Bioequivalence for a Fixed-Dose Combination Formulation of Bazedoxifene and Cholecalciferol Compared With the Corresponding Single Entities Given Together.

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of bazedoxifene 20 mg and cholecalciferol 8 mg was developed to increase medication compliance and convenience for osteoporosis patients. This study was conducted to demonstrate bioequivalence by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and tolerability of an FDC tablet and the individual component tablets. A randomized, open-label, single-dosing, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted in 52 healthy subjects. All subjects were randomly assigned to 2 sequences, and they received FDC tablets of bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol and individual component tablets. Serial blood samples for PK evaluation were collected up to 24 hours predose and 120 hours postdose, and the PK parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Throughout the study, tolerability was assessed based on adverse events, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests. Of the enrolled 52 subjects, 47 subjects completed the study. The results, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (90%CIs), of bazedoxifene Cmax and AUC0-t for FDC to single entities given together were 0.98 (0.91-1.05) and 1.02 (0.97-1.07), respectively. The GMRs (90%CIs) of cholecalciferol Cmax and AUC0-t for FDC to single entities given together were 0.96 (0.91-1.00) and 0.94 (0.90-0.99), respectively. Overall, the GMRs (90%CIs) of the PK parameter of bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol fell within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. There were no clinically significant differences in the safety profile between the 2 treatments. In conclusion, this study confirmed the development of a new FDC drug by demonstrating that the FDC formulation of bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol is biologically equivalent to the coadministered individual formulations.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety characteristics between two olopatadine hydrochloride 5 mg tablet formulations in healthy Korean subjects.

Histamine acts by binding to four histamine receptors (H1 to H4), of which the H1 is known to participate in dilate blood vessels, bronchoconstriction, and pruritus. Olopatadine hydrochloride blocks the release of histamine from mast cells and it inhibits H1 receptor activation. Olopatadine hydrochloride is anti-allergic agent that is effectively used. The object of this study had conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety characteristics between olopatadine hydrochloride 5 mg (test formulation) and olopatadine hydrochloride 5 mg (reference formulation; Alerac ®) in Korean subjects. This study had conducted an open-label, randomized, fasting condition, single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-way crossover. Subjects received single-dosing of reference formulation or test formulation in each period and blood samples were collected over 24 hours after administration for PK analysis. A wash-out period of 7 days was placed between the doses. Plasma concentration of olopatadine were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem spectrometry mass (LC-MS/MS). A total of 32 subjects were enrolled and 28 subjects completed. There were not clinical significantly different in the safety between two treatment groups for 32 subjects who administered the study drug more than once. The geometric mean ratio of test formulation to reference formulation and its 90% confidence intervals for The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to the last concentration (AUClast) were 1.0845 (1.0107-1.1637) and 1.0220 (1.0005-1.0439), respectively. Therefore, the test formulation was bioequivalent in PK characteristics and was equally safe as the reference formulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0005943.

A randomized, open-label, crossover study to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of tenofovir (tenofovir disoproxil and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the pharmacokinetic properties and assess bioequivalence for the test formulation (HUG116 tablet; tenofovir disoproxil) and reference formulation (Viread tablet; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dosing, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence cross-over study was conducted in 50 healthy subjects. All subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two sequences, and they received a single dose of test or reference formulation in the first period and the alternative formulation during the next period under fasting conditions. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected up to 72 hours post dose, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Throughout the study, tolerability was assessed based on adverse events, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: The test formulation showed similar pharmacokinetic profiles to those of the reference formulation. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval (CI) of the test formulation to the reference formulation for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 0.93 (0.87 - 0.99), and the corresponding value for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUCt) was 0.94 (0.89 - 0.99). Both CIs were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.8 - 1.25. The tolerability profile was not significantly different between the test and reference formulations. CONCLUSION: This study found that the PKs of the test formulation (HUG116 tablet; tenofovir disoproxil) and reference formulation (Viread tablet; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) were similar, and the test formulation met the regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence with the reference formulation.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of two bazedoxifene acetate 20 mg tablet formulations in healthy Korean male volunteers.

Bazedoxifene, used as bazedoxifene acetate, is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that selectively affects the uterus, breast tissue, bone metabolism, and lipid metabolism by antagonizing or enhancing estrogens in the estrogen receptor in the tissue. This study was conducted as an open, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, crossover design to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and tolerability of two bazedoxifene tablets when administered to 50 healthy Korean male volunteers. Enrolled subjects were randomly allocated to 2 sequences of a single oral administration of a test drug and a reference drug, or vice versa with a 14-day washout period between the two doses. Serial blood samples were collected over 96 h for PK analysis. Plasma concentration of bazedoxifene was assayed using liquid chromatography-tandem spectrometry mass. Forty-five participants completed the study with no clinically relevant safety issues. The peak concentrations (Cmax, mean ± strandard deviation) of reference drug and test drug were 3.191 ± 1.080 and 3.231 ± 1.346 ng/mL, respectively, and the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUClast) were 44.697 ± 21.168 ng∙h/mL and 45.902 ± 23.130 ng∙h/mL, respectively. The geometric mean ratios of test drug to reference drug and their 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUClast were 0.9913 (0.8828-1.1132) and 1.0106 (0.9345-1.0929), respectively. The incidence of adverse events between the two formulations was similar. The present study showed that PK and tolerability of two bazedoxifene tablet formulations were comparable when administered to healthy Korean male volunteers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003978.

Comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two epoetin alfa formulations Eporon® and Eprex® following a single subcutaneous administration in healthy male volunteers.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess and compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties following a single subcutaneous injection of epoetin alfa (Eporon®) with those of the comparator (Eprex®) in healthy male subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, crossover study was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose, that is, 4,000 IU, of the test or comparator epoetin alfa. After 4 weeks, all subjects received the alternative formulation. The primary PK parameters, maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), were calculated with the serum erythropoietin (EPO) concentrations from blood samples collected for 144 h after dosing. The reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin and red blood cell counts were measured up to 312 h as PD markers. The primary PD parameters, maximum observed effect (Emax) and area under the effect curve (AUEC), were obtained from the baseline-corrected reticulocyte count. The serum EPO concentration and the reticulocyte count were used to assess the concentration-response relationship. The tolerability and immunogenicity profiles were assessed together. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects completed the study. The mean EPO concentration-time profiles were comparable between the two formulations. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the Cmax and AUCinf were 0.908 (0.843-0.978) and 1.049 (0.999-1.101), respectively, both of which were within the regulatory range of 0.80-1.25. Additionally, the PD and tolerability profiles were similar between the two formulations. The time-matched serum EPO concentration and PD markers presented a counterclockwise hysteresis, suggesting a time delay between the measured concentration and the response. Both formulations were well tolerated, and production of anti-drug antibodies was not observed. CONCLUSION: The two epoetin alfa formulations had similar PK, PD and tolerability profiles. Furthermore, both formulations had a similar time-matched serum EPO concentration and erythropoietic response profile. Thus, the two formulations are expected to be used interchangeably in clinical settings.

A comparative pharmacokinetic and tolerability analysis of the novel orotic acid salt form of tenofovir disoproxil and the fumaric acid salt form in healthy subjects.

A novel orotic acid salt form of tenofovir disoproxil (DA-2802) was developed and is expected to replace the fumaric acid salt form. The pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and tolerability profiles of DA-2802 were compared to those of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, Viread®) in healthy subjects. A randomized, open-label, single-dose study was conducted in 36 healthy subjects using a two-treatment, two-period, and two-sequence crossover design. Subjects received a single oral dose of 319 mg DA-2802 or 300 mg TDF, during each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected pre-dosing and up to 72 hours post-dosing in each period, for determination of serum tenofovir concentration, which was measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A non-compartmental method was used to obtain PK parameters of tenofovir. For comparison between the two tenofovir disoproxil salts, the 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of geometric mean ratios of DA-2802 to TDF for the maximum concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) were determined. The tolerability profiles of tenofovir were assessed by evaluation of adverse events and vital signs, physical examination, ECG, and clinical laboratory tests. The serum tenofovir concentration-time profiles of DA-2802 or TDF were comparable in 32 subjects who completed the study. In both profiles, a two-compartmental elimination with first-order elimination kinetics in the terminal phase was reported in a few subjects, showing a secondary peak in the initial phase of elimination. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) of DA-2802 to TDF was 0.898 (0.815-0.990) for Cmax and 0.904 (0.836-0.978) for AUC0-t. There were no clinically significant findings in the tolerability assessments. DA-2802 showed comparable PK characteristics and tolerability profiles to TDF.

A study of the development of the Korean version of PedsQL(TM) 3.0 cerebral palsy module and reliability and validity.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean version of the PedsQL(TM) 3.0 Cerebral Palsy Module to evaluate the health-related quality of life of children with cerebral palsy and to test the reliability and validity. [Subjects and Methods] The study included 108 caregivers of children with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 4 years and 72 caregivers of children aged 5 to 7 years, who visited multiple sites between February and August 2015. The Translation Commission performed the first translation with the approval of the Mapi Research Trust Company to create a Korean-version of the PedsQL(TM). Afterwards, back-translation was performed by one translator specializing in health and medical treatment who was a native English-speaker fluent in Korean, and one native Korean-speaker fluent in English. The consistency of each question was confirmed and a translation-integrated version was created. Test components were explained to caregivers during a one-on-one interview; caregivers then completed the PedsQL(TM) questionnaire and a Pediatric Evaluation Disability Inventory (PEDI) questionnaire. Subjects contributing to test-retest measures were asked to repeat the PedsQL questionnaire one week later and return it by mail. To assess data quality for the survey question results, non-response rate, ceiling effect, and floor effect were analyzed. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability were assessed. For test-retest reliability, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated, and for internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha was used. To test criterion-related validity, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used. [Results] The content validity of the PedsQL 3.0 Cerebral Palsy Module was high for both age groups, and demonstrated significant internal consistency (>0.7) in all areas. For test-retest reliability, both groups demonstrated a significant ICC (>0.61). Correlation with the PEDI was statistically significant in all areas except pain and hurt. [Conclusion] The Korean version of the PedsQL(TM) 3.0 Cerebral Palsy Module was found to be reliable and valid, and is expected to contribute greatly to the evaluation of the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy.

Is there an agreement among the items of the Korean physical therapist licensing examination, learning objectives of class subjects, and physical therapists' job descriptions?

PURPOSE: To determine the agreement among the items of the Korean physical therapist licensing examination, learning objectives of class subjects, and physical therapists' job descriptions. METHODS: The main tasks of physical therapists were classified, and university courses related to the main tasks were also classified. Frequency analysis was used to determine the proportions of credits for the classified courses out of the total credits of major subjects, exam items related to the classified courses out of the total number of exam items, and universities that offer courses related to the Korean physical therapist licensing examination among the surveyed universities. RESULTS: The proportions of credits for clinical decision making and physical therapy diagnosis-related courses out of the total number credits for major subjects at universities were relatively low (2.06% and 2.58%, respectively). Although the main tasks of physical therapists are related to diagnosis and evaluation, the proportion of physiotherapy intervention-related items (35%) was higher than that of examination and evaluation-related items (25%) on the Korean physical therapist licensing examination. The percentages of universities that offer physical therapy diagnosis and clinical decision making-related courses were 58.62% and 68.97%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both the proportion of physiotherapy diagnosis and evaluation-related items on the Korean physical therapist licensing examination, and the number of subjects related to clinical decision making and physical therapy diagnosis in the physical therapy curriculum, should be increased to ensure that the examination items and physical therapy curriculum reflect the practical tasks of physical therapists.