Dysphagia in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective study.

To investigate dysphagia after extubation in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We retrospectively examined patients with severe COVID-19 treated in our hospital between August 2021 and March 2022. Feeding outcomes were categorized into two groups-(1) total oral intake, and (2) difficulty in oral intake. To assess the feeding outcome, we used modified water-swallowing test (MWST) for all patients. However, in cases where aspiration or recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was suspected, we conducted the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing after MWST. Patient data were collected from medical records. Forty-six patients with severe COVID-19 were included. Among the 46 patients, 14 (30.4%) experienced difficulties with oral intake. Older age, longer length of hospitalization, duration of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, diabetes, and higher serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) at the time of intubation were associated with difficulty in oral intake. The rate of difficulty with oral intake in patients with severe COVID-19 was 30.4%, which is not as high as reported in previous studies. Older age, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, diabetes, and higher levels of CRP and PCT were associated with the prevalence of oral intake difficulty, suggesting that early attention should be paid to high-risk patients who have preexisting deterioration of swallowing function due to aging and comorbidities, or who have prolonged intubation or tracheostomy to prevent aspiration pneumonia.

Cricotracheostomy for patients with severe COVID-19: A case control study.

Background: Tracheostomy is an important procedure for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Older age and obesity have been reported to be associated with the risk of severe COVID-19 and prolonged intubation, and anticoagulants are often administered in patients with severe COVID-19; these factors are also related to a higher risk of tracheostomy. Cricotracheostomy, a modified procedure for opening the airway through intentional partial cricoid cartilage resection, was recently reported to be useful in cases with low-lying larynx, obesity, stiff neck, and bleeding tendency. Here, we investigated the usefulness and safety of cricotracheostomy for severe COVID-19 patients. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with severe COVID-19 who underwent cricotracheostomy between January 2021 and April 2022 with a follow-up period of ≥ 14 days were included in this study. Forty patients with respiratory failure not related to COVID-19 who underwent traditional tracheostomy between January 2015 and April 2022 comprised the control group. Data were collected from medical records and comprised age, sex, body mass index, interval from intubation to tracheostomy, use of anticoagulants, complications of tracheostomy, and decannulation. Results: Age, sex, and days from intubation to tracheostomy were not significantly different between the COVID-19/cricotracheostomy and control/traditional tracheostomy groups. Body mass index was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group than that in the control group (P = 0.02). The rate of use of anticoagulants was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group compared with the control group (P < 0.01). Peri-operative bleeding, subcutaneous emphysema, and stomal infection rates were not different between the groups, while stomal granulation was significantly less in the COVID-19 group (P = 0.04). Conclusions: These results suggest that cricotracheostomy is a safe procedure in patients with severe COVID-19.

Laryngeal complications after endotracheal intubation and prone positioning in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Objectives: Laryngeal complications have been reported after endotracheal intubation and prone positioning in patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but their association is unclear. In this study, we investigated the rate of laryngeal complications in patients with COVID-19 compared to an alternative condition (control group). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 40 patients who underwent endotracheal intubation for either COVID-19 or an alternative condition (control group). Data on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, use of prone therapy, duration of endotracheal intubation, and duration from extubation/tracheostomy to laryngeal evaluation were collected from medical records. Results: There were no significant differences in BMI, frequency of CVD risk factors, duration of endotracheal intubation, or duration from extubation/tracheostomy to laryngeal evaluation between the two groups. In the COVID-19 group, all patients adopted the prone position. In comparison, only one patient in the control group adopted the prone position. Significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the incidence of vocal fold immobility and laryngeal granuloma. Conclusion: Laryngeal complications were more common in the COVID-19 group than in the control group. Prone positioning may be a risk factor for these complications. Level of Evidence: 4.

Quantitative evaluation of age-related alteration of swallowing function: Videofluoroscopic and manometric studies.

OBJECTIVE: Swallowing function progressively deteriorates with advancing age, leading to high morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. To establish strategies for treatment of age-related swallowing disorders, the mechanisms of such disorders must be quantitatively clarified. The purpose of this paper was to elucidate the swallowing function of healthy elderly individuals by comparison with that of young adults by videofluorographic and manometric examinations. METHODS: The subjects were 70 healthy volunteers with no history of diseases affecting swallowing function. They were classified into three groups according to age: the young adult group (21-32 years of age, n=8), early elderly group (60-69 years of age, n=39), and late elderly group (70-83 years of age, n=23). Their swallowing functions were quantitatively evaluated by videofluorographic and manometric studies. RESULTS: Videofluorographic examination showed no significant differences in the moving distances of the hyoid bone and larynx in the pharyngeal swallowing phase between the young and elderly groups. The pharyngeal transit time (PTT) of the bolus in the elderly group was longer and the percentage of laryngeal elevation (%LE) was lower than those in the young group. Manometric examination revealed higher hypopharyngeal swallowing pressure in the elderly groups. The traveling velocity of the swallowing pressure in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) region and the UES relaxation time decreased with aging. Reduction of the UES pressure during the pharyngeal swallowing phase was insufficient in 15.4% of the early elderly group and 30.4% of the late elderly group. Additionally, the UES zone was broadened in 20.5% of the early elderly group and 26.1% of the late elderly group. CONCLUSION: Videofluorographic and manometric examinations quantitatively demonstrated that the swallowing reflex was delayed and UES opening was impaired by aging. UES dysfunction may develop secondary by increased tonicity and decreased elasticity of the cricopharyngeal muscle. Stimulation of oropharyngeal sensory function and exercising the laryngeal levator muscles may be effective for age-related swallowing disorders.

A rare manifestation of cricopharyngeal myopathy presenting with dysphagia in sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory granulomatous disease that affects multiple organs in the body; however, dysphagia is a relatively rare manifestation at early stages. Dysphagia in sarcoidosis is attributed to many mechanisms, such as mediastinal lymphadenopathy, esophageal or laryngeal involvement, cranial neuropathy, and brainstem infiltration. In this article, we report an extremely rare case with sarcoidosis who presented with dysphagia due to isolated cricopharyngeal myopathy. The 75-year-old woman presented with slowly progressive swallowing difficulty and videofluorography showed insufficient opening of the upper esophageal sphincter. On presentation, she had no cranial nerve or central nervous system impairments. A cricopharyngeal myotomy was performed, and histopathological study revealed a significant inflammatory change with non-necrotizing granulomas within the muscle tissue. We concluded that this was a very rare case of sarcoidosis presenting with localized cricopharyngeal myopathy. Postoperatively, a contracture of the esophageal entrance was successfully released and the dysphagia was alleviated.

Japanese version of voice handicap index for subjective evaluation of voice disorder.

Recently, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), developed in the United States, has been highlighted as a means to assess a patient's perceptions of the severity of his or her voice disorder. The VHI is based on a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies the degree of a patient's disability related to his/her voice disorder. The questionnaire was translated into Japanese and applied to Japanese patients with various kinds of disordered voice or dysphonia. The results were analyzed and the usefulness discussed. In this study, 546 patients (281 males and 265 females) were included. Mean VHI scores were 36.2/120 in males and 44.1/120 in females. In the male patients, VHI scores were the highest among teens. However, VHI scores did not vary with age in the female patients. Patients with vocal fold paralysis, functional dysphonia, psychological dysphonia, and spasmodic dysphonia showed relatively high VHI scores, whereas those with laryngeal granuloma and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease showed low scores. In most diseases, functional and physiological scores were higher than emotional scores. In any treated patients, those with vocal nodule, vocal polyp, polypoid vocal fold, and recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, VHI scores decreased after therapeutic intervention. These findings suggest that the Japanese VHI is a useful tool for monitoring a patient's psychological status, choosing appropriate treatment, and assessing the therapeutic outcome.

[New scoring proposed for endoscopic swallowing evaluation and clinical significance].

Dysphagia is becoming a critical medical and social issue with aging population. Appropriate treatment requires that swallowing be assessed objectively. The simple, clinic-based scoring we developed for flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) uses four parameters--(1) the salivary pooling degree at the vallecula and piriform sinuses, (2) the glottal closure reflex induced by touching the epiglottis or arytenoid with the endoscope, (3) swallowing reflex initiation assessed by "white-out" timing, and (4) pharyngeal clearance after blue-dyed water is swallowed-categorized as 0 for normal, 1 for mildly impaired, 2 for moderate, or 3 for severe. Scores given by experienced otolaryngologists expert in treating dysphagic subjects correlated significantly with those of nonexpert otolaryngologists and speech-language-hearing therapists. Pharyngeal clearance evaluated by videofluorography correlated with FEES clearance scores, as did aspiration severity with total scores statistically significantly. Feeding procedures related significantly to total scores for the four parameters, indicating its usefulness in deciding oral food intake. Our new scoring is thus simple and reliable in evaluating dysphagia severity and features, and potentially clinically advantageous.

Laterofixation of the vocal fold using an endo-extralaryngeal needle carrier for bilateral vocal fold paralysis.

OBJECTIVES: Laterofixation of the vocal fold is a simple and reliable surgical intervention for laryngeal obstruction due to bilateral vocal fold fixation to obtain sufficient glottal space. Nevertheless, it has some technical disadvantages. This report summarizes the surgical outcomes in patients who underwent laterofixation of the vocal fold with or without the use of an endo-extralaryngeal needle carrier (EENC). METHODS: A prospective study of 11 consecutive patients with bilateral vocal fold paralysis. All of the patients underwent unilateral vocal fold laterofixation. Six patients were assigned to the non-EENC group and five to the EENC group. The surgical outcomes were evaluated, including the operating time and respiratory and phonatory functions. RESULTS: The operating time was 44% shorter in the EENC group and less skin incisions were required. Postoperatively, the dyspnea was eliminated in all of the patients in both groups, and the six patients who required a tracheotomy were successfully decannulated. Spirometry confirmed the improvements in %FEV(1) and %PEF in the two groups. Postoperative voice function was socially acceptable in all patients, and it tended to be better in the non-EENC group. In the EENC group, one patient developed a minor submucosal hematoma and another patient had a recurrence of dyspnea 2 months postoperatively, probably due to thread disruption. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that laterofixation of the vocal fold with or without EENC relieves laryngeal obstruction. Surgery with the EENC is simpler and quicker than the conventional procedure. However, the surgery with the EENC has some disadvantages, including likely problems with the thread and downward traction on the vocal fold. Surgeons should be aware of these possible shortcomings.