Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2300266, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330274

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To build capacity for improved treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in Ghana, including computed tomography (CT) staging and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer were prospectively staged with abdominopelvic CT and ultrasound and offered the opportunity to have IMRT instead of conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy. The development of an efficient, high-quality, and safe IMRT program was facilitated by investment in new technology and comprehensive training of the interdisciplinary radiotherapy team in collaboration with a North American center of excellence. RESULTS: Of 215 patients with cervical cancer referred in 2022, 66% were able to afford CT scans and 26% were able to afford IMRT. Lymph node metastases were identified in 52% of patients by CT but in only 2% of patients by ultrasound. The use of CT resulted in 63% of patients being upstaged and changed treatment intent or radiation treatment volumes in 67% of patients. Patients who had IMRT experienced fewer acute side effects and were more likely to complete treatment as planned. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to provide state-of the-art cancer treatment with CT staging and IMRT to patients with cervical cancer in low-resource settings and achieve meaningful improvements in outcomes. It requires a broad commitment by program leadership to invest in technology and staff training. Major challenges include balancing improved clinical care with reduced patient throughput when radiation treatment capacity is constrained, and with the additional cost in the absence of universal health coverage.


Assuntos
Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Gana , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 31(5): 670-678, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33558421

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients with cervical cancer in Ghana present with locally advanced disease. In October 2014, high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was introduced at the National Center for Radiotherapy, Accra after years of using low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of patients treated with LDR versus HDR brachytherapy. METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer treated from January 2008 to December 2017 were reviewed. Those with stage IB-IIIB who received chemoradiation plus brachytherapy were included in the study. Post-operative patients and those with stage IV were excluded. The study end points were local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years. Endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We included 284 LDR and 136 HDR brachytherapy patients. For stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIB disease, the 2-year local control for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 63% and 61% (p=0.35), 86% and 90% (p=0.68), 86% and 88% (p=0.83), 66% and 60% (p=0.56), and 77% and 40% (p=0.005), respectively. The 2-year disease-free survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 64% and 61% (p=0.50), 81% and 69% (p=0.18), 81% and 80% (p=0.54), 62% and 33% (p=0.82), and 71% and 30% (p=0.001) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB, respectively. The 2-year overall survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 94% and 93% (p=0.92), 98% and 68% (p=0.21), 89% and 88% (p=0.60), and 88% and 82% (p=0.34) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIB disease, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between LDR and HDR brachytherapy in local control and disease-free survival for all stages of disease, except in stage IIIB. These findings highlight the need to refine this brachytherapy technique for this group of patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Gana , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA