The pitfalls of treating anorectal conditions after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

We present a salutary lesson learned from three cases with significant complications that followed anorectal intervention in the presence of radiation proctitis due to prior radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. After apparent routine rubber band ligation for painful haemorrhoids, one patient developed a colo-cutaneous fistula. Following laser coagulation for radiation proctitis, one patient required a pelvic exenteration for a fistula, while another developed a rectal stenosis. Those diagnosing and treating colonic conditions should be mindful of the increased prevalence of patients who have had radiotherapy for prostate cancer and the potential for complications in treating these patients.

Inappropriate colonoscopic surveillance of hyperplastic polyps.

Colonoscopic surveillance of hyperplastic polyps alone is controversial and may be inappropriate. The colonoscopy surveillance register at a university teaching hospital was audited to determine the extent of such hyperplastic polyp surveillance. The surveillance endoscopy records were reviewed, those patients with hyperplastic polyps were identified, their clinical records were examined and contact was made with each patient. Of the 483 patients undergoing surveillance for colonic polyps 113 (23%) had hyperplastic polyps alone on last colonoscopy. 104 patients remained after exclusion of those under appropriate surveillance. 87 of the 104 patients (84%) were successfully contacted. 37 patients (8%) were under appropriate colonoscopic surveillance for a significant family history of colorectal carcinoma. 50 (10%) patients with hyperplastic polyps alone and no other clinical indication for colonoscopic surveillance were booked for follow up colonoscopy. This represents not only a budgetary but more importantly a clinical opportunity cost the removal of which could liberate valuable colonoscopy time for more appropriate indications.

Significant psychological morbidity occurs in irritable bowel syndrome: a case-control study using a pharmacy reimbursement database.

BACKGROUND: Psychological problems are associated with IBS but the strength of this association is unclear. AIM: To assess co-prescribing of antispasmodic and CNS-acting drugs through a nested case-control study. METHODS: A national dispensing database identified patients who were first dispensed antispasmodic medicines for a continuous 3-month period or more during 2006, using 2005 as a run-in period. Each patient was matched with four control patients and excluded if they received drugs indicated for IBD. RESULTS: Four hundred and seven patients commenced antispasmodic drugs during 2006. These patients were matched with 1628 controls. In 2005, patients subsequently prescribed antispasmodics were 2-3 times more likely to receive CNS-acting drugs than controls. In the year following commencement of IBS therapy, patients were 2-4 times more likely than controls to be prescribed CNS-acting drugs including antidepressants (35.4% vs. 9.3%), anxiolytics (27.8% vs. 8.8%), antipsychotics (9.8% vs. 3.3%) and hypno-sedatives (32.7% vs. 11.3%; P < 0.0001). The adjusted OR (95% CI) for antidepressant, anxiolytic, hypnosedative and antipsychotic prescribing in IBS patients were 3.81 (2.79-5.20), 2.84 (2.12-3.81), 2.62 (1.91-3.60) and 2.58 (1.80-3.66), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prescribed ongoing therapy for presumed IBS are 2-4 times more likely to be prescribed CNS-acting drugs than controls, providing evidence of psychological comorbidity in IBS.

The role of capsule endoscopy in small bowel Crohn's disease.

UNLABELLED: Video capsule endoscopy is an invaluable tool for examining the small bowel. It is non-invasive and generally well tolerated, however its role in the assessment of the severity and extent of small bowel Crohn's disease has not, to date, been adequately evaluated. METHODS: All capsule endoscopies performed over a two year period in a tertiary referral centre in subjects with known or suspected Crohn's disease were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-six capsule endoscopy studies in total were included. These were performed in 15 cases of known Crohn's disease, 5 cases of suspected Crohn's disease, 3 cases of endoscopically diagnosed non-specific terminal ileal inflammation and finally 3 post colectomy cases of indeterminant being considered for IPAA formation. Ten patients known to have small bowel Crohn's disease were prospectively recruited; of 3 with normal small bowel follow through or CT exams, one had an abnormal capsule endoscopy. The other 7 patients had small bowel follow through or abdominal CT scans consistent with small bowel Crohn's disease; additional mucosal abnormalities were detected by capsule endoscopy in 6 cases with capsule retention in the stomach in one. Of 5 with colonic Crohn's disease normal small bowel imaging corresponded with normal capsule endoscopy in all but one. A diagnosis of Crohn's disease was made in 2 out of 5 cases of suspected Crohn's disease on the basis of the capsule endoscopy findings. Three patients with non-specific acute terminal ileal inflammation at ileocolonoscopy were confirmed to have ongoing inflammation. The capsule was retained in four subjects beyond 24 h. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy more accurately determines the severity and extent of the Crohn's disease in the small bowel than traditional imaging modalities.

What is new in the management of Helicobacter pylori?

Since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori in the early 1980s several treatment regimens have been developed to effectively treat this infection. International guidelines have allowed consensus on the best management and improved eradication rates. In recent years increasing antimicrobial resistance and falling eradication rates highlight the need for updated guidelines. In this article we review the most recent European management guidelines and in view of the unavailability of some drugs consider new treatment regimens for the management of H. pylori in Ireland.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori.

Since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori in the early 1980s many treatment regimes have been developed to effectively treat this infection. International guidelines have allowed consensus on the best management and improved eradication rates. In recent years, increasing antimicrobial resistance has resulted in falling eradication rates with standard therapies. In this article, we review the most recent studies and guidelines in the treatment of H. pylori. Currently, the first-line treatment remains clarithromycin, amoxicillin or metronidazole and proton pump inhibitor twice daily, but a number of recent studies have shown low eradication rates with this treatment. Increased duration of therapy has been recommended to overcome the falling eradication rates. However, conflicting findings have been reported on the benefits of extending the length of traditional therapy. Sequential therapy may be an effective alternative to standard triple therapy in regions of increased antimicrobial resistance. Probiotics reduce side-effects from traditional regimens and may improve eradication rates. A quinolone-based second-line triple therapy appears to be effective and well tolerated. Bismuth-based quadruple therapy is also an effective alternative if available. In the future, regional antimicrobial resistance and eradication rates will determine the best treatment for H. pylori.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori on the management of dyspepsia in primary care.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear what impact Helicobacter pylori infection has had on the management of dyspepsia in primary care and to what extent published guidelines on H. pylori are implemented in routine clinical practice. AIM: To assess the impact of H. pylori infection on the management of dyspepsia in primary care. METHODS: Patients referred by primary care doctors to an open-access 13-carbon urea breath test service over a 2-year period for their first urea breath test were included in the study. Individual breath results were linked with data on prescribing obtained from the General Medical Services prescription database. RESULTS: Of 805 patients, 374 (47%) had a positive urea breath test and 431 (54%) a negative urea breath test. Of positive urea breath test patients, only 245 (64%) were prescribed eradication therapy in the 3 months after the breath test and only 43% were referred back for re-testing. In the year after the urea breath test, there was a significant fall in prescribing of antisecretory therapy which was greatest in the patients who received H. pylori therapy (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be under and inappropriate treatment of H. pylori infection in primary care, and a low rate of re-testing after eradication, indicating that current guidelines are not well implemented in practice.

Oxegen 2004: the impact of a major music festival on the workload of a local hospital.

This prospective observational study was undertaken to assess the impact of a major music festival on the workload of a local hospital. Data were collected on all attendances at Naas General Hospital from the nearby Oxegen 2004 music festival. Patient demographics, disposition and diagnoses were recorded. Emergency department activity levels were compared before, during and after the festival. Seventy-two attendees were referred to Naas emergency department over a 3-day period, representing a 45% increase in the hospital's emergency department attendance rate. Thirty-seven of these attendees (51%) required inpatient or tertiary centre services. Thirty-four attendees (47%) were noted as having consumed alcohol and/or used illicit substances. We conclude that despite the provision of on-site medical facilities, major music events are associated with a significant increase in local health care activity and expenditure.

Proton pump inhibitors: a survey of prescribing in an Irish general hospital.

Prescription rates and attendant costs of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) continue to rise. The aim of this study was to assess the extent and appropriateness of PPI prescribing in an Irish general hospital. Using a structured pro forma, we conducted a 1-day comprehensive survey of the prescription charts of all inpatients. Of the 157 inpatients, 48 (30.6%) were on PPI therapy and omeprazole was the most widely prescribed PPI. Rabeprazole, the least expensive PPI, was the least prescribed. Prescription of PPI therapy was for an approved indication in 32 patients (66.6%) but was for an unapproved or unknown indication in 16 (33.3%). Prescribing had been initiated in hospital in 34 patients (70.8%) but only one-third of the patients on PPI therapy had undergone endoscopy. Over 90% of patients were on additional, often multiple, prescribed medications. Our results suggest that PPIs are overprescribed in hospital practice, and there is scope to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of PPI prescribing.

Review article: test and treat or test and scope for Helicobacter pylori infection. Any change in gastric cancer prevention?

A 'test and treat' strategy is advocated for patients with dyspepsia under the age of 45 years, with endoscopy reserved for those with alarm symptoms or aged over 45 years. One of the consequences of this strategy will be a reduction in population infection rates of Helicobacter pylori. It is now clear that H. pylori is one of the prime initiators of gastric cancer with up to 70% of gastric cancers attributable to H. pylori. What remains unclear is if H. pylori reduction will lead to a reduction in gastric cancer.

Symposium: Helicobacter pylori and clinical risks--focus on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Helicobacter pylori is a gastric pathogen that is a major cause of peptic ulcer disease, has a role in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and is associated with gastric cancer. Yet, in a large proportion of the human population, H. pylori infection has no apparent adverse clinical consequences. Furthermore, recent research suggests that H. pylori may even confer protection against gastroesophageal reflux disease. The conflicting evidence surrounding H. pylori infection was discussed at a sponsored symposium in Helsinki, introduced by Professor P. Malfertheiner, with papers presented by Dr H. J. O'Connor, Professor R. M. Genta, Dr P. Unge and Professor A. T. R. Axon. Emerging epidemiological and retrospective evidence suggests that the presence of H. pylori infection may provide some protection against gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is other evidence that shows no benefit of H. pylori for the protection of the oesophagus. It was felt that prospective, multicentre studies are needed to explore the H. pylori-gastroesophageal disease relationship further, to avoid confusing potential benefits with known risks. Following the symposium, a discussion on the relative risks and benefits for H. pylori eradication was provided by Professor Axon and Professor Blaser. Eradication of H. pylori has been recommended in a series of management guidelines issued by consensus groups. However, accurate estimates of the relative risks and benefits of H. pylori infection in the general population, as well as in specific patient groups, is essential in order to develop a management strategy.

Helicobacter pylori and dyspepsia: physicians' attitudes, clinical practice, and prescribing habits.

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines have been published on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection and it is assumed that these guidelines are adhered to in clinical practice. AIM: To assess the changing attitudes of medical practitioners to H. pylori, and the impact of H. pylori infection on everyday clinical practice and prescribing patterns. METHODS: Data for this review were gathered up to December 2000 from detailed review of medical journals, the biomedical database MEDLINE, and relevant abstracts. RESULTS: Physician surveys show widespread acceptance of H. pylori as a causal agent in peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterologists adopted H. pylori therapy for peptic ulcer earlier and more comprehensively than primary care physicians. Despite a low level of belief in H. pylori as a causal agent in non-ulcer dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), H. pylori therapy is widely prescribed for these conditions. Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy is the eradication regimen of choice by all physician groups. In routine clinical practice, there appears to be significant under-treatment of peptic ulcer disease with H. pylori therapy, but extensive use for non-ulcer indications. Prescription of H. pylori treatment regimens of doubtful efficacy appears commonplace, and are more likely in primary care. Despite the advent of H. pylori therapy, the prescription of antisecretory therapy, particularly of proton pump inhibitors, continues to rise. CONCLUSIONS: Publication of consensus guidelines per se is not enough to ensure optimal management of H. pylori infection. Innovative and ongoing educational measures are needed to encourage best practice in relation to H. pylori infection. These measures might be best directed at primary care, where the majority of dyspepsia is managed.

Evaluation of the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice--is it patient-friendly?

A new immunoassay has been developed to detect the presence of Helicobacter pylori antigens in stool specimens. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy and utility of the H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice. Dyspeptic patients undergoing endoscopy were studied. H. pylori status was defined before treatment by CLOtest and histology, and by 13C urea breath test (UBT) after eradication therapy. A standard universal container was provided for stool collection and the HpSA test was performed by an investigator blind to the results of the other diagnostic tests. Patients also provided a venous blood sample prior to endoscopy for H. pylori serology. Sixty patients (30 M : 30 F: mean age 47 yr) were enrolled in the study. The pretreatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 93%, 94%, 96%, and 90%. Twenty five patients returned for post treatment 13CUBT, but only 14 (56%) provided a stool sample for analysis. The post treatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 67%, 100%, 67%, and 92%. The HpSA test was negative in 19% of the patients found positive for anti-H. pylori antibodies on serology testing. All H. pylori antibody-negative patients had a negative HpSA test. Our results suggest that the HpSA test provides accurate pretreatment diagnosis of H. pylori infection but the reliability of the test after treatment is uncertain. A potential problem with the HpSA test appears to be patient reluctance about stool handling and this could prove a significant obstacle to patient compliance and the acceptability of the test in everyday clinical practice.

Prevalence of esophagitis in H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer disease and the impact of eradication therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There have been recent reports of reflux esophagitis apparently occurring de novo after cure of H. pylori in peptic ulcer disease. The possibility that this phenomenon might be explained, at least in part, by unmasking of coexistent disease has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of esophagitis in H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer disease and examine the short-term impact of H. pylori therapy on the esophagus. METHODOLOGY: Esophagitis was systematically graded and the presence of hiatal hernia was noted in 244 peptic ulcer patients (duodenal 223; gastric 21) before and at least four weeks after triple therapy. H. pylori status was assessed using CLO test and histology, and esophagitis grade was assigned without knowledge of H. pylori status. RESULTS: Of the 244 patients, 49 (20%) had esophagitis which was grade 2 or more in over two-thirds. The prevalence of esophagitis was similar in duodenal and gastric ulcer patients. The presence of hiatal hernia was strongly associated with the finding of esophagitis (P < 0.001). Of 241 patients evaluable after therapy, 215 (89%) were H. pylori-negative and 26 remained H. pylori-positive. Esophagitis tended to improve or remain stable after H. pylori therapy and worsened in only 2 of the 49 patients (4%). Of 192 patients with a normal esophagus at baseline endoscopy, 14 (7%) showed evidence of esophagitis after therapy. The presence of hiatal hernia, but not cure of H. pylori, was significantly associated with the development of esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that esophagitis can coexist with peptic ulcer disease and persists after cure of H. pylori. Development of de novo esophagitis seems uncommon in the short-term after H. pylori therapy. Esophagitis in peptic ulcer disease is strongly associated with the presence of hiatal hernia.

Six-year follow-up after Helicobacter pylori eradication in peptic ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: The longterm outlook after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in peptic ulcer disease is unclear. AIM: This study documents H. pylori recurrence, dyspeptic symptoms and anti-secretory therapy in peptic ulcer patients six years or more after H. pylori eradication. METHODS: Peptic ulcer patients with H. pylori eradication between 1990 and 1992 were included. Infection recurrence was diagnosed by 13-carbon urea breath test (UBT). Dyspeptic symptoms and anti-secretory therapy use were assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients completed the study protocol. Mean follow-up after eradication was 6.1 years (range 4.8-8.3). Four patients had a positive UBT. H. pylori recurrence rate was 6.6% or 0.02% per patient per year. Forty-two patients (69%) had dyspeptic symptoms. Heartburn and belching were more common than pain (p<0.001). All four patients with H. pylori recurrence had symptoms compared with 38 of 57 H. pylori-negative patients (p>0.05). Ten of 61 patients (16.4%) were taking anti-secretory therapy and their dyspepsia scores were higher. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a low H. pylori recurrence rate, longterm dyspeptic symptoms were common in peptic ulcer patients after H. pylori eradication. The symptoms are mainly reflux in type and require anti-secretory therapy in only a minority of patients.