RESUMO
About 90% of new HIV-1 infections in children occur in sub-Saharan Africa, where treatment monitoring remains suboptimal. We sought to ascertain factors associated with immunovirological responses among an ART-experienced paediatric population in Cameroon. A laboratory-based and analytical study was conducted from January 2017 throughout December 2020 wherein plasma viral load (PVL) analyses and CD4 cell counts were performed. Viral suppression (VS) was defined as PVL < 1000 copies/mL and immunological failure (IF) as CD4 < 500 cells/µL for participants ≤5 years and CD4 < 250 cells/µL for those >5 years; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Overall, 272 participants were enrolled (median age: 13 [9-15.5] years; 54% males); median ART duration 7 [3-10] years. Globally, VS was achieved in 54.41%. VS was 56.96% in urban versus 40.48% in rural areas (p = 0.04). IF was 22.43%, with 15.79% among participants ≤5 years and 22.92% among those >5 years (p = 0.66). IF was 20.43% in urban versus 33.33% in rural areas (p = 0.10). Following ART, IF was 25.82% on first-line (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NNRTI-based) versus 10.17% on second-line (protease inhibitor-based) regimens (p = 0.01). Interestingly, IF was 7.43% among virally suppressed versus 40.32% among virally unsuppressed participants (p < 0.0001). A low VS indicates major challenges in achieving AIDS' elimination in this paediatric population, especially in rural settings and poor immune statuses. Scaling up NNRTI-sparing regimens alongside close monitoring would ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes.
RESUMO
Molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is critical to the control of the pandemic, which is a major threat to global health. Several molecular tests have been validated by WHO, but would require operational evaluation in the field to ensure their interoperability in diagnosis. In order to ensure field interoperability in molecular assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, we evaluated the diagnostic concordance of SARS-CoV-2 between an automated (Abbott) and a manual (DaAn gene) realtime PCR (rRT-PCR), two commonly used assays in Africa. A comparative study was conducted on 287 nasopharyngeal specimens at the Chantal BIYA International Reference Centre (CIRCB) in Yaounde- Cameroon. Samples were tested in parallel with Abbott and DaAn gene rRT-PCR, and performance characteristics were evaluated by Cohen's coefficient and Spearman's correlation. A total of 273 participants [median age (IQR) 36 (26-46) years] and 14 EQA specimens were included in the study. Positivity was on 30.0% (86/287) Abbott and 37.6% (108/287) DaAn gene. Overall agreement was 82.6% (237/287), with k=0.82 (95%CI: 0.777-0.863), indicating an excellent diagnostic agreement. The positive and negative agreement was 66.67% (72/108) and 92.18 % (165/179) respectively. Regarding Viral Load (VL), positive agreement was 100% for samples with high VLs (CT<20). Among positive SARS-CoV- 2 cases, the mean difference in Cycle Threshold (CT) for the manual and Cycle Number (CN) for the automated was 6.75±0.3. The excellent agreement (>80%) between the Abbott and DaAn gene rRTPCR platforms supports interoperability between the two assays. Discordance occurs at low-VL, thus underscoring these tools as efficient weapons in limiting SARS-CoV-2 community transmission.
