Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 8-16, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721950

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis proportions of incidence are increasing globally. However, limited data are available regarding anaphylaxis in the pediatric population of Greece. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate management of anaphylaxis in Greek pediatric departments. METHODS: We performed a questionnaire-based study of children aged less than 16 years presenting with anaphylaxis in 10 national pediatric hospitals over a period of 2 years. Management of anaphylaxis was assessed prior to and after an informative intervention. RESULTS: In all, 127 cases of anaphylaxis were identified. Epinephrine was administered in almost half of all cases (51.2%), predominantly through intramuscular route (88.5%), while the majority of anaphylaxis patients were treated with antihistamines (92.9%) and corticosteroids (70.1%). Epinephrine was more likely administered by physicians if the elicitor was a drug (P < 0.003). Regarding long-term management, an epinephrine auto-injector was prescribed in 66.9% of patients. Follow-up information was available for most of the patients (92.9%), the majority of whom (76.3%) were referred to an allergist. More than half of these patients (63.6%) had a documented allergy follow-up, which identified a causative allergen in 53.3% of cases. No statistically significant differences were recorded prior to and after the intervention regarding management of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study highlighted the necessity of further improvement in terms of anaphylaxis treatment and secondary prevention measures. This presupposes appropriate education and training of healthcare professionals, thus contributing to proper and comprehensive care of the pediatric population.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Epinefrina , Humanos , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/terapia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Grécia/epidemiologia , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Lactente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Injeções Intramusculares
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(3)2021 Mar 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33664041

RESUMO

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a debilitating functional gastrointestinal disorder. Diagnosis is based on the Rome III criteria. There are no evidence-based guidelines for the management of paediatric CVS, although ondansetron and antimigraine medications are frequently tried. We describe a 13-year-old adolescent girl with severe CVS and numerous hospital admissions for dehydration because of cyclic vomiting. She had failed oral ondansetron therapy. Oral aprepitant (125 mg in the first, and 85 mg on the second and third days), a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist that has been approved for preventing chemotherapy-induced vomiting or postoperative emesis, was tried in our patient at home during the first prodromal signs of an upset stomach. She had a dramatic response to it, with no further episodes of vomiting since its start. There is an urgent need for randomised clinical studies to assess the efficacy of available treatment options, including aprepitant in patients with severe CVS.


Assuntos
Antieméticos , Antineoplásicos , Adolescente , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Aprepitanto/uso terapêutico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Morfolinas/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Neurocinina-1/uso terapêutico , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA