RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The protocol for deceased donor kidney transplants has been standardised. The procedure for a living donor has peculiarities derived from the differences in the graft. When a living kidney donor program is implemented, changes occur in both the profile of the kidney transplant candidate and in the postoperative treatments. AIMS: To discover whether a living donor program influences the functional outcomes of kidney grafts in a longstanding classical deceased donor kidney transplant program and to identify the factors associated with transplant outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective observational multicentre study. SAMPLE: Kidney transplant patients in two urology referral centres for renal transplant in Spain between 1994 and 2019. Groups: TV (living transplant): patients given kidney transplants from living donors (n = 150); TCpre11 (deceased transplant previous to 2011): patients given kidney transplants from deceased donors before the living donor program was implemented (n = 650); and TCpost11 (deceased transplant after 2011): patients given kidney transplants from deceased donors after the living donor program was implemented (n = 500). RESULTS: Mean age was 55.75 years (18-80 years), higher in TCpre11. There were 493 female patients (37.92%) and 1007 male patients (62.08%). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.69 kg/m2 (17.50-42.78 kg/m2), higher in TCpre11. Mean ischemia time was 17.97 h (6-29 h), higher in TCpost11. Median duration of urethral catheter: 8 days (6-98 days), higher in TCpost11. Median duration of double-J ureteral stent: 58 days (24-180 days), higher in TCpost11. Pretransplant UTIs: 17.77%, higher in TCpre11 (25.69%) than in TV (12%), higher in TV (12%) than TCpost11 (9.2%), and higher in TCpre11 (25.69%) than TCpost11 (9.2%). Acute renal rejection in 9.33% of TV, 14.77% of TCpre11, and 9.8% of TCpost11. Multivariate analysis: TCpost11 featured higher BMI, more smoking, and chronic renal failure progression time. Lower use of nonantibiotic prophylaxis to prevent recurrent urinary tract infections, increased duration of urethral catheters due to obstructive problems, and favoured deterioration of kidney function was observed in the deceased donor program. The living donor (LD) program had a strong influence on deceased donor transplants in the prelysis phase. Implementation of a LD program was associated with a decrease in the likelihood of acute rejection in TCpost11 and an increase in the tendency towards normal kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing living donor transplant programs affects functional outcomes in deceased donor transplants, reducing the probability of acute rejection and increasing the tendency towards normal kidney function. Preventing recurrent urinary tract infections with measures other than antibiotics, smoking cessation, delaying the removal of the double-J stent from the graft, and pre-emptive transplant (transplant prior to dialysis) are associated with improved renal function of the graft.
RESUMO
Introduction/Objectives: This study aims to describe the procedure and effectiveness of the four-vertex technique for correcting urethral prolapse in women. Methods and Materials: includes a retrospective case series of 17 patients who underwent surgery for urethral prolapse. Two study groups were distinguished based on the presence or absence of pelvic heaviness symptoms. The variables were analyzed, including age, BMI, concomitant diseases, obstetric and gynecological history, time from diagnosis to surgery, and outcomes of treatment. Results: All patients were postmenopausal, with a mean age at the time of the intervention of 70.41 years, with no differences between groups. Mean BMI was 23.67â kg/m2, higher in the group with a sensation of vaginal heaviness (p = 0.027). Mean time elapsed between diagnosis and operation was 231.58 days, with no differences between groups. Mean childbirth count was 2.29. The most frequent causes for consultation were urethrorrhagia (33.33%) and a bulging sensation (33.33%). After the intervention, 14 patients (82.35%) were asymptomatic, two (11.76%) had dysuria, and one (5.88%) had urinary urgency. Ten patients had pre-surgical urinary incontinence, which was resolved in nine patients. 17.46% subsequently presented pelvic organ prolapse. In three women there was secondary impairment of sexual activity. Conclusion: The four-vertex technique was effective in resolving symptoms in most patients. However, some patients experienced dysuria, urinary urgency, and pelvic organ prolapse after surgery. Urinary incontinence improved in most patients, but a few required additional treatments with suburethral tape. The study also identified associations between variables and the presence of cystocele, consultation for a bulging sensation, and bleeding from urethral prolapse. Overall, this study sheds light on the challenges and outcomes of surgical treatment for urethral prolapse and provides valuable insights for future research in this area.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: VA is currently considered the treatment of choice for patients with low and very low risk prostate cancer. We analyzed the evolution of this treatment strategy in our series and adherence to the protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ambispective study of patients in VA in our center between 2014- 2019. 237 meet inclusion criteria, of which 142 (60%) have a minimum of 12 months of follow- up. Mean age: 68.5 (4678), median PSA 6.37 ng / ml (1-33). 229 (96.6%) are ISUP 1 and 8 (3.4%) ISUP 2. Objectives are proposed to assess our adherence to the protocol. Descriptive statistics are used to communicate the results. RESULTS: According to the classification by risk groups of the NCCN, 145 (61.2%), 49 (20.7%) and 42 (17.7%) were very low risk, low risk and favorable intermediate risk patients, respectively. The median of follow-up is 14 months (0-66). Of the patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, 107 (75.4%) were re-biopsied. 80 (33.8%) leave the protocol in these 5 years, 31.3% (25) by their own decision, 55% (44) due to medical criteria, and 11.3% (9) go to WW. After 5 years of follow-up, 99.2% of patients are still alive, 0.8% died of specific non-cancer causes. Of the objectives to assess adherence, 8 are achieved, 1 partially and 1 is not evaluable. CONCLUSIONS: VA in our center is already the treatment of choice for very low-risk patients, with a constant increase from year to year. Adherence to the protocol has been favorable during the period of time studied.
OBJETIVO: La VA se ha convertido en uno de los tratamientos de elección del CP localizado de bajo y muy bajo riesgo. Analizamos la evolución de esta estrategia de tratamiento en nuestra serie, así como la adherencia al protocolo.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio ambispectivo de los pacientes incluidos en VA en nuestro centro entre los años 2014-2019. 237 pacientes cumplen los criterios de inclusión en VA, de los cuales 142 (60%) tienen un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses. Edad media: 68,5(46-78), mediana PSA 6,37 ng/ml (1-33). 229 pacientes (96,6%) son ISUP 1 y 8 (3,4%) ISUP 2. Se proponen unos objetivos para valorar nuestra adherencia al protocolo. Se utiliza estadística descriptiva y contraste de hipótesis para comunicar los resultados.RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN: Atendiendo a la clasificación por grupos de riesgo de la NCCN, 145 (61,2%), 49 (20,7%) y 42 (17,7%) eran pacientes muy bajo riesgo, bajo riesgo y riesgo intermedio favorable respectivamente. El tiempo (mediana) de permanencia en el programa es de 14 meses (0-66). De los pacientes con un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses, 107 (75,4%) son re biopsiados. 80 pacientes (33,8%) salen del protocolo en estos 5 años, 31,3% (25) por decisión propia, 55% (44) por criterios médicos, y 11,3% (9) pasan a WW. Tras 5 años de seguimiento, el 99,2% de los pacientes continúan vivos, el 0,8% falleció por causas no cáncer específicas. De los objetivos para evaluar la adherencia, 8 de ellos se alcanzan, 1 parcialmente y 1 no es evaluable. CONCLUSIONES: La VA en nuestro centro constituye actualmente el tratamiento de elección para los pacientes con muy bajo riesgo. La adherencia al protocolo ha sido favorable durante el periodo de tiempo estudiado.
