Effect of coaching the sit-to-stand motion and attentional focus.

[Purpose] The present study investigated whether (1) "standing up while bowing" is effective for promoting the sit-to-stand (STS) motion and (2) whether this coaching promotes internal focus. [Participants and Methods] The participants included 17 healthy adults who performed the 30-s chair stand test with two sets of verbal instructions. The verbal instructions were as follows: "Please stand up as many times as possible for 30 s" (control condition) and "Please stand up while bowing as many times as possible for 30 s" (bowing condition). The participants performed the tests successively under the two conditions. In the 30-s chair stand test, a three-axis accelerometer was attached to the participants and the sagittal STS motion was filmed using a video camera. After the 30-s chair stand test, we used the modified Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS) to evaluate attentional focus. Differences in the measurements were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t-test for each condition. [Results] Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the CS-30 count, time from sitting to standing, time from sitting to lift-off, time from lift-off to standing, and the trunk tilt angle on lift-off. Regarding the questionnaire, Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the MSRS and "conscious motor processing". [Conclusion] These results suggest that "standing up while bowing" has limited effectiveness in promoting the STS motion because the coaching promotes internal focus.

The difference in attentional focus during exercise affects attention resources.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the difference in attentional focus, including the external focus (EF) or internal focus (IF) during exercise on attention resources from the viewpoint of the brain activity. [Participants and Methods] The study included 20 healthy adult participants randomly assigned to two groups: the EF and IF groups. The participants in each group received different verbal instructions before performing a tennis ball task, in which they threw a tennis ball on the floor at a target with their non-dominant hands as accurately as possible while sitting on a chair. During the task, oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was continuously measured using a near-infrared spectroscopy device. The accuracy of the task and the change of oxy-Hb were statistically analyzed. [Results] Although there were no statistically significant differences between the groups, both accuracy of the task and oxy-Hb in the EF group were found to be higher than those in the IF group. [Conclusion] Our results showed that although the accuracy of motor control in the EF was superior to that in the IF, there is a possibility of increased attention resources in the EF compared to those in the IF.