Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Justice ; 52(2): 90-5, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22583500

RESUMO

Forensic scientists may sometimes be asked to identify the presence of urine in cases such as harassment, rape or murder. One popular presumptive test method uses para-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC), favoured because it is simple, rapid and safe. This paper confirms that DMAC reacts with urea rather than creatinine, ammonia or uric acid. Sensitivity studies found that the 0.1% w/v DMAC solution currently used for urine identification detects levels of urea found in other body fluids, potentially resulting in false positives. A 0.05% w/v solution was found to be more appropriate in terms of sensitivity to urea however the test is still not specific for urine, giving positive reactions with a number of body fluids (saliva, semen, sweat and vaginal material) and other substances (foot lotion, hair removal cream and broccoli).


Assuntos
Cinamatos/análise , Medicina Legal/métodos , Urina/química , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise Química do Sangue , Muco do Colo Uterino/química , Criança , Fezes/química , Feminino , Humanos , Indicadores e Reagentes/análise , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saliva/química , Sêmen/química , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Suor , Ureia/química , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA