RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate changes in acetabular morphology during the follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and search for factors associated with acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity. METHODS: We evaluated 108 patients with unilateral SCFE (mean age at slip, 12.3 years sd 1.7) to skeletal maturity, with a minimum follow-up of two years (median 4.5 years; interquartile range 3.2 to 6.2). Acetabular parameters obtained from initial and most recent radiographs included the lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA) and acetabular depth-width ratio (ADR). Acetabular dysplasia was considered for LCEA < 20° or TA > 10°. Femoral parameters consisted of the most recent head diameter, neck-shaft angle, neck length, articulotrochanteric distance and alpha angle. RESULTS: At SCFE onset, the affected hip showed a slightly lower LCEA (26.4° sd 6.1° versus 27.3° sd 5.7°; p = 0.01) and ADR (330 sd 30 versus 340 sd 30; p < 0.001) compared with the uninvolved hip. At final follow-up, the affected hip showed lower LCEA (24.5° sd 7.6° versus 28.8°sd 6.6°; p < 0.001) and ADR (330 sd 40 versus 350 sd 40; p < 0.001), and TA was larger (5.5° sd 5.4° versus 2.3° sd 4.2°; p < 0.001) compared with the uninvolved hip. Acetabular dysplasia was observed in 27 (25%) of 108 hips with SCFE. Femoral head overgrowth, age at slip and SCFE severity were independent factors associated with acetabular dysplasia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acetabular coverage and depth are not increased in SCFE, and the acetabular coverage tends to decrease up to skeletal maturity. A potential disturbance in the acetabular growth and remodelling exists mainly for young children with severe SCFE, and a potential for acetabular insufficiency may be observed at the diagnosis and follow-up of SCFE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine age-and gender-dependent variation of epiphyseal tilt and epiphyseal angle using CT in adolescents without hip pathology. METHODS: Pelvic CT scans were obtained in 132 adolescents for evaluation of abdominal pain. Radially oriented planes around the femoral neck were reformatted and the epiphyseal tilt and angle were measured in the anterior, anterosuperior and superior planes. Variations in the tilt angle and epiphyseal angle were assessed by age group from 12 to 18 years and gender by using a linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: The epiphyseal tilt did not change (p = 0.97) with increasing age. Male patients exhibited smaller tilt angle in the anterosuperior plane (p = 0.003) but no difference was detected in the anterior (p = 0.17) or superior (p = 0.06) planes. The epiphyseal angle decreased with increasing age in the anterior (p = 0.03), anterosuperior (p = 0.001) and superior (p < 0.001) planes in male patients, with no variation in female patients (p = 0.92). Male patients had larger epiphyseal angles in the anterior (p = 0.02), anterosuperior (p < 0.001) and superior (p = 0.002) planes compared with female patients. CONCLUSION: We found no age-specific variations in the epiphyseal tilt and no difference in the epiphyseal tilt in male and female patients in the superior and anterior plane. The epiphyseal angle was smaller in female patients, however, the epiphyseal angle decreased with increasing age in male patients which corresponds to an increase in epiphyseal extension. The reference values reported in this study may serve as additional information in the evaluation of adolescents with hip pain and as reference for future studies investigating slipped capital femoral epiphysis and femoroacetabular impingement development. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Diagnostic Study.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of an anteverting triple periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip instability in skeletally immature patients with Down syndrome. METHODS: We evaluated 16 patients (21 hips) with Down syndrome and hip instability who underwent an anteverting triple periacetabular osteotomy between 2007 and 2016. There were nine females and seven males with an average age of 7.4 years SD 2.0. We assessed the level of hip pain, gait ability and clinical stability at a minimum of one year after surgery. Radiographic evaluation included pre- and postoperative lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis acetabular angle and extrusion index. RESULT: After an average follow-up of 4.1 years SD 2.6, 20 of 21 hips (95%) remained clinically stable. In all, 12 of 16 (75%) patients had a full gait without a major limp, but three patients (19%) had a persistent limp. Of the 21 procedures, one hip (5%) was considered a failure due to persistent instability. There was a mean increase of 18.3º SD 15.3º of the LCEA (p < 0.001); a mean decrease of 15.2º SD 11.6º (p < 0.001) for the Tönnis angle and the extrusion index had a mean decrease of 0.27 SD 0.20 (p < 0.001). The most common complications were minor and included nonunion of the pubis or ischium (24%) and stress fractures of the pubis and ischium (14%). Only one patient required unplanned surgery for the treatment of an infection; which was considered a major complication. CONCLUSION: The anteverting triple periacetabular osteotomy provided global deformity correction and achieved hip stability in 95% of the hips after a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV.
RESUMO
Obesity is a risk factor for complications following many orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether obesity was an independent risk factor increasing the rate of complications following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and to determine whether radiographic correction after PAO was affected by obesity. We retrospectively collected demographic, clinical and radiographic data on 280 patients (231 women; 82.5% and 49 men; 17.5%) who were followed for a mean of 48 months (12 to 60) after PAO. A total of 65 patients (23.2%) were obese (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2)). Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that BMI was an independent risk factor associated with the severity of the complications. The average probability of a patient developing a major complication was 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.78 to 38.21) for an obese patient compared with 3% (95% CI 1.39 to 6.58) for a non-obese patient The odds of a patient developing a major complication were 11 times higher (95% CI 4.71 to 17.60, p < 0.0001) for an obese compared with a non-obese patient. Following PAO surgery, there was no difference in radiographic correction between obese and non-obese patients. PAO procedures in obese patients correct the deformity effectively but are associated with an increased rate of complications.