Extragonadal Perirectal Mature Cystic Teratoma in the Adult Male.

Background: Extragonadal abdominopelvic teratomas in adults are extremely rare, and those in males are exceedingly rare. These masses are most commonly found incidentally and require surgical excision for diagnostic confirmation after a thorough workup. Case Presentation: This is a case report of a 49-year-old male who presented to a urology office with symptoms of hematuria, incidentally, found to have a pelvic mass on computed tomography urogram prompting colorectal surgical evaluation and subsequent laparoscopic complete excision. The clinical presentation, radiographic findings, and histopathological findings are described along with a literature review of extragonadal abdominopelvic mature cystic teratoma, also referred to as a sacrococcygeal teratoma. Discussion: A broad differential diagnosis was generated for this patient with a pelvic mass after complete work-up, consisting of a dermoid or epidermoid cyst, liposarcoma, or sacrococcygeal teratoma. Radiological features can aid in the diagnostic confusion that may present in the adult patient. Conclusion: Albeit rare in the male and adult population, sacrococcygeal teratoma is a plausible differential diagnosis for a pelvic mass. Underrepresented in the literature in regard to guidelines on management, complete surgical excision is the gold standard, with laparoscopy being a reasonable approach.

Anal dysplasia among solid organ transplant recipients; a cross sectional study / Displasia anal entre receptores de transplantes de órgãos sólidos - um estudo transversal

ABSTRACT Introduction: The incidence of anal cancer in United States has increased over of the last few decades impacting immunosuppressed populations like solid organ transplant recipients, in particular. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anal dysplasia among solid organ transplant patients. We also attempted to identify factors that predispose solid organ transplant recipients to developing anal dysplasia. Methods and materials: Patients presenting to transplant office for routine care were recruited to participate in the study. All anal cytology specimens were collected using standard anal pap technique. The results were assessed using Bethesda classification. Information on perceived risk factors for development of anal dysplasia among our subjects was obtained. Results: Among 80 patients approached, 47 agreed to participate in the study. Of all the samples 19.1% had an inadequate amount of specimen to perform any analysis. Dysplastic cells were found in 10.5% of the specimens available for analysis. We were not able to identify any risk factors including age, gender distribution, smoking, and duration of immunosuppression that were statistically significant different between patients with anal dysplasia versus those without anal dysplasia. Conclusions: The rate of anal dysplasia detectable on cytology is high enough to warrant anal dysplasia screening in transplant recipients, which can then be followed up with high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy. Defining a cohort of patients among solid organ transplant recipients who are at an increased risk for the development of anal dysplasia mandating screening continues to be a challenge.

RESUMO Introdução: A incidência de câncer anal nos Estados Unidos aumentou nas últimas décadas, afetando populações imunossuprimidas, especialmente receptores de órgãos sólidos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a prevalência de displasia anal entre pacientes que receberam transplante de órgãos sólidos. Os autores buscaram identificar fatores que predispõem os receptores de transplante de órgãos sólidos a desenvolverem displasia anal. Métodos e materiais: Pacientes que se apresentaram ao consultório de transplante para acompanhamento de rotina foram recrutados para participar do estudo. Todos os espécimes de citologia foram coletados usando a técnica padrão de Papanicolau anal. Os resultados foram avaliados usando a classificação de Bethesda. Foram coletados dados sobre os fatores de risco percebidos para o desenvolvimento de displasia anal entre os participantes. Resultados: Dos 80 pacientes abordados, 47 concordaram em participar do estudo. Do total de amostras, 19,1% tinham uma quantidade inadequada para realizar qualquer análise. Células displásicas foram encontradas em 10,5% dos espécimes disponíveis para análise. Não foi possível identificar quaisquer fatores de risco, incluindo idade, distribuição de gênero, tabagismo e duração da imunossupressão, que foram estatisticamente diferentes entre pacientes com displasia anal e aqueles sem displasia anal. Conclusões: A taxa de displasia anal detectável na citologia é alta o suficiente para justificar a triagem em receptores de transplante, que pode então ser acompanhada com anuscopia de alta resolução com biópsia. A definição de triagem para uma coorte de pacientes entre os receptores de transplantes de órgãos sólidos que apresentam risco aumentado para o desenvolvimento displasia anal continua a ser um desafio.

Trends in the clinical presentation, treatment, and survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We assessed trends in the clinical presentation, treatment, and survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using data from the SEER program (2004-2014). All patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma over 2 eras were included (A: 2004-2009 vs. B: 2010-2014). Outcomes of interest were the likelihood of metastatic disease at diagnosis, utilization of resection, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 62,201 patients were included in this study [Era B - 31,998 (51.4%)]. Patients diagnosed in Era B were significantly less likely to have metastatic pancreatic cancer at diagnosis, and demonstrated improved long-term survival after risk-adjustment. Similarly, patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer that were diagnosed in Era B were independently more likely to undergo resection. The observed association between era of diagnosis and survival was independent of resection status and the presence of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: There have been significant improvements in pancreatic cancer care over the last decade, as evidenced by earlier diagnosis, increased utilization of surgery, and improvement in overall survival for both resected and un-resected patients.

Inadvertent Traumatic Fracture of Central Venous Catheter during Procurement, Transmitted Through Solid Organ Transplant.

Central venous catheters play a pivotal role in the perioperative support of critically ill patients. They are used for administration of fluids, vasopressors, blood products, and various medications; however, their use may be associated with serious complications, such as catheter fracture and embolization. While most data on catheter fracture embolization consist of isolated case reports, only a few studies have examined patients with central venous catheter embolism. We report a traumatic inadvertent transection of central venous catheter that migrated through a donor transplanted liver and was found to be lodged in the recipient's right ventricle. The catheter was retrieved under fluoroscopy using a trilobed snare device.

Coexisting right nonrecurrent and right recurrent inferior laryngeal nerves: a rare and controversial entity: report of a case and review of the literature.

Variations in the course of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) can occur, including the development of a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve (NRILN). Rarely, both a right RLN and a right NRILN have been reported in the same patient, merging before they enter the larynx. A case is presented, including images, and the literature concerning this rare anatomical finding is reviewed, including studies suggesting alternative explanations for these cases. Fourteen previously reported cases of coexisting RLN and NRILN were identified, all involving the right side. Some cases were associated with an anomalous origin of the right subclavian artery and some were not. The alternative explanations that a communicating branch of the sympathetic nerve, which joins the RLN, is mistaken for an NRILN or that a collateral branch from an NRILN is mistaken for an RLN in these cases are also considered. Surgeons must be aware of these unusual variations to minimize nerve injury during neck surgery.