Hepatitis B virus reactivation in kidney transplant patients with resolved hepatitis B virus infection: Risk factors and the safety and efficacy of preemptive therapy.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is associated with complications and adverse outcomes in patients with clinically resolved HBV infection who are seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), and seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBc Ab) and/or hepatitis B surface antibody (HBs Ab) before kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients with resolved HBV infection who were HBV-DNA negative. HBV-DNA after KT was evaluated, and the occurrence of HBV reactivation and outcomes were monitored. We defined HBV reactivation as seropositivity for HBV-DNA at or above the minimal detection level of 1.0 log IU/mL and treated preemptively (using entecavir) when the HBV-DNA level was at or above 1.3 log IU/mL, in accordance with the Japanese Guidelines for HBV treatment. RESULTS: Among the 52 patients, the mean age was 57.2 ± 10.8 years. The median HBc Ab titer was 12.8 (interquartile range, 4.6-42.6) cutoff index, and five (9.6%) cases of HBV reactivation occurred. No patients developed graft loss and died due to HBV reactivation. Statistical analysis showed that age and HBc Ab titer were significant risk factors for HBV reactivation (P = .037 and P = .042, respectively). No significant differences were found between graft survival and the presence or absence of HBV reactivation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that HBc Ab titer and age could be significant risk factors for HBV reactivation. Resolution of HBV infection did not appear to be associated with patient or graft survival, regardless of whether HBV reactivation occurred, when following our preemptive strategy.

Relative hypophosphatemia early after transplantation is a predictor of good kidney graft function.

BACKGROUND: Phosphate level is a potent independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. The association between hypophosphatemia and kidney function in kidney transplant patients is uncertain. METHODS: In total, 90 kidney transplant recipients were divided into two groups: one group of patients with hypophosphatemia and the other group without hypophosphatemia. The recipients with hypophosphatemia were identified as having less than or equal to the lowest quartile of serum phosphate levels at 1-, 3-, and 12-month post-transplant. The cumulative kidney survival rates were calculated for each group using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 47 years and the median follow-up period was 58 months. During the follow-up period, the following results were demonstrated in 90 transplant patients: graft loss (n = 6), mortality (n = 3). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis results, the patients with hypophosphatemia demonstrated a significantly lower risk of 30% decline in eGFR compared to those without hypophosphatemia at 1- and 3-month post-transplant, but not at 12-month post-transplant. After adjusting for confounding factors, hypophosphatemia at 1- and 3-month post-transplant was an independent predictor of good kidney survival (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.82 and HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.07-0.92, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that hypophosphatemia during the first 3 months after kidney transplantation was associated with better kidney survival.

Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with anticardiolipin antibody in a kidney transplant recipient with polycythemia.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) develops from various etiologies, and it is often difficult to distinguish the etiology of TMA in kidney transplantation. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is one of the differential diagnoses for TMA that may cause acute loss of graft function or fatal thrombotic complications. This report details a 66-year-old male patient with polycythemia after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. Antibody screening tests were negative before transplant. Despite administration of an adequate desensitization therapy including plasmapheresis and rituximab, he developed acute graft dysfunction on postoperative day 112 and graft biopsy revealed prominent microvascular inflammation in the glomerular capillaries without immunoglobulin deposits. Flow cytometric panel-reactive antibody screening failed to detect donor-specific antibodies at both pre-transplant and episode biopsies. Anticardiolipin antibody was repeatedly positive, but neither thrombosis nor previous thrombotic episodes were detected. After excluding several differential diagnoses, the graft dysfunction with unexplained TMA was treated with steroid pulse, plasmapheresis and rituximab re-induction. Anticardiolipin antibody disappeared after this intensive treatment and graft function recovered gradually and stabilized for 52 months. This report suggests that asymptomatic anticardiolipin antibody may be associated with acute graft dysfunction. Even if thrombotic episodes are not observed, an exist of anticardiolipin antibody may be one of the risk factors of renal TMA after kidney transplantation.

Kidney transplantation for treatment of end-stage kidney disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: The safety of kidney transplantation (KT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological disease has not been investigated thoroughly. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre study, we investigated the clinical courses of six ESKD patients that received KT after HSCT for various haematological diseases. Data for six such patients were obtained from three institutions in our consortium. RESULTS: Two patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia, one with refractory aplastic anaemia and another one with acute lymphocytic leukaemia received bone marrow transplantation. One patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia received umbilical cord blood transplantation, and one with mantle cell lymphoma received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The patients developed ESKD at a median of 133 months after HSCT. Two patients who received KT and HSCT from the same donor were temporarily treated with immunosuppressive drugs. The other patients received KT and HSCT from different donors and were treated with antibody induction using our standard regimens. For one patient with ABO-incompatible transplantation, we added rituximab, splenectomy, and plasmapheresis. In the observational period at a median of 51 months after KT, only one patient experienced acute T-cell-mediated rejection. Four patients underwent hospitalization because of infection and fully recovered. No patient experienced recurrence of their original haematological disease. All patients survived throughout the observational periods, and graft functions were preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high infection frequency, survival rates and graft functions were extremely good in patients compared with previous studies. Therefore, current management contributed to favourable outcomes of these patients.

The potential role of perivascular lymphatic vessels in preservation of kidney allograft function.

BACKGROUND: Lymphangiogenesis occurs in diseased native kidneys and kidney allografts, and correlates with histological injury; however, the clinical significance of lymphatic vessels in kidney allografts is unclear. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 63 kidney transplant patients who underwent protocol biopsies. Lymphatic vessels were identified by immunohistochemical staining for podoplanin, and were classified according to their location as perivascular or interstitial lymphatic vessels. The associations between perivascular lymphatic density and kidney allograft function and pathological findings were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in perivascular lymphatic densities in kidney allograft biopsy specimens obtained at 0 h, 3 months and 12 months. The groups with higher perivascular lymphatic density showed a lower proportion of progression of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy grade from 3 to 12 months (P for trend = 0.039). Perivascular lymphatic density was significantly associated with annual decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate after 12 months (r = -0.31, P = 0.017), even after adjusting for multiple confounders (standardized ß = -0.30, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: High perivascular lymphatic density is associated with favourable kidney allograft function. The perivascular lymphatic network may be involved in inhibition of allograft fibrosis and stabilization of graft function.

Temporal serum creatinine increase and exacerbation of tubulointerstitial inflammation during the first two months in resolving polyomavirus BK nephropathy.

AIM: Polyomavirus BK nephropathy (BKVN) is an important complication in kidney transplantation. After immunosuppressive agents are reduced, some patients experience a temporal increase in serum creatinine (sCr) before viral clearance. The histological characteristics of re-biopsies were therefore investigated to evaluate the time course of remission. METHODS: sCr was measured and urinary cytology evaluated periodically in 14 patients with biopsy-proven BKVN. Remission of BKVN was defined as re-biopsies negative for SV40 large T antigen (SV40-TAg) or for decoy cells on at least three consecutive cytology tests. Early changes in sCr were correlated with re-biopsy findings. RESULTS: Mean sCr was 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/dL at diagnosis, increasing during the first 2 months to 2.6 ± 2.0 mg/dL, and decreasing thereafter, to 2.3 ± 1.2 mg/dL at 3-4 months. Two patients who experienced further increases in sCr at 3 months showed early graft loss, while the others showed clinical or histological remission. Nineteen re-biopsies were obtained from eight patients over 4 months. Banff i-scores were higher in re-biopsies obtained during the first 2 months than the index biopsies and re-biopsies at 2-4 months (P = 0.02). SV40-TAg positivity was common in re-biopsies during the first 2 months (10/11 biopsies), but rarer at 2-4 months (2/8 biopsies, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporal graft dysfunction and increased inflammation, called immune reconstitution, were observed at 2 months. Later sCr reversal is associated with remission.

[Examination of UGT1A1 polymorphisms and irinotecan-induced neutropenia in patients with Colorectal cancer].

Irinotecan is an effective drug in the treatment of colorectal cancer. However, there are reports of an association between certain UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms and the development of adverse reactions(such as neutropenia)related to irinotecan metabolism. We retrospectively investigated UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms and the occurrences of irinotecan-induced neutropenia in 25 patients of colorectal cancer at our hospital. Analysis of UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms in these patients yielded the following classifications: a wild-type group( *1/*1)comprising 13 patients(52%), a heterozygous group(*1/ *28, *1/*6)of 10 patients(40%), and a homozygous group(*28/*28, *6/*6)of 2 patients(8%). The frequency of neutropenia was 15.4%(2/13)in the wild-type group, 30%(3/10)in the heterozygous group, and 100%(2/2)in the homozygous group. Grade 4 neutropenia only occurred in the homozygous group. These results suggest that a dose reduction of irinotecan should be considered for patients who fall into the homozygous group upon analysis of their UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms, as such patients might be susceptible to grade 4 neutropenia.

Pancreas transplantation: a single-institution experience in Japan.

PURPOSE: We herein report our experience with pancreas transplantation in 26 patients at a single institution in Japan between August 2001 and December 2011. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 26 pancreas transplantations performed in our institute. RESULTS: The early complications (within 2 weeks) included one graft venous thrombosis, one arterial thrombosis, and two reoperations for bleeding. Of the 26 pancreas transplant recipients, five lost pancreas graft function. Of 24 simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients, three lost kidney graft function due to noncompliance. The patient, pancreas, and kidney survival rates were 100, 96 and 93 % at 1 year; 100, 80 and 93 % at 5 years; and 100, 67 and 68 % at 10 years, respectively. Of all these complications, venous thrombosis after pancreas transplantation was the most critical. CONCLUSIONS: As the largest series of pancreas transplantations in a single institution in Japan, our series yielded better results than the worldwide data recorded by the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Routine postoperative anticoagulation therapy is not necessary for the prevention of graft thrombosis if sufficient fluid infusion is strictly controlled and the graft blood flow is frequently monitored. When graft thrombosis occurs, both early detection and appropriate intervention are extremely important if the pancreas graft is to survive.

One-year follow-up of treatment with once-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant.

OBJECTIVES: The once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (tacrolimus QD) is expected to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety to the twice-daily formulation (tacrolimus BID). We reviewed the 1-year outcomes of tacrolimus QD in de novo renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 50 de novo renal transplant patients assigned in a nonrandomized fashion to either tacrolimus QD (n=23, historic control group) or tacrolimus BID (n=27). Other immunosuppressive drugs used in both groups included mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, and steroids. We evaluated trough levels, required dosages, renal function, rejection rates, and episodes of infection within 1 year after transplant. RESULTS: Trough levels of both drugs varied during the perioperative periods, but subsequently stabilized in both groups. There was a tendency toward a slow elevation and a higher dosage requirement in the tacrolimus QD group, compared with the tacrolimus BID group in the early stages, though the required dosages decreased steadily. The rejection rate in the tacrolimus QD group was low, and only 1 patient experienced subclinical rejection. No severe infectious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients taking tacrolimus QD tended to have lower trough levels and require higher dosages than those taking tacrolimus BID during the early posttransplant period, though the differences decreased with increasing time after transplant. Tacrolimus QD can be administered with excellent efficacy and safety in de novo renal transplant recipients.

Treatment of arteriovenous shunts after renal transplantation.

PURPOSE: Immunosuppressive drugs have improved the results of renal transplantation dramatically in recent years; however, there is still no consensus on the treatment of arteriovenous (A-V) shunts after successful transplantation. We evaluated the treatment of A-V shunts after transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent shunt closure at our hospital between 2005 and 2007 assessing surgical methods, operative time, blood loss, and complications. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent shunt closure, as a simple transection in 5 patients, resection of the anastomotic site in 16, resection and reconstruction of the artery in 26, and graftectomy in 5. Graftectomy was associated with copious blood loss and a long operative time. The most frequent complication was phlebitis, but there were no nerve complications. CONCLUSIONS: An A-V shunt after renal transplantation may result in an aneurysm, severe venous dilatation, pain, bloating of the arm, infection, and cardiac problems. Thus, after successful transplantation, shunt closure should be performed to prevent these complications and to improve quality of life.