Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy (n = 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy (n = 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores. RESULTS: Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for "Convenience" and "Recommend." CONCLUSION: Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).

Subcutaneous Infusion of DNA-Aptamer Raised against Advanced Glycation End Products Prevents Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Strength in Accelerated-Aging Mice.

We have developed DNA aptamers that can inhibit the toxic effects of advanced glycation end products (AGE-Apts). We herein evaluated the effects of AGE-Apts on muscle mass and strength in senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8 (SAMP8) mice. Eight-month-old male SAMP8 mice received subcutaneous infusion of control DNA aptamers (CTR-Apts) or AGE-Apts. Mice in an age-matched senescence-accelerated mouse resistant strain 1 (SAMR1) group were treated with CTR-Apts as controls. The soleus muscles were collected after the 8-week intervention for weight measurement and histological, RT-PCR, and immunofluorescence analyses. Grip strength was measured before and after the 8-week intervention. AGE-Apt treatment inhibited the progressive decrease in the grip strength of SAMP8 mice. SAMP8 mice had lower soleus muscle weight and fiber size than SAMR1 mice, which was partly restored by AGE-Apt treatment. Furthermore, AGE-Apt-treated SAMP8 mice had a lower interstitial fibrosis area of the soleus muscle than CTR-Apt-treated SAMP8 mice. The soleus muscle levels of AGEs, oxidative stress, receptor for AGEs, and muscle ring-finger protein-1 were increased in the CTR-Apt-treated mice, all of which, except for AGEs, were inhibited by AGE-Apt treatment. Our present findings suggest that the subcutaneous delivery of AGE-Apts may be a novel therapeutic strategy for aging-related decrease in skeletal muscle mass and strength.

Effects of omarigliptin on glucose variability and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes patients: A prospective study.

AIMS: To date, no clinical studies have compared once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors in terms of glucose variability (GV) and oxidative stress (OS). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors for at least 12 weeks were randomized to either continue once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors or receive omarigliptin, a once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitor, for 24 weeks. The primary end points were changes in the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolite (d-ROMs) test, a marker of OS, and GV using flash glucose monitoring. The secondary end point was changes in the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) scores. RESULTS: There were no significant group differences in d-ROMs and DTSQ scores after 24 weeks of treatments. However, omarigliptin was superior to once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors in controlling fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and time in range (TIR). Although FPG and TIR were unchanged at 24 weeks after switching to omarigliptin, these parameters increased in the group receiving maintenance therapy with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors. No statistically significant changes in hemoglobin A1c were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that switching from once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors to omarigliptin may be efficacious for maintaining FPG and TIR in T2DM patients.