Non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility among people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To synthesise evidence evaluating non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility among people with advanced cancer, considering the type, efficacy and contextual factors that may influence outcome. METHODS: Systematic review of studies of non-pharmacological interventions in adults (≥ 18 years) with advanced (stage III-IV) cancer, and assessing mobility using clinical or patient-reported outcome measures. Searches were conducted across three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) up to June 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools and contextual factors were evaluated through the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to clinical heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: 38 studies encompassing 2,464 participants were included. The most frequent mobility outcome measure was the 6-min walk test (26/38 studies). Exercise was the most common intervention, (33 studies: 27 aerobic and resistance, 5 aerobic, 1 resistance versus aerobic training) and improvements in mobility were found in 21/33 outcomes. Electrotherapy interventions led to significant improvements in mobility in 3/5 studies. Geographical factors (e.g. distance, transport, parking requirements) potentially limited participation in 18/38 studies. A lack of ethnic diversity among populations was evident and language proficiency was an inclusion criterion in 12 studies. CONCLUSION: Exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation appear to improve mobility outcomes in advanced cancer. The evaluation of other non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility should consider access and inclusivity, and be adaptable to the needs of this population.

A traffic light approach for treatment and supportive care stratification in lung cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Comprehensive supportive care interventions for patients with lung cancer are being investigated in a range of ways, including: early palliative care, prehabilitation and rehabilitation. We review recent literature on supportive care and propose a traffic light system to individualise comprehensive supportive care. Green for those very likely to receive anti-cancer treatment, red for those very unlikely to receive anti-cancer treatment and orange where the chance of accessing treatment is uncertain. Comprehensive supportive care can be individualised based on the group a particular patient is in. RECENT FINDINGS: Lung cancer outcomes are improving with the availability of increasingly efficacious treatments; however, treatment rates for advanced disease remain low. In this review, we discuss how person-centred outcomes could be improved, how outcomes can be prognosticated and how the 'host' can be staged as well as the cancer. Recent data suggests that early comprehensive supportive care improves quality of life, reduces time spent in hospital and may affect survival. SUMMARY: Comprehensive supportive care is likely to improve quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. Further work is needed to see if it can improve treatment rates and survival.