RESUMO
Clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are usually carried out in specialized centers whereas primary care for patients (pts) with CML is mainly provided by local oncology practices. The aim of this study was to assess treatment practices in pts with CML in the setting of private oncology practices in Germany. We collected data of 819 pts with a confirmed diagnosis (dx) of CML in 2013 or later from 43 practices. At dx, 84.2% (n=690) and 9.4% (n=77) of pts were in chronic or accelerated phase, 0.7% (n=6) had a blast crisis. Molecular monitoring was provided by EUTOS certified laboratories in 87.7% of pts. Typical BCR::ABL1 transcripts were detected in 86.6% (n=709). Molecular response was assessed after 2.8, 6.0, 9.4 and 12.9 m (mean) after start of treatment. Of the pts with available data, 11.1% did not achieve early molecular response and at 18 m, 83.7% had at least a major molecular response. 288 (35.2%) of pts switched to 2nd line (2L) treatment after a mean of 21.0 months. Reasons for 2L treatment were side effects in 43.4% and suboptimal response or failure in 31.4% of pts. 106 pts went on to third line (3L) treatment. 36.8 % of pts switched to and 92.8 % of pts still on 3L treatment achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% at 12 m. In conclusion, in Germany pts with CML are routinely monitored by qPCR and good responses are achieved in the majority. Treatment changes are mainly due to adverse events rather than suboptimal responses.
Assuntos
Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Crise Blástica , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Proteínas de Fusão bcr-abl/genética , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Today's treatment options for indolent lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) range from watch & wait, immunochemotherapy up to allogeneic transplantation. We describe changes in the diagnosis and treatment of indolent lymphoma and CLL in Germany between 2006 and 2009. Two nation-wide surveys in the fourth quarter of 2006 and 2009 included patients with indolent lymphoma and CLL. Data from 576 patients from 46 centers in Q4/2006 were compared with data from 521 patients from 57 centers in Q4/2009. The subpopulation of patients ≥ 70 years of age and the number of patients with comorbidities increased from 39% to 55% and 47% to 55%, respectively. Both in indolent lymphoma and CLL, Rituximab and R-based immunochemotherapy (50.6% vs. 64.4%) as well as bendamustine (4.8 % vs. 24%) were much more frequently applied. In contrast, high dose chemotherapy consolidation was almost abandoned in first line treatment. Supportive care is given more frequently, with exception of erythropoietin and immunoglobulins. Our national survey confirmed that scientific results were rapidly transferred into clinical care of indolent lymphoma.
