Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Nutr ; 40(3): 997-1004, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32736816

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) is used as a surrogate for daily dietary protein intake and nutritional status in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. It remains uncertain whether the nPCR level is associated with the incidence of bone fracture. METHODS: A total of 2869 hemodialysis patients registered in the Q-Cohort Study, a multicenter, prospective, observational study, were followed up for 4 years. The primary outcome was bone fracture at any site. The main exposure was the nPCR level at baseline. Patients were assigned to four groups based on their baseline nPCR levels (G1: <0.85, G2: 0.85≤, <0.95, G3: 0.95≤, <1.05 [reference], G4: ≥1.05 g/kg/day). We examined the relationship between the nPCR levels and the risk for bone fracture using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 136 patients experienced bone fracture at any site. In the multivariable analyses, the risk for bone fracture was significantly higher in the lowest (G1) and highest (G4) nPCR groups than the reference (G3) group (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals]: G1, 1.93 [1.04-3.58]; G2, 1.27 [0.67-2.40]; G3 1.00 (reference); G4, 2.21 [1.25-3.92]). The association remained almost unchanged, even when patients were divided into sex-specific nPCR quartiles, when analysis was limited to patients with a dialysis vintage ≥2 years, assumed to have lost residual kidney function, or when a competing risk model was applied. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that both lower and higher nPCR levels are associated with an increased risk for bone fracture in hemodialysis patients.


Assuntos
Proteínas Alimentares/farmacocinética , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Nutricional , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Kidney Med ; 1(5): 296-306, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32734210

RESUMO

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The short- and long-term impact of conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from either 2.5 or 3.0 mEq/L to 2.75 mEq/L on mineral and bone metabolism remains unknown in hemodialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized intervention study. SETTING & POPULATION: 12 hemodialysis patients treated at baseline with a 2.5-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration and another 12 hemodialysis patients treated with a 3.0-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration. INTERVENTION: Use of 2.75-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration. OUTCOMES: Changes in intradialytic calcium and phosphate clearance and changes in predialysis and intradialytic serum and ionized mineral and biochemical parameters over the 24 weeks following dialysate calcium conversion. RESULTS: Conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from 2.5 to 2.75 mEq/L increased intradialytic calcium loading and serum total and ionized calcium levels, whereas conversion of dialysate calcium from 3.0 to 2.75 mEq/L decreased intradialytic calcium loading and serum total and ionized calcium levels. Dialysate calcium concentration conversion did not affect intradialytic serum parathyroid hormone level, intradialytic phosphate elimination, or predialysis serum calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and fibroblast growth factor 23 levels. Intradialytic calcium influx was determined by dialysate calcium concentration and predialysis serum calcium levels, whereas intradialytic phosphate elimination was determined by predialysis serum phosphate levels. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and no control groups treated with 2.5- and 3.0-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentrations during the 24 weeks of the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from either 3.0 or 2.5 to 2.75 mEq/L results in expected changes in calcium loading based on predialysis calcium concentration. The dialysate calcium concentration should be personalized based on clinical factors. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network, www.umin.ac.jp/english/, R000040105, UMIN000035184.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA