Predicting efficacy of viloxazine extended-release treatment in adults with ADHD using an early change in ADHD symptoms: Machine learning Post Hoc analysis of a phase 3 clinical trial.

Early response to viloxazine extended-release (viloxazine ER, Qelbree®) treatment predicted efficacy outcome in pediatric subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study sought to determine whether the machine learning lasso model used in the pediatric study would predict response to viloxazine ER in an adult population based on early improvements in ADHD symptoms. We used data from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose (200-600 mg) study of viloxazine ER (N = 354; 18 to 60 years old). Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC AUC) statistics were computed using the lasso model from pediatric data to predict responder status in adults. Response was defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptoms Rating Scale (AISRS) Total score at Week 6. The adult study sample included 127 viloxazine ER-treated subjects with Week 6 data. Fifty-one subjects (40.2%) were categorized as responders. The ROC curves indicated that data collected up to Week 2 were sufficient to accurately predict treatment response at Week 6 with 68% positive predictive power, 80% sensitivity, and 74% specificity. This analysis demonstrated that the predictive model estimated from the child data generalizes to adults with ADHD, further supporting the consistency of viloxazine ER treatment across age groups.

The role of placebo response in the efficacy outcome assessment in viloxazine extended-release pivotal trials in paediatric subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

AIMS: Four Phase 3 studies evaluated efficacy and safety of viloxazine extended-release in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The primary efficacy objective-change from baseline in ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at end of study (EOS)-was not met in one of the studies (812P304). A band-pass analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of placebo response on the results. METHODS: The distribution of placebo response at EOS of each trial was evaluated. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the distribution of ADHD-RS-5 Total score were used as boundaries for the band-pass analysis. An independent mixed model for repeated measures analysis was conducted for each trial using all eligible data (active and placebo) from the total and band-pass filtered populations. RESULTS: The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles at EOS were 3.5 and 53.5, respectively. Application of the band-pass filter (filtering out all subjects [active, n = 305 (32.1%) and placebo, n = 134 (33.5%)] of clinical sites with placebo scores <3.5 or >53.5) revealed statistically significant improvement at the primary endpoint (600-mg/d viloxazine ER vs. placebo) in Study 812P304 (mean [confidence interval] = 4.9537 [0.5405-9.3669]), previously masked by a high placebo response (mean [confidence interval] = 3.5756 [-0.3332-7.4844]). The outcome of the analysis indicated that the impact of the band-pass adjustment is greater when placebo response is higher. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicated that a higher placebo response in Study 812P304 confounded the assessment of treatment effect. Application of the band-pass methodology confirmed the positive results of the 3 prior studies and the signal detection confounder in the fourth study.

Current and future nonstimulants in the treatment of pediatric ADHD: monoamine reuptake inhibitors, receptor modulators, and multimodal agents.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the single most common neuropsychiatric disorder with cognitive and behavioral manifestations, often starts in childhood and usually persists into adolescence and adulthood. Rarely seen alone, ADHD is most commonly complicated by other neuropsychiatric disorders that must be factored into any intervention plan to optimally address ADHD symptoms. With more than 30 classical Schedule II (CII) stimulant preparations available for ADHD treatment, only three nonstimulants (atomoxetine and extended-release formulations of clonidine and guanfacine) have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), all of which focus on modulating the noradrenergic system. Given the heterogeneity and complex nature of ADHD in most patients, research efforts are identifying nonstimulants which modulate pathways beyond the noradrenergic system. New ADHD medications in clinical development include monoamine reuptake inhibitors, monoamine receptor modulators, and multimodal agents that combine receptor agonist/antagonist activity (receptor modulation) and monoamine transporter inhibition. Each of these "pipeline" ADHD medications has a unique chemical structure and differs in its pharmacologic profile in terms of molecular targets and mechanisms. The clinical role for each of these agents will need to be explored with regard to their potential to address the heterogeneity of individuals struggling with ADHD and ADHD-associated comorbidities. This review profiles alternatives to Schedule II (CII) stimulants that are in clinical stages of development (Phase 2 or 3). Particular attention is given to viloxazine extended-release, which has completed Phase 3 studies in children and adolescents with ADHD.

Viloxazine in the Management of CNS Disorders: A Historical Overview and Current Status.

Viloxazine has a long history of clinical use in Europe as an antidepressant, and has recently been repurposed into an extended-release form for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the USA. An immediate-release formulation was approved for the treatment of depression in the UK in 1974, and was subsequently marketed there and in several European countries for 30 years with no major safety concerns. In contrast to first-generation antidepressants (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors), viloxazine was associated with a relatively low risk for cardiotoxicity. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most commonly reported side effects. The therapeutic effects of viloxazine are thought to be primarily the result of its action as a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, although in vitro and preclinical in vivo animal data suggest that viloxazine may also impact the serotoninergic system. This review summarizes the evolving knowledge of viloxazine based on information from previously published preclinical and clinical investigations, and acquired unpublished historical study reports from both open-label and blinded controlled clinical trials. We review the chemical properties, mechanism of action, safety, and tolerability across these studies, and discuss the contemporary rationale for the development of this agent as an extended-release oral formulation for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Translating Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Effectiveness Scores into Clinical Global Impressions Clinical Significance Levels in Four Randomized Clinical Trials of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objectives: Clinical trials in psychiatry frequently report results from lengthy, comprehensive assessments to characterize a subject emotionally, cognitively, and behaviorally before and after treatment. However, the potential treatment implications of these results and how they translate into clinical practice remain unclear. Conversely, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales are quick, intuitive assessments used to assess the functional impact of a treatment in clinically relevant terms. The objectives of the present analyses are to translate scores from comprehensive assessments of symptom severity and functional impairment into clinically meaningful CGI levels. Methods: These post-hoc analyses use data integrated from four pivotal Phase 3 trials in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents treated with the novel nonstimulant SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release). In this study, we evaluated the ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P), assessments of symptom severity and functional impairment, respectively, by linking these scales with the CGI scales at baseline and end of study. Results: For participants that improved, a one-level change on the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) was associated with a 10-15-point change on the ADHD-RS-5, and a 0.2-0.5-point change on the WFIRS-P. On the CGI-I, ratings of much improved and very much improved were associated with a percent score decrease (i.e., improvement) of ∼55% and 80% on the ADHD-RS-5 and ∼40% and 70% on the WFIRS-P, respectively. Differences between children and adolescents were minor and are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Conclusion: These post-hoc analyses provide clinically meaningful benchmarks for the interpretation of scores on the ADHD-RS-5 and WFIRS-P in terms of CGI evaluations in subjects with ADHD. These results may be useful for physicians seeking to understand a treatment's potential impact on their ADHD patients or for researchers looking to define their study results within a clinically relevant context. Data are from clinical trials NCT03247530, NCT03247543, NCT03247517, and NCT03247556.

Early response to SPN-812 (viloxazine extended-release) can predict efficacy outcome in pediatric subjects with ADHD: a machine learning post-hoc analysis of four randomized clinical trials.

Machine learning (ML) was used to determine whether early response can predict efficacy outcome in pediatric subjects with ADHD treated with SPN-812. We used data from four Phase 3 placebo-controlled trials of 100- to 600-mg/day SPN-812 (N=1397; 6-17 years of age). The treatment response was defined as having a ≥50% reduction in change from baseline (CFB) in ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 6. The variables used were: ADHD-RS-5 Total score, age, body weight, and body mass index at baseline; CFB ADHD-RS-5 Total score at Week 1, cumulative change in ADHD-RS-5 Total score at Week 2, and cumulative change in ADHD-RS-5 Total score at Week 3; Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score at Week 1, 2, and 3; and target dose. Using the best selected model, lasso regression, to generate importance scores, we found that change in ADHD-RS-5 Total score and CGI-I score were the best predictors of efficacy outcome. Change in ADHD-RS-5 Total score at Week 2 could predict treatment response at Week 6 (75% positive predictive power, 75% sensitivity, 74% specificity). Therefore, early response after two weeks of treatment with once-daily SPN-812 in pediatric patients with ADHD can predict efficacy outcome at Week 6.

Closing the gap: unmet needs of individuals with impulsive aggressive behavior observed in children and adolescents.

Impulsive aggressive (IA, or impulsive aggression) behavior describes an aggregate set of maladaptive, aggressive behaviors occurring across multiple neuropsychiatric disorders. IA is reactive, eruptive, sudden, and unplanned; it provides information about the severity, but not the nature, of its associated primary disorder. IA in children and adolescents is of serious clinical concern for patients, families, and physicians, given the detrimental impact pediatric IA can have on development. Currently, the ability to properly identify, monitor, and treat IA behavior across clinical populations is hindered by two major roadblocks: (1) the lack of an assessment tool designed for and sensitive to the set of behaviors comprising IA, and (2) the absence of a treatment indicated for IA symptomatology. In this review, we discuss the clinical gaps in the approach to monitoring and treating IA behavior, and highlight emerging solutions that may improve clinical outcomes in patients with IA.

Predicted Efficacy of Once-Daily Extended-Release Oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR®) Monotherapy in Adults and Children with Partial-Onset Seizures: Exposure-Response Modeling and Simulation.

PURPOSE: We conducted exposure-response modeling and simulations to compare the predicted efficacy of extended-release oxcarbazepine (OXC-XR), an oral once-daily (qd) antiepileptic drug, with that of immediate-release (IR) OXC twice-daily (bid) when the agents are used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures (POS). METHODS: Modeling assessed percent change from baseline 28-day seizure frequency (PCH) as a function of minimum concentration (Cmin) of monohydroxy derivative (MHD), the clinically relevant metabolite of OXC. For OXC-IR, the model used historical data; values for OXC-XR were derived from observed data. The model was simulated (N=100) to predict PCH at MHD Cmin concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day in adults and children receiving OXC-XR qd or OXC-IR bid. Mean PCH and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated and compared. RESULTS: Predicted efficacy was not different (ie, 95% CI of mean PCH overlapped) for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at mean MHD Cmin concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day adjunctive OXC-XR (47.4 and 76.4 µmol/L) and at target MHD Cmin concentrations for OXC-IR monotherapy (59.1 and 112 µmol/L) in adults. Predicted efficacy in adults vs children was not different between formulations. Depending on MHD Cmin, the predicted mean PCH in adults ranged from -51.4% to -73.4% with OXC-XR qd and -53.2% to -78.5% with OXC-IR bid. In children, the predicted mean PCH ranged from -48.4% to -58.1% (OXC-XR qd) and -32.5% to -70.4% (OXC-IR bid). CONCLUSION: This model-based analysis predicted comparable efficacy for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at MHD Cmin concentrations corresponding to 1200 and 2400 mg/day as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. Based on this analysis, the US Food & Drug Administration approved OXC-XR for use as monotherapy in adults and children ≥6 years of age with POS.

Real-world assessment of treatment with extended-release topiramate (Trokendi XR®) and comparison with previous immediate-release topiramate treatment.

AIM: Examine clinical profile of extended-release topiramate (Trokendi XR®) and compare treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) associated with Trokendi XR versus previous immediate-release topiramate (TPM-IR) treatment. PATIENTS & METHODS: Pilot retrospective study analyzing data extracted from medical charts of patients ≥6 years of age prescribed Trokendi XR. RESULTS: Trokendi XR was the most commonly used to prevent migraine. The most common TEAEs recorded during topiramate treatment were cognitive symptoms (word-finding difficulty, attention/concentration difficulty, slowed thinking), paresthesia, gastrointestinal problems and decreased appetite/weight loss. TEAE incidence was significantly (p < 0.001) lower during Trokendi XR versus previous TPM-IR treatment. CONCLUSION: Trokendi XR use and outcomes in clinical practice were consistent with established profile of topiramate. Results supported the potential for better tolerability of Trokendi XR versus TPM-IR.

Atrial fibrillation and mortality in African American patients with heart failure: results from the African American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT).

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and portends a worsened prognosis. Because of the low enrollment of African American subjects (AAs) in randomized HF trials, there are little data on AF in AAs with HF. This post hoc analysis reviews characteristics and outcomes of AA patients with AF in A-HeFT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1,050 AA patients with New York Heart Association class III/IV systolic HF, well treated with neurohormonal blockade (87% ß-blockers, 93% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin receptor blocker), were randomized to an added fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (FDC I/H) or placebo. Atrial fibrillation was confirmed in 174 (16.6%) patients at baseline and in an additional 9 patients who developed AF during the study, for a final cohort of 183 (17.4%). Comparison of patients with AF versus no AF revealed the following: mean age 61 ± 12 versus 56 ± 13 years (P < .001), systolic blood pressure (BP) 124 ± 18 versus 127 ± 18 mm Hg (P = .044), diastolic BP 74 ± 11 versus 77 ± 10 mm Hg (P = .002), creatinine level 1.4 ± 0.5 versus 1.2 ± 0.5 mg/dL (P < .001), and brain natriuretic peptide 431 ± 443 versus 283 ± 396 pg/mL (P < .001). No significant difference was observed in ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, or quality-of-life scores. However, AF increased the risk of mortality significantly among AA patients (P = .018), and the use of FDC I/H reduced the risk of mortality in patients with AF (HR 0.21, P = .002). CONCLUSION: African Americans with HF and AF (vs no AF) were older, had lower BP, and had higher creatinine and brain natriuretic peptide levels. Mortality and morbidity were worse when AF was present, and these data suggest that there may be an enhanced survival benefit with the use of FDC I/H in AA patients with HF and AF.

A retrospective, observational cohort analysis of a nationwide database to compare heart failure prescriptions and related health care utilization before and after publication of updated treatment guidelines in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) clinical guidelines for heart failure (HF), published September 20, 2005, provide a summary of the best evidence for treatment, but these recommendations are not always reflected in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare 6-month prescribing habits in the United States before and after the publication of updated clinical guidelines for the evaluation and management of HF and the impact of these prescribing habits on health care resource use. METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort analysis used the Humana nationwide health insurance administrative claims database that includes -3.5 million covered members from all 50 states and Puerto Rico who are enrolled in a health maintenance organization, a preferred provider organization, or a Medicare plan. The data included demographics (age, sex, type of insurance, and geographic location), medical information with up to 9 diagnostic codes per encounter, codes for procedures and medical equipment, laboratory tests, and pharmacy-dispensed medications. HF medication prescriptions and health care utilization were evaluated for 2 cohorts: those identified from claims before guideline publication (January 1, 2005-June 30, 2005) and those identified from claims after publication (October 1, 2006-March 31, 2007). Patients were eligible if they were aged ≥45 years, had 12 months of continuous enrollment (6 months before and 6 months after the index date, defined as the date of diagnosis or hospitalization for HF), and had ≥1 claim for HF. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received prescriptions for HF medications individually or in combination. Secondary outcomes were adherence to medication, all-cause and HF-specific hospitalizations, and emergency department and outpatient physician visits. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age in the before-publication cohort (n = 29,784) was 75 (11) years; in the after-publication cohort (n = 33,598), it was 74 (11) years (P < 0.001). Half of all patients in each cohort were female (50% [n = 14,796 and n = 16,803, respectively]); 9% (n = 2539) of the before-publication cohort and 7% (n = 2283) of the after-publication cohort were classified as having moderate to severe HF based on the baseline number of hospitalizations (P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the before-publication cohort received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (43% [12,811/29,784] vs 44% [14,776/33,598]; P = 0.01), ß-blockers (37% [10,901/29,784] vs 41% [13,639/33,598]; P < 0.01), angiotensin receptor blockers (10% [3008/29,784] vs 13% [4378/33,598]; P < 0.01), or hydralazine (3% [865/29,784] vs 4% [1378/33,598]; P < 0.01). Among those with moderate to severe HF, there were no significant differences between groups in the use of combination therapy (ie, ß-blockers with any combination of isosorbide dinitrate, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or hydralazine; all combinations, P = NS between cohorts), except for less use of a ß-blocker with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker among the before-publication cohort (23% [595/2539] vs38% [875/2283]; P = 0.005). Therewere significantly fewer all-cause and HF-related outpatient visits, all-cause and HF-related hospitalizations, and all-cause and HF-related emergency department visits in the after-publication cohort (all, P < 0.001); however, the absolute differences in the proportions of patients in each cohort who required such services were relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis of real-world prescribing patterns, only small differences in prescribing practices were found before and after the 2005 publication of the ACC/AHA guidelines for HF treatment. Health care utilization was slightly, but significantly, reduced after publication of the guidelines.

The Metabolic Syndrome in African Americans: a review.

The Metabolic Syndrome represents a specific clustering of cardiovascular risk factors. One of several recently proposed definitions encompasses 3 or more of the following 5 abnormalities: waist circumference > 102 cm in men or > 88 cm in women, serum triglyceride level > or = 150 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/dL in women, blood pressure (BP) > or = 130/> or = 85 mm Hg and serum glucose > or = 110 mg/dL. The diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome allows early recognition of an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. African Americans have the highest coronary heart disease mortality of any ethnic group in the United States. African-American women and Hispanic men and women have the highest prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome. This phenomenon is attributable mainly to the disproportionate occurrence of elevated BP, obesity, and diabetes in African Americans, and the high prevalence of obesity and diabetes in Hispanics. Management of the Metabolic Syndrome consists primarily of modification or reversal of the root causes and direct therapy of the risk factors. The first strategy involves weight reduction and increased physical activity, both of which can improve all components of the syndrome. The second strategy often involves drug treatment of the individual risk factors to further improve BP, lipids, and glucose thereby decreasing the risk of cardiovascular disease. This comprehensive review is provided as part of the educational activities of the African-American Lipid and Cardiovascular Council (AALCC).