Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 25(3): 258-264, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458849

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although many integrative therapies exist, studies increasingly demonstrate yoga can help change the negative neuroplastic effects experienced by people living with chronic pain. Despite encouraging findings, a gap exists in accessible yoga programs designed to meet the individual needs of those experiencing limitations from chronic pain. This study evaluated a yoga program designed for people living with chronic pain delivered in a health care setting. Although yoga began as a spiritual practice thousands of years ago, it is now widely practiced for its physical and mental well-being aspects achieved through movement and breathing techniques. DESIGN: This was a piolt study that did not include a control group. METHODS: Twenty-one people with chronic pain participated in an in-person group yoga program for 8 weeks that included an educational program and yoga practice. A prepost design was used to measure effectiveness of the program on pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory), physical function, opioid medication use, overall impression of change in pain, satisfaction with the program, and likelihood of continuation of yoga practice. RESULTS: Data collected from participants demonstrated a decrease in pain interference as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory subscale between pre- and postintervention (5.6 ± 2.2 to 4.0 ± 2.3). In addition, the proportion of respondents with a pain interference rating of severe decreased by 15.4% (38.1% to 22.7%) between the pre- and postintervention time point. On follow-up from a survey 3 months after the completion of the study, more than 25% (N = 5) of participants were still practicing yoga daily. CONCLUSIONS: Despite yoga being practiced for thousands of years, studies evaluating the neural effects of yoga show possible reversal of persistent patterns leading to chronic pain, leading to new interest in an ancient practice. This study helps fill the gap in research findings addressing the benefits of yoga programs designed to meet the needs of people living in chronic pain and provides an accessible option. This program provides pain management nurses an innovative nonpharmacological intervention to consider for people living with chronic pain. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Evidence supporting the use of yoga in the treatment of chronic pain is growing, yet it remains an underutilized approach in a comprehensive treatment plan. Yoga can not only improve self-agency, but also reduces social isolation. Pain management nurses can play an important role in promoting the application of yoga for chronic pain and advocating for yoga programs that are focused on accessibility for people living with pain.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Manejo da Dor , Yoga , Humanos , Yoga/psicologia , Dor Crônica/terapia , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/normas , Idoso , Medição da Dor/métodos
2.
JAMA ; 327(16): 1598-1607, 2022 04 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35471506

RESUMO

Importance: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is updating its 2016 recommendation on the use of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and colorectal cancer (CRC). Objective: To provide updated model-based estimates of the net balance in benefits and harms from routine use of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention. Design, Setting, and Participants: Microsimulation modeling was used to estimate long-term benefits and harms for hypothetical US cohorts of men and women aged 40 to 79 years with up to 20% 10-year risk for an atherosclerotic CVD event and without prior history of CVD or elevated bleeding risks. Exposures: Low-dose (≤100 mg/d) aspirin for lifetime use, unless contraindicated by a bleeding event, and with stopping ages in 5-year intervals from age 65 to 85 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were lifetime net benefits measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years. Benefits included reduced nonfatal myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Harms included increased nonfatal major gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Reduced CRC incidence was considered in sensitivity analysis. Results: Estimated lifetime net QALYs were positive for both men and women at 5% or greater 10-year CVD risk when starting between ages 40 and 59 years and at 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk when starting between ages 60 and 69 years. These estimates ranged from 2.3 (95% CI, -2.7 to 7.4) to 66.2 (95% CI, 58.2 to 74.1) QALYs per 1000 persons. Lifetime net life-years were positive for men at 5% or greater and women at 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk starting aspirin at ages 40 to 49 years and for men at 7.5% or greater and women at 15% or greater 10-year CVD risk at ages 50 to 59 years. These estimates ranged from 0.4 (95% CI, -6.1 to 6.9) to 52.4 (95% CI, 43.9 to 60.9) life-years per 1000 persons. Lifetime net life-years were negative in most cases for persons starting aspirin between ages 60 and 79 years, as were lifetime net QALYs for persons aged 70 to 79 years. Stopping aspirin between ages 65 and 85 years generally showed little advantage compared with lifetime use. Sensitivity analyses showed lifetime net benefits may be higher if aspirin reduced CRC incidence or CVD mortality and lower if aspirin increased fatal major gastrointestinal bleeding or reduced quality of life with routine use. Conclusions and Relevance: This microsimulation study suggested that several population groups may benefit from taking aspirin for the primary prevention of CVD, primarily in persons starting at younger ages with higher 10-year CVD risk.


Assuntos
Aspirina , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias Colorretais , Adulto , Idoso , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevenção Primária , Qualidade de Vida
3.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 35(4): 527-534, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114509

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Research criteria for prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) were published in 2020, but little is known regarding prodromal DLB in clinical settings. METHODS: We identified non-demented participants without neurodegenerative disease from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set who converted to DLB at a subsequent visit. Prevalence of neuropsychiatric and motor symptoms were examined up to 5 years prior to DLB diagnosis. RESULTS: The sample included 116 participants clinically diagnosed with DLB and 348 age and sex-matched (1:3) Healthy Controls. Motor slowing was present in approximately 70% of participants 3 years prior to DLB diagnosis. In the prodromal phase, 50% of DLB participants demonstrated gait disorder, 70% had rigidity, 20% endorsed visual hallucinations, and over 50% of participants endorsed REM sleep behavior disorder. Apathy, depression, and anxiety were common prodromal neuropsychiatric symptoms. The presence of 1+ core clinical features of DLB in combination with apathy, depression, or anxiety resulted in the greatest AUC (0.815; 95% CI: 0.767, 0.865) for distinguishing HC from prodromal DLB 1 year prior to diagnosis. The presence of 2+ core clinical features was also accurate in differentiating between groups (AUC = 0.806; 95% CI: 0.756, 0.855). CONCLUSION: A wide range of motor, neuropsychiatric and other core clinical symptoms are common in prodromal DLB. A combination of core clinical features, neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment can accurately differentiate DLB from normal aging prior to dementia onset.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Disfunção Cognitiva , Doença por Corpos de Lewy , Doenças Neurodegenerativas , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Humanos , Corpos de Lewy , Doença por Corpos de Lewy/diagnóstico , Sintomas Prodrômicos
4.
Drugs Aging ; 38(5): 407-415, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33719017

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intranasal insulin is a potential treatment for neurodegenerative disease shown to increase cerebral glucose uptake, reduce amyloid plaques, and improve verbal memory in cognitively impaired as well as healthy adults. Investigations have suggested rapid-acting insulins such as glulisine may result in superior cognitive benefits compared with regular insulin. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rapid-acting intranasal glulisine in subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal glulisine 20 IU twice daily versus saline placebo in 35 memory-impaired (MCI/AD) subjects using the Impel NeuroPharma I109 Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD®) device. The 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score, and Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) were measured at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcome measures included digit span forward/backwards, Trail Making Test Parts A/B, Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and Weschler Memory Scale (WMS)-IV logical memory. Adverse effects (AEs) and serious adverse effects (SAEs) were measured along with blood glucose/insulin levels. RESULTS: No significant difference in ADAS-Cog13, CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), or FAQ scores were found between treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Subjects in the saline group were significantly older than those in the glulisine group (p = 0.022). No significant differences in sex, education, apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) status, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score existed between treatment groups. Overall, the number of adverse events per person was similar between groups (2.32 vs. 2.24; p = 0.824), although subjects receiving intranasal glulisine had higher rates of nasal irritation (25.0% vs. 13.9%) and respiratory symptoms (15.9% vs. 8.3%) compared with placebo. There were no differences in blood sugar or rate of hypoglycemia between the treatment and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal glulisine was relatively safe and well-tolerated and did not consistently impact peripheral glucose or insulin levels. There were no enhancing effects of intranasal glulisine on cognition, function, or mood, but the ability to detect significance was limited by the number of subjects successfully enrolled and the study duration. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02503501.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Disfunção Cognitiva , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Administração Intranasal , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Cognitiva/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Memória , Testes Neuropsicológicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA