168 Cases of aneurysmal dermatofibroma and 29 cases of hemosiderotic dermatofibroma: A clinicopathologic study.

OBJECTIVES: Aneurysmal dermatofibroma (ADF) and hemosiderotic dermatofibroma (HDF) are rare variants of dermatofibroma (DF) characterized by distinct histologic features. While HDF is traditionally considered a precursor to ADF, supporting evidence is limited, and the etiology remains unclear. A retrospective analysis of 2128 DF cases (2016-2019) was conducted to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics of ADF, HDF, and other DFs. METHODS: Histopathologically diagnosed DF cases were examined for ADF and HDF. Univariate analyses were performed to compare clinicopathologic features. RESULTS: Among the cases, 168 (7.9%) were ADF and 29 (1.4%) were HDF. Aneurysmal dermatofibroma and HDF shared several common characteristics, including lower occurrence in females, larger size, and increased cellularity (all P < .0001). Notably, 29% of ADFs lacked hemosiderin deposition. Aneurysmal dermatofibroma primarily manifested on exposed areas (face and forearm, both P < .001). In contrast, 41% of HDFs occurred on the lower leg (P = .018), and all lower leg HDFs exhibited signs of venous stasis, distinguishing them from other HDFs (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a potential close relationship between ADF and HDF. Contrary to conventional beliefs, we also presented the possibility of ADF progressing into HDFs. Physical trauma may induce ADF, and HDFs may emerge from ADFs in conjunction with venous stasis in the lower extremities.

Keloidal dermatofibroma: Clinicopathological comparison of 52 cases with a series of 2077 other dermatofibromas.

Dermatofibroma is a common benign skin lesion with a contested etiology: some believe it is a neoplasm while others propose minor injuries initiate it. Many dermatofibroma variants have been described, including keloidal dermatofibroma, which is unusual by bearing keloidal collagen. Keloidal dermatofibroma was first described in 1998 and only 15 cases have been reported. Since keloids are driven by skin injuries, the existence of keloidal dermatofibroma has been suggested to support the injury hypothesis of dermatofibroma etiology. To better understand keloidal dermatofibroma characteristics and gain clues regarding dermatofibroma etiology, consecutive keloidal dermatofibroma cases (n = 52) and dermatofibroma without keloidal collagen (n = 2077) that were histopathologically diagnosed in 2016-2019 were identified from the records of a Japanese dermatopathology laboratory and compared in terms of demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics by univariate analyses. Compared to other dermatofibromas, keloidal dermatofibromas occurred more frequently on the forearm and hand (P < 0.0001 and 0.0019), especially the wrist dorsum, and in the superficial skin layer (P < 0.0001). Keloidal dermatofibromas also demonstrated more cellularity and hemorrhage (both P < 0.0001). Correlation analyses between keloidal collagen amount and keloidal dermatofibroma size (a proxy of time-since-onset) did not support the notion that keloidal collagen deposition and keloidal dermatofibroma formation are triggered simultaneously. Recent injury, as indicated by fresh hemorrhage, was equally common in putatively older and younger keloidal dermatofibromas. Thus, keloidal collagen in keloidal dermatofibromas could be due to injury to preexisting dermatofibromas, which suggests that the keloidal dermatofibroma entity does not prove the injury hypothesis. Commonalities between keloids and keloidal dermatofibromas suggest a link between genetics, provocative events that induce myofibroblast differentiation, and keloidal collagen production.

Multicentric endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma of the skin: A case report.

Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma (EMPSGC) is a rare low-grade sweat gland carcinoma. EMPSGC is thought to be a precursor to mucinous carcinoma of the skin (MCS). Since the first description of EMPSGC in 1997, only a few cases have been reported, and its etiology and mechanisms remain unknown. In this report, we describe a 71-year-old Japanese woman with two isolated EMPSGC and one MCS lesion on her face. She was simultaneously diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. She had a history of uterine cancer of unknown histopathological diagnosis 24 years previously. The presence of in situ lesions confirmed by myoepithelial cells suggested that the cutaneous lesions were primary tumors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of multiple primary EMPSGC/MCS tumors. Additionally, this might be the first case with multiple primary carcinomas including adnexal cutaneous tumors, breast cancer, and uterine cancer, which may share the common feature of expressing female hormonal receptors. This case indicates that EMPSGC/MCS may be triggered by a hormonal receptor abnormality, perhaps because of genetic defects. A larger number of reports examining this issue may be necessary to further assess our initial observations.