Common and contrast determinants of peripheral artery disease and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in North Central Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) are two of the leading causes of non-traumatic amputation worldwide with tremendous negative effects on the quality of life, psychosocial well-being of persons with diabetes mellitus; and a great burden on health care expenditure. It is therefore imperative, to identify the common and contrast determinants of PAD and DPN in order to ease adoption of common and specific strategies for their early prevention. METHODS: This was a multi-center cross-sectional study which involved the consecutive enrolment of one thousand and forty (1040) participants following consent and waiver of ethical approval. Relevant medical history, anthropometric measurements, other clinical examinations including measurement of ankle-brachial index (ABI) and neurological examinations were undertaken. IBM SPSS version 23 was used for statistical analysis and logistic regression was used to assess for the common and contrast determinants of PAD and DPN. Significance level used was p < 0.05. RESULTS: Multiple stepwise logistic regression showed that common predictors of PAD vs DPN respectively include age, odds ratio (OR) 1.51 vs 1.99, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.18-2.34 vs 1.35-2.54, p = 0.033 vs 0.003; duration of DM (OR 1.51 vs 2.01, CI 1.23-1.85 vs 1.00-3.02, p = <.001 vs 0.032); central obesity (OR 9.77 vs 1.12, CI 5.07-18.82 vs 1.08-3.25, p = <.001 vs 0.047); poor SBP control (OR 2.47 vs 1.78, CI 1.26-4.87 vs 1.18-3.31, p = .016 vs 0.001); poor DBP control (OR 2.45 vs 1.45, CI 1.24-4.84 vs 1.13-2.59, p = .010 vs 0.006); poor 2HrPP control (OR 3.43 vs 2.83, CI 1.79-6.56 vs 1.31-4.17, p = <.001 vs 0.001); poor HbA1c control (OR 2.59 vs 2.31, CI 1.50-5.71 vs 1.47-3.69, p = <.001 vs 0.004). Common negative predictors or probable protective factors of PAD and DPN respectively include statins (OR 3.01 vs 2.21, CI 1.99-9.19 vs 1.45-3.26, p = .023 vs 0.004); and antiplatelets (OR 7.14 vs 2.46, CI 3.03-15.61 vs 1.09-5.53, p = .008 vs 0.030). However, only DPN was significantly predicted by female gender (OR 1.94, CI 1.39-2.25, p = 0.023), height (OR 2.02, CI 1.85-2.20, p = 0.001), generalized obesity (OR 2.02, CI 1.58-2.79, p = 0.002), and poor FPG control (OR 2.43, CI 1.50-4.10, p = 0.004) CONCLUSION: Common determinants of PAD and DPN included age, duration of DM, central obesity, and poor control of SBP, DBP, and 2HrPP control. Additionally, the use of antiplatelets and statins use were common inverse determinants of PAD and DPN which means they may help protect against PAD and DPN. However, only DPN was significantly predicted by female gender, height, generalized obesity, and poor control of FPG.

Comparison of waist-height ratio and other obesity indices in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Background: Waist-height ratio (WHtR) is increasingly being studied as a simple and effective measure of central obesity. Reports have shown that WHtR is a better predictor of hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases when compared to traditional obesity indices like body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-hip ratio (WHR). This study is therefore aimed at comparing WHtR with other obesity indices in the prediction of peripheral neuropathy in persons with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methodology: One thousand and forty persons with DM were enrolled following consent. Relevant details of history were obtained, followed by physical examinations. Data were analyzed using IBM-SPSS version 23. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds ratio of obesity indices in the prediction of peripheral neuropathy. The level of significance used was p = 0.05. Results: Logistic regression showed that WHtR had the highest odds ratio (OR) for the prediction of "probable" diabetic peripheral neuropathy (OR 9.11, 95% CI 3.07-47.97, p = 0.002), followed by WC (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.09-4.05, p = 0.004), and BMI (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00-3.99, p = 0.019) after correction for age; systemic hypertension; duration of DM; control of SBP, DBP, HbA1c, FPG, and 2HrPP. Conclusion: WHtR has the highest odds ratio in the prediction of "probable" diabetic peripheral neuropathy in both genders, followed by WC in the males and BMI in the females.

Impact of Diabetes Foot Care Education on Amputation Rate in the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Ulceration of the foot is a major problem for people with diabetes. In a developing country like Nigeria, huge challenge is caused by diabetes foot problems. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of diabetic foot care education of patients and health care staff on the outcome of diabetic foot complications in our hospital. This was a pre and post design carried out from April 2013 to March 2014 on 155 diabetes patients. Patient education was carried out by diabetes nurses and doctors, at diagnosis and re-enforced at follow-up clinics. At the end of 1 year, the impact of education was assessed. Descriptive statistics were generated as appropriate. A total of 155 patients, 64 (41%) males and 91 (59%) females, were studied with mean age of 49 ± 3 years and mean duration of diabetes 6 ± 2.6 years. At the onset of the program, 70% of the patients had no knowledge of foot care education. Only 13.5% knew that diabetes mellitus foot ulcer could be related to long duration of diabetes, nerve damage, blood vessel blockage, foot deformity, and uncontrolled blood glucose. Ninety-two percent of the patients preferred home remedies, herbal treatment, or chemist in the event of an ulcer. After the program, 77% would seek hospital care as first option, and amputation rate decreased from 50% in 2009 to 10% by 2017. Our experience has shown that education is the cheaper option for the prevention of lower limb amputation in a resource-poor setting like ours.