Pharmacists Providing Palliative Care Services: Demonstrating a Positive Return on Investment.

Objective: To establish a return on investment (ROI) for a pharmacist position on a hospital-based palliative care (PC) team. Background: Utilizing a pharmacist to provide PC services is often overlooked as a solution to physician shortages. Integration of a pharmacist into PC teams yields a favorable ROI. Methods: A 16-month retrospective review comparing PC patients at two hospitals with consultative PC teams. The PC teams at the two facilities had identical full-time equivalent team members, except for a PC pharmacist at Facility 1. The PC pharmacist's ROI was calculated based on cost savings created by utilizing the PC pharmacist as a physician extender and costs attributable to preventable adverse drug events (pADEs) identified by the PC pharmacist. Results: An annual ROI of 1.2 to 2.9 million dollars was calculated, $125,760 from physician time saved and $1.1-2.8 million dollars from pADEs. A statistically significant difference in rates of pADEs was realized between the PC pharmacist and non-PC pharmacists at Facility 1 as well as between pharmacists at Facility 1 (PC pharmacist and non-PC pharmacists) and pharmacists at Facility 2 (non-PC pharmacists). Conclusion: A PC pharmacist's unique qualifications and perspective contribute to the value of care provided to PC patients. A favorable ROI that exceeds a pharmacist's annual salary was demonstrated in this analysis.

Expanding Palliative Medicine across Care Settings: One Health System Experience.

BACKGROUND: The success of our hospital-based Palliative Care program stimulated requests to duplicate the program across the health system continuum of care. OBJECTIVE: To develop a model of care focused on a high-need, high-cost population that could be implemented across all care settings, including hospitals and patients' homes. METHODS: To fiscally support program expansion from hospital to home, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis for home-based Palliative Care (HBPC)-enrolled patients with continuous claims months before program enrollment through date of death. The HBPC enrollees were evaluated against a cohort group of CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service) and Medicare Advantage patients who did not participate in the HBPC program (n = 3135). Twenty-one months of claims leading up to the date of death were evaluated for both populations. The analysis was designed to test whether Palliative Care patients demonstrated less overall claims expense and service utilization in the same periods as patients without Palliative Care. Claim months were grouped into three-month clusters for evaluation and statistical testing of per member per month utilization and cost. RESULTS: Overall, HBPC patients demonstrated significantly less service utilization and cost in the months leading up to death. Cost differences were primarily driven by clear cost divergence in the last three months of life [$9,843 (PC) vs. $27,530 (C)]. Our program grew from a hospital-based program to include the establishment of a home-based program. CONCLUSION: Palliative Care programs can successfully expand outside hospital walls to serve a high need/high-cost patient population.

Prospective evaluation of surgical palliative care immersion training for general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care competencies in surgical training are recognized to improve the care of surgical patients with advanced or life-threatening illnesses. Formal programs to teach these competencies are lacking. The study aims to assess the feasibility and utility of a unique surgical palliative care immersion training program. STUDY DESIGN: A half-day Surgical Palliative Care Immersion Training (SPCIT) was developed using the American College of Surgeon's manual titled "Surgical Palliative Care: A Resident's Guide" as a framework. The training format was modeled after the highly successful University of Arizona Center on Aging's Interprofessional Chief Resident Immersion Training (IP-CRIT) Program to teach palliative care competencies to general surgery residents. Objective and self-assessments were performed at baseline, immediately post training and 5-months after training. For all pre-test, post-test comparisons on Likert scale, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used. For aggregate scores a repeated-measures analysis of variance was used. RESULTS: Forty of the forty-eight residents (83%) completed the learner's needs assessment survey. Thirty-four (71%) of the forty-eight residents in the residency program participated in the SPCIT. Significant improvement was noted in objective assessment of post-test aggregate scores (Mean difference 2.15, 95% CI 0.52-3.77, p = 0.0083). There was a significant increase in proportion of residents who felt confident in discussing palliative care options (96.5% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.0001); end-of-life care (86.2% vs. 52.5%, p < 0.0065); code status (86% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001); prognosis (96% vs. 35%, p < 0.001); or withholding or withdrawing life support (79.2% vs. 45%, p = 0.0059) with patient/families after the SPCIT. CONCLUSION: The newly developed SPCIT program drastically improves knowledge, attitudes and perceived skills of general surgery residents. Similar training can be implemented in other surgical residency programs.

Development of an Enhanced Interprofessional Chief Resident Immersion Training (IP-CRIT) Program.

Using interprofessional faculty, the authors reviewed and enhanced the nationally renowned Chief Resident Immersion Training (CRIT) in the Care of Older Adults Program to include Triple Aim objectives and interprofessional competency-based content and developed the Interprofessional CRIT. Evaluations were positive and sustained. The authors educated chief residents about value-based care, linking them to key interprofessional staff to build team-based care. The authors addressed quality improvement issues identified by the Institute of Medicine and our health network. Chief residents are now better prepared to train medical students and residents using a team-based, patient-centered approach, and a culture of continual quality improvement toward improved care of older patients.

Healthy aging rounds: using healthy-aging mentors to teach medical students about physical activity and social support assessment, interviewing, and prescription.

Medical students underestimate the health and functional status of community-dwelling older adults and have little experience in health promotion interviewing or prescribing physical activity. The goal was to provide third-year University of Arizona medical students with an opportunity to gain a broader and evidence-based understanding of healthy aging, with specific focus on physical activity and social engagement. Students engaged in one-on-one conversations with healthy older adult mentors and practiced assessment, interviewing and prescription counseling for physical activity and social support. This 2-hour mandatory interactive educational offering improved student attitudes and knowledge about healthy aging and provided hands-on health promotion counseling experience.