Reproductive healthcare in adolescents with autism and other developmental disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Adults with developmental disabilities often have less access to reproductive health services than adults without these disabilities. However, little is known about how adolescents with developmental disabilities, including autism, access reproductive healthcare. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the use of reproductive healthcare services among adolescents with autism and those with other developmental disabilities in comparison with adolescents with typical development. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study of a sample of adolescents who were continuously enrolled members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated healthcare system, from ages 14 to 18 years. The final analytical sample included 700 adolescents with autism, 836 adolescents with other developmental disabilities, and 2187 typically developing adolescents who sought care between 2000 and 2017. Using the electronic health record, we obtained information on menstrual conditions, the use of obstetrical-gynecologic care, and prescriptions of hormonal contraception. We compared healthcare use between the groups using chi-square tests and covariate-adjusted risk ratios estimated using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Adolescents with autism and those with other developmental disabilities were significantly more likely to have diagnoses of menstrual disorders, polycystic ovary syndrome, and premenstrual syndrome than typically developing adolescents. These 2 groups also were less likely than typically developing peers to visit the obstetrician-gynecologist or to use any form of hormonal contraception, including oral contraception, hormonal implants, and intrauterine devices. Adolescents in all 3 groups accessed hormonal contraception most frequently through their primary care provider, followed by an obstetrician-gynecologist. CONCLUSION: Adolescents with autism and those with other developmental disabilities are less likely than their typically developing peers to visit the obstetrician-gynecologist and to use hormonal contraception, suggesting possible care disparities that may persist into adulthood. Efforts to improve access to reproductive healthcare in these populations should target care delivered in both the pediatric and obstetrics-gynecology settings.

Short report: Recommendations for education, clinical practice, research, and policy on promoting well-being in autistic youth and adults through a positive focus on sexuality and gender diversity.

LAY ABSTRACT: In this article, we propose recommendations on what we can do to promote that autistic people can enjoy their sexuality and gender identity, because that contributes to overall well-being.First, we briefly summarize the existing research on sexuality and gender diversity in autistic individuals.Next, we propose recommendations for how to promote sexual and gender diversity-related health and well-being. Based on what is known about sexuality, gender diversity, and relationships in autistic adolescents and adults, we convened an international group of autistic and non-autistic researchers, advocates, parents, and professionals to develop recommendations to promote sexual and gender health in autistic people.The resulting recommendations were checked through an online survey distributed to autistic people across the world. The online participants endorsed the importance of eight final recommendations related to:1. Providing education and information on sexuality, relationships, and gender diversity to autistic individuals and their families;2. Improving expertise in and accessibility to healthcare for sexuality, relationships, and gender-related questions, with specific attention to prevention of and support after sexual victimization; and3. Meaningfully including the autism community in future research that addresses well-being relating to sexuality, relationships, and gender diversity.These community-driven recommendations aim to promote sexual health and well-being in autistic individuals internationally.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Psychiatric and Medical Diagnoses Among Autistic Adults.

Background: Racial/ethnic disparities in access to diagnostic services are pervasive for autistic children. However, a few studies have examined racial/ethnic health disparities among autistic adults, who commonly experience higher rates of health conditions than non-autistic adults. We aimed at examining the intersection of autism and race/ethnicity in association with psychiatric and medical diagnoses. Methods: The study population included adult members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California enrolled from 2008 to 2012. We ascertained 1507 adults who had an autism diagnosis documented in their electronic medical records. We sampled a matched control group of adults without an autism diagnosis (N = 15,070) at a 10:1 ratio. Our sample was 46% White, 17% Hispanic, 16% Asian, 7% Black, and 14% other race/ethnicity. We compared health diagnoses (a) between autistic and non-autistic adults within strata of race/ethnicity and (b) across race/ethnicity within strata of autistic and non-autistic adults. Lastly, we examined the interaction between autism and race/ethnicity on both multiplicative and additive scales. Results: Autistic adults were more likely to be diagnosed with most medical and psychiatric conditions compared with their non-autistic counterparts of the same race/ethnicity. Among autistic adults, Black, Hispanic, and Asian adults were less likely to be diagnosed with psychiatric conditions and Black and Hispanic autistic adults were more likely to be diagnosed with obesity than their White counterparts. In interaction models, we found that adults who were Black and autistic were disproportionately less likely to be diagnosed with psychiatric conditions and autoimmune disease and more likely to be diagnosed with hypertension than expected. Conclusion: Health vulnerabilities may be compounded at the intersection of autism and race/ethnicity. Future research should continue to apply an intersectional lens toward understanding and addressing these disparities. Our findings likely underestimate the health disparities that exist in uninsured autistic adults and those living in other parts of the United States.

Why is this an important issue?: Very few studies have looked at how the combination of a person's autistic and racial/ethnic identities affects their health in adulthood. Dual experiences of ableism and structural racism may have a larger negative effect on the health of autistic people of color than either one experience alone. It is important to identify potential health disparities so that they can be addressed. What is the purpose of this study?: We wanted to understand whether autistic adults of color were more likely to be diagnosed with medical and psychiatric conditions than non-autistic and/or White peers. What did the researchers do?: We studied a diverse group of 1507 autistic adults and 15,070 non-autistic adults who all received health care from the same large, health plan in California. We examined electronic health records to determine whether diagnoses of health conditions differed by autism status and race/ethnicity. We then looked at whether autistic people of color were disproportionately diagnosed with these conditions compared with other groups. What were the results of the study?: Within every racial/ethnic group, autistic adults were more likely than non-autistic adults to be diagnosed with most medical and psychiatric conditions. Among the autistic group, Black, Hispanic, and Asian adults were less likely to be diagnosed with psychiatric conditions compared with White adults. We saw similar differences in psychiatric diagnoses by race/ethnicity among non-autistic adults. Further, the diagnostic patterns among adults who were autistic and Black suggested that this group may experience unique difficulties receiving mental health and autoimmune diagnoses. They also may be at a higher risk of hypertension. What do these findings add to what was already known?: Previous studies have found racial/ethnic disparities in both mental health and access to health care among autistic children. This study suggests that racial/ethnic disparities, especially in mental health care, may also exist among autistic adults. What are potential weaknesses in the study?: As a broad social label, race/ethnicity does not tell us much about people's lived experiences. Future studies should replace race/ethnicity with more useful measures of our social environment, including economic opportunity and experiences of structural racism. In addition, health records may imperfectly represent the actual occurrence of health conditions. For example, we cannot tell from this study whether autistic people of color actually experience fewer psychiatric problems, are less likely to visit the doctor, or are more likely to have their problems missed by doctors. Lastly, because our findings are from an insured population, we have likely underestimated the health disparities that exist among autistic adults who do not have consistent insurance coverage or health care access. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: We hope this study highlights the need for greater attention to the unique health risks at the intersection of autism and race/ethnicity in adults. Through more research and advocacy, we can increase awareness and understanding of these potential health disparities. This will lead to changes that promote more equal access to health care and greater well-being among autistic people of color.

Ethics of HIV cure research: an unfinished agenda.

BACKGROUND: The pursuit of a cure for HIV is a high priority for researchers, funding agencies, governments and people living with HIV (PLWH). To date, over 250 biomedical studies worldwide are or have been related to discovering a safe, effective, and scalable HIV cure, most of which are early translational research and experimental medicine. As HIV cure research increases, it is critical to identify and address the ethical challenges posed by this research. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the growing HIV cure research ethics literature, focusing on articles published in English peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2021. We extracted and summarized key developments in the ethics of HIV cure research. Twelve community advocates actively engaged in HIV cure research provided input on this summary and suggested areas warranting further ethical inquiry and foresight via email exchange and video conferencing. DISCUSSION: Despite substantial scholarship related to the ethics of HIV cure research, additional attention should focus on emerging issues in six categories of ethical issues: (1) social value (ongoing and emerging biomedical research and scalability considerations); (2) scientific validity (study design issues, such as the use of analytical treatment interruptions and placebos); (3) fair selection of participants (equity and justice considerations); (4) favorable benefit/risk balance (early phase research, benefit-risk balance, risk perception, psychological risks, and pediatric research); (5) informed consent (attention to language, decision-making, informed consent processes and scientific uncertainty); and (6) respect for enrolled participants and community (perspectives of people living with HIV and affected communities and representation). CONCLUSION: HIV cure research ethics has an unfinished agenda. Scientific research and bioethics should work in tandem to advance ethical HIV cure research. Because the science of HIV cure research will continue to rapidly advance, ethical considerations of the major themes we identified will need to be revisited and refined over time.