Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med J Aust ; 221(4): 217-223, 2024 Aug 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39154292

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number of people in Australia with long COVID by age group, and the associated medium term productivity and economic losses. STUDY DESIGN: Modelling study: a susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) model to estimate the number of people with long COVID over time following single infections, and a labour supply model to estimate productivity losses as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP). SETTING: Australia, 2022-2024. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated number of people infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during 2022-2023 (based on serosurvey data) who have long COVID, 2022-2024, by age group; estimated GDP loss during 2022 caused by reduced labour supply attributable to long COVID. RESULTS: Our model projected that the number of people with long COVID following a single infection in 2022 would peak in September 2022, when 310 341-1 374 805 people (1.2-5.4% of Australians) would have symptoms of long COVID, declining to 172 530-872 799 people (0.7-3.4%) in December 2024, including 7902-30 002 children aged 0-4 years (0.6-2.2%). The estimated mean labour loss attributable to long COVID in 2022 was projected to be 102.4 million (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.4-162.2 million) worked hours, equivalent to 0.48% (95% CI, 0.24-0.76%) of total worked hours in Australia during the 2020-21 financial year. The estimated mean GDP loss caused by the projected decline in labour supply and reduced use of other production factors was $9.6 billion (95% CI, $4.7-15.2 billion), or 0.5% of GDP. The estimated labour loss was greatest for people aged 30-39 years (27.5 million [95% CI, 16.0-41.0 million] hours; 26.9% of total labour loss) and people aged 40-49 years (24.5 million [95% CI, 12.1-38.7 million] hours; 23.9% of total labour loss). CONCLUSION: Widespread SARS-CoV-2 infections in Australia mean that even a small proportion of infected people developing long COVID-related illness and disability could have important population health and economic effects. A paradigm shift is needed, from a sole focus on the immediate effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to preventing and treating COVID-19 and treating long COVID, with implications for vaccine and antiviral policy and other mitigation of COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Humanos , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/economia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pré-Escolar , Idoso , Criança , Adolescente , Lactente , Adulto Jovem , Saúde Pública/economia , SARS-CoV-2 , Produto Interno Bruto , Recém-Nascido , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Feminino , Masculino
2.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3856, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719852

RESUMO

The Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine developed by Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) was widely deployed to prevent mpox during the 2022 global outbreak. This vaccine was initially approved for mpox based on its reported immunogenicity (from phase I/II trials) and effectiveness in animal models, rather than evidence of clinical efficacy. However, no validated correlate of protection after vaccination has been identified. Here we performed a systematic search and meta-analysis of the available data to test whether vaccinia-binding ELISA endpoint titer is predictive of vaccine effectiveness against mpox. We observe a significant correlation between vaccine effectiveness and vaccinia-binding antibody titers, consistent with the existing assumption that antibody levels may be a correlate of protection. Combining this data with analysis of antibody kinetics after vaccination, we predict the durability of protection after vaccination and the impact of dose spacing. We find that delaying the second dose of MVA-BN vaccination will provide more durable protection and may be optimal in an outbreak with limited vaccine stock. Although further work is required to validate this correlate, this study provides a quantitative evidence-based approach for using antibody measurements to predict the effectiveness of mpox vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacina Antivariólica , Eficácia de Vacinas , Animais , Humanos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Vacina Antivariólica/imunologia , Vacina Antivariólica/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/métodos , Vacínia/imunologia , Vacínia/prevenção & controle , Monkeypox virus
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA