Treatment of Large Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects With Plate-Assisted Bone Segment Transport.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes following plate-assisted bone segment transport (PABST) in large bone defects of the lower extremities. DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center located in Germany. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients who underwent PABST and were at least 1 year postoperatively were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Demographic data were collected. Radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG), time to consolidation, time to full weight-bearing, and consolidation index were calculated. Numeric rating scale, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients [13 male; mean age 51 years (range, 20-75)] underwent PABST and had follow-up at a mean of 29.1 months. The tibia was affected in 8 and the femur in 7 patients. Preoperative RABG was 60 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 40-125], and bone defects were caused by septic nonunions in 73% of patients. Fourteen patients (93%) demonstrated consolidated transport callus at 7.3 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 6-8.5], and 9 patients (60%) demonstrated complete consolidation of both docking site and transport callus at 11.5 months (95% CI, 7.3-15.3). Postoperative RABG was 0.1 mm (IQR: 0-0.8), and consolidation index was 1.9 months/cm (95% CI, 1.3-2.5). All patients achieved full weight-bearing at 8.7 months (IQR: 6.5-10.3). LEFS was 42 (95% CI, 34-50), and numeric rating scale was 3 (95% CI, 2-4). Patients treated for tibial defects had a significantly higher consolidation rate compared with patients treated for femoral defects ( P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: PABST demonstrated high consolidation of transport callus with few complications. Although full weight-bearing was achieved in all patients, complete consolidation of the docking site was only present in 60% of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hook plate fixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures results in satisfactory patient-reported outcomes but complications and revisions are high.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures Neer type II is challenging. A gold standard has not yet been established, thus various surgical procedures have been described. The purpose of this study is to report the radiological and clinical outcomes using hook plate fixation in Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 53 patients who underwent hook plate fixation between December 2009 and December 2019 with ≥ 2 years of follow-up. Patients with preexisting pathologies or concomitant injuries of the ipsilateral shoulder were excluded. Pre- and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD), bony union and patient-reported outcomes were collected, including the Constant Score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). Complications and revisions were recorded. RESULTS: At a mean final follow-up of 6.2 years, mean SSV was 91.0% (range, 20-100) and mean CS was 80.9 points (range, 25-99). The mean preoperative CCD was 19.0 mm (range, 5.7-31.8), the mean postoperative CCD was 8.2 mm (range, 4.4-12.2) and the mean CCD following hardware removal was 9.7 mm (range, 4.7-18.8). The loss of reduction following hardware removal was statistically significant (P = 0.007). Eleven (20.8%) patients had complications, with 5 cases of deep or superficial infection (9.4%), four non-unions (7.5%), one periosteosynthetic fracture, one postoperative seroma, one implant failure and one symptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis (all 1.9%). A total of 10 patients (18.9%) underwent revision surgery at a mean of 113 (range, 7-631) days. CONCLUSION: Medium-term patient-reported outcomes for hook plate fixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures are satisfactory; however, one in five patients suffers a complication with the majority of them requiring revision surgery.

Correlation of Acromial Morphology With Risk and Direction of Shoulder Instability: An MRI Study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of bony morphology on the development of posterior shoulder instability is not well known. PURPOSE: To determine if acromial morphology, as measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is associated with posterior or anterior shoulder instability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: MRI measurements of posterior acromial coverage (PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), posterior acromial tilt (PAT), and anterior acromial coverage (AAC) were completed for 3 separate matched groups who underwent surgical intervention: posterior instability, anterior instability, and a comparison group of patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for snapping scapula. Inclusion criteria were patients with recurrent instability <40 years of age without multidirectional instability, glenoid bone loss >13.5%, or glenoid retroversion >10%. RESULTS: Overall, 37 patients were included in each group. PAC was significantly less in the posterior instability group than in the anterior instability and comparison groups (68.3° vs 88.7° vs 81.7°; P < .001). PAH was significantly greater in the posterior group than in the anterior instability group (11.0 mm vs -0.1 mm; P < .001) and comparison group (0.7 mm; P < .001). There was no difference between the posterior and anterior groups in terms of PAT or AAC (P = .45 and P = .05, respectively). PAT was significantly smaller in the posterior instability group than the comparison group (55.2° vs 62.2°; P = .026). The anterior and comparison groups were not significantly different in PAH or PAT (P = .874 and P = .067, respectively) but were significantly different in AAC (P = .026). CONCLUSION: A higher and flatter posterior acromion, as measured on preoperative MRI, appears to be associated with patients who require arthroscopic capsulolabral repair due to posterior shoulder instability. This information may help clinicians to both diagnose and predict the need for operative intervention for patients with posterior labral tears.

High correlation of the subjective elbow value with Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Oxford Elbow Score in patients with elbow dislocation.

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation of the Subjective Elbow Value (SEV) with 2 widely used elbow scoring systems: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Oxford Elbow Score (OES) in patients following elbow dislocation. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, patients who sustained an elbow dislocation between January 2008 and December 2019 and were at least 2 years out from injury were included. SEV, OES and MEPS were assessed and statistical correlation was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 114 patients (61 male, 53 female) with a mean age of 47.1 years (range, 16-70) were analyzed following elbow dislocation. The mean SEV was 87.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.2-90.7), mean MEPS was 88.1 (95% CI 85.1-91.0) points and mean OES was 40.0 (95% CI 38.4-41.7) points. Both MEPS (r = 0.710, P < .001), and OES (r = 0.764, P < .001) demonstrated high correlation with the SEV. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the SEV is a valid tool to assess overall status of the elbow in patients following elbow dislocations and presents an expressive but easy to perform addition to more complex scoring systems.

High return to sport rate and good patient-reported outcomes in recreational athletes following simple elbow dislocations.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes and return to sport metrics in recreational athletes who suffered simple elbow dislocations and were treated operatively or nonoperatively. METHODS: The study included patients between the ages of 16 and 65 who were recreational athletes and had experienced a simple elbow dislocation, with at least 2 years having passed since the injury. Patient-reported outcomes including Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Subjective Elbow Value (SEV), Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected. Return to sport metrics were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (21 females, mean age 43.8 years [95% CI, 39.1-48.5]) who were recreational athletes before their injury completed follow-up at mean 7.6 years (95% CI, 6.7-8.5). There were 29 patients (65.9%) who were treated operatively. Mean MEPS was 93.3 (95% CI, 90.2-96.4), mean SEV was 94.9 (95% CI, 91.9-97.9) and mean OES was 43.3 (95% CI, 41.3-45.4). A total of 36 (81.8%) patients returned to their pre-injury sport. Mean time to return to sport was 21.7 (95% CI, 16.8-26.5) weeks. There was a significant difference in OES (P = .019) and SEV (P = .030) that favored the nonoperative group; however, no significant differences for MEPS, VAS, satisfaction, arc of motion and return to sport were present between groups. A total of five (11.4%) complications were observed and one (2.3%) required revision. CONCLUSIONS: Good outcomes and a high return to sport rate can be expected in recreational athletes following operative and nonoperative treatment of simple elbow dislocations. However, as many as one-in-five patients may not return to pre-injury sport.

[Plate-assisted bone segment transport for bone defects of the lower extremities : Possibilities and limitations of treatment]. / "Plate-assisted bone segment transport" bei Knochendefekten an der unteren Extremität : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Behandlung.

Large bone defects of the lower extremities are challenging for both patients and the treating orthopedic surgeons. The treatment is determined by the size and location of the defect; however, patient-specific factors, such as the soft tissue situation and the presence of systemic comorbidities must be taken into consideration in the treatment strategy. Osteodistraction is an excellent technique especially for large bone defects exceeding 3 cm; however, it is time-consuming and required external fixation prior to the development of motorized distraction nails. This article describes the procedure for the treatment of large bone defects of the lower extremities, with its possibilities and limitations, using the novel plate-assisted bone segment transport (PABST) procedure.

Improvement in long head of biceps function and lower rate of biceps deformities after subpectoral tenodesis with cortical button and interference screw vs. arthroscopic tenotomy: a 4-year follow-up.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate clinical, cosmetic, and strength midterm outcomes in arthroscopic biceps tenotomy and subpectoral biceps tenodesis using bicortical endobutton and interference screw. Methods: In this retrospective study, inclusion criteria were long head of the biceps (LHB) pathologies treated either with tenotomy or an additional tenodesis. Postoperative assessment included Long Head of Biceps Score (LHBS), age-adjusted Constant-Murley Score, and Subjective Shoulder Value. Elbow flexion and forearm supination strength were measured. The presence of Popeye sign, cramps, and tenderness over the bicipital grove was evaluated. Statistical analysis of continuous variables without normal distribution was performed using Mann-Whitney U test. Grouped analysis was performed using 2-way analysis of variance. Binominal data were analyzed using chi-square test. Results: A total of 73 patients with a mean age of 63.1 ± 9.6 years and a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 0.5 years were included. Tenotomy was performed in 34 and tenodesis in 39 patients. Tenodesis group displayed a significantly higher LHB score (P = .0006), but no significant differences were detected for the age-adjusted Constant-Murley Score and Subjective Shoulder Value. Tenodesis group showed a significantly lower rate of Popeye deformities (P = .0007) and tenderness over the bicipital groove (P = .004). Patients from the tenotomy group with biceps deformity showed a significantly higher mean contralateral supination strength (P = .002) but no significant difference in contralateral elbow flexion compared with patients without biceps deformity. There was one (1.4%) complication in the tenotomy group (postoperative shoulder stiffness). Conclusion: Both techniques resulted in comparable outcome scores on preselected patients, with tenodesis leading to better LHB function. Tenodesis did not improve elbow flexion and forearm supination strength beyond the tenotomy; however, it reduced the frequency of biceps deformities and tenderness over the bicipital groove. Patients with a strong contralateral forearm supination strength could be at risk of developing a biceps deformity after tenotomy.

Does the Interval Slide Procedure Reduce Supraspinatus Tendon Repair Tension?: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of the interval slide (IS) procedure in retracted rotator cuff tears remain controversial. PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the IS procedure on repair tension (RT). It was hypothesized that the IS procedure (anterior IS [AIS], posterior IS [PIS], and intra-articular capsular release [CR]) would reduce the RT of a supraspinatus tendon. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 31 Thiel-embalmed human cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 74 years; range, 68-84 years) were tested. Full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears were created, and 1 cm of tendon was resected to simulate a retracted defect. Shoulders were randomized into intervention (n = 16) and control (n = 15) groups. In all shoulders, the load during tendon reduction to footprint was measured, an endpoint was defined as maximum tendon lateralization before 50 N was reached, and the RT (load during lateralization to endpoint) of the native tendon (t1) was evaluated. In the intervention group, AIS (t2), PIS (t3), and CR (t4) were performed in order, with RT measurement after each step. In the control group, RT was assessed at the same time points without the intervention. RESULTS: A complete reduction of the tendon was not achieved in any of the shoulders. Mean maximum lateralization was 6.7 ± 1.30 mm, with no significant differences between groups. In the intervention group, the overall IS procedure reduced RT about 47.0% (t1 vs t4: 38.7 ± 3.9 vs 20.5 ± 12.3 N; P < .001). AIS reduced RT significantly (t1 vs t2: 38.7 ± 3.9 vs 27.4 ± 10.5 N; P < .001), whereas subsequent PIS (t2 vs t3: 27.4 ± 10.5 vs 23.2 ± 12.4 N; P = .27) and CR (t3 vs t4: 23.2 ± 12.4 vs 20.5 ± 12.3 N; P = .655) did not additionally reduce tension. Comparison between groups at t4 revealed a reduction of RT of about 47.8% (control vs intervention: 39.3 ± 4.0 vs 20.5 ± 12.3 N; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The IS procedure reduces RT of the supraspinatus tendon in human cadaveric shoulders. However, performing PIS and CR subsequent to AIS does not reduce tension additionally. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings provide surgeons with a biomechanical rationale regarding the efficacy of the IS procedure.

No difference in mid-term outcome after superior vs. anteroinferior plate position for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

To compare outcomes, complications, revisions, and rates of implant removal of superior compared to anteroinferior plating in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures at mid-term follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients who underwent operative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (Group A: 28 patients with superior plating; Group B: 51 patients with anteroinferior plating) that were at least 2 years postoperatively. Adjusted Constant Score (aCS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score were compared. Bone union, implant removal, complications and revision surgeries were assessed. Group A had a significantly higher aCS compared to group B (90, IQR: 85.0-91.0 vs. 91, IQR: 90.0-93.0; P = 0.037). No significant differences between groups were seen in VAS (P = 0.283) and QuickDASH (P = 0.384). Bone union was achieved in 76 patients (96.2%) with no significant differences between groups (Group A: 96.4% vs. Group B: 96.1%; P > 0.999). There were no significant differences in implant removal rates (Group A: 60.7% vs. Group B: 66.7%; P = 0.630), complications (Group A: 46.4% vs. Group B: 31.4%; P = 0.226) and revisions (Group A: 25% vs. Group B: 9.8%; P = 0.102). Superior and anteroinferior plating result in high bone union rates and good clinical outcomes with similar rates of plate removal.

More Adverse Events after Osteosyntheses Compared to Arthroplasty in Geriatric Proximal Humeral Fractures Involving Anatomical Neck.

The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events and clinical outcomes of geriatric proximal humerus fractures (PHF) involving the anatomical neck (type C according to AO classification) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using locking plate vs. arthroplasty. In this retrospective cohort study, geriatric patients (>64 years) who underwent operative treatment using ORIF or arthroplasty for type C PHFs were included. Complications, revisions and clinical outcomes using Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score were assessed and compared between groups. At a mean follow up of 2.7 ± 1.7 years, 59 patients (mean age 75.3 ± 5.5 years) were included. In 31 patients ORIF was performed and 29 patients underwent arthroplasty. Complications and revision surgeries were significantly more frequent after ORIF (32.6% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.023 and 29.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.045). In contrast, clinical outcomes showed no significant differences (DASH 39.9 ± 25.7 vs. 39.25 ± 24.5, p = 0.922; CMS 49.7 ± 29.2 vs. 49.4 ± 25.2, p = 0.731). ORIF of type C PHFs in geriatric patients results in significantly more complications and revision surgery when compared to arthroplasty. Therefore, osteosynthesis of geriatric intraarticular fractures of the proximal humerus must be critically evaluated.

Long-term outcome and survival rate of monopolar radial head replacement.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were (1) to report functional outcomes; (2) to assess complications, revisions, and survival rate; and (3) to assess differences in functional outcomes between removed and retained radial head arthroplasties (RHAs), early and delayed treatment, and type of RHA used at long-term follow-up after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible radial head fractures or their sequelae. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients (mean age, 59.2 years) who were at least 6 years postoperatively after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible RHFs or their sequelae were included. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS); Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score; visual analog scale; postoperative satisfaction (1-6, 6 = highly unsatisfied); range of motion; complications; and revisions were assessed. Radiographic findings were reported. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Subgroups (RHA type, early vs. delayed surgery, RHA removed vs. retained) were compared. RESULTS: At a median clinical follow-up of 9.5 years (range: 6.0-28.4 years), median MEPS was 80.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60.0-97.5), median QuickDASH was 22.0 (IQR: 4.6-42.6), median visual analog scale was 1 (IQR: 0-4), median postoperative satisfaction was 2 (IQR: 1-3), and median arc of extension/flexion was 110° (IQR: 80°-130°). Radiographic follow-up was available for 48 patients at a median of 7.0 years (range: 2.0-15.0 years). Heterotopic ossifications were seen in 14 (29.2%), moderate-to-severe capitellar osteopenia/abrasion in 3 (6.1%), moderate-to-severe ulnohumeral degeneration in 3 (6.1%), and periprosthetic radiolucencies in 17 (35.4%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (37.2%) had complications and 20 patients (25.6%) underwent RHA exchange or removal. Kaplan-Meier analysis with failure defined as RHA exchange or removal demonstrated survival of 75.1% (95% confidence interval: 63.7-83.3) at 18 years. The highest annual failure rate was observed in the first year in which the RHAs of 7 patients (9%) were exchanged or removed. No significant differences were detected between type of RHA in MEPS (Mathys: 82.5 [75.0-100] vs. Evolve: 80.0 [60.0-95.0]; P = .341) and QuickDASH (Mathys: 12.5 [0-34.4] vs. Evolve: 26.7 [6.9-46.2]; P = .112). Early surgery (≤3 weeks) yielded significantly superior MEPS (80.0 [70.0-100.0] vs. 52.5 [30.0-83.8]; P = .014) and QuickDASH (18.6 [1.5-32.6] vs. 46.2 [31.5-75.6]; P = .002) compared with delayed surgery (>3 weeks). Patients with retained RHAs had significantly better MEPS (80.0 [67.5-100] vs. 70.0 [32.5-82.5]; P = .016) and QuickDASH (18.1 [1.7-31.9] vs. 49.1 [22.1-73.8]; P = .007) compared with patients with removed RHAs. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes for RHA are satisfactory; however, there is a high complication and revision rate, resulting in implant survival of 75.1% at 18 years with the highest annual failure rate observed in the first postoperative year.

Biomechanical significance of the collateral ligaments in transolecranon fracture-dislocations.

BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that transolecranon fracture-dislocations are not associated with collateral ligament disruption. The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of the collateral ligaments in transolecranon fractures. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric elbows with a mean age of 46.3 years were used. All soft tissue was dissected to the level of the capsule, leaving the anterior band of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) intact. A standardized, oblique osteotomy starting from the distal margin of the cartilage bare area of the ulna was made. The elbows were loaded with an inferiorly directed force of 5 and 10 N in the intact, MCL cut, LCL cut, and both ligaments cut states. All measurements were recorded on lateral calibrated radiographs. RESULTS: The mean inferior translation with intact ligaments (n = 20) when the humerus was loaded with 5 and 10 N was 1.52 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.02) and 2.23 mm (95% CI, 1.61-2.85), respectively. When the LCL was cut first (n = 10), the inferior translation with 5 and 10 N load was 4.11 mm (95% CI, 0.95-7.26) and 4.82 mm (95% CI, 1.91-7.72), respectively. When the MCL was cut first (n = 10), the inferior translation when loaded with 5 and 10 N was 3.94 mm (95% CI, 0.796-7.08) and 5.68 mm (95% CI, 3.03-8.33), respectively. The inferior translation when loaded with 5 and 10 N and both ligaments cut was 15.65 mm (95% CI, 12.59-18.79) and 17.50 mm (95% CI, 14.86-20.13), respectively. There was a statistical difference between the intact and MCL cut first at 10 N and when both ligaments were cut at 5 and 10 N. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that collateral ligament disruption is a prerequisite for a transolecranon fracture-dislocation. An inferior translation of more than 3 mm suggests that at least one of the collateral ligaments is disrupted, and more than 7.5 mm indicates that both collateral ligaments are disrupted.

Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services.

PURPOSE: It remains controversial how to immobilize the cervical spine (CS) in trauma patients. Therefore, we analyzed different CS immobilization techniques during prehospital patient transport. METHODS: In this explorative, biomechanical analysis of immobilization techniques conducted in a standardized setting, we recorded CS motion during patient transport using a wireless human motion tracker on a volunteer. To interpret spinal movement a benchmark called motionscore (MS) was developed based on biomechanics of the injured spine. RESULTS: We found the best spinal motion restriction using a spine board, head blocks and immobilization straps with and without a cervical collar (CC) (MS 45 vs. 27). Spinal motion restriction on a vacuum mattress with CC and head blocks was superior to no CC or head blocks (MS 103 vs. 152). An inclined vacuum mattress was more effective with head blocks than without (MS 124 vs. 187). Minimal immobilization with an ambulance cot, CC, pillow and tape was slightly superior to a vacuum mattress with CC and head blocks (MS 92 vs. 103). Minimal immobilization without CC showed the lowest spinal motion restriction (MS 517). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest an immobilization procedure customized to the individual situation. A spine board should be used whenever spinal motion restriction is indicated and the utilization is possible. In some cases, CS immobilization by a vacuum mattress with CC and head blocks could be more beneficial. In an unstable status of the patient, minimal immobilization may be performed using an ambulance cot, pillow, CC and tape to minimize time on scene caused by immobilization.

Robot-assisted training after proximal humeral fracture: A randomised controlled multicentre intervention trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether robotic-assisted training as a supplement to usual therapy is safe, acceptable and improves function and patient reported outcome after proximal humeral fractures (PHF). DESIGN: Multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled prospective trial. SETTING: Three different rehabilitation hospitals in Germany. SUBJECTS: In total 928 PHF patients between 35 and 70 years were screened. Forty-eight participants were included in the study (intervention group n = 23; control group n = 25). INTERVENTION: The control group received usual occupational and physiotherapy over three weeks, and the intervention group received additional 12 robot-assisted training sessions at the ARMEO®-Spring. MAIN MEASURES: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), the Wolf Motor Function Test-Orthopaedic, active range of motion and grip strength were determined before and after intervention period. The DASH was additionally obtained postal 6 and 13 months following surgery. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 55 ± 10 years and was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). The change in DASH as the primary endpoint in the intervention group after intervention was -15 (CI = 8-22), at follow-up six month -7 (CI = -2 to 16) at follow up 13 month -9 (CI = 1-16); in control group -14 (CI = 11-18), at follow-up six month -13 (CI = 7-19) at follow up 13 month -6 (CI = -3 to 14). No difference in the change was found between groups (p > 0.05). None of the follow-up time points demonstrated an additional benefit of the robotic therapy. CONCLUSION: The additional robot-assisted therapy was safe, acceptable but showed no improvement in functional shoulder outcome compared to usual therapy only.

Conversion of Failed Proximal Long Head of the Biceps Tenodesis to Distal Subpectoral Tenodesis: Outcomes in an Active Population.

PURPOSE: To assess failure rates and patient reported outcomes following revision of failed proximal long head of the biceps (LHB) tenodesis. METHODS: Patients from an active-military population who underwent revision proximal (suprapectoral) to distal (subpectoral) LHB tenodesis were prospectively enrolled. Patients were included if they were between the ages of 16 and 60 years presenting after a previous biceps tenodesis with mechanical failure and clinical failure, defined as Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) <70. Exclusion criteria were concomitant rotator cuff repair or debridement, full-thickness rotator cuff tear, extensive labral tears, or any evidence of glenohumeral arthritis. Pre- and postoperative SANE and ASES were documented and analyzed. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2010, a total of 12 patients (all male) with a mean age of 39.9 years (range, 30-54 years) were assessed at a mean follow-up time of 29 months (range, 24-38 months). Nine patients presented with a failed tenodesis construct located at the top of the bicipital groove and 9 patients had LHB tendons originally affixed with an interference screw. Diagnostic arthroscopy revealed that the majority of patients (10/12) had excessive scarring at the site of previous fixation. Mean preoperative assessments of SANE (70.4) and ASES (59.9) improved postoperatively to SANE (90.3; P < .01) and ASES (89.8; P < .01). No patients were lost due to follow-up, and there were no reported complications or failures. All patients returned to full active duty and were able to perform all required physical tests before returning to their vocation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with symptoms following a proximal LHB tenodesis can be successfully converted to a distal (subpectoral) LHB tenodesis with favorable outcomes. Although in a small sample, there was excessive scarring and synovitis in a majority, which improved significantly when treated with a revision subpectoral tenodesis with minimal complication risk and no reported failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (Therapeutic case series).

[Reconstruction of a fracture of the posterior acetabular wall with Pipkin fracture and lesion of the sciatic nerve after dorsal hip dislocation]. / Rekonstruktion einer Fraktur der hinteren Acetabulumwand mit Pipkin-Fraktur und Ischiadicusläsion nach dorsaler Hüftluxation.

A 50-year-old male suffered a crash landing while paragliding and sustained a posterior dislocation of the hip with a Pipkin fracture type 4 (fracture of the posterior acetabular wall and Pipkin fracture type 2) and a lesion of the sciatic nerve. After primary treatment in an external hospital, the patient was transferred to this hospital 4 days following the trauma. An operative stabilization of the acetabular fracture and the Pipkin fracture was performed using a trochanter flip osteotomy. Despite a large central defect of the femoral head it was decided to attempt a reconstruction. Following fixation of the Pipkin fragment an autologous bone graft harvested from the intertrochanteric region was used to fill the defect. Subsequently, a collagen matrix was applied onto the filled defect and a perineural adaptation of the sciatic nerve was performed.

Inter-rater reliability, sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the orthopaedic Wolf-Motor-Function-Test as functional capacity measure before and after rehabilitation in patients with proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) increased by more than 30% over the last decade, which is accompanied by an increased number of operations. However, the evidence on operative vs. non-operative treatment and post-operative treatments is limited and mostly based on expert opinion. It is mandatory to objectively assess functional capacity to compare different treatments. Clinical tools should be valid, reliable and sensitive to change assessing functional capacity after PHFs. This study aimed to analyse inter-rater reliability of the videotaped Wolf-Motor-Function-Test-Orthopaedic (WMFT-O) and the association between the clinical WMFT-O and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and to determine the sensitivity to change of the WMFT-O and the DASH to measure functional capacity before and after rehabilitation in PHF patients. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (61.7 ± 14.7 years) after surgical treatment of PHF were assessed using the WMFT-O at two different time points. To determine inter-rater reliability, the videotaped WMFT-O was evaluated through three blinded raters. Inter-rater agreement was determined by Fleiss' Kappa statistics. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the association between the clinical WMFT-O and the video rating as well as the DASH. Sensitivity to change and responsiveness were analysed for the WMFT-O and the DASH in a subsample of forty patients (53.8 ± 1.4 years) who were assessed before and after a three week robotic-assisted training intervention. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement was indicated by Fleiss' Kappa values ranging from 0.33-0.66 for functional capacity and from 0.27-0.54 for quality of movement. The correlation between the clinical WMFT-O and the video rating was higher than 0.77. The correlation between the clinical WMFT-O and the DASH was weak. Sensitivity to change was high for the WMFT-O and the DASH and responsiveness was given. In comparison to the DASH, the sensitivity to change of the WMFT-O was higher. CONCLUSION: The overall results indicate that the WMFT-O is a reliable, sensitive and responsive instrument to measure more objectively functional change over time in rehabilitation after PHF. Furthermore, it has been shown that video assessment is eligible for studies to ensure a full blinding of raters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03100201 . Registered on 28 March 2017. The trial was retrospectively registered.