Cuboid fracture: An extremely rare cause of limping in a 2-year-old child.

The purpose of this case report is to raise awareness of an extremely rare cause of limping, in young children. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion of a possible cuboid fracture when evaluating a young child who presents with limping.

A study of the possible effect of abnormal patella height on meniscal tears.

OBJECTIVE: Patellar height is key to knee biomechanics. Variations (alta/baja) have been associated with instability/dislocations, ACL ruptures etch. The effect of abnormal patella height and meniscal lesions is not clear yet; this is a first investigation of this relation. METHODS: 100 patients with meniscal tears were X-Rayed to determine patellar height using the Insall-Salvati ratio and the Caton-Deschamps Index. RESULTS: 20% had abnormal patellar height according to the Insall-Salvati ratio and 9% based on the Caton-Deschamps index. CONCLUSION: This indicates that patella height could be a parameter in the occurrence of meniscal injuries worth investigating in larger populations; yet the mechanism remains unclear.

Traumatic Elbow Mediolateral Investigatory Screening: The value of the sitting axial mediolateral projection in the diagnosis of radial head fractures.

BACKGROUND: Elbow injuries are frequently encountered in hospital practice, while radial head fractures are the commonest result of such trauma. Diagnosis of radial head fractures is based on clinical and radiographic evaluation with a number of X-ray projections being available. A combination of views is chosen, comprising of routine elbow series screenings and modified techniques, as well as the assistance of the fat-pat sign; never the less fractures can still be occult on X-rays. PURPOSE: This article aims to demonstrate the diagnostic value of the sitting axial mediolateral projection, which in our hospital is referred to as the Traumatic Elbow Mediolateral Investigatory Screening (TEMIS). This projection has been successfully used in our hospital repeatedly for the identification of occult fractures that were missed by other projections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 62 patients who presented to our Emergency Department due to trauma in the elbow over a six-month period were X-rayed for the identification of fractures. Projections included an anteroposterior, a lateral and TEMIS. RESULTS: Radial head fractures (Mason type I) were identified in 14 out of 62 patients. 2 of these were only visible on the TEMIS projection, while they were missed by the other two views. CONCLUSION: Trauma to the elbow is a common type of injury. Minor fractures can be expected to heal with good results; complications, however, should not be underestimated. Improper healing can result in a permanently malfunctioning joint with restricted movement and stiffness. To avoid such consequences the choice of a reliable screening projection is significant. In our case the diagnostic value of the TEMIS projection lies in the fact that it shows all fractures seen on routine screenings and reveals fractures missed by them, also being well tolerated by patients due to comfortable arm placement during the screening. All in all, when a fracture is suspected on the basis of clinical signs but no radiographic evidence is seen on conventional screenings, the TEMIS view is recommended for further investigation.