lack of leadership to improve the care of older adults." Conclusion Geriatric screening was used at less than half of the major cancer centers and hospitals in Japan. One feasible solution to this problem is to establish an interprofessional workgroup at each hospital with the shared goal of providing high-quality care for this population.

Preoperative frailty assessment with the Robinson Frailty Score, Edmonton Frail Scale, and G8 and adverse postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the potential utility of the Robinson Frailty Score (RFS), the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), and the G8 tool for predicting postoperative adverse events (AEs) in older adults with cancer. METHODS: We included consecutive older adults evaluated at geriatric oncology service before undergoing oncologic surgery between September 2018 and December 2019. The RFS measures cognition, function, falls, comorbidity, albumin, and hematocrit. The EFS evaluates cognition, function, incontinence, self-perceived health, mood, nutrition, polypharmacy, and social support. These scales classify patients into three frailty categories (fit, pre-frail, or frail). The G8 score was dichotomized at a cut-off value of 14. The primary outcome was composite AEs including 30-day postoperative complications (≥Clavien-Dindo grade II) and discharge to an institutional care facility. The severity of surgery was assessed using the Operative Stress Score (OSS). RESULTS: Among 114 patients (median age 80 years, range 72-96 years), the main surgery types were gastrointestinal (62%), and head and neck (20%). Using the OSS, surgical procedures were classified as very low to low-stress (9%), moderate-stress (31%), high-stress (46%), and very high-stress (15%). Forty-five patients (40%) experienced postoperative AEs. After adjusting for the OSS, preoperative RFS was significantly associated with AEs (fit: 25%, pre-frail: 49%, frail: 77%; p < 0.01). However, the EFS (fit: 30%, pre-frail: 37%, frail: 60%; p = 0.14) and the G8 tool (score >14: 17%, score ≤14: 41%; p = 0.07) were not significantly associated with the risk of AEs. CONCLUSION: The RFS is predictive of postoperative AEs in older adults undergoing elective surgery for cancer.

Landscape of education and clinical practice in geriatric oncology: a Japanese nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this survey was to describe how geriatric oncology is integrated in undergraduate teaching and graduate training as well as in daily clinical oncology practice in Japan. METHODS: All schools of medicine in Japan are allied with graduate schools of medicine. We conducted a survey of all Japanese medical and graduate schools (n = 81), and designated cancer hospitals (n = 437) from July 2018 to August 2018. The survey of the schools asked about existence of geriatrics division and geriatric oncology service and if an education curriculum in geriatrics and geriatric oncology was used. The survey of designated cancer hospitals requested general hospital information and the current practice patterns of general geriatric and cancer patients. RESULTS: Forty-eight medical schools (59%) participated in this survey, and teaching in geriatrics and geriatric oncology was implemented in 23 schools and 1 school, respectively. Forty-two graduate schools of medicine (52%) responded; five had an education curriculum in geriatrics, but none provided geriatric oncology training. Among 151 participating hospitals (35%), 5 had a geriatrics division and 20 hospitals employed geriatricians. There was no geriatric oncology service or geriatric oncology specialists in any of the 151 hospitals. Seventy percent of the hospitals reported performing a geriatric assessment for at least some older adults with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides information on the current state of Japanese education and clinical practice in geriatric oncology. In Japan, a nation with among the largest population of older citizens in the world, education and training greatly need to be promoted to disseminate a core set of geriatrics knowledge and skills to students, trainees and healthcare professionals.

Inflammatory markers and overall survival in older adults with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of three inflammatory markers - neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte monocyte ratio (LMR) - on overall survival (OS) in older adults with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our sample includes 144 patients age ≥ 65 years with solid tumor cancer who completed a cancer-specific Geriatric Assessment (GA) from 2010 to 2014 and had pretreatment CBC with differential. NLR was dichotomized a previously reported cut-off value of 3.5, while PLR and LMR were dichotomized at the median. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated whether NLR, PLR and LMR were predictive of OS independent of covariates including a recently developed 3-item GA-derived prognostic scale consisting of (1) "limitation in walking several blocks", (2) "limitation in shopping", and (3) "≥ 5% unintentional weight loss in 6 months". RESULTS: Median age was 72 years, 53% had breast cancer, 27% had stage 4 cancer, 14% had Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 80, 11% received less intensive than standard treatment for stage, and 39% had NLR > 3.5. In univariable analysis, higher NLR and PLR and lower LMR were significantly associated with worse OS. NLR remained a significant predictor of OS (HR = 2.16, 95% CI; 1.10-4.25, p = .025) after adjusting for cancer type, stage, age, KPS, treatment intensity, and the GA-derived prognostic scale. CONCLUSION: NLR > 3.5 is predictive of poorer OS in older adults with cancer, independent of traditional prognostic factors and the GA-derived prognostic scale.

Patient-Reported Outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between programmed death receptor-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors and standard-of-care therapy in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, or durvalumab) with standard-of-care therapy in patients with advanced cancer reporting PROs with generic measures: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire. The summary outcomes were changes in PROs from baseline to follow-up within and between treatment groups and time to deterioration (TTD) in PROs based on clinically meaningful change. RESULTS: A total of 6,334 patients from 13 RCTs were included: six nivolumab, five pembrolizumab, and two atezolizumab trials. For the QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life, the pooled difference in mean change between treatment groups was 5.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-6.9; p < .001) favoring PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The pooled mean change from baseline in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and controls was 0.1 (95% CI, -2.2, 2.5) and - 6.1 (95% CI, -8.4, -3.8), respectively. The TTD was significantly longer with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, with a hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.93; p = .011). Similarly, significantly better outcomes were noted with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors on most of the other PRO measures. CONCLUSION: PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors maintained health-related quality of life to a greater degree and had less worsening in symptoms than standard-of-care therapy even though patients on these immune modulators were on treatment longer. The better PRO profile further supports the clinical benefit of this treatment strategy for advanced cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of programmed death receptor-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors and standard-of-care therapy in patients with advanced cancer. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with consistently smaller PRO score deterioration from baseline to follow-up for different health-related quality-of-life and symptoms scales. In addition, the time to deterioration in multiple PRO domains was significantly longer with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Taken together, these findings indicate that the patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors maintained health-related quality of life to a greater degree and had less symptom burden compared with those treated with standard-of-care therapy.

The incremental value of a geriatric assessment-derived three-item scale on estimating overall survival in older adults with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A geriatric assessment (GA) assesses functional age of older patients with cancer and is a well-established tool predictive of toxicity and survival. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of individual GA items. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 546 patients with cancer ≥ 65 years completed GA from 2009 to 2014 and were followed for survival status for a median of 3.7 years. The GA consisted of function, nutrition, comorbidity, cognition, psychological state, and social activity/support domains. GA items with p < 0.05 in univariable analyses for overall survival (OS) were entered into multivariable stepwise selection procedure using a Cox proportional hazards model. A prognostic scale was constructed with significant GA items retained in the final model. RESULTS: Median age was 72 years, 49% had breast cancer, and 42% had stage 3-4 cancer. Three GA items were significant prognostic factors, independent of traditional factors (cancer type, stage, age, and Karnofsky Performance Status): (1) "limitation in walking several blocks", (2) "limitation in shopping", and (3) "≥ 5% unintentional weight loss in 6 months". A three-item prognostic scale was constructed with these items. In comparison with score 0 (no positive items), hazard ratios for OS were 1.85 for score 1, 2.97 for score 2, and 8.67 for score 3. This translated to 2-year estimated survivals of 85%, 67%, 51% and 17% for scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This three-item scale was a strong independent predictor of survival. If externally validated, this could be a streamlined tool with broader applicability.

Chemotherapy Toxicity Risk Score for Treatment Decisions in Older Adults with Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The decision whether to treat older adults with advanced cancer with standard therapy (ST) or reduced therapy (RT) is complicated by heterogeneity in aging. We assessed the potential utility of the chemotherapy toxicity risk score (CTRS) [J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3457-3465] for treatment decisions in older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients aged ≥65 years receiving first-line chemotherapy for advanced cancer for which combination chemotherapy is the standard of care. Patients were categorized as high risk (CTRS ≥10), for whom RT (dose-reduced combination or single-agent chemotherapy) is deemed appropriate, or nonhigh risk (CTRS <10), for whom ST is deemed appropriate for toxicity. The primary objective was to estimate the agreement in chemotherapy choice (ST vs. RT) between the treating physician and the CTRS using a κ statistic. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (median age, 71 years) were enrolled. Thirty-eight patients received ST (21 had CTRS <10, and 17 had CTRS ≥10), and 20 patients received RT (12 had CTRS ≥10, and 8 had CTRS <10), with minimal agreement in chemotherapy choice (κ = 0.14; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.38). Grade 3-4 toxicity and hospitalization occurred in 60% and 27% of 55 patients with follow-up data, respectively. Among patients receiving ST, patients with CTRS ≥10 had a higher incidence of toxicity (88% vs. 40%, p = .006) and hospitalization (50% vs. 15%, p = .03) than those with CTRS <10. CONCLUSION: Older patients with cancer with a high CTRS who receive combination chemotherapy have an exceedingly high rate of severe toxicity and hospitalization. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The potential utility of the chemotherapy toxicity risk score (CTRS) in old adults with advanced solid tumors receiving first-line chemotherapy was assessed. Little agreement was found between chemotherapy treatment decisions based on the clinical impression versus what was recommended based on the CTRS. Among patients treated with standard-dose combination chemotherapy, patients with CTRS ≥10 had a very high incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities and hospitalization, which was significantly greater than that of patients with a low CTRS (<10). These findings suggest that the addition of CTRS to the clinical impression has a potential to improve treatment decisions.

A Systematic Review of Strategies to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin, a platinum-based antineoplastic agent, is the cornerstone for the treatment of many malignancies. Nephrotoxicity is the primary dose-limiting toxicity, and various hydration regimens and supplementation strategies are used to prevent cisplatin-induced kidney injury. However, evidence-based recommendations on specific hydration regimens are limited. A systematic review was performed to evaluate clinical studies that have examined hydration and supplementation strategies to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Excerpta Medica databases were searched from 1966 through October 2015 for clinical trials and other studies focused on hydration regimens to prevent nephrotoxicity in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. The University of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria were used to grade level of evidence. RESULTS: Among the 1,407 identified studies, 24 were included in this systematic review. All studies differed on type, volume, and duration of hydration. Among the 24 studies, 5 evaluated short-duration hydration, 4 evaluated low-volume hydration, 4 investigated magnesium supplementation, and 7 reviewed forced diuresis with hydration. Short-duration and lower-volume hydration regimens are effective in preventing cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Magnesium supplementation may have a role as a nephroprotectant, and forced diuresis may be appropriate in some patients receiving cisplatin. CONCLUSION: Hydration is essential for all patients to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Specifically, short-duration, low-volume, outpatient hydration with magnesium supplementation and mannitol forced diuresis (in select patients) represent best practice principles for the safe use of cisplatin. The Oncologist 2017;22:609-619 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings contained within this systematic review show that (a) hydration is essential for all patients to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, (b) short-duration, low-volume, outpatient hydration regimens appear to be safe and feasible, even in patients receiving intermediate- to high-dose cisplatin, (c) magnesium supplementation (8-16 milliequivalents) may limit cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, and (d) mannitol may be considered for high-dose cisplatin and/or patients with preexisting hypertension. These findings have broad implications for clinical practice and represent best practice principles for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Safety and Tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Compared with Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Compared with chemotherapy, significant improvement in survival outcomes with the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab and the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor atezolizumab has been shown in several types of advanced solid tumors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare safety and tolerability between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy. METHODS: PubMed and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) databases were searched 1966 to September 2016. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single-agent U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab) with chemotherapy in cancer patients reporting any all-grade (1-4) or high-grade (3-4) adverse events (AEs), all- or high-grade treatment-related symptoms, hematologic toxicities and immune-related AEs, treatment discontinuation due to toxicities, or treatment-related deaths. The summary incidence, relative risk, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 3,450 patients from 7 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis: 4 nivolumab, 2 pembrolizumab, and 1 atezolizumab trials. The underlying malignancies included were non-small cell lung cancer (4 trials) and melanoma (3 trials). Compared with chemotherapy, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had a significantly lower risk of all- and high-grade fatigue, sensory neuropathy, diarrhea and hematologic toxicities, all-grade anorexia, nausea, and constipation, any all- and high-grade AEs, and treatment discontinuation. There was an increased risk of all-grade rash, pruritus, colitis, aminotransferase elevations, hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism, and all- and high-grade pneumonitis with PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. Our results provide further evidence supporting the favorable risk/benefit ratio for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The Oncologist 2017;22:470-479 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare summary toxicity endpoints and clinically relevant adverse events between programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and chemotherapy. PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of treatment-related symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and sensory neuropathy) but a higher risk of immune-related adverse events (AEs). Summary toxicity endpoints favor PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors (any all- and high-grade AEs and treatment discontinuation). PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. In addition to efficacy data from trials, our findings provide useful information for clinicians for well-balanced discussions with their patients on the risks and benefits of treatment options for advanced cancer.

Frailty and inflammatory markers in older adults with cancer.

We examined the associations between frailty and inflammatory markers, in particular neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), in elderly cancer patients. We conducted cross-sectional analyses of data derived from the Carolina Seniors Registry (CSR), a database of geriatric assessments (GA) in older adults (≧65 years) with cancer. We included patients in the CSR who had a GA and complete blood count test before initiation of therapy. The primary outcome was frailty, determined using the 36-item Carolina Frailty Index (CFI). In our sample of 133 patients, the median age was 74, and 54% were robust, 22% were pre-frail, and 24% were frail. There was a significant positive correlation between CFI and NLR (r = 0.22, p = 0.025). In multivariable analysis, patients in the top tertile of NLR had an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% CI = 1.1-12.8) for frail/pre-frail status, adjusting for age, sex, race, education level, marital status, cancer type and stage. In bivariable analyses, higher NLR was associated with lower instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) score (p = 0.040) and prolonged timed up and go (p = 0.016). This study suggests an association between frailty and inflammation in older adults with cancer.

Molecular and Clinical Characterization of a Claudin-Low Subtype of Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: Claudin-low molecular subtypes have been identified in breast and bladder cancers and are characterized by low expression of claudins, enrichment for epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and tumor-initiating cell (TIC) features. We evaluated whether the claudin-low subtype also exists in gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred fifteen tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) gastric cancer mRNA data set were clustered on the claudin, EMT, and TIC gene sets to identify claudin-low tumors. We derived a 24-gene predictor that classifies gastric cancer into claudin-low and non-claudin-low subtypes. This predictor was validated with the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) data set. We characterized molecular and clinical features of claudin-low tumors. RESULTS: We identified 46 tumors that had consensus enrichment for claudin-low features in TCGA data set. Claudin-low tumors were most commonly diffuse histologic type (82%) and originally classified as TCGA genomically stable (GS) subtype (78%). Compared with GS subtype, claudin-low subtype had significant activation in Rho family of GTPases signaling, which appears to play a key role in its EMT and TIC properties. In the ACRG data set, 28 of 300 samples were classified as claudin-low tumors by the 24-gene predictor and were phenotypically similar to the initially derived claudin-low tumors. Clinically, claudin-low subtype had the worst overall survival. Of note, the hazard ratios that compared claudin-low versus GS subtype were 2.10 (95% CI, 1.07 to 4.11) in TCGA and 2.32 (95% CI, 1.18 to 4.55) in the ACRG cohorts, with adjustment for age and pathologic stage. CONCLUSION: We identified a gastric claudin-low subtype that carries a poor prognosis likely related to therapeutic resistance as a result of its EMT and TIC phenotypes.

Skeletal Muscle Measures as Predictors of Toxicity, Hospitalization, and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Taxane-Based Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Severe skeletal muscle (SM) loss (sarcopenia) is associated with poor cancer outcomes, including reduced survival and increased toxicity. This study investigates SM measures in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving first-line taxane-based chemotherapy and evaluates associations with treatment toxicity and other outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using computerized tomography (CT) images taken for the evaluation of disease burden, skeletal muscle area (SMA), and density (SMD) were measured at the third lumbar vertebrae. Sarcopenia was defined as skeletal muscle index (SMI = SMA/height2) ≤ 41. Skeletal muscle gauge (SMG) was created by multiplying SMI × SMD. Fisher exact tests, t tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression modeling were used. RESULTS: MBC patients (N = 40), median age 55 (range, 34-80), 58% sarcopenic, median SMG 1296 AU (SD, 522). Grade 3-4 toxicity was found in 57% of sarcopenic versus 18% of non-sarcopenic patients (P = 0.02). Toxicity-related hospitalizations were also higher in sarcopenic patients (39% vs. 0%, P = 0.005) as were any adverse events-defined as any grade 3-4 toxicities, hospitalizations, dose reductions, or dose delay-(74% vs. 35%, P = 0.02). Low SMG was associated with grade 3-4 toxicity (P = 0.04), hospitalization (P = 0.01), and time to treatment failure (for progression or toxicity; P = 0.03). Low SMG had a borderline significant association with any adverse event (P = 0.06) and overall survival (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: SM measures are associated with toxicity outcomes and survival in MBC patients receiving first-line taxane-based chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to explore how routinely obtained CT scans can be used to individualize dosing and improve treatment planning. Clin Cancer Res; 23(3); 658-65. ©2016 AACR.

A comparison of toxicity profiles between the lower and standard dose capecitabine in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) bid × 14 days every 21 days (14/21) has been reported to have similar efficacy but more favorable toxicity profile than the approved dosage of 1250 mg/m(2). However, a dose-toxicity relationship of capecitabine in breast cancer patients has not been fully elucidated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare a safety profile between capecitabine starting dose of 1000 and 1250 mg/m(2) bid. Studies were identified using PubMed, ASCO, and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract databases through December 2015. Eligible trials included phase II/III trials of capecitabine monotherapy at 1000 or 1250 mg/m(2) bid (14/21) for breast cancer patients that reported adequate safety data for all (grade 1-4) or high (grade 3-4) grade hand foot syndrome (HFS), diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia, as well as dose reductions, treatment discontinuation or treatment-related deaths. The summary incidence was calculated using random-effects models. A total of 4833 patients from 34 trials were included. 1218 and 3615 patients were treated with capecitabine 1000 and 1250 mg/m(2) bid, respectively. A significantly lower incidence of dose reduction (15.9 vs. 39.0 %; P = 0.007), high-grade HFS (12.0 vs. 19.0 %; P = 0.01), diarrhea (5.3 vs. 9.1 %; P = 0.01), and neutropenia (1.8 vs. 7.3 %; P < 0.01), and all-grade neutropenia (5.8 vs. 25.4 %; P = 0.01) was seen in capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) compared to 1250 mg/m(2). Capecitabine monotherapy at 1000 mg/m(2) bid (14/21) has a clinically meaningful and significantly better toxicity profile compared to 1250 mg/m(2) bid (14/21).

Comparison of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between younger and older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) rely on the presence of ongoing immune response to exert their antitumor effect. Little is known whether an age-related decline in immune function negatively influences antitumor response and in so doing diminishes the efficacy of ICIs in elderly subjects. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of ICIs between younger and older patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed and the ASCO databases were searched up to September 2015. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ICIs (ipilimumab, tremelimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) reporting subgroup comparison of overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) based on age cutoffs. The summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 5265 patients from nine RCTs of ICI were included. When patients are dichotomized into younger and older groups with an age cut-off of 65-70 years, ICIs improved OS in both younger (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82) and older (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.87) groups. An improvement in PFS was observed in younger (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84) and older (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.01) patients. Subgroup analyses according to ICI and tumor type showed a consistent survival benefit in both younger and older groups except for the subgroup of older patients treated in 4 trials of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.41-1.83). CONCLUSIONS: A benefit in OS with ICIs was significant in both younger and older patients with a cut-off age of 65-70 years.