Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 66(12): e0093522, 2022 12 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36394316

RESUMO

This phase I study evaluated the safety of the optimal ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) with aztreonam (ATM) regimens identified in hollow fiber infection models of MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Eligible healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 years were assigned to one of six cohorts: 2.5 g CZA over 2 h every 8 h (approved dose), CZA continuous infusion (CI) (7.5 g daily), 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, ATM CI (8 g daily), CZA (approved dose) with 1.5 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, and CZA (approved dose) with 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h. Study drug(s) were administered for 7 days. The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hepatic aminotransferase (ALT/AST) elevations (n = 19 subjects). Seventeen of the 19 subjects with ALT/AST elevations received ATM alone or CZA-ATM. The incidence of ALT/AST elevations was comparable between the ATM-alone and CZA-ATM cohorts. Two subjects in the ATM CI cohort experienced severe ALT/AST elevation AEs. All subjects with ALT/AST elevations were asymptomatic with no other findings suggestive of liver injury. Most other AEs were of mild to moderate severity and were similar across cohorts, except for prolonged prothrombin time (more frequent in CZA-ATM cohorts). These results suggest that CZA-ATM administered as 2-h intermittent infusions is safe and that some caution should be exercised with the use of ATM CI at an ATM dose of 8 g daily. If CZA-ATM is prescribed, clinicians are advised to monitor liver function, hematologic, and coagulation parameters. Future controlled studies are required to better define the safety and efficacy of the CZA-ATM regimens evaluated in this phase I study.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Aztreonam , Humanos , Adulto , Aztreonam/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Ceftazidima/efeitos adversos , Compostos Azabicíclicos/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Voluntários , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , beta-Lactamases
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 66(12): e0093622, 2022 12 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36394326

RESUMO

Scant pharmacokinetic (PK) data are available on ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and aztreonam (ATM) in combination, and it is unknown if CZA-ATM exacerbates alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevations relative to ATM alone. This phase 1 study sought to describe the PK of CZA-ATM and assess the associations between ATM exposures and ALT/AST elevations. Subjects (n = 48) were assigned to one of six cohorts (intermittent infusion [II] CZA, continuous infusion [CI] CZA, II ATM, CI ATM [8 g/daily], II CZA with II ATM [6 g/daily], and II CZA with II ATM [8 g/daily]), and study product(s) were administered for 7 days. A total of 19 subjects (40%) had ALT/AST elevations, and most (89%) occurred in the ATM/CZA-ATM cohorts. Two subjects in the CI ATM cohort experienced severe ALT/AST elevations, which halted the study. All subjects with ALT/AST elevations were asymptomatic with no other signs of liver injury, and all ALT/AST elevations resolved without sequalae after cessation of dosing. In the population PK (PopPK) analyses, CZA-ATM administration reduced total ATM clearance by 16%, had a negligible effect on total ceftazidime clearance, and was not a covariate in the avibactam PopPK model. In the exposure-response analyses, coadministration of CZA-ATM was not found to augment ALT/AST elevations. Modest associations were observed between ATM exposure (maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) and ALT/AST elevations in the analysis of subjects in the II ATM/CZA-ATM cohorts. The findings suggest that administration of CZA-ATM reduces ATM clearance but does not exacerbate AST/ALT elevations relative to ATM alone. The results also indicate that CI ATM should be used with caution.


Assuntos
Aztreonam , Ceftazidima , Humanos , Adulto , Ceftazidima/farmacocinética , Aztreonam/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/farmacocinética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacocinética , Combinação de Medicamentos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 66(7): e0025622, 2022 07 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35727059

RESUMO

Imipenem (IMI)/cilastatin/relebactam (REL) (I/R) is a novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with expanded microbiologic activity against carbapenem-resistant non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (CR-NME) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Relebactam, a bicyclic diazabicyclooctane, has no direct antimicrobial activity but provides reliable inhibition of many Ambler class A and class C enzymes. It is currently approved for the treatment of adult patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) and those with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) when limited or no alternative treatments are available. Given the number of recently approved ß-lactams with expanded activity against highly resistant Gram-negative pathogens, this review summarizes the published literature on I/R, with a focus on its similar and distinguishing characteristics relative to those of other recently approved agents. Overall, available data support its use for the treatment of patients with HABP/VABP, cUTI, and cIAI due to CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa. Data indicate that I/R retains some activity against CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa isolates that are resistant to the newer ß-lactams and vice versa, suggesting that susceptibility testing be performed for all the newer agents to determine optimal treatment options for patients with CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa infections. Further comparative PK/PD and clinical studies are warranted to determine the optimal role of I/R, alone and in combination, for the treatment of patients with highly resistant Gram-negative infections. Until further data are available, I/R is a potential treatment for patients with CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa infections when the benefits outweigh the risks.


Assuntos
Compostos Azabicíclicos , Pneumonia Bacteriana , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos , Humanos , Imipenem/farmacologia , Imipenem/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/farmacologia , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/uso terapêutico
4.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 59(6): 106595, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35483625

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are limited. Imipenem/relebactam (I/R) plus aztreonam (ATM) may be an option. METHODS: Ten OprD(-) P. aeruginosa isolates (3 parent strains; 7 MBL-producers) were evaluated using checkerboard methodology and Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI). Isolates exhibiting synergy in checkerboard studies (FICI ≤0.5) were evaluated using 24-h static concentration time-kill. Bacteria in late log-phase growth were diluted to 1 × 106 cfu/mL and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Samples were drawn at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h. Physiological fCmax, fCss,avg and fCmin of imipenem (26.7, 5.6, 0.5 mg/L), relebactam (REL; 13.1, 4, 0.8 mg/L) and ATM (62, 29, 8 mg/L) were used. Synergy in time-kill studies was defined as >2 log10 cfu/mL reduction compared with the most active individual agent. RESULTS: Synergy was observed in five isolates in checkerboard studies, including three of seven MBL-producing isolates. Isolates that were OprD(-) and harbored inducible Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinases (PDCs) did not show synergy as defined by FICI; however, ATM minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were significantly reduced with the combination. In time-kill studies, ATM alone was as active as combination regimens for MBL-producing isolates with deleted or inducible PDC production. For strains exhibiting constitutive PDC production, I/R plus ATM was synergistic at fCss,avg concentrations but exhibited similar activity to ATM at fCmin and fCmax concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: I/R plus ATM appears to exhibit synergy for some MBL-producing P. aeruginosa at physiological concentrations. Further study of the effect of dynamic concentrations is needed to fully understand the utility of this combination.


Assuntos
Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Aztreonam/farmacologia , Cefalosporinase , Humanos , Imipenem/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pseudomonas , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , beta-Lactamases/farmacologia
6.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 59(2): 106490, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34871745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention (ASI) appears to be necessary to realize the full benefits of rapid diagnostic technologies in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between early ASI paired with matrix-associated laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) compared with MALDI-TOF with standard of care (SOC) reporting in patients with positive blood cultures. METHODS: Adult patients with positive blood cultures and organism speciation via MALDI-TOF admitted between February 2015 and September 2015 were randomized to ASI or SOC in a 1:1 fashion. Patients admitted for at least 48 h following positive culture were included in analyses. ASI was defined as a clinical assessment by a stewardship team member with non-binding treatment recommendations offered to the primary team. The primary outcome was time to definitive therapy. Secondary outcomes included post-culture length of stay (LOS), time to first change in antibiotics, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients were included in the analyses (76 in the ASI group and 73 in the SOC group). ASI and SOC arms did not differ according to age, sex, comorbidities or severity of illness. Gram-positive organisms were common in both SOC and ASI arms (74.0 vs. 61.8%, P=0.11). Time to definitive therapy was reduced, on average, by 30.3 h in the ASI group (71.6 vs. 41.3 h, P=0.01). Hospital LOS following the first positive blood culture was significantly shorter in the ASI group (8.7 vs. 11.2 days, P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: ASI combined with MALDI-TOF reduced the time to definitive therapy and time to first change in antibiotics, and was associated with a shorter post-culture LOS.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemocultura/métodos , Humanos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos
7.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(10): e0106021, 2021 09 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34339278

RESUMO

Vancomycin area under the concentration curve (AUC) is known to predict vancomycin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). Data were analyzed from a rat model (n = 48) and two prospective clinical studies (PROVIDE [n = 263] and CAMERA2 [n = 291]). A logit-link model was used to calculate the multiplicative factors between the probability of AKI from clinical studies and in the rat. The rat was 2.7 to 4.2 times more sensitive to AKI between AUCs of 199.5 and 794.3 mg·h/liter, respectively.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Vancomicina , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Área Sob a Curva , Estudos Prospectivos , Ratos , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos
8.
Pharmacotherapy ; 41(9): 762-780, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34170571

RESUMO

This review critically appraises the published microbiologic and clinical data on the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Despite being recognized as an urgent threat pathogen by the CDC and WHO, optimal treatment of patients with serious CRAB infections remains ill-defined. Few commercially available agents exhibit reliable in vitro activity against CRAB. Historically, polymyxins have been the most active agents in vitro, though interpretations of susceptibility data are difficult given issues surrounding MIC testing methodologies and lack of correlation between MICs and clinical outcomes. Most available preclinical and clinical data involve use of polymyxins, tetracyclines, and sulbactam, alone and in combination. As the number of viable treatment options is limited, combination therapy with a polymyxin is often used for patients with CRAB infections, despite the significant risk of nephrotoxicity. However, no treatment regimen has been found to reduce mortality, which exceeds 40% across most studies, or substantially improve clinical response. While some newer agents, such as eravacycline and cefiderocol, have demonstrated in vitro activity, clinical efficacy has not been fully established. New agents with clinically relevant activity against CRAB isolates and favorable toxicity profiles are sorely needed.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33753337

RESUMO

The Accelerate Pheno and BacT/Alert Virtuo systems may improve bacteremia management. Here, we evaluated the impact of both devices on outcomes in patients with sepsis and concurrent Gram-negative bacteremia. This quasiexperimental study included a retrospective preimplementation and a prospective postimplementation group. Patients ≥18 years old with Gram-negative bacteremia were included. Patients with neutropenia, pregnant patients, those who were transferred from an outside hospital with active bloodstream infections, and those with polymicrobial bacteremia were excluded. Blood culture incubation in the BacT/Alert 3D device and microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing from culture plate growth were used prior to implementation of the BacT/Alert Virtuo and Accelerate Pheno systems. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) identification directly from blood culture was used pre- and postimplementation. Time to Gram stain results, identification, susceptibility reporting, initiation of narrow-spectrum Gram-negative therapy at 72 h, 30-day inpatient mortality, sepsis resolution, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. A total of 116 patients were included (63 preimplementation, 53 postimplementation). Median times to Gram stain and susceptibility results were significantly shorter postimplementation (P < 0.001). The postimplementation group had an improved hazard ratio for narrow-spectrum Gram-negative therapy at 72 h (hazard ratio [HR], 2.685 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.348 to 5.349]), a reduced hazard ratio for 30-day inpatient mortality (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.150 [95% CI, 0.026 to 0.846]), and improved sepsis resolution (92.5% versus 77.8% [P = 0.030]). The length of hospital stay was unchanged after implementation. We conclude that implementation of the BacT/Alert Virtuo and Accelerate Pheno systems improved microbiology laboratory processes, antibiotic utilization processes, and clinical outcomes. These data support the use of rapid diagnostics in sepsis with concurrent Gram-negative bacteremia.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Sepse , Adolescente , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemocultura , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz
10.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 57(4): 106311, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33621602

RESUMO

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Oral vancomycin is a cornerstone of CDI treatment, but dosing strategies in clinical practice may differ from guideline recommendations. This study aimed to determine differences in outcomes between patients treated with standard (125 mg QID) and high-dose (≥250 mg QID) oral vancomycin. This dual-centre study evaluated adult patients admitted between January 2013 and July 2017. Patients were included in the study if they had a positive C. difficile toxin PCR, symptomatic infection and received ≥48 h of oral vancomycin. Disease severity was characterised using a variety of classifiers, including guideline definitions. The primary outcome was 90-day CDI recurrence; secondary outcomes included clinical failure, in-hospital mortality and 90-day re-admission. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to balance differences between groups. A total of 535 patients were included; 261 received standard and 274 received high-dose vancomycin. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, except that patients receiving high-dose vancomycin were more likely to have more severe disease and to be admitted to the ICU. Few patients had fulminant disease (14.4%). No significant differences in recurrence (OR, 1.52, 95% CI 0.82-2.84), clinical failure (OR, 0.64, 95% CI 0.328-1.26), mortality (OR, 1.44, 95% CI 0.78-2.66) or re-admission (OR, 1.03, 95% CI 0.70-1.51) were identified between patients receiving standard and high-dose vancomycin in the IPTW analyses. No differences in recurrence, mortality or re-admission were identified between standard and high-dose vancomycin for the treatment of CDI not requiring surgery.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/tratamento farmacológico , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Padrão de Cuidado , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33318004

RESUMO

Vancomycin induces exposure-related acute kidney injury. However, the pharmacokinetic-toxicodynamic (PK-TD) relationship remains unclear. Sprague-Dawley rats received intravenous (i.v.) vancomycin doses of 300 mg/kg/day and 400 mg/kg/day, divided into once-, twice-, three-times-, or four-times-daily doses (i.e., QD, BID, TID, or QID) over 24 h. Up to 8 samples plus a terminal sample were drawn during the 24-h dosing period. Twenty-four-hour urine was collected and assayed for kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1). Vancomycin was quantified via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Following terminal sampling, nephrectomy and histopathologic analyses were conducted. PK analyses were conducted using Pmetrics. PK exposures (i.e., area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0-24] and maximum concentration from 0 to 24 h [Cmax0-24]) were calculated for each rat, and PK-TD relationships were discerned. A total of 53-rats generated PK-TD data. A 2-compartment model fit the data well (Bayesian observed versus predicted concentrations; R2 = 0.96). KIM-1 values were greater in QD and BID groups (P for QD versus TID, <0.002; P for QD versus QID, <0.004; P for BID versus TID, <0.002; and P for BID versus QID, <0.004). Exposure-response relationships were observed between KIM-1 versus Cmax0-24 and AUC0-24 (R2 = 0.7 and 0.68). Corrected Akaike's information criterion showed Cmax0-24 as the most predictive PK-TD driver for vancomycin-induced kidney injury (VIKI) (-5.28 versus -1.95). While PK-TD indices are often intercorrelated, maximal concentrations and fewer doses (for the same total daily amount) resulted in increased VIKI in our rat model.


Assuntos
Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Vancomicina , Animais , Área Sob a Curva , Teorema de Bayes , Cromatografia Líquida , Rim , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos
12.
Clin Ther ; 42(8): 1580-1586.e2, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684326

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this communication was to determine the intravenous compatibility of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam using simulated and actual Y-site administration. METHODS: Ceftazidime-avibactam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride. Aztreonam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL. Each combination of concentrations was tested for compatibility using visual, Tyndall beam, microscopy, turbidity, and pH assessments. Microscopy results were compared to those from sodium chloride 0.9% in water, pH was compared to that at time 0, and turbidity of combinations was compared to that of individual agents. Actual Y-site mixing was conducted over 2-h infusions with samples collected at 0, 1, and 2 h. Test results were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after mixing. All experiments were completed in triplicate. FINDINGS: Across simulated and actual Y-site experiments, no evidence of incompatibility between combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam was observed. Visual and microscopic tests revealed no particulate matter, color changes, or turbidity. Tyndall beam tests were negative with all combinations. No evidence of incompatibility was observed in turbidity testing. The pH values were consistent across each of the 6 combinations, from immediately after mixing until 12 h after mixing. When the addition of agents was reversed in simulated Y-site experiments, no differences in compatibility were observed. No differences in compatibility between actual and simulated Y-site administration were observed, and there was minimal variability across all replicate experiments. IMPLICATIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam, at concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL, appeared compatible with aztreonam at concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/química , Compostos Azabicíclicos/química , Aztreonam/química , Ceftazidima/química , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Azabicíclicos/administração & dosagem , Aztreonam/administração & dosagem , Ceftazidima/administração & dosagem , Simulação por Computador , Combinação de Medicamentos , Incompatibilidade de Medicamentos , Infusões Intravenosas
13.
Pharmacotherapy ; 40(9): 952-969, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696452

RESUMO

Multidrug resistance(MDR) among Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) isolates presents a significant clinical challenge and can substantially complicate the approach to selection of optimal antibiotic therapy. This review addresses major considerations in antibiotic selection for patients with suspected or documented serious MDR-PSA infections. Common mechanisms contributing to MDR among clinical PSA isolates are summarized. Empiric and definitive therapy considerations are addressed including the potential role of combination therapy. Newer agents with in vitro activity against MDR-PSA (e.g., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol) and their potential roles in clinical settings are discussed. Although these newer agents are promising options for the treatment of MDR-PSA, clinical data remain generally limited. Future studies are needed to determine optimal agents for the empiric and definitive treatment of MDR-PSA.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Tazobactam/farmacologia , Tazobactam/uso terapêutico
14.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(2): 105849, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31770628

RESUMO

In 2010, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) lowered carbapenem breakpoints to reduce the proportion of 'susceptible' organisms that produced carbapenemases. Few studies have evaluated the effect of this change on clinical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of carbapenem MICs on 30-day mortality from pooled patient-level data from studies of patients treated with carbapenems across a range of meropenem MICs. PubMed was searched to March 2019 with the terms 'carbapenem', 'meropenem', 'imipenem', 'doripenem', 'ertapenem', 'susceptibility' and 'outcomes'. Studies were included in the analysis if patients had Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia treated with a carbapenem for ≥48 h and mortality was reported. Studies were excluded if all isolates were either susceptible or resistant to meropenem based on CLSI 2010 breakpoints or if only carbapenemase-producing isolates were included. Authors were contacted for patient-level data. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, with planned subset analyses of patients treated with meropenem, receiving active combination therapy, treated in the ICU or infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of 157 articles identified, 4 met the inclusion criteria (115 eligible patients). The odds of mortality increased with each increasing meropenem MIC dilution (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.06-2.15) as a continuous variable. A similar increase in odds was observed in patients treated with meropenem, treated in the ICU, infected with K. pneumoniae or receiving no other active antimicrobials. Increasing meropenem MICs in Enterobacteriaceae were associated with increased mortality; however, more work is needed to define optimal clinical decision rules for infections within the susceptible range.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Humanos , Meropeném/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
15.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 74(8): 2326-2334, 2019 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31065686

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify the pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicodynamic (TD) relationship for vancomycin-induced kidney injury. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats received intravenous (iv) vancomycin. Doses ranging from 150 mg/kg/day to 400 mg/kg/day were administered as a single or twice-daily injection over 24 h (total protocol duration). Controls received iv saline. Plasma was sampled with up to eight samples in 24 h per rat. Twenty-four hour urine was collected and assayed for kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), osteopontin and clusterin. Vancomycin in plasma was quantified via LC-MS/MS. PK analyses were conducted using Pmetrics for R. PK exposures during the first 24 h (i.e. AUC0-24h, Cmax 0-24h and Cmin 0-24h) were calculated. PK/TD relationships were assessed with Spearman's rank coefficient (rs) and the best-fit mathematical model. RESULTS: PK/TD data were generated from 45 vancomycin-treated and 5 control rats. A two-compartment model fit the data well (Bayesian: observed versus predicted R2 = 0.97). Exposure-response relationships were found between AUC0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.61 and 0.66) and Cmax 0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.50 and 0.56) using a four-parameter Hill fit. Conversely, Cmin 0-24h was less predictive of KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.46 and 0.53). A vancomycin AUC0-24h of 482.2 corresponded to a 90% of maximal rise in KIM-1. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin-induced kidney injury as defined by urinary biomarkers is driven by vancomycin AUC or Cmax rather than Cmin. Further, an identified PK/TD target AUC0-24h of 482.2 mg·h/L may have direct relevance to human outcomes.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/patologia , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Biomarcadores/urina , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Administração Intravenosa , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Moléculas de Adesão Celular/urina , Cromatografia Líquida , Clusterina/urina , Masculino , Osteopontina/urina , Plasma/química , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30988153

RESUMO

Urinary biomarkers are superior to serum creatinine for defining onset and extent of kidney injury. This study classifies the temporal predictive ability of biomarkers for vancomycin-induced kidney injury (VIKI) as defined by histopathologic damage. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 125) were randomized to receive 150 to 400 mg/kg of body weight/day vancomycin via once or twice daily intraperitoneal injection over 1, 3, or 6 days. Urine was collected once during the 24 h prior to euthanasia or twice for rats treated for 6 days. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess the urinary biomarker performances of kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), clusterin, osteopontin (OPN), cystatin C, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) to predict histopathologically defined VIKI (using a national standard pathological assessment scheme from hematoxylin and eosin stained kidneys). Urinary KIM-1, clusterin, and OPN outperformed cystatin C and NGAL with regard to sensitivity and specificity. For the earliest injury, urinary KIM-1 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.662; P < 0.001) and clusterin (AUC, 0.706; P < 0.001) were the most sensitive for predicting even low-level histopathologic damage at 24 h compared to NGAL. KIM-1 and clusterin are the earliest and most sensitive predictors of VIKI. As injury progresses, KIM-1, clusterin, and OPN best define the extent of damage.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/urina , Biomarcadores/urina , Moléculas de Adesão Celular/urina , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos , Animais , Cistatina C/urina , Lipocalina-2/urina , Masculino , Osteopontina/urina , Curva ROC , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
17.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(10): 2643-2651, 2018 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30085140

RESUMO

Background: Bacteraemias caused by MSSA are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Controversy exists over the optimal treatment of severe infections caused by MSSA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify whether differences in clinical outcomes exist between cefazolin and antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical outcomes of cefazolin and ASPs for adult patients with MSSA bacteraemias throughout November 2017. Comparative studies reporting 90 day mortality associated with each treatment were included. Random effects models were used to evaluate the impact of directed treatment agent on the odds of 30 and 90 day mortality, clinical failure, discontinuation due to adverse effects and infection recurrence. Results: Five hundred and ninety-nine articles were evaluated for inclusion, of which seven met all inclusion criteria. Across all studies, 1589 patients received cefazolin and 2802 received an ASP. All-cause 90 day mortality was lower in patients who received cefazolin (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.99; I2 = 58%). Odds of discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly lower in patients receiving cefazolin (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.56; I2 = 13%). No differences in clinical failure were observed (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.41-1.76; I2 = 74%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis identified a significant decrease in mortality associated with cefazolin therapy for MSSA bacteraemia compared with ASPs, though no differences in clinical failure were observed. Additionally, cefazolin appeared to be better tolerated. These results should be interpreted with caution given the uncontrolled and retrospective nature of the included studies.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Meticilina/uso terapêutico , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Cefazolina/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/sangue , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29891607

RESUMO

The efficacy of cefazolin with high-inoculum methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections remains in question due to therapeutic failure inferred as being due to an inoculum effect (InE). This study investigated the local prevalence of a cefazolin InE (CInE) and its association with staphylococcal blaZ gene types among MSSA isolates in the Chicago area. Four medical centers in Chicago, IL, contributed MSSA isolates. Cefazolin MICs (C-MIC) were determined at 24 h by the broth microdilution method using a standard inoculum (SI; 5 × 105 CFU/ml) and a high inoculum (HI; 5 × 107 CFU/ml). The CInE was defined as (i) a ≥4-fold increase in C-MIC between SI and HI and/or (ii) a pronounced CInE, i.e., a nonsusceptible C-MIC of ≥16 µg/ml at HI. PCR was used to amplify the blaZ gene, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing to determine the gene type. Approximately 269 MSSA isolates were included. All but one isolate were susceptible to cefazolin at SI, and 97% remained susceptible at HI. A total of 196 isolates (73%) were blaZ positive, with the blaZ types led by gene type C (40%). CInE was seen in 45 blaZ-positive isolates (23%), with 44 (22%) presenting a ≥4-fold increase in C-MIC (SI to HI) and 5 (3%) a pronounced CInE. Four of the five met both definitions of CInE, two of which expressed the type A gene. The prevalence of a pronounced CInE associated with the type A blaZ gene from MSSA isolates in Chicago is low. Our predilection for cefazolin use, even early in the management of hospitalized MSSA infections, is tenable.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Genes Bacterianos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Carga Bacteriana , Chicago/epidemiologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Prevalência , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
19.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 52(4): 451-458, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29665442

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Carbapenems have shown efficacy in treating nosocomial pneumonias in clinical trials despite a reported low lung penetration compared with other ß-lactams. Preserving the clinical activity of carbapenems through stewardship efforts is essential. The aim of this review was to identify any differences in outcomes potentially as a function of decreased penetration. METHODS: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical trials comparing carbapenems with other anti-pseudomonal ß-lactams for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia through to end December 2016. Trials reporting clinical and microbiological outcomes associated with treatment were included. Pediatric studies and those with uneven comparators (e.g., carbapenem vs. combination Gram-negative therapy) were excluded. Fixed effects models were used to evaluate the impact of treatment on the odds of clinical failure, death, or microbiological failure. RESULTS: 252 unique articles were identified; five met inclusion criteria and comprised 640 patients in the carbapenem group and 634 patients in the ß-lactam group. No differences in clinical failure (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.81-1.44], I2=16%) or mortality (OR 0.75, CI 0.57-1.11, I2=0%) were noted between groups. Patients infected with P. aeruginosa and treated with imipenem were more likely to experience clinical failure (OR 4.21, CI 1.51-11.12, I2=44%) and to develop resistance to the study carbapenem (OR 2.86, CI 1.08-6.44, I2= 13%) than those treated with alternative ß-lactams. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in clinical outcomes were observed between carbapenems and non-carbapenem ß-lactams in nosocomial pneumonias. Those infected with P. aeruginosa fared worse and were more likely to have resistance develop if they were treated with imipenem. Additional studies are warranted.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/tratamento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/mortalidade , Esquema de Medicação , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/fisiologia , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/microbiologia , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/mortalidade , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Razão de Chances , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Staphylococcus aureus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 20(2): 3, 2018 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29511909

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are frequent causes of infection among critically ill patients. VAP is the most common hospital-acquired bacterial infection among mechanically ventilated patients. Unfortunately, many of the nosocomial Gram-negative bacteria that cause VAP are increasingly difficult to treat. Additionally, the evolution and dissemination of multi- and pan-drug resistant strains leave clinicians with few treatment options. VAP patients represent a dynamic population at risk for antibiotic failure and under-dosing due to altered antibiotic pharmacokinetic parameters. Since few antibiotic agents have been approved within the last 15 years, and no new agents specifically targeting VAP have been approved to date, it is anticipated that this problem will worsen. Given the public health crisis posed by resistant Gram-negative bacteria, it is essential to establish a firm understanding of the current epidemiology of VAP, the changing trends in Gram-negative resistance in VAP, and the current issues in drug development for Gram-negative bacteria that cause VAP. RECENT FINDINGS: Rapid identification technologies and phenotypic methods, new therapeutic strategies, and novel treatment paradigms have evolved in an attempt to improve treatment outcomes for VAP; however, clinical data supporting alternative treatment strategies and adjunctive therapies remain sparse. Importantly, new classes of antimicrobials, novel virulence factor inhibitors, and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are currently in development. Conscientious stewardship of new and emerging therapeutic agents will be needed to ensure they remain effective well into the future.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA