Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Prior to Lung Transplantation Does Not Increase Postoperative Pulmonary Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the only therapeutic option for selected patients with end-stage lung disease. In comparison to surgical lung volume reduction, few data exist on the risks and benefits of pretransplant endoscopic lung volume reduction (eLVR). Here, we investigate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after LTx in patients with emphysematous lung disease bridged with eLVR until transplantation. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with emphysematous lung disease who underwent double-LTx (DLTx) were included and retrospectively evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and GraphPad Prism software. RESULTS: 28/82 patients underwent eLVR prior to DLTx. eLVR patients spent comparable time on the waitlist; however, they were older at the time of DLTx (median 60 vs. 58 years, p = 0.02). Both groups showed comparable 90-day (92%) and long-term survival (eLVR 1-/5-/10-year survival: 92/88/77%, vs. control: 89/77/67%, p = 0.5). The odds for PPCs were similar in patients with and without eLVR (OR 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3-1.7), as well as major perioperative surgical and cardiovascular complications. In the entire cohort, we found ≥1 PPC to be a risk factor for death within 90 days (OR 9.7, 95% CI: 1.3-110). Among the PPCs, pneumonia (HR 4.6 95% CI: 1.1-14.9, p = 0.02) and ARDS (HR 11.2 95% CI: 1.6-229.2, p = 0.04) were identified as independent risk factors for reduced long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: eLVR does not increase the risk for PPCs, surgical complications, or reduced survival after LTx in patients with emphysematous lung disease and can serve as a bridge to LTx.

Independent risk factors for an increased incidence of thromboembolism after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolism (TE) after lung transplantation (LTX) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence and outcome of venous and arterial thromboembolic complications and to identify independent risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 221 patients who underwent LTX at our institution between 2002 and 2021. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and GraphPad software. RESULTS: 74 LTX recipients (33%) developed TE. The 30-days incidence and 12-months incidence were 12% and 23%, respectively. Nearly half of the patients (48%) developed pulmonary embolism, 10% ischemic stroke. Arterial hypertension (p = 0.006), a body mass index (BMI) > 30 (p = 0.006) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.041) were independent predictors for TE. Moreover, a BMI of > 25 at the time of transplantation was associated with an increased risk for TE (43% vs. 32%, p = 0.035). At the time of LTX, 65% of the patients were older than 55 years. An age > 55 years also correlated with the incidence of TE (p = 0.037) and these patients had reduced overall post-transplant survival when the event occurred within the first postoperative year (59% vs. 72%, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TE after LTX is high, especially in lung transplant recipients with a BMI > 25 and an age > 55 years as well as cardiovascular risk factors closely associated with the metabolic syndrome. As these patients comprise a growing recipient fraction, intensified research should focus on the risks and benefits of regular screening or a prolonged TE prophylaxis in these patients. Trial registration number DKRS: 00021501.