Association of the pre-transplant CD4/CD8 ratio with the prognosis following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The tumor microenvironment's cells can promote or inhibit tumor formation, and there are no reports on the CD4/CD8 ratio's association with outcomes post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated the pre-transplant peripheral blood CD4/CD8 ratio in 168 patients who underwent their first allo-HSCT for hematological malignancies at our institution. When patients were divided into two groups according to the median CD4/CD8 ratio 1.35 (range, 0.09-19.89), the high CD4/CD8 ratio group had a higher incidence of relapse, equivalent non-relapse mortality and worse overall survival (OS) than the low CD4/CD8 ratio group. In a multivariate analysis, the CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly associated with an increased risk of relapse, although there was a marginally significant difference in OS. The pre-transplant peripheral blood CD4/CD8 ratio could be a novel biomarker for predicting the prognosis of allo-HSCT.

Effects of CD34+ cell dose on engraftment and long-term outcomes after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The number of CD34+ cells in the graft is generally associated with time to engraftment and survival in transplantation using cord blood or allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells. However, the significance of abundant CD34+ in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) remained unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 207 consecutive adult patients who underwent their first BMT at Jichi Medical University between January 2009 and June 2021. RESULTS: The median nucleated cell count (NCC) and CD34+ cell dose were 2.17 × 108/kg (range .56-8.52) and 1.75 × 106/kg (.21-5.84), respectively. Compared with 104 patients in the low CD34+ group (below the median), 103 patients in the high CD34+ group (above the median) showed faster engraftment at day +28 in terms of neutrophil (84.6% vs. 94.2%; p =  .001), reticulocyte (51.5% vs. 79.6%; p < .001), and platelet (39.4% vs. 72.8%; p < .001). There were no significant differences in overall survival, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease, or infectious complications between the two groups in univariate and multivariate analyses. Low or high NCC had no significant effect on overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, cumulative incidence of relapse and graft-versus-host disease, either. While a positive correlation was observed between NCC and the CD34+ cell dose, a high CD34+ cell dose was associated with rapid hematopoietic recovery, even in patients with NCC below the median. CONCLUSION: Measurement of CD34+ cell dose in addition to NCC was useful for predicting hematopoietic recovery, but seemed to have little influence on the long-term outcome in BMT.

Cost-Effectiveness of Anti-BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Despite its promising outcomes, anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) is the most expensive myeloma treatment developed to date, and its cost-effectiveness is an important issue. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of anti-BCMA CAR-T compared to standard antimyeloma therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The model included myeloma patients in Japan and the United States who have received ≥3 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. A Markov model was constructed to compare the CAR-T strategy, in which patients receive either idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) followed by 3 lines of multiagent chemotherapy after relapse, and the no CAR-T strategy, in which patients receive only chemotherapy. Data from the LocoMMotion, KarMMa, and CARTITUDE-1 trials were extracted. Several assumptions were made regarding long-term progression-free survival (PFS) with CAR-T. Extensive scenario analyses were made regarding regimens for no CAR-T strategies. The outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with willingness-to-pay thresholds of ¥7,500,000 in Japan and $150,000 in the United States. When a 5-year PFS of 40% with cilta-cel was assumed, the ICER of the CAR-T strategy versus the no CAR-T strategy was ¥7,603,823 per QALY in Japan and $112,191 per QALY in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. When a 5-year PFS of 15% with ide-cel was assumed, the ICER was ¥20,388,711 per QALY in Japan and $261,678 per QALY in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. The results were highly dependent on the PFS assumption with CAR-T and were robust to changes in most other parameters and scenarios. Although anti-BCMA CAR-T can be cost-effective even under current pricing, a high long-term PFS is necessary.

Early reversal of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio after allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with reduced relapse and improved prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The early recovery of lymphocyte and monocyte cells is associated with a favorable prognosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT); however, it is not clear whether the balance of lymphocyte and monocyte recovery affects the post-transplant prognosis. METHODS: We examined whether the time-point at which the number of lymphocytes exceeded the number of monocytes, which we termed lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio reversal (LMRR), affected the prognosis after allo-HSCT. We retrospectively evaluated 235 patients who underwent their first allo-HSCT at our institution. RESULTS: The median number of days from HSCT to LMRR was 46 (range, 0-214), and the patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of LMRR by day 45 (LMRR45). In a multivariate analysis, early LMRR contributed favorably to overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] .519; 95% confidence interval [CI] .332-.812; p = .004) with fewer post-transplant relapses (HR .462; 95% CI, .274-.777; p = .004). Differences in the timing of LMRR did not affect non-relapse mortality (HR 1.477; 95% CI .779-2.80; p = .23) or the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (LMRR45(+): 25.0% vs. LMRR45(-) 35.2%. p = .111). In subgroup analyses, LMRR45(+) was found to be a favorable factor for survival with less relapse, regardless of the disease risk, stem cell source, or the recovery of either lymphocyte or monocyte counts. CONCLUSIONS: An early LMRR may be a novel factor that is associated with reduced relapse and improved survival after allo-HSCT.

Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy of novel therapies.

The prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) has dramatically improved with the development of new drugs, and it has become important to determine the appropriate combinations of these novel agents. This study was a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized trials in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for randomized trials from 1 January 2002 to 28 February 2022 of patients treated for MM. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS), evaluated as a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) compared to dexamethasone (DEX). The p-score was used to rank treatments. Of a total of 1136 abstracts screened, 37 studies were selected, including 34 treatment options for RRMM. Daratumumab, lenalidomide and DEX was found to be the best treatment for RRMM, with the best HR compared to DEX (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.20; p-score 0.9796). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity (I2 , 41.3%; p = 0.146). The current NMA confirmed the excellent efficacy of three-drug regimens including anti-CD38 antibodies to treat RRMM and provides background data to evaluate the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatments and bispecific T-cell engager therapies.