Ocular Pharmacology.

Treatment of ocular diseases presents unique challenges and opportunities for the clinician and for the clinical pharmacologist. Ophthalmic pharmaceuticals, typically given as liquids, require consideration of solubility, physiological pH, and osmolarity, as well as sterility and stability, which in turn requires optimal pharmaceutics. Ocular tissue levels are challenging to obtain in humans, and the clinical pharmacokinetics is typically blood levels, which are primarily related to safety, rather than efficacy. The eye is a closed compartment with multiple physiological barriers with esterases and transporters, but relatively little cytochrome oxidases. Delivery routes include topical, intravitreal, and systemic. Patient dosing involves not only adherence issues common to all chronic diseases, but also performance requirements on eye drop instillation. Therapeutically, ocular diseases and their pharmacological treatments include both those analogous to systemic diseases (e.g., inflammation, infection, and neuronal degeneration) and those unique to the eye (e.g., cataract and myopia).

AG-920 (Articaine) Ophthalmic Solution: A Masked, Active-Controlled Evaluation of Its Local Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety in Pediatric Patients.

Purpose: The safety and efficacy of a novel topical ocular anesthetic (AG-920 sterile ophthalmic solution, 8%) was previously evaluated in adults. For both clinical and regulatory purposes, this new agent was evaluated in children. Methods: This was a Phase 3, randomized, active-controlled, single-masked, parallel-group design study in healthy pediatric subjects performed at a private practice retina clinic in the United States. The safety and anesthetic efficacy of AG-920 was compared with proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.5% in 60 children undergoing ophthalmic examinations. The primary efficacy endpoint was whether the investigator was able to perform the eye examination. Results: In all subjects in each treatment group, the investigator was able to perform the eye examination without additional local anesthetic. There were no adverse events reported in this study. In both the study eye and fellow eye, there were no notable changes after dosing, and both treatment groups were similar. All external eye exams in all subjects in both treatment groups were normal. Conclusions: In this pediatric population aged 7 months to >11 years, AG-920 was therapeutically equivalent to marketed proparacaine with respect to having an ophthalmic examination performed without needing additional local anesthetic. Further, AG-920 was well tolerated, and there were no clinically significant safety findings.

Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled, Randomized, Phase II Study of the Ocular Hypotensive Activity and Safety of VVN539 Ophthalmic Solution.

Purpose: To assess safety and ocular hypotensive efficacy of VVN539 ophthalmic solution in a first-in-human study. Design: Multicenter, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, dose-response, parallel-comparison study. Participants: Sixty-eight subjects with ocular hypertension (OHT) or open-angle glaucoma enrolled at 5 private practices. Methods: After washout of ocular hypotensive medications as required, the subjects were randomized to receive either VVN539 ophthalmic solution 0.02%, 0.04%, or vehicle once-daily (QD) in the morning (5 days), once-daily in the evening (6 days) and then twice-daily (6 days). Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of VVNM539 to its vehicle in mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at each diurnal time point (8:00am, 10:00am, and 4:00pm) at visit 4 (day 7), visit 5 (day 14), and visit 6 (day 21). Results: Mean IOP decreased throughout dosing in the active groups to between 18 and 20 mmHg in both active groups, to between 22 to 23 mmHg in the vehicle group. VVN539 0.04% was statistically superior to vehicle at all 9 diurnal time points (QD AM, QD PM, and twice daily, P ≤ 0.0109). VVN539 0.02% was statistically superior to vehicle at only 6 of 9 diurnal time points (selected QD times and twice daily). The most common ocular treatment-emergent adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia (11 [47.8%], 10 [4.5%], and 1 [4.3%]), followed by ocular hyperemia (3 [13.0%], 5 [22.7%] and 0), respectively. There were no clinically significant changes of note in visual acuity, biomicroscopy, dilated ophthalmoscopy, blood chemistry, hematology, or cardiovascular measures. Conclusions: In conclusion, the results of this initial phase II study indicate that VVN539 ophthalmic solution showed clinically and statistically significant ocular hypertensive activity and was relatively well tolerated for the treatment of subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma or OHT. Additional studies will be required for a more complete evaluation of the utility of VVN539 ophthalmic solution. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.