Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29343950

RESUMO

Background: Thirty-day readmission in COPD is common and costly, but potentially preventable. The emergency department (ED) may be a setting for COPD readmission reduction efforts. Objective: To better understand COPD readmission through the ED, ascertain factors associated with 30-day readmission through the ED, and identify subgroups of patients with COPD for readmission reduction interventions. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2009 to September 2015 in patients with COPD of age ≥18 years. Electronic health record data were abstracted for information available to admitting providers in the ED. The primary outcome was readmission through the ED within 30 days of discharge from an index admission for COPD. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between potential risk factors and 30-day readmission. Results: The study involved 1,574 patients who presented to the ED within 30 days on an index admission for COPD. Of these, 82.2% were readmitted through the ED. Charlson score (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6; 95% CI: 2.9-4.4), a chief complaint of breathing difficulty (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.6), outpatient utilization of albuterol (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 2.6-6.4), fluticasone/salmeterol (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3-4.2), inhaled steroids (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.3-10.7), and tiotropium (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.0-3.2), as well as arterial blood gas (OR: 4.4; 95% CI: 1.3-15.1) and B-type natriuretic peptide (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.4-3.5) testing in the ED were associated with readmission (c-statistic =0.936). Seventeen-point-eight percent of patients with COPD presented to the ED and were discharged home; 56% presented with a complaint other than breathing difficulty; and 16% of those readmitted for breathing difficulty had a length of stay <48 hours. Conclusion: Intensive outpatient monitoring, evaluation, and follow-up after discharge are needed to help prevent re-presentation to the ED, as practically all patients with COPD who represent to the ED within 30 days are readmitted to the hospital and for a variety of clinical complaints. Among those patients with COPD who present with breathing difficulty, improved decision support algorithms and alternative management strategies are needed to identify and intervene on the subgroup of patients who require <48-hour length of stay.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 39(9): 978-84, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27440320

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preprocedure systemic antibiotic prophylaxis reduces infections in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantations. Whether pocket irrigation with antibiotic solution offers any advantage over saline solution in CIED implantation is unknown. METHODS: Records from 327 consecutive patients who underwent CIED implantation by three operators from February 2011 to January 2014 were reviewed. From February 2011 to January 2012, the antibiotic solution was used for pocket irrigation; from February 2012 to January 2014, saline solution was used. All patients received preprocedural IV antibiotics. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, lab data, and occurrence of any pocket infection postimplant were collected. RESULTS: There were 118 and 209 patients in the antibiotic solution and saline solution group, respectively. A total of four (1.2%) patients had CIED infection: two in the antibiotic solution group and two in the saline solution group. Median time to infection from implant date was 81.5 ± 35 days. Two patients (50%) had infection after first device implantation. Of the four patients, one had positive blood culture, three had positive pocket cultures, one had lead vegetation, one underwent pocket exploration, and all of them had devices/leads extracted, with reimplantation on the contralateral side. No mortality was observed due to infectious complications. CONCLUSION: When compared to pocket irrigation in the antibiotic solution group, the saline solution group was not associated with increased incidence of infectious complications after CIED implantation. The use of saline solution pocket irrigation alone may be used in CIED pocket irrigation periprocedurally.  Further evaluation in larger randomized trials is needed.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Irrigação Terapêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiologia , Implantação de Prótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Cloreto de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA