Clinical study on the utility of allergy tests to detect IgE-mediated anaphylaxis after diclofenac etalhyaluronate administration.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate factors involved in anaphylaxis related to diclofenac etalhyaluronate (DEH) [product name: Joyclu® (JCL)] (containing DEH and macrogol 400), which is used to treat patients with osteoarthritis. METHODS: Patients with osteoarthritis were divided into two groups that had (experienced patients) or had not experienced anaphylactic symptoms after JCL administration (non-experienced patients). Five tests performed to assess factors related to anaphylaxis consisted of a skin prick test (SPT) as the primary endpoint and the other tests including basophil activation test, allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) tests using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or immunochromatographic kits, and genetic study were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The SPT showed 4 (wheal)/7 (erythema) of 15 experienced patients and 0/3 of 19 non-experienced patients were positive for any of the test reagents containing DEH. The basophil activation test showed two experienced patients were positive for test reagents containing DEH. DEH- and diclofenac-sIgE were detected in 3 and 1 of 12 experienced patients, respectively. No clear results were shown in the other tests. CONCLUSIONS: DEH may be the main factor involved in the development of anaphylaxis. The SPT was more sensitive than the basophil activation and allergen-sIgE tests for identifying factors associated with anaphylaxis.

Clinical investigation for the mechanisms of anaphylactic symptoms in osteoarthritis patients after diclofenac etalhyaluronate administration.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate mechanisms of anaphylaxis in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of knee and hip after diclofenac etalhyaluronate (product name: JOYCLU® [JCL]) intra-articular injection, and to determine the utility of tests to investigate the mechanism involved. METHODS: In this observational study in Japan, patients aged ≥20 years with knee or hip OA who received JCL intra-articular injection, experienced anaphylactic symptoms considered related to JCL ("experienced patients") or did not experience allergic symptoms considered related to JCL ("non-experienced patients"). Basophil activation tests (BAT), specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody testing by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) or immunochromatographic kit, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were conducted using patient blood and saliva. RESULTS: Thirteen experienced patients and 14 non-experienced patients were tested. Seven experienced patients tested positive by BAT using diclofenac etalhyaluronate (DEH)-containing test substances. Diclofenac (DF)-specific IgE antibodies were detected in 4 of 7 BAT-positive patients, but not in the non-experienced patients. Specific IgE antibody testing by immunochromatographic kit and GWAS showed no clear results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that anaphylaxis occurs after JCL administration via an IgE-mediated mechanism and that DEH may be involved in this mechanism. BAT and DF-specific IgE ELISA may be useful tests for investigating the mechanisms of anaphylactic reactions after JCL administration.

Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac-Hyaluronate Conjugate (Diclofenac Etalhyaluronate) for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Phase III Trial in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the efficacy and safety of intraarticular (IA) injection of diclofenac covalently linked to hyaluronic acid (diclofenac etalhyaluronate [DF-HA]; ONO-5704/SI-613) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: In a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, eligible subjects ages 40-75 years with symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence score of 2 or 3) were randomly assigned to receive IA injections of DF-HA 30 mg or placebo (citric acid-sodium citrate buffered solution; 1:1) once every 4 weeks for 20 weeks (a total of 6 injections). Subjects were followed up for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline to 12 weeks in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC) pain subscale scores, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Safety was evaluated by adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: All 440 subjects received investigational products (220 received placebo and 220 received DF-HA). The full analysis set and safety population comprised 438 subjects (220 in the placebo group and 218 in the DF-HA group) and 440 subjects, respectively. At 12 weeks, subjects receiving DF-HA showed significant improvement from baseline in the WOMAC pain subscale score (-23.2 mm) compared to subjects receiving placebo ( -17.1 mm), with a difference of -6.1 mm (95% confidence interval -9.4, -2.8; P < 0.001). The difference between groups was significant as early as week 1, and a difference was maintained for 24 weeks, although the difference at week 24 was not significant. Anaphylactic reactions were observed in 2 subjects receiving DF-HA. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that treatment with DF-HA results in significant improvement in the WOMAC pain subscale score compared to placebo over 12 weeks. Anaphylactic reactions were observed, and further safety evaluation is needed.

Sustained-release diclofenac conjugated to hyaluronate (diclofenac etalhyaluronate) for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized phase 2 study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of diclofenac etalhyaluronate (DF-HA) (ONO-5704/SI-613), a novel DF-conjugated hyaluronate, in patients with knee OA in Japan. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 30 mg of DF-HA or placebo intra-articularly at weeks 0, 4 and 8 and were followed up for 24 weeks. The primary outcomes were changes from baseline in the WOMAC pain subscores, 50-foot walk test pain score and daily pain score. The secondary outcomes were the WOMAC physical function subscores, patient global assessment, responder rate and safety outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 176 patients received the investigational drugs (87 received DF-HA and 89 received placebo). The mean changes in the WOMAC pain subscores and daily pain score from baseline over 12 weeks after the first injection were significantly higher in the DF-HA than placebo group; the mean difference was -7.0 mm [95% CI, -12.7, -1.2; P =0.018] and -0.61 (95% CI, -1.06, -0.16; P =0.008), respectively. The difference in the 50-foot walk test pain score was -5.0 mm (95% CI, -10.3, 0.3; P =0.065). Improvement of pain by DF-HA was observed at week 1 and maintained from week 12 to week 24. Significantly greater improvements in the secondary outcomes were also observed with DF-HA than with placebo. No clinically significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: DF-HA reduced pain in patients with knee OA without major safety concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm, UMIN000015858.

Simultaneous determination of N(1)-methylnicotinamide, L-carnitine, and creatinine in human plasma and urine by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry for assessing the activities of multiple renal cationic transporters.

Organic cation transporters are responsible for the disposition of various endogenous and therapeutic agents in humans; thus, there is a great need for the development of a simple assay for simultaneous assessment of the activities of multiple transporters. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS), we developed an assay that allows for simultaneous quantitation of plasma and urinary levels of N(1)-methylnicotinamide (a substrate of hOCT2/hMATEs), L-carnitine (a substrate of hOCTN2), and creatinine (an indicator of glomerular filtration). Samples were diluted with ultrapure water, deproteinized with trichloroacetic acid, filtered, and then injected on a cation exchange column. The analytes were separated with a gradient LC technique and detected by MS. The total assay time was less than 8 min. The lower detection limits for N(1)-methylnicotinamide, L-carnitine, and creatinine were 2, 10, and 24 ng/mL, respectively. Recovery of the analytes was almost complete. A preliminary clinical study conducted in 25 healthy subjects revealed that the mean±SD for the renal clearance (CLR) of N(1)-methylnicotinamide (272.7±81.0 mL/min) far exceeded the glomerular filtration rate (116.3±19.6 mL/min), indicating the involvement of active tubular secretion, while the mean CLR of clearance of L-carnitine was close to nil (1.5±1.4 mL/min), indicating almost complete tubular reabsorption. The present method is potentially useful for clinical studies on the genetic control of cationic transporter activities and the transporter-mediated drug interactions.