False-Profile Radiograph Sourcil-Edge and Bone-Edge Measurements Correlate to Different Weightbearing Regions of the Acetabulum: A 3-Dimensional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The acetabular sourcil is commonly interpreted as a reliable radiographic representation of the weightbearing dome of the acetabulum, despite limited modern data. Assessment of weightbearing acetabular coverage has been described using both the sourcil edge and bone edge as anatomic landmarks, leading to confusion and potential misguidance in surgical decision-making and thus compromised patient outcomes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to characterize the 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic correlates of the sourcil-edge and bone-edge radiographic measurements on false-profile radiographs. It was hypothesized that the sourcil edge would represent anterolateral coverage and the bone edge would represent anterior coverage. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 80 hips were grouped by large or small differences between bone-edge and sourcil-edge anterior center-edge angles, based on upper and lower quartiles of discrepancy. Three-dimensional surface mesh models and digitally reconstructed radiographs were generated from hip computed tomography scans. Sourcil-edge and bone-edge anterior center-edge angles were identified on digitally reconstructed radiographs and registered to the 3D models with fiducial markers. Intersections of bone-edge and sourcil-edge projection lines with the acetabular rim were obtained from the 3D models. RESULTS: The bone-edge and sourcil-edge projections intersected the acetabular rim at clockface means of 2:05 ± 0:22 and 1:12 ± 0:25, respectively. The 3D models consistently demonstrated that, in both large- and small-discrepancy groups, the sourcil edge corresponded to the acetabular area just posterior to the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) projection, and the bone edge corresponded to the weightbearing region inferior to the AIIS. Additionally, in large-discrepancy hips, the bone edge corresponded to more prominent acetabular coverage in the region inferomedial to the AIIS when compared with the small-discrepancy hips. CONCLUSION: On false-profile radiographs, the sourcil edge corresponds to superior femoral head coverage, and the bone edge corresponds to anterosuperior coverage. Radiographs with a large discrepancy between sourcil-edge and bone-edge measurements demonstrate acetabular rim prominence in the region of the AIIS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Characterizing the anatomic weightbearing regions of the acetabulum represented on false-profile radiographs facilitates improved clinical and intraoperative decision-making in hip preservation surgery, including acetabuloplasty and periacetabular osteotomy.

A Novel Bone-Screw-Fastener Demonstrates Greater Maximum Compression Force Before Failure Compared With a Traditional Buttress Screw.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the maximal compression force before thread stripping of the novel bone-screw-fastener (BSF) with the traditional buttress screw (TBS) in synthetic osteoporotic and cadaveric bone models. METHODS: The maximum compression force of the plate-bone interface before loss of screw purchase during screw tightening was measured between self-tapping 3.5-mm BSF and 3.5-mm TBS using calibrated load cells. Three synthetic biomechanical models were used: a synthetic osteoporotic diaphysis (model 1), a 3-layer biomechanical polyurethane foam with 50-10-50 pounds-per-cubic-foot layering (model 2), and a 3-layer polyurethane foam with 50-15-50 pounds-per-cubic-foot layering (model 3). For the cadaveric metaphyseal model, 3 sets of cadaveric tibial plafonds and 3 sets of cadaveric tibial plateaus were used. A plate with sensors between the bone and plate interface was used to measure compression force during screw tightening in the synthetic bone models, while an annular load cell that measured screw compression as it slid through a guide was used to measure compression in the cadaver models. RESULTS: Across all synthetic osteoporotic bone models, the BSF demonstrated greater maximal compression force before stripping compared with the TBS [model 1, 155.51 N (SD = 7.77 N) versus 138.78 N (SD = 12.74 N), P = 0.036; model 2, 218.14 N (SD = 14.15 N) versus 110.23 N (SD = 8.00 N), P < 0.001; model 3, 382.72 N (SD = 20.15) versus 341.09 N (SD = 15.57 N), P = 0.003]. The BSF had greater maximal compression force for the overall cadaver trials, the tibial plafond trials, and the tibial plateau trials [overall, 111.27 N vs. 97.54 N (SD 32.32 N), P = 0.002; plafond, 149.6 N versus 132.92 N (SD 31.32 N), P = 0.006; plateau, 81.33 N versus 69.89 N (SD 33.38 N), P = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: The novel bone-screw-fastener generated 11%-65% greater maximal compression force than the TBS in synthetic osteoporotic and cadaveric metaphyseal bone models. A greater compression force may increase construct stability, facilitate early weight-bearing, and reduce construct failure.

Evaluation and Management of Posterior Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Tibial plateau fractures are caused by high-energy or low-energy trauma and result in complex injuries that require careful management of both osseous injuries and associated soft tissues. The posterior aspect of the tibial plateau can be involved in a variety of fracture patterns, requiring systematic evaluation, imaging, and advanced surgical planning to address these complex injuries. Early classification systems failed to classify posterior plateau fractures; however, three-dimensional imaging and newer classification schemes, including the Quadrant System and 3D systems, have incorporated posterior column lesions. There has been a growing body of literature focused on fixation principles and plating options for posterior column fractures. Furthermore, there are multiple approaches for surgeons to choose between, including a direct posterior, posteromedial, posterolateral (including Lobenhoffer and lateral condyle osteotomy), and combined posterior approach. This article presents a guide for managing posterior tibial plateau fractures, including the initial evaluation and management, descriptions of the surgical approaches, principles of fixation, and the associated outcomes and complications.

The Role of the Hip Capsule in Restoring Stability in the Initial Phase of Hip Distraction: An In Vivo Analysis.

Background: The labral suction seal has been shown to provide the majority of resistance in the initial phase of hip distraction. However, the effect of an unrepaired interportal capsulotomy and capsular repair on the initial phase of hip distractive stability in vivo is not well understood. Purpose: To investigate the effect of capsular repair on the initial phase of distractive stability of hip joints in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI between March and August 2020 were prospectively enrolled. Total joint space was measured on fluoroscopic images at the medial and lateral edges of the sourcil at 12.5-lb (5.7-kg) axial traction intervals (up to 100 lb [45.4 kg]) in 3 capsular states: (1) native capsule, (2) interportal capsulotomy, and (3) capsular repair. Distraction on anteroposterior radiographs was calculated as the difference between total joint space at each traction interval and baseline joint space at 0 lb, normalized to millimeters. The native, capsulotomy, and capsular repair states were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar tests. Results: Included were 36 hips in 35 patients. The median force required to distract ≥3 mm was 75 lb (34.0 kg; 95% CI, 70-80 lb [31.8-36.3 kg]) in both the native and capsular repair states (P = .629), which was significantly greater than the median force required to distract ≥3 mm in the capsulotomy state (50 lb [22.7 kg]; 95% CI, 45-55 lb [20.4-24.9 kg]) (P < .001). The most rapid rates of change in joint space were observed at the traction interval at which hips first achieved ≥3 mm of distraction (n = 33 hips; 92%). Conclusion: The traction force at which hips distracted ≥3 mm was 75 lb (34.0 kg) in both the native capsular and capsular repair states. Significantly less traction force (50 lb [22.7 kg]) distracted hips ≥3 mm in the capsulotomy state. Complete capsular closure after interportal capsulotomy resulted in restoration of initial distractive stability relative to the unrepaired capsulotomy state at time zero after primary hip arthroscopy. Clinical Relevance: This study provides surgeons with an improved understanding of the additional stability to the hip joint from capsular repair after hip arthroscopy for FAI syndrome.

Worse Quality of Life Associated With Hyperextension Varus Tibial Plateau Fracture Pattern.

OBJECTIVES: Compare patient-reported outcome measures between hyperextension varus tibial plateau (HEVTP) fracture patterns to non-HEVTP fracture patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Single academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 were collected. Exclusion criteria included inaccurate Current Procedural Terminology code, ipsilateral compartment syndrome, bilateral fractures, incomplete medical records, or follow-up <10 months. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: In patients who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture, compare Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, PROMIS Preference, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) between patients with a HEVTP pattern with those without. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seven patients were included, of which 17 (8%) had HEVTP fractures. Compared with non-HEVTP fracture patterns, patients with HEVTP injuries were younger (42.6 vs. 51.0, P = 0.025), more commonly male (71% vs. 44%, P = 0.033), and had higher body mass index (32.8 vs. 28.0, P = 0.05). HEVTP fractures had significantly more ligamentous knee (29% vs. 6%, P = 0.007) and vascular (12% vs. 1%, P = 0.035) injuries. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function scores were similar between groups; however, PROMIS-Preference (0.37 vs. 0.51, P = 0.017) was significantly lower in HEVTP fractures. KOOS pain, activities of daily living, and quality-of-life scores were statistically lower in HEVTP fractures, but only KOOS quality-of-life was clinically relevant (41.7 vs. 59.3, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The HEVTP fracture pattern, whether unicondylar or bicondylar, was associated with a higher rate of ligamentous and vascular injuries compared with non-HEVTP fracture patterns. They were also associated with worse health-related quality of life at midterm follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes after Operatively Treated Tibial Plateau Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Define patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds and factors affecting PASS thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) following operatively treated tibial plateau fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single Level I academic trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients (n = 159) who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at minimum 1-year follow-up were enrolled for the study. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: PASS thresholds for global outcome (PASS-Global), pain (PASS-Pain), and function (PASS-Function) were determined using anchor-based questions such as "How satisfied are you today with your injured lower extremity?" with answer choices of very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, and very unsatisfied. PASS thresholds for each PROM were calculated using 3 methods: (1) 80% specificity, (2) 75th percentile, and (3) Youden Index. RESULTS: Sixty percent of patients were satisfied with their global outcome and 53% with function. Using 80% specificity, 75th percentile, and Youden Index, PASS-Global thresholds were 48.5, 44.5, and 47.9 for PROMIS-PF and 56.3, 56.2, and 56.3 for KOOS-QOL, respectively. PASS-Pain threshold for KOOS-Pain was 84.4, 80.6, and 80.6, respectively. PASS-Function thresholds were 48.9, 46.8, and 48 for PROMIS-PF and 94.1, 90.2, and 86.8 for KOOS-ADL, respectively. Younger patients and those with bicondylar fractures or infections were associated with significantly lower PASS-Pain thresholds. Schatzker II fractures, lateral column involvement, or isolated lateral approach resulted in significantly higher PASS-Global and PASS-Function thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: This study defines global, functional, and pain PASS thresholds for tibial plateau fractures. Patients with bicondylar fractures, infections, and medial column involvement were more often unsatisfied. These thresholds are valuable references to identify patients who have attained satisfactory outcomes and to counsel patients with risk factors for unsatisfactory outcomes following tibial plateau fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.